Physiological Change of Four Wild Elymus Species from Tibet under Drought Stress at Seedling Stage

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.025

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 1333-1339.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.025

Previous Articles Next Articles

Physiological Change of Four Wild Elymus Species from Tibet under Drought Stress at Seedling Stage

YAN Tian-fang^1,2, MIAO Yan-jun¹, WANG Xiang-Tao¹, WEI Zheng-wu², XU Ya-mei¹, LIN Yong-he³

1. Tibet Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College, Nyingchi 860000, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China;
3. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730020, China

Received:2017-06-21 Revised:2017-10-20 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-03-30

干旱胁迫对西藏4份野生披碱草属牧草幼苗生理指标的影响

闫天芳^1,2, 苗彦军¹, 王向涛¹, 魏臻武², 徐雅梅¹, 蔺永和³

1. 西藏农牧学院, 西藏林芝 860000;
2. 扬州大学动物科学与技术学院, 江苏扬州 225009;
3. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 甘肃兰州 730000

通讯作者: 徐雅梅,E-mail:670003231@qq.com.
作者简介:闫天芳(1993-),男,甘肃天祝人,硕士,主要从事牧草种质资源与育种研究,E-mail:1650643876@qq.com
基金资助:
西藏自治区科技厅重点项目（2017ZDKJZC-15；2016KJTZD01）；国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0502002）；国家自然基金（41761008）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

The seedlings of four kinds of different habitats of wild Elymus species from the Tibet were used in a potted experiment. The seedling drought stress tolerance was investigated by comparing the changing of relative water content (RWC), malondialdehyde (MDA), free proline (Pro), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and soluble sugar content (SSC) in seedling leaves. We did four drought treatments and sampled at 4 days, 8 days, 12 days and 16 days for observing physiological index of leaves (RWC, MDA, SOD, Pro and SSC). The results revealed that the rate of RWC reduced with the stress extended.MDA, Pro and SSC increased with stress prolonged. SOD increased and then decreased for 4 types of Elymus. The physiological index had also significant difference, which can be as the index of drought stress evaluation for the filed Elymus. The trend of index revealed a turning point after drought stress of 8 days, which could be the critical soil water potential points of Elymus. This paper used the average subordinative function method to evaluate the 4 types of filed Elymus in Tibet and the rank of water stress tolerance was E.natans (Shengzha) > E.natans (Naqu) > E.natans (Linzhi) > E.sibircus (Lasa).

Key words: Elymus, Seedling stage, Drought stress, Physiological index, Tibet

摘要：

以西藏地区4种不同生境的野生披碱草属植物作为试验材料进行干旱胁迫模拟盆栽试验，通过对比幼苗叶片中相对含水量（RWC）、丙二醛（MDA）、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、游离脯氨酸（Pro）、以及植物体内可溶性糖（SSC）含量的变化对供试幼苗进行抗旱性分析与评价。干旱处理4 d、8 d、12 d、16 d，测其叶片生理指标（RWC、MDA、Pro、SOD、SSC）。研究表明：4种披碱草属植物幼苗在干旱胁迫条件下，RWC含量随胁迫程度的加剧而下降，MDA、Pro及SSC含量随胁迫程度的加剧而上升，SOD则是先上升后下降。5个生理指标在4种披碱草属植物幼苗间均存在显著差异，可以作为披碱草属植物抗旱性的评价指标。在胁迫8 d后各测试指标的变化趋势均出现了明显的转折点，表明8 d后土壤的含水量可能是披碱草属幼苗耐旱的关键水势点。本试验采用隶属函数法对4种西藏野生披碱草属幼苗进行抗旱性综合评价后，得出其抗旱性强弱顺序依次为：申扎垂穗披碱草 > 那曲垂穗披碱草 > 林芝垂穗披碱草 > 拉萨老芒麦。

关键词: 披碱草属, 苗期, 干旱胁迫, 生理指标, 西藏

CLC Number:

S543.9

YAN Tian-fang, MIAO Yan-jun, WANG Xiang-Tao, WEI Zheng-wu, XU Ya-mei, LIN Yong-he. Physiological Change of Four Wild Elymus Species from Tibet under Drought Stress at Seedling Stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(6): 1333-1339.

