Comprehensive Evaluation and Screening of Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.05.007

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1408-1417.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.05.007

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation and Screening of Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties

YANG Bing¹, WANG Yu-ting¹, LIU Jin-long², HAN Xu³, LI Yue¹, SUN Yan¹

1. College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Ningxia Qianyeqing Agriculture Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd, Shizuishan, Ningxia 753400, China;
3. Chengde Yuershan Chengken Agricultural Development Co., Ltd, Chengde, Hebei Province 068359, China

Received:2024-07-12 Revised:2024-09-19 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-20

不同燕麦品种茎秆抗倒性的综合评价及筛选

杨冰¹, 王玉婷¹, 刘金龙², 韩旭³, 李跃¹, 孙彦¹

1. 中国农业大学草业科学与技术学院, 北京 100193;
2. 宁夏千叶青农业科技发展有限公司, 宁夏石嘴山 753400;
3. 承德鱼儿山承垦农业发展有限公司, 河北承德 068359

通讯作者: 李跃,E-mail:liyue2020@cau.edu.cn;孙彦,E-mail:02008@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:杨冰（1999-），女，汉族，甘肃民勤人，硕士研究生，主要从事燕麦资源育种研究，E-mail：1516924458@qq.com；王玉婷（1999-），女，汉族，安徽安庆人，硕士研究生，主要从事草坪科学与管理研究，E-mail：wangyt0429@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2022YFF1003201）；宁夏重点研发计划项目（2022BDE92070，2022BBF02030）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to compare the lodging resistance of different oat （Avena sativaL.） germplasms and explore the main factors affecting their lodging resistance， in this study we took 9 oat varieties as experimental materials to explore the relationship between ear characteristics， stem morphological characteristics and the content of stem chemical substances and lodging resistance. Further， grey correlation analysis was performed to identify the key traits affecting lodging resistance in oat. Meanwhile， membership function method and cluster analysis were used to comprehensively evaluate and cluster the oat materials tested in this study. The excellent varieties and characters were screened out preliminarily to provide parental materials and reference for breeding in the future. The results show that： A05， AN222， and A01 had the strongest lodging resistance. The key factors affecting the resistance to lodging in oats are center of gravity height， second internode length， stem diameter coefficient， spike length， internode length below the spike， potassium， and cellulose.

Key words: Avena sativa L., Lodging-resistant, Morphological characteristics, Chemical substances, Comprehensive evaluation

摘要： 为比较不同燕麦（Avena sativa L.）种质抗倒伏能力的差异，探究影响燕麦倒伏的主要因素，本研究以9种燕麦品种为试验材料，研究穗部特征、茎秆形态特征和茎秆化学物质含量与抗倒性的关系。利用灰色关联度分析法明确影响燕麦抗倒性的主要性状，并采用隶属函数法和聚类分析法进行综合评价。初步筛选出优良品种和性状，为今后育种提供亲本材料和参考依据。结果表明：抗倒性最强的燕麦品种分别是A05，AN222和A01，重心高度、第二节间长度、茎粗系数、穗长、穗下节长、钾和纤维素含量是影响燕麦抗倒伏能力的关键因素。

关键词: 燕麦, 抗倒伏, 形态特征, 化学物质, 综合评价

CLC Number:

S544.9

YANG Bing, WANG Yu-ting, LIU Jin-long, HAN Xu, LI Yue, SUN Yan. Comprehensive Evaluation and Screening of Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(5): 1408-1417.

杨冰, 王玉婷, 刘金龙, 韩旭, 李跃, 孙彦. 不同燕麦品种茎秆抗倒性的综合评价及筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(5): 1408-1417.

