Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.028

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3591-3601.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.028

Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet

LIU Zeng-hui¹, ZHOU Rong-zhu², SUN Wei³, LI Shao-wei³, ZHANG Xin-yong¹, CHEN Lin-yao¹, WU Jian-shuang¹

1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. National Animal Husbandry Service, Beijing 100125, China;
3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academic of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2024-03-05 Revised:2024-04-23 Published:2024-11-29

藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析

刘增辉¹, 周荣柱², 孙维³, 李少伟³, 张新永¹, 陈林耀¹, 武建双¹

1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081;
2. 全国畜牧总站, 北京 100125;
3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101

通讯作者: 武建双,E-mail:wujianshuang@caas.cn
作者简介:刘增辉(1997-),男,汉族,山西临汾人,博士研究生,主要从事农业气象与气候变化以及农牧民可持续生计研究,E-mail:liuzhcaas@163.com
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原科学考察研究，任务十专题二《农牧耦合绿色发展的资源基础考察研究》(2019QZKK1002)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Semi-structured questionnaires were employed to investigate the volumes and composition of livestock inventory and slaughter as well as their potential drivers at herder households from alpine meadow,alpine steppe,and desert steppe zones across the northern Tibetan Plateau. The results showed that (1) The volumes of livestock inventory and slaughter (254.8 and 48.6 SSU,Standardized Sheep Unit) at the household level in desert steppes were significantly larger than those in alpine meadows (191.55/33.22 SSU) and alpine steppes (189.89/33.49 SSU). (2) The most important influencing factor for the volumes of livestock inventory varies among alpine grassland types,from forage productivity in alpine meadows,to population per household in alpine steppes,and fenced grassland area in alpine deserts,which correspondingly explained 10.78%,19.40%,and 15.99% of its variance among households within each alpine grassland type. (3) The most important influencing factor for the volumes of livestock slaughter also differs among alpine grassland types,from grazing grassland area per household in alpine meadows,to population per household in alpine steppes,and labors per household in alpine deserts,which correspondingly explained 15.01%,11.20%,and 23.55% of its variance among households within each alpine grassland type. Therefore,the volumes and composition of livestock inventory and slaughter are different at the household level among alpine grassland types,and influenced by different natural and anthropogenic factors across the northern Tibetan Plateau. The spatial differences in endowment and utilization of grassland resources should be emphatically taken into account for the policy-making in the future.

Key words: Changtang,North Xizang, Livestock inventory and slaughter, Grassland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward Policy, Livelihood diversity, Grassland type

摘要： 本研究以藏北牧民家庭为研究对象，通过半结构式访谈调查高寒草甸、高寒草原和荒漠草原区牧户牲畜存出栏规模结构及其影响因素。结果表明：荒漠草原户均牲畜存/出栏规模(254.8 /48.6 SSU)显著高于高寒草甸(191.55 /33.22 SSU)和高寒草原(189.89 /33.49 SSU)；对牧户牲畜存栏规模影响最大的因素依次为单位面积产草量(高寒草甸)、家庭规模(高寒草原)和草畜平衡草场面积(荒漠草原)，可以解释其变异的10.78%，19.40%和15.99%；对牧户牲畜出栏规模影响最大的因素依次为草畜平衡草场面积(高寒草甸)、家庭规模(高寒草原)和劳动力数量(荒漠草原)，可以解释其变异的15.01%，11.20%和23.55%。综上所述，藏北高原牧民户均牲畜存/出栏规模和结构在不同草地类型之间存在明显差异，且受到自然和人文因素的双重影响。在未来制定草原生态保护政策时需要重点考虑资源禀赋和利用方式的差异。

关键词: 藏北羌塘, 牲畜存出栏, 草原生态保护补助奖励政策, 生计多样性, 草地类型

CLC Number:

F326.3

LIU Zeng-hui, ZHOU Rong-zhu, SUN Wei, LI Shao-wei, ZHANG Xin-yong, CHEN Lin-yao, WU Jian-shuang. Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3591-3601.

刘增辉, 周荣柱, 孙维, 李少伟, 张新永, 陈林耀, 武建双. 藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3591-3601.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I11/3591

