Effects of Different Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on the Silage Quality of the Native Grass

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.031

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 1348-1352.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.031

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on the Silage Quality of the Native Grass

SHAO Xin-qing¹, LIU Yue-hua¹, LIU Ting-yu², WANG Zhi-xue¹, WEI Xiao-ting¹, ZHONG Meng-ying¹, WU Rui-xin^1,3, PAN Duo¹

1. Grassland Science Department, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Nationality University, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia 028000, China;
3. Pratacultural college, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2014-04-23 Revised:2014-05-29 Online:2014-12-15 Published:2014-12-01

不同乳酸菌添加剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响

邵新庆¹, 刘月华¹, 刘庭玉², 王志学¹, 位晓婷¹, 钟梦莹¹, 武瑞鑫^1,3, 潘多¹

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院草地研究所, 北京 100193;
2. 内蒙古民族大学, 内蒙古通辽 028000;
3. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 刘庭玉
作者简介:邵新庆(1969-),男,甘肃天水人,副教授,主要从事草地管理和草地恢复研究,E-mail:shaoxinqing@163.com
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-35);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203006);国家科技支撑计划(2012BAC01B02)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

The native mixed grass mowed from semi-arid mountain steppe in Inner Mongolia was used as material to make silage by adding different lactic acid bacteria additives. After stored for 45 days, all treatments were sampled for the analysis of fermentation quality and chemical composition to study the influence of different lactic acid bacteria additives on the quality of natural grass silage and to screen out the most suited additives. The result indicated that five lactic acid bacteria additives all could improve the silage quality inordinately. By a sensory evaluation, the treatments adding lactic acid bacteria were superior to the control. The analyses of fermentation quality and chemical composition showed that Zhongnong NO.1 was the best lactic acid bacteria to increase lactic acid content and decrease the ammoniacal nitrogen content, pH, and acid detergent fiber of silage, followed by Zhongnong NO.3, and the advantages of others were non-significant.

Key words: Native grass, Silage, Lactic acid bacteria, Fermentation quality

摘要：

以内蒙古半干旱山地草原天然混合牧草为原料,通过添加不同的乳酸菌添加剂进行青贮对比试验,探讨不同乳酸菌添加剂对天然牧草青贮饲料品质的影响,筛选适宜的乳酸菌添加剂.结果表明:5种添加剂均能不同程度地改善天然牧草青贮品质,经过感官评定,乳酸菌添加剂青贮饲料优于对照组;青贮饲料的发酵品质和营养价值综合分析表明,在提高乳酸含量,降低氨态氮含量、pH值、酸性洗涤纤维等方面表现最佳的是中农1号乳酸菌,其次是中农3号,中农2号、4号和8号添加剂青贮效果改善不明显.

关键词: 天然牧草, 青贮, 乳酸菌, 发酵品质

CLC Number:

S324
S543.6

SHAO Xin-qing, LIU Yue-hua, LIU Ting-yu, WANG Zhi-xue, WEI Xiao-ting, ZHONG Meng-ying, WU Rui-xin, PAN Duo. Effects of Different Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on the Silage Quality of the Native Grass[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1348-1352.

邵新庆, 刘月华, 刘庭玉, 王志学, 位晓婷, 钟梦莹, 武瑞鑫, 潘多. 不同乳酸菌添加剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1348-1352.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2014/V22/I6/1348

