Effects of Different Additives on Nutritional Quality and Palatability of Rice Straw Yellow Stored Feed

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.034

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3646-3653.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.034

Effects of Different Additives on Nutritional Quality and Palatability of Rice Straw Yellow Stored Feed

CHEN Yuan-hang¹, CHENG Ming-jun², LI Hong-quan², LI Xiao-mei¹, WEN Xing-jing³, LIU Hai-ping¹, ZHANG Lei¹, YAN Yan-hong¹

1. College of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611130, China;
2. Sichuan Grassland Technology Research and Promotion Center, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
3. Sichuan Grassland Science Research Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611731, China

Received:2024-03-27 Revised:2024-05-28 Published:2024-11-29

不同添加剂对水稻秸秆黄贮饲料营养品质及适口性的影响

陈远航¹, 程明军², 李洪泉², 李小梅¹, 文兴金³, 刘海平¹, 张磊¹, 闫艳红¹

1. 四川农业大学草业科技学院, 四川成都 611130;
2. 四川省草业技术研究推广中心, 四川成都 610041;
3. 四川省草原科学研究院, 四川成都 611731

通讯作者: 闫艳红,E-mail:yanyanhong3588284@126.com
作者简介:陈远航(2000-),男,贵州盘州人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草栽培加工利用研究,E-mail:1342771077@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2023YFD1301402)；国家现代农业产业技术体系四川大豆创新团队(SCCXTD-2024-21)项目资助

Abstract

Abstract: Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important food crop in China,and efficient utilization of rice straw can expand the feed sources for ruminants. In this study,rice straw was used as the raw material,with seven treatments set up:Control (CK),commercial lactic acid bacteria Zhuanglemei,Lactobacillus plantarum 149 (LP149),Lactobacillus rhamnosus 608 (LG608),compound lactic acid bacteria (LP149+LG608,FP),sodium diacetate,and corn flour. After 60 days of fermentation,the silage was opened and analyzed. The results showed that,compared to CK,the treatments with LG608,sodium diacetate,and corn flour significantly increased the crude protein content of the rice straw silage (P<0.05). The neutral detergent fiber content in the LG608 and FP treatments was significantly lower than that in other treatments (P<0.05). The water-soluble carbohydrate content was highest in the LG608 treatment,reaching 5.32% DM (P<0.05). The lactic acid content in all additive treatments was significantly higher than in CK (P<0.05),with the highest being in the LG608 treatment at 5.41% DM (P<0.05),and it had the lowest pH value of 4.48 (P<0.05). The feed intake of beef cattle was significantly higher in the LG608 and FP treatments compared to other treatments (P<0.05). Based on grey relational analysis,all additive treatments effectively improved the quality of rice straw silage,with the LG608 treatment showing the best effect,followed by the FP treatment.

Key words: Rice straw, Yellow storage feed, Additives, Fermentation quality, Palatability

摘要： 水稻(Oryza sativa L.)是我国重要的粮食作物，高效利用水稻秸秆可拓宽反刍家畜的饲料来源。本研究以水稻秸秆为原料，设置七种处理，分别为无添加对照(CK)、添加商业乳酸菌壮乐美、植物乳杆菌149(Lactobacillus plantarum149,LP149)、鼠李糖乳杆菌608(Lactobacillus rhamnosus 608, LG608)、乳酸菌复配(LP149+LG608,FP)、双乙酸钠和玉米粉处理，发酵60 d后开袋分析。结果表明：与CK相比，LG608、双乙酸钠和玉米粉处理显著提高了稻秸黄贮饲料的粗蛋白含量(P<0.05)；LG608和FP处理的中性洗涤纤维含量显著低于其他处理(P<0.05)；LG608处理的水溶性碳水化合物含量最高，为5.32%DM(P<0.05)。所有添加剂处理的乳酸含量显著高于CK(P<0.05)，其中LG608处理最高，为5.41%DM(P<0.05)，其pH值最低，为4.48(P<0.05)。LG608和FP处理的肉牛采食量显著高于其他处理(P<0.05)。结合灰色关联度分析，添加剂处理均有效改善稻秸秆黄贮饲料品质，LG608处理效果最优，其次为FP处理。

关键词: 水稻秸秆, 黄贮饲料, 添加剂, 发酵品质, 适口性

CLC Number:

S816.53

CHEN Yuan-hang, CHENG Ming-jun, LI Hong-quan, LI Xiao-mei, WEN Xing-jing, LIU Hai-ping, ZHANG Lei, YAN Yan-hong. Effects of Different Additives on Nutritional Quality and Palatability of Rice Straw Yellow Stored Feed[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3646-3653.