References

[1] 刘文辉，贾志锋，梁国玲. 我国饲用燕麦产业发展现状及存在的问题和建议[J]. 青海科技，2020，27（3）：82-85
[2] MARTÍNEZ-VILLALUENGA C，PEÑAS E. Health benefits of oat：current evidence and molecular mechanisms[J]. Current Opinion in Food Science，2017，14：26-31
[3] 董锐，李亮，胡新中，等. 我国燕麦产品特点及消费需求分析[J]. 粮油食品科技，2021，29（6）：146-155
[4] 张曼，张美莉，郭军，等. 中国燕麦分布、生产及营养价值与生理功能概述[J]. 内蒙古农业科技，2014，42（2）：116-118，126
[5] 田保明，杨光圣. 农作物倒伏及其评价方法[J]. 中国农学通报，2005，21（7）：111-114
[6] BERRY P M，STERLING M，MOONEY S J. Development of a model of lodging for barley[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science，2006，192（2）：151-158
[7] 南铭. 燕麦抗倒伏生理机制及茎秆木质素合成基因表达研究[D]. 兰州：甘肃农业大学，2021：27
[8] 梁国玲，刘文辉，张永超，等. 倒伏发生对燕麦籽粒灌浆进程及非结构性碳水化物的影响[J]. 草地学报，2020，28（4）：1024-1033
[9] 胡伟，梁国玲，刘凯强，等. 青藏高原9个燕麦品种抗倒伏能力及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报，2023，31（6）：1788-1797
[10] 耿小丽，武慧娟，付萍，等. 叶面喷施多效唑、矮壮素、缩节胺对燕麦抗倒伏性和种子产量的调节作用[J]. 草业科学，2023，40（9）：2340-2347
[11] HIZBAI B T，GARDNER K M，WIGHT C P，et al. Quantitative trait loci affecting oil content，oil composition，and other agronomically important traits in oat[J]. The Plant Genome，2012，5（3）：164-175
[12] 任长忠，杨才. 中国燕麦品种志[M]. 北京：中国农业出版社，2018：23
[13] 牟海萌，孙丽芳，王壮壮，等. 施氮量和种植密度对两冬小麦品种抗倒性能和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学，2023，56（15）：2863-2879
[14] 赵安庆，袁志华，曹晴. 水稻茎秆抗倒伏的综合评价[J]. 生物数学学报，2006，21（4）：554-556
[15] 孙怀恩，谭旭良，张俊超，等. 施氮量和植物生长调节剂对青引2号燕麦抗倒能力及产量品质的影响[J]. 草学，2022（3）：24-30
[16] 南铭，赵桂琴，李晶，等. 不同燕麦品种茎秆形态特征与抗倒伏性的关系[J]. 草地学报，2018，26（6）：1382-1391
[17] NAKHFOROOSH A，KUMAR S，FETCH T，et al. Peduncle breaking resistance：a potential selection criterion to improve lodging tolerance in oat[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science，2020，100（6）：707-719
[18] 韩玉林，殷贵鸿，杨光宇，等. 小麦品种周麦22茎秆生长特性及其与抗倒性的关系[J]. 作物杂志，2017（2）：34-37
[19] 郝爽楠，秦杰，刘攀锋，等. 外源硒对燕麦茎部特征及其抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 草地学报，2020，28（6）：1572-1579
[20] 李召锋，黄润，刘晓欢，等. 新疆春小麦资源茎秆形态特征与抗倒性的关系[J]. 西南农业学报，2017，30（4）：717-721
[21] TIAN B H，WANG J G，ZHANG L X，et al. Assessment of resistance to lodging of Landrace and improved cultivars in foxtail millet[J]. Euphytica，2010，172（3）：295-302
[22] 靳英杰. 不同玉米品种茎秆力学特性与化学成分对抗倒特性的影响[D]. 郑州：河南农业大学，2018：31-36
[23] 顾汉柱，王琛，张瑛，等. 水稻茎秆抗倒伏评价及其生理机制研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学，2023，51（21）：1-7
[24] 罗茂春，田翠婷，李晓娟，等. 水稻茎秆形态结构特征和化学成分与抗倒伏关系综述[J]. 西北植物学报，2007，27（11）：2346-2353
[25] 樊海潮，顾万荣，杨德光，等. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响[J]. 作物学报，2018，44（6）：909-919
[26] 覃凤，汪小飞，吴臻，等. 集雨种植模式下种植密度与行距配置对小麦茎秆糖积累及倒伏性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学，2024，57（1）：65-79
[27] 胡丹. 甜荞抗倒伏相关性状的遗传分析及木质素合成特征[D]. 重庆：西南大学，2016：59-64
[28] KAMRAN M，AHMAD I，WU X R，et al. Application of paclobutrazol：a strategy for inducing lodging resistance of wheat through mediation of plant height，stem physical strength，and lignin biosynthesis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International，2018，25（29）：29366-29378
[29] 陶庭余，王荣圆，魏鹏，等. 密度和钾肥及其互作对小麦茎秆形态特征与抗倒性的影响[J]. 安徽科技学院学报，2024，38（1）：71-76
[30] LUO Y L，NI J，PANG D W，et al. Regulation of lignin composition by nitrogen rate and density and its relationship with stem mechanical strength of wheat[J]. Field Crops Research，2019，241：107572
[31] 江林. 小麦木质素含量与茎秆强度的关系[D]. 合肥：安徽农业大学，2013：13-26

Comprehensive Evaluation and Screening of Lodging Resistance of Different Oat Varieties

