Evaluation of Grey Relational Grade Analysis to 16 Oats Varieties Introduced in Lhasa Region

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.012

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 389-396.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.012

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of Grey Relational Grade Analysis to 16 Oats Varieties Introduced in Lhasa Region

ZHOU Qi-long, Duoji-dunzhu, Yixi-yangzong

Key Laboratory of National yak and highland barley/Institute of Pratacultural Science, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, Tibet 850000, China

Received:2019-10-18 Revised:2019-12-02 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-11

拉萨地区16个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价

周启龙, 多吉顿珠, 益西央宗

青稞和牦牛种质资源与遗传改良国家重点实验室/西藏自治区农牧科学院草业科学研究所, 西藏拉萨 850000

通讯作者: 多吉顿珠
作者简介:周启龙(1988-),男,吉林榆树人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事牧草遗传育种方面的研究,E-mail:qilong_zhou@163.com
基金资助:
西藏自治区自然科学基金项目-逆境条件下燕麦品种选配及光合性能的研究（XZ2018ZRG-40）；国家牧草产业技术体系拉萨综合试验站（CARS-34）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In Order to study suitable forage germplasm for the Lhasa,16 oat varieties were assessed. Four nutritional traits and six agronomic traits were determined and analyzed by conventional analysis,and the comprehensive evaluation was carried out by grey relational analysis method. The results showed that the Everleaf had the highest hay yield(10 371.57 kg·hm²) and highest leaf stem ratio(0.5),Tianyanmai had the highest plant height(138.13 cm),Baler 2 was the best in stem diameter(7.11 mm),flag leaf length(36.49 cm) and flag leaf width(10.04 mm),Baiyan NO.7 had the highest ether extract (2.45%),Charisma had the highest crude protein (9.19%),Haymaker had the highest RFQ(165.86). The grey relational analysis results showed that Baler 2,Everleaf,Haymaker and Tianyanmai were better suitable for planting in this area.

Key words: Lhasa region, Oat, Relative feed quality, Gray correlation analysis, Comprehensive evaluation

摘要： 本研究在拉萨地区以16个燕麦（Avena sativa）引进品种作为研究对象，利用常规分析方法对干草产量、株高、茎粗、叶茎比、旗叶长、旗叶宽、粗蛋白（Crude Protein，CP）含量、粗脂肪（Ether Extract，EE）含量和相对饲草品质（Relative Feed Quality，RFQ）值进行测定分析，采用灰色关联度评价方法进行综合评价，以期筛选出适宜拉萨地区种植的燕麦种质。结果表明：爱沃的干草产草量和叶茎比最高，分别为10 371.57 kg·hm^-2和0.5，甜燕麦的株高最高，达到138.13 cm，贝勒2茎粗、旗叶长、旗叶宽最高，分别为7.11 mm，36.49 cm，10.04 mm，白燕7号EE含量最高，为2.45%，魅力CP最高，为9.19%，牧王RFQ最高，为165.86。灰色关联度分析法综合分析结果表明，贝勒2、牧王、爱沃和甜燕麦4个品种在生产性能和营养品质上表现良好，适宜作为牧草在拉萨地区进行推广种植。

关键词: 拉萨地区, 燕麦, 相对饲草品质, 灰色关联度法, 综合评价

CLC Number:

S512.6

ZHOU Qi-long, Duoji-dunzhu, Yixi-yangzong. Evaluation of Grey Relational Grade Analysis to 16 Oats Varieties Introduced in Lhasa Region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 389-396.

周启龙, 多吉顿珠, 益西央宗. 拉萨地区16个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 389-396.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.012