闫天芳, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 魏臻武, 徐雅梅, 蔺永和. 干旱胁迫对西藏4份野生披碱草属牧草幼苗生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1333-1339.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.025

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2017/V25/I6/1333

References

[1] 邹燕, 赵平. 青藏高原年代际气候变化研究进展[J]. 气象科技, 2008, 36(2):168-173
[2] 董玉深, 刘旭. 中国作物及其野生近缘植物[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2007:142-144
[3] 陈默君, 贾慎修. 中国饲用植物[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2002:119-120
[4] 李东明, 郭正刚, 安黎哲. 青藏高原多年冻土区不同草地生态系统恢复能力评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(10):2182-2188
[5] 付娟娟, 刘建, 孙永芳, 等. 冷胁迫对2种垂穗披碱草生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4):789-785
[6] 潘昕, 邱权, 李吉跃等. 干旱胁迫对青藏高原6种植物生理指标的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13):3558-3567
[7] 韩刚, 赵忠. 不同土壤水分下4种沙生灌木的光合光响应特性[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(15):4019-4026
[8] 张仁和, 郑友军, 马国胜, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光合作用和保护酶的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(5):1303-1311
[9] 张治安, 张美善, 蔚荣海. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004:54-138
[10] 刘新. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2015:65-67
[11] 邹琦. 植物生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2003:97-99
[12] 孔祥生, 易现峰. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2008:160-161
[13] 张立军, 樊金娟. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2007:57-59
[14] 张尚雄, 尼玛平措, 徐雅梅等. 3个披碱草属牧草对低温胁迫的生理响应及苗期抗寒性评价[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(6)1154-1163
[15] 郝冉彬, 苍晶, 徐仲. 植物生理试验[M]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 2004:130-133
[16] 陈淑燕, 毛培春, 田小霞, 等. 4种薰衣草属植物抗旱性综合评价[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(6):152-158
[17] 祁娟, 徐柱, 等. 披碱草与老芒麦苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1):37-42
[18] 祁娟, 徐柱, 马玉宝, 等. 披碱草属六种野生牧草苗期抗旱胁迫的生理变化[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(5):18-23
[19] 史晓霞, 毛培春, 张国芳, 等. 15份马蔺材料苗期抗旱性比较[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(4):352-358
[20] 鲁存海. 8种野生早熟禾抗旱性及草坪质量综合评价研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2010
[21] 程红焱, 郑光华. 超干处理提高榆树种子的耐藏性[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1992, 28(5):340-342
[22] 马彦军, 马瑞, 曹致中, 等. PEG胁迫对胡枝子幼苗叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(6):1662-1668
[23] 高蕾, 刘丽君, 等. 干旱胁迫对大豆幼苗叶片生理生化特性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2009, 40(8):1-4
[24] 任文伟, 钱吉, 马骏, 等. 不同地理种群羊草在聚乙二醇胁迫下含水量和游离脯氨酸含量的比较[J].生态学报, 2000, 20(2):349-352
[25] 张昌胜, 刘国彬, 等. 干旱胁迫和CO₂浓度升高条件下白羊草的光合特征[J]. 应用生态报, 2012, 23(11):3009-3015
[26] 籍越, 王德勤, 王爱武. 干旱胁迫对不同草坪草生理特性的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(20):25-26
[27] 郭郁频, 米福贵, 闫利军, 等. 不同早熟禾品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2004, 23(4):220-228
[28] 李禄军, 蒋志荣, 李正平, 等. 3树种抗旱性的综合评价及其抗旱指标的选取[J]. 水土保持研究, 2006, 12(6):253-254
[29] 王厚新, 张安琪, 魏秀英, 等. 3个元宝槭品种的抗旱性评价[J]. 山东林业科技, 2013, 31(5):10-15
[30] 王川, 谢惠民, 王娜, 等. 小麦品种可溶性糖和保护性酶与抗旱性关系研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(5):94-98
[31] 张小娇, 祁娟, 曹文侠, 等. 干旱胁迫对垂穗披碱草苗期抗旱生理特性的影响[J]. 草原与草坪2014, 34(5):55-59
[32] 单立山. 西北典型荒漠植物根系形态结构和功能及抗旱生理研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2013
[33] 邱权, 潘昕, 李吉跃, 等. 青藏高原20种灌木抗旱形态和生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(06):562-575