不同燕麦品种茎秆抗倒性的综合评价及筛选

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	FU Jun-shi, NAN Li-li, ZHANG Ze-long, WU Shi-wen, REN Meng-yu, CHEN Na, JIAO Long-guang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Morphology， Photosynthetic and Fluorescence Characteristics of 21 Germplasm Resources of Timothy [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(9): 2796-2807.
[2]	SHI Jing, LIU Xiao-jing, LI Jia-qi, HAN Yan-long, WANG Xue, WANG Jing. Study on the Adaptability of 15 Alfalfa Varieties in Minqin Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(9): 2843-2853.
[3]	JIN Jian-gang, ZHENG Min-na, KANG Jia-hui, YANG Fu, TIAN Zai-fang, WANG Yuan-dong. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Stem Lodging Resistance Traits of 98 Oat Varieties （lines） [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(8): 2567-2574.
[4]	LIU Tian, FENG Jia-xin, LIU Meng-jiao, Chen Jing-bo, GUO Hai-lin, KONG Wei-yi, ZHENG Yi-qi. Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Shade-Tolerance Hybrid Cultivars in Zoysiagrass （Zoysia spp.） [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(7): 2288-2298.
[5]	LYU Yan-zhen, YAO Xing-jie, ZHANG Zhao, SUN Qing-ying, YANG Yu-ze, YAN Hui-fang. Evaluation of Alkali Tolerance and Key Indicators Screening during Seed Germination of Different Alfalfa Cultivars [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(6): 1852-1861.
[6]	YANG Wei-qiang, ZHANG Han, JIANG Ji-shun, QI Tian-gang, ZHOU Qin-yu, PENG Yan. Screening of Drought-Tolerant Germplasm Resources of White Clover and Analysis of Drought Tolerance Evaluation Index [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(5): 1510-1522.
[7]	ZHU Qi-meng, HE Lin-lin, WU Ting-da, ZHANG Chi, RAN Fu, LI Juan-xia, YAN Yu-bang, ZHU Ya-nan, ZHANG Cai-zhong, BAI Xiao-ming. Comprehensive Evaluation on Salt Stress of 10 Wild Ophiopogoneae Germplasms in Southern Region of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(5): 1588-1601.
[8]	YAO Xing-jie, SUN Qing-ying, ZHANG Zhao, LYU Yan-zhen, YAN Si-qi, CHEN Si-yu, SHI Yan-xin, DUAN Xiao-tong, MENG Shu-han, YAN Hui-fang. Comprehensive Evaluation on Salt Tolerance of 61 Alfalfa Cultivars during Seed Germination [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(4): 1181-1191.
[9]	SHI Jia-qi, XIE Nan, CUI Sui-qian, SUN Guo-tong, PAN Xuan, ZHANG Li-feng, LIU Zhong-kuan, LIU Zhen-yu, ZHANG Hong-fa, LI Ya-nan, YANG Qing-chuan, LONG Rui-cai. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of 16 Alfalfa Varieties under Different Salt Concentration Stress at Germination Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(2): 472-480.
[10]	LI Chun-yan, ZHANG Ran-ran, ZHU Hai-yan, YOU Dong-mei, HU Hai-yan, LI Zong-zhen, RONG Yu-ping. Effects of Salt Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Alfalfa Seedlings and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance at Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(2): 516-523.
[11]	FU Jun-shi, NAN Li-li, ZHANG Ze-long, WU Shi-wen, REN Meng-yu, CHEN Na, JIAO Long-guang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic and Quality Traits of Timothy Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(11): 3633-3642.
[12]	ZHANG Xiao-peng, DENG Yan-tian, YANG Rui, KANG Jun-mei, ZHANG Tie-jun, GUO Qian-qian. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Forage Oat Germplasm Resources at Germination and Seedling Stages [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(11): 3741-3755.
[13]	DUAN Lei-yu, LI Zhi-guo, CUI Le, SUN Xue-yan, WANG Xin-yu, LYU Shi-jie. Study on the Morphological Characteristics of Wind Erosion in Desert Steppe Under Different Grazing Intensities [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(11): 3766-3773.
[14]	LI Cui, YANG Zhi-chen, GUO Chen-jia, ZHENG Mei, ZHAO Chun-qiao, HOU Xin-cun, GUO Qiang. Evaluation and Identification of Salt Tolerance of 22 Karelinia caspia Germplasm [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(10): 3353-3361.
[15]	LIU Ze-yu, YUAN Zi-tong, SUI Ke, ZHANG Yu-xia, LIU Ting-yu, SHAN Xin-he, ZHANG Zhi-yong, WANG Xian-guo. Comprehensive Evaluation of Cold Resistance of Alfalfa Varieties of the “WL” Series Based on Cold Resistance Coefficients [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(8): 2592-2598.