Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Production Performance and Nutrient Quality of Grassland

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.031

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 3439-3446.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.031

Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Production Performance and Nutrient Quality of Grassland

FENG Qin^1,2,3, WANG Bin^1,2,3, WANG Teng-fei^1,2,3, NI Wang^1,2,3, DENG Jian-qiang^1,2,3, LAN Jian^1,2,3

1. College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China;
2. Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China;
3. Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Prodiciency Efficiency of Aguzculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuna, Ningxia 750021

Received:2022-06-09 Revised:2022-07-14 Published:2023-01-04

不同播种量毛苕子与燕麦混播对草地生产性能及营养品质的影响

冯琴^1,2,3, 王斌^1,2,3, 王腾飞^1,2,3, 倪旺^1,2,3, 邓建强^1,2,3, 兰剑^1,2,3

1. 宁夏大学农学院, 宁夏银川 750021;
2. 宁夏草牧业工程技术研究中心, 宁夏银川 750021;
3. 农业农村部饲草生产模式创新重点实验室, 宁夏银川 750021

通讯作者: 兰剑,E-mail:ndlanjian@163.com
作者简介:冯琴(1999-),女,汉族,贵州遵义人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草育种与栽培研究,E-mail:1330653822@qq.com
基金资助:
“一年两熟”人工草地可持续发展模式研究与示范项目(2020BBF02001);宁夏高等学校一流学科建设(草学学科)项目(NXYLXK2017A01)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the optimal sowing rate of mixed sowing of Vicia villosa and Avena sativa in arid areas of Ningxia. A single-factor randomized block design was used in the experiment. Five sowing rates of vetch (V₁:33.0 kg·hm^-2,V₂:45.0 kg·hm^-2,V₃:57.0 kg·hm^-2,V₄:69.0 kg·hm^-2 and V₅:81.0 kg·hm^-2) were mixed with oat (120.0 kg·hm^-2),and vetch monoculture (VD:57.0 kg·hm^-2) and oat monoculture (OD:180.0 kg·hm^-2) were used as control. The agronomic traits,production performance,and nutritional value of forage in mixed grassland were studied. The results showed that the plant height of the oat was the highest under the V₂ treatment,and the density was the highest under the V₅ treatment. The plant height and density of vetch were the highest under the V₄ treatment. The total hay yields of V₁,V₂,V_3, and V₅treatments were increased to varying degrees compared with those of monoculture,and the total hay yields of V₂ treatment were increased by 15.75% and 63.21% compared with those of oat and vetch monoculture,respectively. The land equivalent ratios of other treatments except V₄ were greater than 1,indicating that mixed sowing improved land use efficiency. Compared with oat monoculture,mixed grassland increased crude protein content and relative feeding value,and decreased acid and neutral detergent fiber content. The comprehensive evaluation showed that the order from high to low was V₂>V₁>V₅>V₃>V₄. Therefore,it is suggested that the best sowing rate of mixed sowing of vetch and oat in arid areas of Ningxia is 45.0 kg·hm^-2.

Key words: Mixed grassland, Production performance, Land equivalent ratio, Forage quality, Oat, Vetch

摘要： 为探究出宁夏干旱区毛苕子(Vicia villosa)与燕麦(Avena sativa)混播的最佳播种量。试验采用单因素随机区组设计，设置五个毛苕子播种量水平(V₁：33.0kg·hm^-2、V₂：45.0kg·hm^-2、V₃：57.0kg·hm^-2、V₄：69.0kg·hm^-2和V₅：81.0kg·hm^-2)与燕麦(120.0kg·hm^-2)混播，毛苕子单播(VD：57.0kg·hm^-2)和燕麦单播(OD：180.0kg·hm^-2)为对照，研究了混播草地牧草农艺性状、生产性能以及营养价值。结果表明，燕麦株高在V₂处理下最高，密度在V₅处理下最大；毛苕子株高和密度在V₄处理下最大。V₁，V₂，V₃和V₅处理的总干草产量较单播处理不同程度增加，其中V₂处理的总干草产量较燕麦、毛苕子单播分别提高了15.75%，63.21%。除V₄外其他处理的土地当量比均大于1，表明混播提高了土地利用效率。混播草地较燕麦单播提高了粗蛋白含量和相对饲喂价值，降低了酸性和中性洗涤纤维含量。综合评价显示，排名由高到低为V₂>V₁>V₅>V₃>V₄，因此，建议在宁夏干旱区毛苕子与燕麦混播的最佳播种量为45.0 kg·hm^-2。

关键词: 混播草地, 生产性能, 土地当量比, 牧草品质, 毛苕子, 燕麦

CLC Number:

FENG Qin, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, DENG Jian-qiang, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Production Performance and Nutrient Quality of Grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3439-3446.