Physiological Change of Four Wild Elymus Species from Tibet under Drought Stress at Seedling Stage

干旱胁迫对西藏4份野生披碱草属牧草幼苗生理指标的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Ruo-wei, YE Chong-chong, WANG Yi, HAN Guo-dong, SUN Jian. Carbon Storage Estimation and its Drivering Force Analysis Based on InVEST Model in the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 43-51.
[2]	LAN Xiang-yu, YE Chong-chong, WANG Yi, ZENG Tao, SUN Jian. Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics and Its Driving Forces of Water Conservation Function on the Tibetan Plateau from 1995 to 2014 [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[4]	ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, ZHOU Bing-rong, SONG Ming-hua, XU Wen-hua, DENG Yan-fang, WANG Fang, SHE Yan-di, ZHANG Qian, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Esponse of the Functional Diversity of Dominant Plants to Warming and Simulated Grazing in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[5]	WANG Tan-guo-yan, MA Zhi-yuan, LI Pei-yang, GUO Jun-hong, ZHANG Jia-yi, JIANG Sheng-jing. Effects of Short-Term Warming on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Rhizosphere of Different Plant Species in Alpine Meadows on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1959-1966.
[6]	TONG Li-rong, NI Shun-gang, REN Xing-yuan, LIU Jia-xin, WEN Jing, WANG Juan, SONG Yu. Effects of Melatonin on Seedling Growth and Leaf Water Physiology of Lespedeza davurica under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[7]	SUN Cai-cai, FENG Bin, DONG Quan-min, LIU Wen-ting, SHI Guang, LIU Yu-zhen, ZHANG Xiao-fang, YU Yang, ZHANG Chun-ping, YANG Xiao-xia. Effects of Mixed Grazing of Yak and Tibetan Sheep on the Functional Characteristics of Stipa purpurea in an Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[8]	ZHANG Li-tian, LIU De-mei, LIU Bo, YANG Shi-hai, WANG Yan-long, WANG Xiao-li, MA Yu-shou. Karyotype Analysis of Pennisetum centrasiaticum in Shigatse,Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1589-1593.
[9]	LI Peng-zhen, ZHAO De-qin, DENG Bo, Yang Jun, Zhao Guo-hua, Zhao Liang. Effects of Biochar Addition and Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Efficiency and Growth of Alfalfa Inoculated with Rhizobia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[10]	WEI Xing-xing , WU Jiang-qi , LI Guang, WANG Hai-yan,LIU Shuai-nan, ZHANG Shi-kang, ZHANG Juan. Response of Soil Nitrogen Components to Nitrogen Addition in Wet Meadow in the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 677-683.
[11]	GUO Yan-hong, PU Xiao-jian, PU Xiao-peng, DU Wen-hua. Change Tendency of the Aboveground Biomass and Nutrition Quality in the Alpine Pastoral Area of Qinghai Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 734-742.
[12]	MA Xiao-lin, HOU Qing-feng, YANG Ding. Impact on Household Income of Farmers and Herdsmen in Qinghai Province of Returning Farmland to Pasture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 772-779.
[13]	LIANG Jia, MAYINU·Wusiman, FANG Zhi-gang. Effects of Exogenous Growth Substances on Seed Germination of Sweet Sorghum under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[14]	YIN Yu-lin, MA Wen-xin, LI Ya-juan, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Study on the Cold Resistance of New Strains of Timothy Grass from the Central Part of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 625-630.
[15]	HAN Meng-li, BAI Shi-qie, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Jia-jun, ZHANG Chuang-jie, ZHANG Chang-bing, ZHANG Jing-xue, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, YAN Xue-bing. Simulation of Elymus sibiricus L. Distribution in Tibetan Plateau Based on MaxEnt Model [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.