Research on Relationship with Physicochemical Properties of Stems and Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties in the Semi-Arid Area

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.05.022

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 1284-1290.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.05.022

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on Relationship with Physicochemical Properties of Stems and Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties in the Semi-Arid Area

NAN Ming^1,2, ZHAO Gui-qin¹, LI Jing², CHAI Ji-kuan¹, LIU Yan-ming²

1. College of Pratacultural Science Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Dingxi Academy of Agricultural Research Science, Dingxi, Gansu Province 743000, China

Received:2019-07-23 Revised:2019-09-07 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-11-09

半干旱区燕麦品种茎秆理化特性及其与抗倒性的关系研究

南铭^1,2, 赵桂琴¹, 李晶², 柴继宽¹, 刘彦明²

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃省定西市农业科学研究院, 甘肃定西 743000

通讯作者: 赵桂琴
作者简介:南铭(1983-),男,甘肃通渭人,博士研究生,主要从事牧草育种及种质资源研究,E-mail:cedar_nanming@126.com
基金资助:
国家燕麦荞麦产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-8-C-1）；甘肃省定西市农业科学研究院青年创新基金（2019YQ02）资助

Abstract

Abstract: The physicochemical substances of the stems at the milk-ripe stage offour oats with different ability of resistance lodging were analyzed and the relationship between of the stem physicochemical properties and lodging resistance of oats were investigated. The results showed that there was a significant difference in lodging grade and actual lodging rate between different oat varieties (P< 0.05). The content of physicochemical substances in stem was significantly different between lodging resistant and lodging prone varieties (P< 0.05). the content of nitrogen and magnesium in the first and second sections of the stem base of lodging resistant varieties was lower than that of lodging prone varieties,and the content of potassium,calcium and silicon in the first and second segments at the base of main stem was higher than that in the cultivars prone to lodging. In addition,the content of lignin,cellulose,soluble sugar and C/N in the first and second sections of the stem base of lodging resistant varieties were significantly higher than that of lodging prone varieties (P < 0.05). The correlation of physical and chemical content at the base of stem with lodging index and its components and morphological characteristics at the base of stem was significantly different (P< 0.05 or P< 0.01). The content of potassium,calcium and silicon,soluble sugar,lignin and cellulose in the first and second sections of the stem base is closely related to the lodging resistance of oat varieties.

Key words: Semi-arid region, Oats, Stem morphological characteristics, physic-biochemical characteristics, Lodging resistance

摘要： 本研究以抗倒性不同的4个燕麦（Avena sativa L.）品种为材料，分析了乳熟期茎秆基部理化物质含量差异，探讨了茎秆理化特性与燕麦抗倒伏的关系。结果表明：4个燕麦品种田间倒伏分级和实际倒伏率差异显著（P<0.05），抗倒伏品种与易倒伏品种在茎秆理化物质含量上差异显著（P<0.05）。抗倒伏品种茎秆基部第1节、第2节氮和镁低于易倒伏品种，而茎秆基部第1节、第2节钾、钙和硅高于易倒伏品种。另外，抗倒伏品种茎秆基部第1节、第2节木质素、纤维素和可溶性糖及C/N显著（P<0.05）高于易倒伏品种。4个燕麦品种茎秆基部理化物质与倒伏指数及其构成要素、茎秆基部形态特征间均存在显著（P<0.05）或极显著（P<0.01）相关关系，茎秆基部第1节与第2节钾、钙和硅，可溶性糖、木质素及纤维素含量的高低与燕麦抗倒伏关系密切。

关键词: 半干旱区, 燕麦, 茎秆形态特征, 理化特性, 抗倒伏性

CLC Number:

S512.6

NAN Ming, ZHAO Gui-qin, LI Jing, CHAI Ji-kuan, LIU Yan-ming. Research on Relationship with Physicochemical Properties of Stems and Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties in the Semi-Arid Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(5): 1284-1290.