陈远航, 程明军, 李洪泉, 李小梅, 文兴金, 刘海平, 张磊, 闫艳红. 不同添加剂对水稻秸秆黄贮饲料营养品质及适口性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3646-3653.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.034

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I11/3646

References

[1] 吴永杰,丁浩,邵涛,等. 酶制剂对水稻秸秆青贮发酵品质及体外消化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(8):167-177
[2] 刘洁. 四川农村年鉴2019[M]. 成都:电子科技大学出版社,2019:155-156
[3] LIANG F,LI B Z,VOGT R D,et al. Straw return exacerbates soil acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2023,198:107176
[4] SHAN A Q,PAN J Q,KANG K J,et al. Effects of straw return with N fertilizer reduction on crop yield,plant diseases and pests and potential heavy metal risk in a Chinese rice paddy:A field study of 2 consecutive wheat-rice cycles[J]. Environmental Pollution,2021,288:117741
[5] 刘凯玉,张永根,辛杭书,等. 不同处理水稻秸秆营养成分及其瘤胃降解特性研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2014,50(7):57-61，101
[6] 徐文豪,周海勇. 大力推广全株玉米青贮、玉米秸秆黄贮技术[J]. 养殖与饲料,2020，19(4):65-66
[7] 王加黛,常娟,王平,等. 微贮秸秆的研究进展[J]. 中国饲料,2024(7):1-6
[8] XU N N,WANG D M,WANG B,et al. Different endosperm structures in wheat and corn affected in vitro rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization of rice straw-based diet[J]. Animal,2019,13(8):1607-1613
[9] 寇江涛,孟佳琪,张海波,等. 不同酶制剂对水稻秸秆青贮营养品质和饲喂价值的影响[J]. 草原与草坪,2020,40(2):39-44
[10] 倪奎奎. 全株水稻青贮饲料中微生物菌群以及发酵品质分析[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2016:47-48
[11] 蔡义民,杜珠梅. 热带地区作物秸秆类青贮饲料的调制与发酵品质[J]. 西华大学学报(自然科学版),2019,38(1):71-78
[12] 王鸿泽,王之盛,康坤,等. 玉米粉和乳酸菌对甘薯蔓、酒糟及稻草混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(6):103-110
[13] 李艳芬,程金花,田川尧,等. 双乙酸钠对苜蓿青贮品质、营养成分及蛋白分子结构的影响[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(2):163-171
[14] 关皓,曾泰儒,帅杨,等. 西南高温高湿地区青贮中天然乳酸菌群落结构特征及优质乳酸菌的筛选[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(12):3203-3213
[15] 郭金桂,宋灵峰,玉柱,等. 混合比例对紫花苜蓿与燕麦混贮品质的动态影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2018,40(1):73-79
[16] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,1993:36-61
[17] NADER G A,CUN G S,ROBINSON P H. Impacts of silica levels,and location in the detergent fiber matrix,on in vitro gas production of rice straw[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2012,174(3/4):140-147
[18] BRODERICK G A,KANG J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[19] 杜昭昌,王红,闫艳红,等. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(7):1549-1554
[20] 李小铃,关皓,帅杨,等. 单一和复合乳酸菌添加剂对扁穗牛鞭草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(6):119-127
[21] 龙瑞军,董世魁,王元素,等. 反刍动物采食量的概念与研究方法[J]. 草业学报,2003,12(5):8-17
[22] 叶开梅,陈泽辉,祝云芳,等. 基于主成分分析与灰色关联度分析的玉米自交系综合评价[J]. 种子,2019,38(10):87-92,96
[23] 汤佩芬,李三要. 水稻秸秆发酵饲料中微生物群落结构与功能分析[J]. 中国饲料,2023(16):81-84
[24] 陆永祥,成启明,陈良寅,等. 不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(2):350-357