References

[1] TANG L,DONG S K,SHERMAN R,et al. Changes in vegetation composition and plant diversity with rangeland degradation in the alpine region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. The Rangeland Journal,2015,37(1):107
[2] BONILLA-CEDREZ C,STEWARD P,ROSENSTOCK T S,et al. Priority areas for investment in more sustainable and climate-resilient livestock systems[J]. Nature Sustainability,2023,6(10):1279-1286
[3] WANG Y F,LV W W,XUE K,et al. Grassland changes and adaptive management on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment,2022,3(10):668-683
[4] LI P,BENNETT J. Understanding herders’ stocking rate decisions in response to policy initiatives[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,672:141-149
[5] ZHOU W,YANG H,HUANG L,et al. Grassland degradation remote sensing monitoring and driving factors quantitative assessment in China from 1982 to 2010[J]. Ecological Indicators,2017,83:303-313
[6] LI M Q,LIU S L,SUN Y X,et al. Agriculture and animal husbandry increased carbon footprint on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during past three decades[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278(1):123963
[7] BARDGETT R D,BULLOCK J M,LAVOREL S,et al. Combatting global grassland degradation[J]. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment,2021,2:720-735
[8] HOU L L,XIA F,CHEN Q H,et al. Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income[J]. Nature Communications,2021,12:4683
[9] ZHOU T,YANG H B,QIU X,et al.China’s grassland ecological compensation policy achieves win-win goals in Inner Mongolia[J]. Environmental Research Communications,2023,5(3):031007
[10] ZHANG J,BROWN C,QIAO G H,et al. Effect of eco-compensation schemes on household income structures and herder satisfaction:lessons from the grassland ecosystem subsidy and award scheme in Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecological Economics,2019,159:46-53
[11] 李新一,尹晓飞，周晓丽,等. 我国农牧民补助奖励政策背景与成效[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(7):163-173
[12] 赵晓园,高启杰,黄圣男,等. 组态视角下草原生态补奖政策满意度提升路径研究——基于藏北地区的实证分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2023,41(4):737-745
[13] 杨清,南志标,陈强强,等. 草原生态补助奖励政策牧民满意度及影响因素研究——基于甘肃青藏高原区与西部荒漠区的实证[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(4):1436-1444
[14] YIN Y,HOU Y L,LANGFORD C,et al. Herder stocking rate and household income under the Grassland Ecological Protection Award Policy in Northern China[J]. Land Use Policy,2019,82:120-129
[15] HU Y N,HUANG J K,HOU L L. Impacts of the grassland ecological compensation policy on household livestock production in China:an empirical study in Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecological Economics,2019,161:248-256
[16] 董全民,赵新全,李世雄,等. 草地放牧系统中土壤-植被系统各因子对放牧响应的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志,2014,33(8):2255-2265
[17] LATAWIEC A E,STRASSBURG B B N,VALENTIM J F,et al. Intensification of cattle ranching production systems:socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil[J]. Animal,2014,8(8):1255-1263
[18] VALLENTINE J F. Grazing management[M].2nd edition. San Diego,California:Academic Press,2001:217-264
[19] LI X J,ZHANG X Z,WU J S,et al. Root biomass distribution in alpine ecosystems of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2011,64(7):1911-1919
[20] ZHU Q A,CHEN H,PENG C H,et al. An early warning signal for grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Nature Communications,2023,14:6406
[21] 熊定鹏,赵广帅,武建双,等. 羌塘高寒草地物种多样性与生态系统多功能关系格局[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(11):3362-3371
[22] 孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(1):3-12
[23] 赵宁宁,李文成,谢聿源,等. 藏北高寒草地放牧模式优化研究——以班戈县多尔格村牧业合作社为例[J]. 高原农业,2023,7(6):621-627
[24] 廖阳慈,李蕊蕊,索朗斯珠,等. 西藏自治区牦牛生产现状和趋势分析[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2023,19(6):72-79
[25] 刘永杰,杨琴. 青藏高原退化草地修复研究进展及展望[J]. 中国草地学报,2023,45(10):131-143
[26] ZHAO G S,SHI P L,WU J S,et al. Foliar nutrient resorption patterns of four functional plants along a precipitation gradient on the Tibetan Changtang Plateau[J]. Ecology and Evolution,2017,7(18):7201-7212
[27] 侯慧新,张雨,李少伟,等. 藏北羌塘牧民家庭人口特征和收入构成之间的关系[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(12):2653-2663
[28] DONGZHI H Q,CHEN X Y,SHI M M,et al. The spatial distribution and driving factors of carbon storage in the grassland ecosystems of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology,2023,14(5):893-902
[29] 格日乐其木格,乌兰图雅,斯琴朝克图,等. 内蒙古草地质量对牧户生计脆弱性的影响评价[J]. 生态学杂志,2024,43(1):216-223
[30] ZHU J P, XU X L, LI T,et al. Foundamental strategic shift required by the expensive ecological policy in Chinese grasslands[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology,2022,13(6):955-963
[31] 冯树林,杜正才,陈功. 对草原生态补奖机制的体会和建议——以西藏自治区八宿县为例[J]. 草业与畜牧,2014(2):46-49
[32] 周升强,赵凯. 草原生态补奖政策对农牧民牲畜养殖规模的影响——基于生计分化的调节效应分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(4):157-165
[33] 祁海萍,申希平. Kruskal-Wallis H检验平均秩多重比较在SPSS软件中的实现[J]. 兰州工业学院学报,2015,22(2):76-78
[34] 张雨珊,周洪,刘秀华,等. 喀斯特地区农村劳动力转移对生态恢复的影响及其区域差异——基于酉阳和沿河的农户调查数据[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(13):5395-5405
[35] 谢先雄,赵敏娟,蔡瑜. 生计资本对牧民减畜意愿的影响分析——基于内蒙古372户牧民的微观实证[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(6):55-62
[36] 宋连久,孙自保,孙前路,等. 藏北草原牧民可持续生计分析——以班戈县为例[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(6):1287-1294
[37] BRISKE D D,ZHAO M L,HAN G D,et al. Strategies to alleviate poverty and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia:intensification vs production efficiency of livestock systems[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2015,152:177-182
[38] BYRNE A T,HADRICH J C,ROBINSON B E,et al. A factor-income approach to estimating grassland protection subsidy payments to livestock herders in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Land Use Policy,2020,91(2):104352
[39] 王丹,王征兵,赵晓锋. 草原生态保护补奖政策对牧户生产决策行为的影响研究——以青海省为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(3):70-76
[40] MAHDAVI S K,SHAHRAKI M,SHARAFATMANDRAD M. Consequences of participatory behavior of pastoralists on rangeland restoration[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2024,92:80-89
[41] 斯日乐. 加强草原生态保护促进牧区可持续发展探讨[J]. 科技展望,2015,25(5):237
[42] 黎洁,李树茁,费尔德曼. 山区农户林业相关生计活动类型及影响因素[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(8):8-16

Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet

藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Ya-li, HE Guo-xing, LIU Xiao-ni, ZHANG De-gang, XU He-guang, JI Tong, JIANG Jia-chang. Variation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Fraction and Carbon Pool Activity in Four Grassland Types in the Temperate Desert of Longzhong [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1489-1499.
[2]	XU Lin-fang, MI Yuan-ting, LIU Lan-zhou, WEN Lu, LI Yong-hong, XU Ji-fei. Study on the Struture and Driving Factors of Soil Fungal Community in Different Grassland Types in Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 1977-1987.
[3]	LI Ya-li, LIU Xiao-ni, ZHANG De-gang, HE Guo-xing, XU He-guang, JI Tong, JIANG Jia-chang. Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Physicochemical Properties of Different Grassland Types of Temperate Steppe in Longzhong [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(11): 3405-3414.
[4]	WANG Hui, DU Fu-lin. Comparative Research on the Decision of Herdsman's with Management Scale from the Perspective of Grassland Types' Heterogeneity [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3123-3135.
[5]	DONG Shi-kui, TANG Fang-lin, PING Xiao-yan, YANG Zhi, YANG Xiu-chun, LIN Chang-cun, LU Xin-shi, WANG Tie-mei, JI Bao-ming, XU Bin, SU De-rong. Study on Multi-dimensional China’s Grassland Classification in New Era of Ecological Civilization [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 1-8.
[6]	HUO Li-li, CHEN Dong-dong, LI Qi, ZHANG Li, HE Fu-quan, SHU Min, ZHAO Liang. Study on the Relationship between Functional Traits of Grassland Plants and Evapotranspiration in the Sanjiangyuan [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2182-2190.
[7]	ZHAO Wen, YIN Ya-li, LI Shi-xiong, LIU Jing-jing, DONG Yi-ling, SU Shi-feng. Study on Vegetation Communities and Forage Nutrition Characteristics of Different Types of Grassland in Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1328-1335.
[8]	JIANG An-jing, DONG Yi-qiang, ASITAIKEN-Julihait, ZHOU Shi-jie, NIE Ting-ting, LI Cai-ying, XI Wei, AN Sha-zhou. Effects of Grazing Exclusion on Soil Bacterial Community Characteristics in different Grassland Types [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(10): 2600-2608.
[9]	ZHANG Hao-rui, FU Gang. Responses of Phylogenetic Diversity of Soil Fungal Community to Grazing in Alpine Grasslands of the Northern Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 21-28.
[10]	LI Fa-yu, YIN Quan-wei, HU Jun, CHEN Dong-ying, WANG Yuan, ZHANG Lu-lu, JIANG Lin-feng, LI Ge, TANG Jun. Distribution and Type Characteristics of Grassland resources in Chongqing [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 474-482.
[11]	BAI Long, YAN Jia-le, LIU Ying, LIU Jun, YANG Ji-yun, CHEN Xi, LIU Hui-lin, WANG Zheng-wen. Characteristics and Distribution Situation of Grassland Types in Northern Liaohe River Plain [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(3): 566-575.
[12]	YAO Xi-xi, GONG Xu-yin, BAI Bin, ZHANG Li-ping, LANG Xia, WU Jian-ping. Study of Grassland Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Nutrient and Their Correlation between Different Grassland Types in Alpine Pastoral Area of Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(2): 371-379.
[13]	XU Jing, WU Hong-qi, JIANG Ping-an, SHENG Jian-dong. Soil Spectral Property of Xinjiang Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5): 980-985.
[14]	ZHAO Feng-jie, WU Hui-hui, LIU Zhao-yang, QIN Xing-hu, WANG Guang-jun, ZHANG Ze-hua. Application of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in the Biomass Monitor of Two Grassland Types in Xilinhot [J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1059-1064.
[15]	REN Ji-zhou. Classfication and Cluster Applicable for Grassland Type [J]. , 2008, 16(1): 4-10.