南铭, 赵桂琴, 李晶, 柴继宽, 刘彦明. 半干旱区燕麦品种茎秆理化特性及其与抗倒性的关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1284-1290.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.05.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2019/V27/I5/1284

References

[1] 黄文辉,王会,梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志,2018(4):13-19
[2] Acrèche M M,Slafer G A. Lodging yield penalties as affected by breeding in meoterranean wheats[J]. Field Crops Research,2011,1221(1):40-48
[3] 张志才. 作物倒伏成因及抗倒伏对策研究进展[J]. 耕作与栽培,2006(4):1-2
[4] 高阳,赵力兴,朱铁霞,等. 施氮量对科尔沁沙地燕麦生物量及物质分配规律的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(5):1168-1172
[5] 柴继宽,慕平,赵桂琴. 8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(5):1100-1107
[6] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 不同燕麦品种茎秆形态特征及其抗倒伏性的研究[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1383-1390
[7] Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio,Morphological and physiological characters behind high-yielding ability of oats (Avena sativa),and their implications for breeding[J]. Field Crops Research,1990,25(11):247-252
[8] Pinthus. Lodging in wheat,barley and oats:The Phenomenon,its causes,and preventive measures,advances in agronomy,1974,25:209-263
[9] Sterling M,Baker C J,BerryP M,et al. An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat[J]. Agricultural and Forest-Meteorology,2003,119(3):149-165
[10] 陈有军,周青平,孙建,等. 不同燕麦品种田间倒伏性状研究[J]. 作物杂志,2016,(5):44-49
[11] AJ.Nor den,KJ,Frey,Factors associated with lodging resistance in oats[J]. Agronomic Journal,1970(51):561-568
[12] 吴敏,潘虹宇,赵东林,等. 燕麦茎秆理化组分分析与动态力学特性研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2018,11(49):448-455
[13] 樊海潮,顾万荣,杨德光,等. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响[J]. 作物学报,2018,44(6):909-919
[14] 张建,陈金城,唐章林,等. 油菜茎秆理化性质与倒伏关系的研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(5):763-765
[15] 郝欢欢. 小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力相关理化特性研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2015:15-21
[16] 范永义,杨国涛,陈敬,等. 硅钾肥配施对水稻茎秆理化性状及抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2017,37(4):0751-0757
[17] 王凯,赵小红,姚晓华,等. 茎秆特性和木质素合成与青稞抗倒伏关系[J]. 作物学报,2019,45(4):621-627
[18] 胡昊. 小麦茎秆特性与抗倒伏关系及其调控研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2013:9-14
[19] 杨世民,谢力,郑顺林,等. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 作物学报,2009,35(1):93-103
[20] 刘唐兴,官春云,肖君泽,等. 甘蓝型油菜主茎理化特性与倒伏的关系及抗倒性评价[J]. 河南农业科学,2007(12):40-42
[21] 李木英,陈关,潘晓华,等. 直播稻不同品种茎秆和根系性状与抗倒伏性关系[J]. 中国稻米,2011,18(2):17-21
[22] 徐磊,王大伟,时荣盛,等. 小麦基部节间茎秆密度与抗倒性关系的研究[J]. 麦类作物学报,2009,29(4):673-679
[23] 卢昆丽,尹燕枰,王振林,等. 施氮期对小麦茎秆木质素合成的影响及其抗倒伏生理机制[J]. 作物学报,2014,40(9):1686-1694
[24] 王勇,李晴祺. 小麦品种抗倒性评价方法的研究[J]. 华北农学报,1995,10(3):84-88
[25] 陈晓光,史春余,尹燕萍,等. 小麦茎秆术质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系[J]. 作物学报,2011,37(9):1616-1622
[26] 李金才,尹钧,魏凤珍. 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响[J]. 作物学报,2005,31(5):662-666
[27] 袁继超,刘丛军,俄胜哲,等. 施氮量和穗粒肥比例对稻米营养品质中微量元素含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(2):183-187
[28] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:295-296
[29] Lin K,Huang X-H,Wang L-H,et al. The change of PAL activity and lignin content during adventitious buds formation of cotyledon in Cucumis melon L[J]. Journal East China Normal University (Nature Science),1996,(2):92-97
[30] Van Soest P J,Robertson J B,Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and no starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal Dairy Science,1991,74:3583-3597
[31] 龚建军. 播种量和氮肥水平对燕麦倒伏和产量的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2007,11-15
[32] 梁国玲,张永超,贾志锋,等. 高寒区不同燕麦品种(系)表型性状和茎秆力学特征与抗倒伏性的关系研究[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(4):58-69
[33] 李杰,张洪程,龚金龙,等. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2011,44(11):2234-2243
[34] Islam M S,Peng S,Visperas R M,et al. Lodging-related morphological traits of hybrid rice in a tropical irrigated ecosystem[J]. Field Crops Research,2007,101(2):240-248
[35] 申广勒,石英尧,黄艳玲,等. 水稻抗倒伏特性及其与茎秆性状的相关性研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2007,23(12):58-62
[36] 王丹,丁位华,冯素伟,等. 不同小麦品种茎秆特性及其与抗倒性的关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2016,(27):1496-1502
[37] 向达兵,郭凯,雷婷,等. 磷钾营养对套作大豆茎秆形态和抗倒性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报,2010(32):395-402
[38] Ookawa T,Ishihara K V. Difference of the cell wall components affecting the ding stress of the culm in relating to the lodging resistance in paddy rice[J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science,1993,62(3):378-384
[39] 杨艳华,朱镇,张亚东,等. 水稻不同生育期茎秆生化成分的变化及其与抗倒伏能力的关系[J]. 植物生理学报,2011,47(12):1181-1187
[40] Berry P M,Spink J,Sterling M,Pickett A A. Methods for rapidly measuring the lodging resistance of wheat cultivars[J]. Journal Agronomy Crop Science,2003,189:390-401
[41] Kokubo A,Sakurai N,Kuraishi S,Takeda K. Culm brittleness of barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) mutants is caused by smaller number of cellulose molecules in cell wall[J]. Plant Physiology,1991,97:509-514
[42] 邓榆川,刘卫国,袁小琴,等. 套作大豆苗期茎秆纤维素合成代谢与抗倒性的关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2016,27:469-476
[43] 胡丹,刘星贝,汪灿,等. 不同抗倒性甜荞茎秆木质素合成关键酶基因的表达分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48:1864-1872