[25] KUNG L Jr,SHAVER R D,GRANT R J,et al. Silage review:Interpretation of chemical,microbial,and organoleptic components of silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(5):4020-4033
[26] ROOKE J A. The effect of increasing the acidity or osmolality of grass silage by the addition of free or partially neutralized lactic acid on silage intake by sheep and upon osmolality and acid-base balance[J]. Animal Science,1995,61(2):285-292
[27] OFFER N W. A comparison of the effects on voluntary intake by sheep of dietary addition of either silage juices or lactic acid solutions of the same neutralizing value[J]. Animal Science,1997,64(2):331-337
[28] 胡梦洁,肖燕子,姜超,等. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿和高丹草混合青贮品质及维生素含量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2024,32(5):1642-1649
[29] MA J,DAI H L,LIU H C,et al. Effects of harvest stages and lactic acid bacteria additives on the nutritional quality of silage derived from Triticale,rye,and oat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. PeerJ,2023,11:e15772
[30] 刘辉,卜登攀,吕中旺,等. 凋萎和不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(5):126-133
[31] 张吉鹍. 反刍家畜粗饲料品质评定的指标及其应用比较[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(5):47-50
[32] 赵小雪,王仕玉,郭凤根,等. 乳酸菌及纤维素酶对不同藜麦秸秆青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(10):2827-2833
[33] 孙雪丽,李秋凤,刘英财,等. 全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(9):201-209
[34] 孙肖慧,原现军,郭刚,等. 添加剂对西藏混合青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(6):1353-1359
[35] WANG Y Q,WU J T,LV M X,et al. Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and the expanding applications in food industry[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,2021,9:612285
[36] 宋金昌,范莉. 利用微生物提高秸秆粗蛋白质的试验[J]. 动物科学与动物医学,2002,19(1):46-49
[37] 张仲卿. 混合真菌发酵秸秆及其对绵羊养分消化和瘤胃发酵的影响[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2019:28-29
[38] 吴刀知才让,裴成芳,马志远,等. 燕麦干草不同饲喂水平对牦牛日增重、血液生理生化指标及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J]. 草业学报,2023,32(11):119-129
[39] 张立涛,刁其玉,李艳玲,等. 中性洗涤纤维生理营养与需要量的研究进展[J]. 中国草食动物科学,2013,33(1):57-61
[40] 郭金双,赵广永,李胜利,等. 添加乳酸菌对大麦青贮品质及中、酸性洗涤纤维的瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,1999,35(4):27-28
[41] 张英,周汉林,刘国道,等. 绿汁发酵液与纤维素酶对王草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(10):1640-1647
[42] 张菊,李伟,李金敏,等. 乳酸菌制剂的研究现状及在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 饲料广角,2013(5):28-30
[43] 辛亚芬,陈晨,曾泰儒,等. 青贮添加剂对微生物多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2021,37(9):24-30
[44] 黄佩珊,张超,陈丹丹,等. 辣木叶提取物对柱花草和象草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(7):2194-2202
[45] 李忠秋,刘春龙. 青贮饲料的营养价值及其在反刍动物生产中的应用[J]. 家畜生态学报,2010,31(3):95-98
[46] 杨荣,王华朗,韩垂旺,等. 畜禽饲用微生物发酵饲料的应用研究进展[J]. 广东饲料,2019,28(1):39-43

Effects of Different Additives on Nutritional Quality and Palatability of Rice Straw Yellow Stored Feed