冯琴, 王斌, 王腾飞, 倪旺, 邓建强, 兰剑. 不同播种量毛苕子与燕麦混播对草地生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3439-3446.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I12/3439

References

[1] 徐强,田新会,杜文华. 高寒牧区黑麦和箭筈豌豆混播对草产量和营养品质的影响研究[J]. 草业学报.2021,30(8):49-59
[2] 汪精海,李广,银敏华,等. 调亏灌溉对高寒荒漠区人工混播草地土壤环境与牧草生长的影响[J]. 草业学报.2022,31(1):95-106
[3] 李思达,刘文辉,张永超,等. 青海扁茎早熟禾混播草地生产性能与种间关系的研究[J]. 草地学报.2021,29(12):2827-2837
[4] 张永亮,于铁峰,郝凤,等. 施肥与混播比例对豆禾混播牧草产量及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报.2020,29(11):91-101
[5] LI M,ZHANG J,LIU S,et al. Mixed-cropping systems of different rice cultivars have grain yield and quality advantages over mono-cropping systems[J]. J Sci Food Agric.2019,99(7):3326-3334
[6] 郑伟,朱进忠,加娜尔古丽. 不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价[J]. 草业学报.2012,21(6):242-251
[7] CUI G W,LI H Y,SUN T,et al. An Experimental Study of Variety Screening,Sequential Cropping,Compaction and Mixed Cropping Techniques for the Cultivation of Annual Forage Crops in Agro-pastoral Area of Tibet,China[J]. International journal of agriculture and biology,2014,16(1):97-103
[8] SMYTH R R,HOFFMANN M P,SHELTON A M. Effects of host plant phenology on oviposition preference of Crocidolomia pavonana (Lepidoptera：Pyralidae)[J]. Environmental entomology,2003,32(4):756-764
[9] 张辉辉,师尚礼,武蓓,等. 苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播效应研究[J]. 草业学报.2022,31(2):159-170
[10] 秦燕,刘勇,张永超,等. 不同混播比例对燕麦和箭筈豌豆混播草地植物生长特征的影响[J]. 草地学报.2020,28(6):1768-1774
[11] SADEGHPOUR A,JAHANZAD E,ESMAEILI A,et al. Forage yield,quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi-arid conditions:Additive series[J]. Field Crops Research.2013,148:43-48
[12] 苟文龙,李平,张建波,等. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究[J]. 草地学报.2019,27(2):473-481
[13] 王斌,李满有,李小云,等. 宁夏干旱区滴灌条件下燕麦与毛苕子的混播方式[J]. 草业科学.2021,38(7):1329-1338
[14] 李蕾蕾,花登峰,郑兴卫,等. 含水量和混播比例对青南牧区燕麦-箭筈豌豆/毛苕子混播青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报.2018,27(7):166-174
[15] BERGHUIJS H N C, WANG Z, STOMPH T J,et al. Identification of species traits enhancing yield in wheat-faba bean intercropping:development and sensitivity analysis of a minimalist mixture model[J]. Plant and Soil:An International Journal on Plant-Soil Relationships.2020,455(1-2):203-226
[16] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京农业大学出版社,1993,19-63.
[17] 李达,方华军,王笛,等. 草甸草原区退耕地的牧草-水分-氮肥耦合机制[J]. 中国农业科学.2020,53(13):2691-2702
[18] 王斌,董秀,李满有,等. 不同播量拉巴豆与青贮玉米混播对草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报.2021,29(4):828-834
[19] 魏晓丽,徐成体,蒲小剑,等. 海北州小黑麦与饲用型豌豆混播生产性能及营养品质分析[J]. 草地学报.2022,30(1):236-244
[20] 杨鹏年,杜文华,田新会. 甘南高寒牧区加拿大饲用燕麦与豌豆的混播效果研究[J]. 中国草地学报.2022,44(3):39-48
[21] AJAL J,KIER L P,PAKEMAN R J,et al. Intercropping drives plant phenotypic plasticity and changes in functional trait space[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology.2022(61):41-52
[22] 史志强,裴亚斌,徐强,等. 甘南高寒牧区甘农2号小黑麦与箭筈豌豆的混播效果[J]. 草业科学.2021,38(9):1771-1781
[23] 刘启宇,云岚,陈逸凡,等. 苜蓿——禾草混播草地牧草产量及种间竞争关系的动态研究[J]. 草业学报.2022,31(3):181-191
[24] 王富强,向洁,郭宝光,等. 拉萨河谷区箭筈豌豆和黑麦混、间播建植方式研究[J]. 草业学报.2018,27(8):39-49
[25] 谢开云,王玉祥,万江春,等. 混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报.2020,29(3):157-170
[26] 赵建华,孙建好,陈亮之,等. 玉/豆间作产量优势中补偿效应和选择效应的角色[J]. 作物学报.2022:1-12
[27] 谢开云,曹凯,万江春,等. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究[J]. 草业学报.2020,29(4):29-40
[28] 朱亚琼,于辉,郑伟,等. 燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地混播优势的测度与影响因素分析[J]. 草业学报.2020,29(1):74-85
[29] 汪精海,李广,余晓雄,等. 调亏微喷灌对高寒荒漠区人工草地产量、品质及水分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报.2021,35(4):200-207
[30] 何双琴. 贵南县禾豆混播及牧草产量测定[J]. 青海草业.2004(2):18-19
[31] 张学梅,马千虎,张子龙,等. 施肥对高寒荒漠草原区混播人工草地产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学.2019,52(8):1368-1379

Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Production Performance and Nutrient Quality of Grassland

不同播种量毛苕子与燕麦混播对草地生产性能及营养品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	FENG Qin, WANG Bin, HAI Yi-rui, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, DENG Jian-qiang, LI Man-you, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Community Competition and Biomass Allocation of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2423-2429.
[2]	GUO Chang-ying, WANG Wei, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WEI Xiao-li, PENG Dan, XU Cheng-ti. Effects of Sowing Method and Row Spacing on Production Performance and Interspecific Relationship of Oat/Forage Pea Mixed Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2483-2491.
[3]	HE Ji-tong, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Ji-xiu, MA Xiao-long, JIA Zhi-feng. Effects of Intercropping between Oat and Broad Bean on Crop Growth and Yield in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2514-2521.
[4]	HUANG Ying, LIU Huan, ZHAO Gui-qin, WANG Qi-yu, LUO Jian-min, YAO Rui-rui. Effects of Natural Aging and Artificial Aging on Germination Characteristics and Genetic Integrity of Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2066-2074.
[5]	ZHANG Ru, ZHAO Bao-ping, WANG Yong-ning, QIAO Zhi-gang, MI Jun-zhen, LIU Jing-hui. Effects of Different Cadmium Concentrations on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Cadmium Enrichment and Transport Coefficients of Three Oat Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2089-2099.
[6]	LI Hong-yu, WANG Ya-cong, ZENG Jia, WANG Cong-cong, DONG Kuan-hu, XIA Fang-shan. Effect of Exogenous H₂O₂ Priming on AsA-GSH Cycles in Embryonic Cells of Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1668-1674.
[7]	WANG Teng-fei, CHANG Yi-ran, DENG Xue, SHEN Xiao-tian, WANG Bin, LI Man-you, NI Wang, LAN Jian. Adaptability Evaluation of Feed Oat Varieties in Rainfed Area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1755-1762.
[8]	GUO Chang-ying, WANG Wei, DE Ke-jia, PU Xiao-jian, WEI Xiao-li, DUAN Na-ning, PENG Dan, XU Cheng-ti. Effects of Sowing Methods on Yield and Quality of Oats and Forage Peas [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1882-1890.
[9]	DUAN Lian-xue, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, YANG Yu-jie, SHI Hong-xiao, JIA Zhi-feng. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Agronomic Traits and Seed Yield of Avena sativa L. cv. Qinghai in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1576-1583.
[10]	JIN Yan-li, YAO Tuo, LAN Xiao-jun, LI Chang-ning, MA Ya-chun. Screening of Antagonistic Bacteria of Oat Root Rot and Studies of Antibacterial Properties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1095-1101.
[11]	GAO Zhi-hao, LI Xue-ying, LAN Jian, HU Hai-ying. Comparison and Evaluation of Seed Germination Indexes of Different Forage-Type Oat Cultivars under PEG-6000 Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1210-1218.
[12]	SUN Yan-liang, LIU Xuan-shuai, LI Sheng-yi, ZHAO Jun-wei, MA Chun-hui, ZHANG Qian-bing. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance with different Fall Dormancy Rates of Alfalfa in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1227-1236.
[13]	LOU Ya-hua, WANG Ling-xiu, SHAO Shuai. Effects of Simulated Nitrogen Deposition and Harvest Period on the Growth and Forage Quality of Autumn-germinated Eremopyrum orientale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1290-1295.
[14]	YANG Yan-yan, SUN Yu, WU Chun-hui, LI Yun-qi, WU Rui-xin, WANG Ming-ya, LI Qiu-feng. Applying CNCPS system to Evaluate the Nutritive Value of Oat and Forage Triticale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 931-935.
[15]	LIN Dou-dou, ZHAO Gui-qin, CHAI Ji-kuan, GONG Wen-long, SU Wei-juan, ZHANG Li-rui. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of M1 Generation of Oat Mutagenized by NaN₃ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 587-593.