Research on Relationship with Physicochemical Properties of Stems and Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties in the Semi-Arid Area

半干旱区燕麦品种茎秆理化特性及其与抗倒性的关系研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[2]	XU Ping-yi, ZHANG Jia-yue, HE Xing-dong. Characteristics of Calcium Oxalate in Leaf Blade of Constructive Species of Different Plant Communities with Close Distribution in the Ecotone [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 929-935.
[3]	TONG Yong-shang, YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Peng-bin, SONG Jian-chao, LI Zhen, LI Ying. Effects of Sowing Date on Forage Yield and Quality of Seven Oat Varieties in Tianzhu Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[4]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, MA Xiang. Phenotypic Diversity of the Panicle Among 590 Covered Oats Germplasm Resources in Apline of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[5]	LIU Bei, SONG Yu-mei, SUN-ming, MAO Pei-sheng. Physiological Responses of Mitochondrial AsA-GSH Cycle to Imbibition of Deteriated Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[6]	FU Dong-qing, WANG Yan-chao, SONG Lei, WANG Xu-zhe, ZHANG Fan-fan, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Production Performance of Early Maturing Forage Oat in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2364-2371.
[7]	HAO Shuang-nan, QIN Jie, LIU Pan-feng, YANG Wu-de, ZHANG Mei-jun, FENG Mei-chen, WANG Chao, SONG Xiao-yan. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on Stem Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1572-1579.
[8]	WANG Xiao-xue, LI Yue, ZHANG Bin, JIA Ju-qing, FENG Mei-chen, ZHANG Mei-jun, YANG Wu-de. Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on Root Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
[9]	LU Yong-xiang, ZHAO Man, CHEN Liang-yin, CHENGQi-ming, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, CHEN Shi-yong, BAI Shi-qie, LI Ping. Effects of Lactobacillus brucei and formic acid addition on fermentation quality and bacterial community of oat silage of different harvest stages in the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1736-1743.
[10]	KANG Yong-jian, ZHAO Bao-ping, WU Jun-ying, ZOU Jun-jie, LIU Jing-hui. Effects of Different Nitrogen Topdressing Stage on the Stalk Physical and Chemical Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Forage Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1775-1783.
[11]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, LIU Yong. Effect of Lodging on the Grain Filling Process and Non-structure Carbohydrate of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1024-1033.
[12]	LU Yong-xiang, CHENG Qi-ming, CHEN Liang-yin, SUN Lin, XIAO Bing-xue, GOU Wen-long, YOU Ming-hong, BAI Shi-qie, LI Ping. Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Characteristics of Oat Silage at Different Altitudes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 350-357.
[13]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, QIN Yan, WEI Xiao-xing, Liu Kai-qiang, Yang Jing. Study of Correlation between Biomass Composition,Stem Traits and Lodging in Different Oats Resources [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(5): 1339-1346.
[14]	LI Qi, YAO Tuo, Abuman, YANG Xiao-mei, ZHANG Jian-gui, FENG Ying. Development of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Microcapsules and Evaluation of Its Growth Promotion Effects on Alfalfa and Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(5): 1392-1399.
[15]	FANG Qing-hui, LIU Huan, ZHAO Gui-qin, WEN Tong, WANG Ting, SUN Shou-jiang, XU Ming. Genetic Integrity Analysis of Oat Seeds by Artificial Aging and Natural Aging [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(4): 1052-1059.