不同添加剂对水稻秸秆黄贮饲料营养品质及适口性的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	MA Tian-li, LI Xiao-mei, ZHONG Yi-hao, LUO Hong-jie, DU Zhao-chang, XIAO Qi-yin, LIU Wei-guo, YAN Yan-hong. Study on the Silage Quality of Mixed Whole Plant Maize and Different Legume Forage in the Northwest Plateau Area of Sichuan Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(9): 2999-3005.
[2]	XU Gui, WANG Ya-ting, MU Lin, WANG Qing-lan, WEI Lan, GUO Yang, WEI Zhong-shan, ZHANG Zhi-fei. Meta-Analysis Study of the Effects of Adding Urea on Silage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(8): 2607-2619.
[3]	CHAI Yu-xin, JIA Shu-an, ZHANG Tian, LI Xiao, CHEN Yong-cheng, HUANG Rong-zheng, ZHANG Fan-fan. Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on Silage Quality of Urtica cannabina and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Sheep [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2283-2289.
[4]	WU Qi-feng, CHEN Chen, HUANG Qin-jiao, ZHANG Yun-fei, LI Xiao-mei, CHEN Yuan-hang, WEN Xing-jin, YAN Yan-hong. A Effects of Cellulase and High-temperature Tolerant Lactic Acid Bacteria on Structural Carbohydrate of (Pennisetum ameri-canum×P.purpureum)×P.durpureum schum. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2314-2322.
[5]	CHENG Zhi-ze, YISILAYI-Dawuti, WAN Jiang-chun, NAIBI-Abulaiti, AIBIBULA-Yimamu. Effects of Different Additives on the Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Pepper Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2330-2336.
[6]	HEI Meng-qin, CAO Zheng-yu, WANG Zhi-yuan, DAI Chun-hui, CHEN Cheng, ZHANG Wen-ju. Effects of Adding Compound Lactobacillus and Molasses on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage with Different Moisture Contents [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1601-1609.
[7]	KONG De-hui, JIN Si-yu, CAO Yang. Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Mixed Acids on Fermentation Quality,Chlorophyll and Chlorophyll Degrading Enzymes in Alfalfa Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1610-1618.
[8]	ZHANG Le, LI Huan, LI Xiang, ZHU Hai-xia. Preparation of Fusarium avenaceum HY-041 Wettable Powder and Herbicidal Activity Study [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1650-1656.
[9]	SUN Rong, LI Mao, CHEN Gui-wu, ZI Xue-juan, WANG Kai. Effects of Callicarpa Nudiflora Addition on Silage Fermentation Quality and in vitro Gas Production in King Grass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1267-1275.
[10]	HUANG Li-ying, CUI Wei-dong, TIAN Jing, ZHANG Jian-guo. Effects of Soybean Straw and Rice Straw on Mixed Silage of Sweet Corn Straw and Wet Brewers Grains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 945-951.
[11]	JIN Li-na, JIANG Su-su, JING Shu-yan, HE Jian-wen, ZHANG Hui-jun. Effects of Adding Astragalus Bunge Residue on the Sensory Evaluation, Fermentation Quality, and Nutritive Value of Whole-crop Corn Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 630-636.
[12]	ZHU La, WANG Zhi-jun, BAO Jian, LIU Ming-jian, YAN Yu-ting, JIA Yu-shan, NA Ri-su, GE Gen-tu. Effects of Different Low-temperature Tolerant Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Natural Pasture Silage Fermentation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3610-3618.
[13]	SUN Ying-chao, CHAI Yu-xin, HOU Guo-qing, CHEN Yong-cheng, ZHENG Xiao-kai, YANG Jian-qi, ZHANG Fan-fan. Fermentation Quality and In Vitro Rumen Gas Production of Corn Straw Wheat Straw Mixed with Whole Conformation Tree [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3297-3304.
[14]	YANG Dan, ZHOU Yu-xin, YIN Han-xue, CHEN Dan-dan, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Cellulose-degrading Bacteria and Temperature on Fibre Degradation and Fermentation Quality of Rice Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3305-3312.
[15]	FENG Bing-sen, LIU Yu-shan, LIU Ling-xiao, WANG Xiao, HAN Qing-dian, LIU Yun-guo. Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Above-ground Parts of Salvia miltiorrhiza [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3313-3319.