Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.024

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 1070-1079.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.024

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions

QIN Wei-na¹, JIAO Ting¹, SHI Shang-li¹, LI Xiong-xiong¹, GAO Xue-mei¹, ZHAO Sheng-guo², QI Juan¹, WANG Zheng-wen²

1. Major in Pratacultural Science of Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grass Ecosystem, Ministry of Education/Sino-US Grassland Animal Husbandry Sustainable Development Research Center, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2020-11-02 Revised:2020-12-08 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-06-02

不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价

秦伟娜¹, 焦婷¹, 师尚礼¹, 李雄雄¹, 高雪梅¹, 赵生国², 祁娟¹, 王正文²

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃农业大学动物科学技术学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 焦婷,E-mail:jiaoting207@126.com
作者简介:秦伟娜(1995-)，女，汉族，甘肃兰州人，硕士研究生，E-mail:498138260@qq.com
基金资助:
农业农村部农牧交错带优质青粗饲料资源开发利用技术集成示范项目（16200157）；甘肃农业大学科技创新基金（青年导师扶持基金）（GAU-QDFC-2018-04）；甘肃省现代草食畜产业技术体系（GARS-CS-4）；现代农业产业技术体系（CARS-40-09B）资助

Abstract

Abstract: 10 green-fed corn varieties from rain-fed area (Huining) and irrigation area (Wuwei) (‘Jinkai No. 3’,‘Jinsui 715’，‘Lidan 295’,‘Yu Silage 23’,‘Beinong Silage 208’，‘TW 268’,‘Hesheng 5288’,‘Wenyu No.3’,‘Shuyu 201’,‘Yuyu 22’) were ensiled at the middle stage of milk maturity to evaluate and compare their silage quality after 60 days of fermentation so that it provided a practical basis for the selection and cultivation of silage maize in different hydrothermal areas. The results showed that ‘Jinkai No.3’ in the rain-fed area had high crude protein and fat content,better fermentation quality;‘Beinong silage 288’ in the irrigation area had high content of water soluble carbohydrates,monosaccharides,calcium,and phosphorus,and the lactic acid content was the highest. ‘Hesheng 5288’ had low acid detergent fiber,neutral detergent fiber and crude ash,and better fermentation quality,and it could be planted as demonstration plant in the two places.

Key words: Green-fed corn, Rain-fed area, Irrigation area, Silage quality, Hydrothermal conditions

摘要： 本试验选择雨养区（会宁）和灌溉区（武威）的10个青饲玉米（Zea maysL.）品种（‘金凯3号’、‘金穗715’、‘利单295’、‘豫青贮23’、‘北农青贮208’、‘TW 268’、‘和盛5288’、‘文玉3号’、‘蜀玉201’、‘豫玉22’），于乳熟中期收割后青贮，发酵60 d后评价比较其青贮品质，为不同水热区域青贮玉米选育栽培提供实践依据。综合分析结果表明：‘金凯3号’在雨养区种植粗蛋白、粗脂肪含量高，发酵品质较好；‘北农青贮208’在灌溉区种植水溶性碳水化合物、单糖和钙、磷含量高，乳酸含量最高；‘和盛5288’在两地区种植酸性洗涤纤维、中性洗涤纤维和粗灰分含量低，淀粉含量高，发酵品质较好可在两地继续示范种植。

关键词: 青饲玉米, 雨养区, 灌溉区, 青贮品质, 水热条件

CLC Number:

S513

QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.

秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2021/V29/I5/1070

References

[1] 苏天增,任伟,丁光省,等. 青贮玉米杂交种大京九26的选育及应用[J]. 山西农业科学,2019,47(4):514-517
[2] 丁光省. 从欧美青贮玉米产业发展看我国之差距[J]. 中国乳业,2019(04):30-35
[3] 张寒序. 河北省奶产业链前向种养一体化研究[D]. 张家口:河北北方学院,2019:1-2
[4] 常玉萍. 洛阳市奶牛场青贮玉米饲料质量评价[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2009:6
[5] 郑卫军. 玉米青贮饲料特点和调制三要[J]. 农家顾问,2014(10):43
[6] 王茜茜,葛兆鹏,裴玉贺,等. 38个青贮玉米品种的农艺性状及品质比较[J]. 西南农业学报,2020,33(3):487-493
[7] 黄运青. 品种及收获期对玉米青贮品质的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018:32-33
[8] 张鹏,雷赵民,张昌吉,等. 品种和种植密度对玉米产量及青贮品质的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2012,30(2):125-129
[9] 龚雨田,孙书洪,闫宏伟. 不同生育期水分胁迫对玉米农艺性状的影响[J]. 节水灌溉,2017(5):34-36,41
[10] 梁志刚,徐军用. 不同水肥处理对玉米生长及水分利用的影响[J]. 现代农业科技,2020(5):14-15
[11] 许庆方,玉柱,侯建刚,等. 灌溉对青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国饲料,2019(3):46-49
[12] 白映红. 甘肃陇西县玉米种植技术要点[J]. 农业工程技术,2019,39(11):62
[13] 孙万斌. 不同生境下20个紫花苜蓿品种的综合评价及不同生育期营养特性的比较[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016:11
[14] Sniffen C J,O'Connor J D,Soest P J V,et al. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:ii.Carbohydrate and protein availability[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3562-3577
[15] 余汝华,赵丽华,莫放,等. 玉米秸秆青贮饲料中水溶性碳水化合物测定方法研究[J]. 饲料工业，2003,24(9):38-39
[16] Playne M. J.,McDonald P. The buffering constituents of grass and silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,4:3583-3597
[17] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,et al. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J]. Journal of Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880
[18] 赵牧其尔,格根图,贾玉山,等. 不同青贮玉米品种青贮品质对比试验[J]. 草原与草业,2019,31(4):39-43
[19] 刘月,王国艮,吴浩,等. 全株青贮玉米品种对其发酵品质及营养价值的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(6):148-156
[20] 施立安,张艳军,沈祥宏,等. 玉溪市小麦新品系主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析[J].农业科技通讯,2020(8):77-79,293
[21] 张佳阔,刘瑶,袁晓峰,等. 不同种植密度对青贮玉米品质的影响[J]. 分子植物育种,2020,18(15):5176-5183
[22] 张文珍,刘建军,王军民,等. 青贮玉米不同品种营养品质比较试验[J]. 农业与技术,2020,40(19):79-80
[23] 满其贤,马彦彪,魏时来,等. 甘肃不同地区青贮玉米发酵品质与营养价值评定[J]. 中国草食动物科学,2019,39(6):22-27,32
[24] 朱新强. 不同生态区4个苜蓿品种营养品质及抗旱性评价[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2011:1
[25] 赵雪娇. 黑龙江地区规模化牧场全株玉米青贮品质评价及制作关键点分析[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2019:2-3
[26] 董姗,王皓,贾倩民,等.灌溉模式与种植方式对河西地区青贮玉米生长、产量和经济效益的影响[J].草地学报,2020,28(4):1111-1120
[27] 梁玉红,郑博,刘齐光,等. 灌溉对青贮玉米营养价值和发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国饲料,2020(20):20-24
[28] 丁一,李会海,徐相波,等. 收获期对不同品种青贮玉米生物产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2019,51(6):83-85
[29] 席杰军,梁子栋,张钰靖,等. 陕西关中地区31个青贮玉米品种比较试验[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1363-1367
[30] Benefield B C，Lineiro M，Ipharraguerre I R，Clark J H. NutriDense Corn Grain and Corn Silage for Dairy Cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2006,89(5):1571-1579
[31] 任丽娟,赵连生,陈雅坤,等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析方法综合评价东北地区不同品种全株玉米青贮饲料的青贮品质[J]. 动物营养学报,2020,32(8):3856-3868
[32] 冯鹏. 品种与栽培技术对玉米产量及青贮质量的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2011:69-70
[33] 杨秋. 影响青贮饲料品质因素分析[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2020,16(3):74
[34] 荣辉,余成群,李志华,等. 添加糖蜜和尿素对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):940-946
[35] 陈广银,郑正,罗艳,等.碱处理对秸秆厌氧消化的影响[J]. 环境科学,2010,31(9):2208-2213
[36] 田健帆,杨蔚,唐敏,等.不同加工方式对青贮玉米品质的影响[J]. 草学,2020(4):47-52
[37] 赵必迁,乃古么你作,胡斌. 刍议全株玉米青贮品质评价及影响因素[J]. 广东饲料,2019,28(6):44-48
[38] 王薇星,杨培志,呼天明. 关中地区不同品种青贮玉米生产特性与营养品质的研究[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志,2019,38(2):16-19

Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions

不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[2]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[3]	ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[4]	CHEN De-kui, GUO Xiang, ZHENG Ming-yang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing. The Effects of Amomum Villosum Lour. Essential Oil on the Fermentation Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.
[5]	KOU Jiang-tao, CHENG Yu, ZHANG Hai-bo, GUO Dong-sheng, LEI Jia-xing, MENG Jia-qi, LIU Xin, LI Le. Effects of Enzyme on Mixed Silage Quality of Rice Straw and Distiller's Grains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 396-401.
[6]	BAI Chun-sheng, TONG Ming-hao, ZHAO Meng-meng, SUN Juan-juan, XUE Yan-lin, YU Zhu. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization and Cutting Height on Silage Fermentation Quality and Forage Value of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1421-1426.
[7]	FU Bing-zhe, CHANG Wei, LI Ze-ya, GAO Xue-qin. Comparative experiment of forage sorghum varieties in the Ningxia irrigation area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1751-1758.
[8]	ZHOU Rui, LIU Liu-shan, LANG Xia, WANG Cai-lian, SONG Shu-zhen, WU Jian-ping. Analysis of Silage Quality and Microbe Quantity During Aerobic Exposure of Beet Root and Corn Stover Mixed-ensilage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(1): 192-198.
[9]	SUN Zhi-qiang, XU Fang, ZHANG Yuan-qing, HAI Ge, YANG Chun-yan, WU Zhe, WANG Bing, YU Zhu. Comparison and Correlation of Agronomic Characteristics and Fermentation Quality of Different Types of Hybrid Corn [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(1): 250-256.
[10]	WANG Yun-tao, YANG Zhi-min, LIU Jian-cheng, WANG Chun-jie, HUANG Jin-shan, YAO Jian-kun, YAN Shu-ying, WU Zhan-jun. Effect of Cultivars and Harvest Stages on the Maize Yield and Silage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1): 261-263.
[11]	YANG Yu-xi, WANG Mu-chuan, YU Zhu, WANG Xiu-mei, XUE Hai-ying. Interaction Effects of Different Additives and Moisture on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(5): 1138-1144.
[12]	JIANG Yi-bao, WANG Yang, LIU Zhen-yang, SUN Juan-juan, YAN Xue-bing, YU Zhu. Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Silage Quality and the Content of Flavonoids of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(4): 896-900.
[13]	WAN Jiang-chun, WANG Yu-xiang, ZHANG Bo, LI Chang-hua, LIU Li. Effects of Additives on the Silage Quality of Different Proportions of Legume-grass Mixtures [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(3): 666-669.
[14]	HE Wen-hua, CUI Guo-wen, CUI Xin, LIU Sheng-yong, LI Bing. Effect of Mix-sowing Ratios of Medicago sativa L. and Bromus inermis Leyss. on Silage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(2): 407-414.
[15]	LIAN Lu, HU Guo-fu, LI Bing, CUI Guo-wen, JI Guo-xu, YAN Nan-nan. Effects of Planting Densities and Mixed Sowing Ratios of Silage Corn and Fodder Soybean on Silage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(1): 178-183.