Soil Microbial Characteristic and Soil Respiration in Grassland under Different Use Patterns

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.01.007

›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 42-48.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.01.007

Previous Articles Next Articles

Soil Microbial Characteristic and Soil Respiration in Grassland under Different Use Patterns

GUO Ming-ying¹, ZHAO Ke-tu¹, YOU Jin-cheng¹, XU Li-jun², WANG Li-juan¹, JA Shu-jie¹, XIN Xiao-ping²

1. Hulunber Grassland Station, Hulunber, Inner Mongolia 021000, China;
2. Key Lab of Resources Remote Sensing and Digital Agriculture, Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2011-09-09 Revised:2011-11-02 Online:2012-02-15 Published:2012-07-06

不同利用方式下草地土壤微生物及土壤呼吸特性

郭明英¹, 朝克图¹, 尤金成¹, 徐丽君², 王丽娟¹, 贾淑杰¹, 辛晓平²

1. 呼伦贝尔市草原工作站, 内蒙古呼伦贝尔021000;
2. 农业部资源遥感与数字农业重点开放实验室呼伦贝尔国家野外站中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京100081

作者简介:郭明英(1982- ),女,黑龙江北安人,硕士,研究方向为草地资源、生态与管理,E-mail:guomingying163@163.com
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金;内蒙古自治区重大科技项目“草甸草原固碳减排管理技术集成与研究示范”资助

Abstract

Abstract: Effects of three different use patterns of grassland(exclosure,grazing,mowing)on soil respiration and soil microorganism were studied at the Leymus chinensis meadow steppe of Hulunber in this paper.Results were that soil respiration rate,soil microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities(except urease)in enclosed grassland were higher(both contents and activities) than that in grazing and mowing grassland under different use patterns.Soil microbial biomass nitrogen,urease activity and microbial biomass were higher(both activity and quantity) under grazing and mowing patterns than under enclosed pattern.The contents of microbial biomass carbon,soil enzyme activities(except urease) and soil microbial biomass were highest in surface soil(0~10 cm) then decreased(both activity and number) in deeper soil depths.Soil respiration rate had a positive correlation with soil microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activity(except catalase),but a negative correlation with the soil microbial biomass nitrogen,catalase and the soil microorganism quantities.

Key words: Grassland use pattern, Soil respiration rate, Microbial biomass carbon, Microbial biomass nitrogen, Microorganism quantity

摘要： 通过对呼伦贝尔羊草(Leymus chinensis)草甸草原土壤呼吸特性及土壤微生物的测定,研究了3种不同利用方式(围封、放牧和刈割)对天然草地土壤呼吸特性及土壤微生物的影响,为草甸草原土壤呼吸研究提供基础理论依据。结果表明:不同利用方式下土壤呼吸速率、土壤微生物量碳含量与土壤酶活性(除脲酶)均表现为草地围封比放牧和刈割呼吸速率高(含量高、活性强);土壤微生物量氮含量、脲酶活性和微生物数量表现为草地放牧和刈割比围封的含量高(活性强、数量多);土壤微生物量碳、氮含量、土壤酶活性(除脲酶)和土壤微生物数量均以表层(0～10cm)最高(活性最强、数量最多),随着土层深度增加而降低(活性下降、数量减少)。土壤呼吸速率与微生物量碳、土壤酶活性(除过氧化氢酶)成正相关,与微生物量氮、过氧化氢酶和微生物数量成负相关,其中只与微生物量氮相关性显著,而其余之间均不显著。

关键词: 草地利用方式, 土壤呼吸速率, 土壤微生物量碳氮, 土壤酶, 微生物数量

CLC Number:

S154.2
S812

GUO Ming-ying, ZHAO Ke-tu, YOU Jin-cheng, XU Li-jun, WANG Li-juan, JA Shu-jie, XIN Xiao-ping. Soil Microbial Characteristic and Soil Respiration in Grassland under Different Use Patterns[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 42-48.

郭明英, 朝克图, 尤金成, 徐丽君, 王丽娟, 贾淑杰, 辛晓平. 不同利用方式下草地土壤微生物及土壤呼吸特性[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 42-48.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.01.007