References

[1] 冯骁骋,格根图,李长春,等. 青贮条件对天然牧草青贮饲料饲用品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(5):9-13
[2] 韩建国.草地学[M]. 第三版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2009:259-261
[3] 肖燕子. 促进剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 内蒙古草业,2012,24(1):37-40
[4] 王保平,秦立刚,许庆方,等. 几种亚高山草甸植物青贮效果的初步研究[J]. 中国奶牛,2010(9):16-19
[5] Weinberg Z G, Muck R E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage [J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews,1996,19(1):53-68
[6] 康慕谊,刘肖骢. 内蒙古扎鲁特旗土地利用方式及强度对草原群落的影响[J]. 地球科学进展,2002,17(2):229- 234
[7] 斯琴朝克图,乌兰图雅. 内蒙古农牧交错带地名特征浅析:以扎鲁特旗为例[J]. 内蒙古林业科技,2011,37(1): 40-44
[8] 韩瑞雪,于振国. 扎鲁特旗牧草引种试验[J]. 内蒙古草业,2001,(1):17-19
[9] 刘建新. 干草秸秆青贮饲料加工技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2004: 180-194
[10] Han K J, Collins M, Vanzant E. S1Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage [J]. Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919
[11] 许庆方. 影响苜蓿青贮品质的主要因素及苜蓿青贮在奶牛日粮中应用效果的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2005
[12] Broderick G A, Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[13] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:53-56,67-78
[14] Owens V N, Albrecht K A, Muck R E, et al. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates [J]. Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880
[15] 郭旭生,周禾,刘桂霞. 苜蓿青贮过程中蛋白的分解及抑制方法[J]. 草业科学,2005,22(11):50-54
[16] Kung J L, Ranjit N K. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(5):1149-1155
[17] 玉柱,白春生. 不同添加剂对无芒雀麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2008,10(4):76 -81
[18] 王莹,玉柱. 不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2010,32(5): 80-84
[19] Filya I, Muck R E, Contreras G F E. Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: Fermentation products and nutritive value [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(11):5108-5114
[20] 肖燕子. 天然牧草青贮发酵品质调控研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012
[21] 许庆方,周禾,玉柱,等. 贮藏期和添加绿汁发酵液对袋装苜蓿青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报,2006,15(2):129-133
[22] 李向林,万里强. 苜蓿青贮技术研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2005,14(2):9-15
[23] 李向林,张新跃,唐一国,等. 日粮中精料和牧草比例对舍饲山羊增重的影响[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(2):43-47
[24] Kung L J, Taylor C C, Lynch M P. The effect of treating alfalfa with Lactobacillus bunchneri 40788 on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value for lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(1):336-343
[25] Colombatto D, Hervs G, Yang W Z. Effects of enzyme supplementation of a total mixed ration on microbial fermentation in continuous culture, maintained at high and low pH [J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(10):2617-2627
[26] 吕建敏,陈民利,胡伟莲. 添加酶制剂对青贮玉米秸发酵品质和营养价值的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2005,41(7):18-20

Effects of Different Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on the Silage Quality of the Native Grass

不同乳酸菌添加剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[3]	CHEN Lei, BAO Xue-yan, GUO Gang, HUO Wen-jie, LI Qing-hong, XU Qing-fang, WANG Cong, LIU Qiang. Effects of Tannic Acid and Lactic Acid Bacteria on Alfalfa Silage Quality and Ruminal Fermentation in Vitro [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[4]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[5]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[6]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[7]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[8]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[9]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[10]	WANG Xin-yu, SHEN Chen, HUO Wen-jie, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Shuan-lin, WANG Cong, CHEN Lei, XU Qing-fang, WANG Yong-xin, GUO Gang. Analysis of Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Structure of Whole Corn Silage of Different Varieties in Yanbei Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[11]	ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[12]	YOU Si-Han, DU Shuai, ZHOU Zhong-Yi, Gegentu, WAN Tao, JIA Yu-Shan. Mixed Silage of Sorghum Hybrid Sudan Grass and Perennial Ryegrass with Different Proportions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[13]	WANG Bin, DONG Xiu, LI Man-you, YANG Yu-qi, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Planting of Dolichos Lablab with Different Sowing Rates and Silage Corn on Grassland Productivity and Forage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[14]	LU Yong-xiang, YAN Xian-ming, ZHOU Zhao-xiang, ZHU Hui-xian, GOU Wen-long, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, CHEN Shi-yong, LI Ping, BAI Shi-qie. Effects of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community of High-moisture Whole-plant Corn Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[15]	CHEN De-kui, GUO Xiang, ZHENG Ming-yang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing. The Effects of Amomum Villosum Lour. Essential Oil on the Fermentation Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.