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I2/389

References

[1] 李佶恺,孙涛,旺扎,等. 西藏地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同混播比例对牧草产量和质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(05):830-833
[2] 张宪洲,何永涛,沈振西,等. 西藏地区可持续发展面临的主要生态环境问题及对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2015,30(03):306-312
[3] 马艳明,刘志勇,白玉亭,等. 新疆燕麦地方品种资源多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学,2006,43(6):510-513
[4] 崔海,王加启,卜登攀,等. 燕麦饲料在动物生产中的应用[J]. 中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(6):214-217
[5] 徐长林. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种生长特性比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(02):280-285
[6] 张光雨,王江伟,张豪睿,等. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(04):1117-1125+920
[7] 张光雨,马和平,邵小明,等. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(05):121-131
[8] 魏娜,金涛. 5个引种到西藏的燕麦新品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 麦类作物学报,2013,33(05):919-922
[9] 宋国英. 7个燕麦品种在拉萨的引种试验初报[J]. 西藏农业科技,2015,37(04):12-15+23
[10] 多吉顿珠. 西藏拉萨地区种植5种燕麦品种比较试验[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2015,36(11):35-37
[11] 王明君,李海贤,崔国文,等. 西藏羊八井五种一年生牧草的引种试验初报[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016,497(05):129-132
[12] 贺建华. 饲料分析与检测. 北京:中国农业出版社,2011:20-156
[13] 李志强. 燕麦干草质量评价[J]. 中国奶牛,2013(19):1-3
[14] 娜日苏,梁庆伟,杨秀芳,等. 阿鲁科尔沁旗燕麦新品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 饲料研究,2019,42(03):83-86
[15] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统与农业[J]. 山西农业科学,1985,(05):34-37
[16] 杨富,郑敏娜,康佳惠,等. 9个燕麦品种在晋北地区的生产性能及饲用价值综合评价[J]. 作物杂志,2019,189(02):100-104
[17] 王小山,纪冰沁. 31份燕麦种质主要株型性状比较及遗传分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2018,46(22):76-79
[18] 刘文辉,颜红波,周青平,等. 西宁地区六种燕麦品种比较试验[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志,2005(01):1-2
[19] 焦金寿,富新年,柴继宽. 不同燕麦品种在天祝高寒地区生产性能研究[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志,2018,37(04):9-12
[20] 彭先琴,周青平,刘文辉,等. 川西北高寒地区6个燕麦品种生长特性的比较分析[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(05):1208-1217
[21] 郑曦,魏臻武,武自念,等. 不同燕麦品种(系)在扬州地区的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(02):272-279
[22] 柴继宽,赵桂琴,师尚礼. 7个燕麦品种在甘肃二阴区的适应性评价[J]. 草原与草坪,2011,31(02):1-6
[23] 崔雄雄,侯扶江,常生华,等. 高寒牧区两个燕麦品种的产量与品质比较[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(06):1489-1495
[24] 秦彧,李晓忠,姜文清,等. 西藏主要作物与牧草营养成分及其营养类型研究[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(05):122-129
[25] 娜日苏,梁庆伟,杨秀芳,等. 13个燕麦品种在科尔沁沙地的生产性能评价[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2018,(17):136-141
[26] 柴继宽,赵桂琴,胡凯军,等. 不同种植区生态环境对燕麦营养价值及干草产量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(03):421-425+476
[27] 周青平,苟小林,田莉华,等. 寒冷区早晚熟燕麦品种的生产性能分析[J]. 科学通报,2018,63(17):1722-1730
[28] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 西北半干旱区引种燕麦品种产量与品质的关联分析及评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(01):125-133

Evaluation of Grey Relational Grade Analysis to 16 Oats Varieties Introduced in Lhasa Region

拉萨地区16个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SONG Ci, HUANG Xiao-tao, SHI Guo-xi, ZHOU Hua-kun, WANG Fang-ping, YAO Bu-qing. Effects of Sowing Dates on the Growth and Forage Quality of Oat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 121-127.
[2]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[3]	SUN Wei, LIU Yu-ling, WANG De-ping, ZHAO Min, YANG He-long, SONG Qian, XIAO Hong, WANG Kai-li, CAO Jing, RONG Yu-ping. Effects of Reseeding Leymus Chinensis (Trin.)Tzvel. and Medicago Falcata L. on Plant Community Characteristics of Degraded Meadow Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[4]	TONG Yong-shang, YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Peng-bin, SONG Jian-chao, LI Zhen, LI Ying. Effects of Sowing Date on Forage Yield and Quality of Seven Oat Varieties in Tianzhu Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[5]	LI Man-you, MA Zhong-ren, WANG Bing, YANG Yu-qi, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LI Xiao-yun, LAN Jian. Study on the Mixed Planting Mode of Two Alfalfa Varieties in Different Row Ratios in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[6]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, MA Xiang. Phenotypic Diversity of the Panicle Among 590 Covered Oats Germplasm Resources in Apline of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[7]	LIU Bei, SONG Yu-mei, SUN-ming, MAO Pei-sheng. Physiological Responses of Mitochondrial AsA-GSH Cycle to Imbibition of Deteriated Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[8]	JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Gui-qin. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Sowing Rate on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Phytohormone Content and Grain Yield of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 293-302.
[9]	LI Si-da, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, QIN Yan, LI Wen. Study on the Relationship Between Productive Performance and Interspecies of Mixed Grassland with Poa pratensis var.anceps Gaund. ‘Qinghai’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2827-2837.
[10]	LI Wen, WEI Ting-hu, Abaodi, Yongcuobazhan, Cairentaci, ZHOU Yu-hai, LI Wen-hao, GUO Wei-xing, ZHANG Yan-ping. Effects of Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer and Organic Manure Supplement on Oat Nutrient Quality and Soil Nutrient in Alpine Cold Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[11]	WANG Xue, LIU Xiao-jing, ZHAO Ya-jiao, WANG Jing. Effects of Alfalfa/Oat Intercropping on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Matter Accumulation of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2258-2264.
[12]	ZHOU Lei, WANG Lu, ZHAO Bao-ping, MI Jun-zhen, WANG Feng-wu, LIU Jing-hui, ZHANG Dan, LIU Ye-kun. Effect of Different Sowing Date and Cutting Time on Yield and Quality of Forage Oat in Agro-pastoral Ecotone of Northern China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2355-2363.
[13]	FU Dong-qing, WANG Yan-chao, SONG Lei, WANG Xu-zhe, ZHANG Fan-fan, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Production Performance of Early Maturing Forage Oat in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2364-2371.
[14]	XIE Nan, LIU Zhen-yu, FENG Wei, ZHI Jian-fei, LI Meng, DU Zi-xuan, LIU Zhong-kuan. The Production Performance and Forage Quality of Forage Millet in Saline Alkali Dryland Around Bohai Sea [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 60-71.
[15]	JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Gui-qin. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Plant Density on Oat Leaf Senescence Characteristics and Cell Structure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 80-87.