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2012/V20/I1/42

References

[1] Singh J S,Gupta S R.Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems[J].Botany Review,1997,43:449-528
[2] 齐志勇,王宏燕,王江丽,等.陆地生态系统土壤呼吸的研究进展[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2003,19(2):116-119
[3] 潘学清.中国呼伦贝尔草地[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1992:82-96
[4] 李博.中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1999,30(6):1-6
[5] 卢欣石,刘起,李守德,等.中国草情[M].北京:开明出版社,2002:16-25
[6] 马涛,董云社,齐玉春,等.放牧对内蒙古羊草群落土壤呼吸的影响[J].地理研究,2009,28(4):1041-1046
[7] 马涛.放牧对内蒙古锡林河流域羊草草原土壤呼吸的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008:23-27
[8] 贾丙瑞,周广胜,王风玉,等.放牧与围栏羊草草原土壤呼吸作用及其影响因子[J].环境科学,2005,26(6):1-7.
[9] 吴金水.土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M].北京:气象出版社,2006:54-78
[10] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:320-344
[11] 许光辉,郑洪元.土壤微生物分析手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:287-289
[12] 李玉强,赵哈林,赵学勇,等.不同强度放牧后自然恢复的沙质草地土壤呼吸、碳平衡与碳储量[J].草业学报,2006,15(5):25-31
[13] 刘颖,韩士杰,胡艳玲,等.土壤温度和湿度对长白松林土壤呼吸速率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1581-1585
[14] 李凌浩,韩兴国,王其兵,等.锡林河流域一个放牧草原群落中根系呼吸占土壤总呼吸比例的初步估计[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(1):29-32
[15] 王娓,周晓梅,郭继勋.东北羊草草原两种主要群落环境因素对土壤呼吸贡献量的影响[J].草业学报,2002,11(1):12-16
[16] Bremer D J,Ham J M,Owensby C E,et al.Responses of soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a tallgrass prairie[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1998,27:1539-1548
[17] Davidson E A,Verchot L V,Cattanio J H,et al.Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia[J].Biogeochemistry,2000,48:53-69
[18] Risser P G,Birney E C,Blocker H D,et al.The true prairie ecosystem[M].Stroudsburg,Pennsylvania:Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company,1981:244-246
[19] 文都日乐,张静妮,李刚,等.放牧干扰对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(4):517-522
[20] 郭明英,卫智军,徐丽君.不同刈割年限天然草地土壤呼吸特性研究[J].草地学报,2011,19(1):51-57
[21] 张蕴薇,韩建国,韩永伟,等.不同放牧强度下人工草地土壤微生物碳、氮的含量[J].草地学报,2003,11(4):343-346
[22] Bardgett R D,leemans D K.The short-term effects of cessation of fertilizer applications,liming and grazing on microbial biomass and activity in a reseeded upland grassland soil[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,1995,19:148-154
[23] 戴伟,陈晓东.北京低山地区土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质的关系[J].河北林学院学报,1995,10(1):14-18
[24] 鲁萍.东北羊草草原主要植物群落土壤酶活性的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北师范大学,2002:9-26
[25] 邵玉琴,敖晓兰,宋国宝,等.皇甫川流域退化草地和恢复草地土壤微生物生物量的研究[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(5):578-580
[26] 刘世贵,葛绍荣,龙富章.川西北退化草地土壤微生物数量与区系研究[J].草业学报,1994,3(4):70-76
[27] 罗明,邱沃.新疆平原荒漠盐渍草地土壤微生物生态分布的研究[J].中国草地,1995,17(5):29-33
[28] 陈海军,王明玖,韩国栋,等.不同强度放牧对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物和土壤呼吸的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(4):165-160
[29] 郭继勋,祝廷成.羊草草原土壤微生物的数量和生物量[J].生态学报,1997,17(1):78-82
[30] 周萍,刘国彬,薛差.草地生态系统土壤呼吸及其影响因素研究进展[J].草业学报,2009,18(2):184-193

Soil Microbial Characteristic and Soil Respiration in Grassland under Different Use Patterns

不同利用方式下草地土壤微生物及土壤呼吸特性

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIN Chun-ying, LI Xi-lai, SUN Hai-song, SUN Hua-fang, MA Cheng-biao, HAN Hui-bang, ZHANG Yu-Peng, LI Cheng-yi. Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Component on Different Degrees of Degradation of Alpine Wetland in the Source of Yellow River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1540-1548.
[2]	FU Hao-yu, JING Chang-qing, GUO Wen-zhang, CHEN-Chen, DENG Xiao-jin. Changes of Soil Respiration in Desert Shrub Grassland and Its Response to Soil Temperature and Humidity in Junggar Basin [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1677-1684.
[3]	YANG Ning, YANG Man-yuan, ZOU Dong-sheng, LIN Zhong-gui, FU Mei-yun. Dynamics of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Soil Water Soluble Organic Carbon along Re-vegetation Chronosequences on Hillslope Land with Purple Soils [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(4): 812-818.
[4]	ZHU Rui-fen, TANG Feng-lan, LIU Jie-lin, LIU Feng-qi, CHEN Ji-shan. Response of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen on A Short-term Fertilizing N in Leymus chinensis meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(3): 553-558.
[5]	ZHAO Xiao-chen, HUANGFU Chao-he, LIU Hong-mei, XIU Wei-ming, ZHAO Jian-ning, YANG Dian-lin. Response of Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen to the Nutrient Addition of Stipa Baicalensis Steppe in Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 47-53.
[6]	PANG Ying-ying, DENG Bo, ZHANG Ying-jun, YANG Shi-chao, MA Xue-min, LIU Meng. Soil Respiration of Alfalfa Fields in the Agro-pastoral Ecotone of Northern China and Its Environment on Responses [J]. , 2011, 19(3): 432-437.
[7]	GUO Ming-ying, WEI Zhi-jun, XU Li-jun, YANG Gui-xia, LIU Hong-mei, WU Yan-ling, XIN Xiao-ping. Soil Respiration of Different Mowing Types of Meadows [J]. , 2011, 19(1): 51-57.