Relationship Between Plant Diversity and Topsoil Phosphorus Activation Coefficient of Temperate Meadow Steppe Under Different Utilization Regimes

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.09.019

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 3354-3364.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.09.019

Relationship Between Plant Diversity and Topsoil Phosphorus Activation Coefficient of Temperate Meadow Steppe Under Different Utilization Regimes

WEI Kai-qiang¹, WANG Meng-tao¹, ZHOU Yu-jing¹, DIAO Zhao-yan², HE Jing¹

1. Center for Grassland Resources and Ecology Research, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2025-09-28 Revised:2025-11-11 Published:2026-09-11

不同利用方式下温性草甸草原植物多样性与表层土壤磷活化系数的关系

魏凯强¹, 王萌韬¹, 周雨静¹, 刁兆岩², 贺晶¹

1. 北京林业大学生态与资源研究中心, 北京 100083;
2. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012

通讯作者: 贺晶, E-mail: hejing_606@163.com
作者简介:魏凯强(2000-),男,汉族,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地资源与生态研究,E-mail:2179067537@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（32201335）资助

Abstract

Abstract: To reveal the regulatory mechanisms of different utilization methods on the relationship between plant diversity and soil phosphorus in temperate meadow steppe， this study selected the grassland within the Huihe National Nature Reserve as the object and systematically compared the response characteristics of plant diversity indicators and surface soil phosphorus activation coefficient （PAC） under grazing， mowing， and enclosure modes. The results showed that plant diversity responded significantly to the utilization methods. The number of species， Margalef index， Simpson index， and Shannon-Wiener index under mowing were significantly higher than those under enclosure and grazing （P<0.05）， and enclosure was significantly higher than grazing； the Pielou evenness index was only significantly higher under mowing than grazing （P<0.05）. Soil phosphorus and its availability varied depending on the utilization methods. The content of total soil phosphorus （TP） under mowing was significantly higher than that under enclosure and grazing （P<0.05）； grazing significantly increased the content of surface soil available phosphorus （AP） and PAC （P<0.05）. The relationship between plant diversity and soil phosphorus was regulated by the utilization methods. Under enclosure， AP was significantly negatively correlated with all diversity indices， and PAC was significantly negatively correlated with most indices； under grazing， TP was significantly negatively correlated with the Margalef index， while significantly positively correlated with the Pielou index， and AP was only negatively correlated with the Margalef index； under mowing， there was no significant correlation between soil phosphorus indicators and plant diversity indices. In summary， the utilization methods not only independently affected plant diversity and soil phosphorus availability， but also regulated the relationship between them.

Key words: Temperate meadow steppe, Species composition, Plant diversity, Available phosphorus, P activation coefficient

摘要： 为揭示不同利用方式对温性草甸草原植物多样性与土壤磷素关系的调控机制，本研究以辉河国家级自然保护区内的草地为对象，系统比较了放牧、刈割和围封模式下植物多样性指标及表层土壤磷活化系数（Phosphorus activation coefficient，PAC）的响应特征。结果表明：植物多样性对利用方式的响应显著。刈割下的物种数、Margalef丰富度指数、Simpson指数与Shannon-Wiener指数均显著高于围封与放牧（P<0.05），围封又显著高于放牧；Pielou 均匀度指数仅刈割显著高于放牧（P<0.05）。土壤磷素及有效性因利用方式而异。土壤全磷（Total phosphorus，TP）含量刈割显著高于围封和放牧（P<0.05）；放牧显著提高了表层土壤有效磷（Available phosphorus，AP）含量与PAC（P<0.05）。植物多样性与土壤磷素的关系受利用方式调控。围封下，AP与所有多样性指数均呈显著负相关，PAC与多数指数显著负相关；放牧下，TP与Margalef丰富度指数显著负相关性，而与Pielou指数显著正相关，AP仅与Margalef丰富度指数呈负相关；刈割下，土壤各磷指标与植物多样性各指数均无显著相关性。综上，利用方式不仅独立影响植物多样性与土壤磷有效性，更调控着二者之间的关系。

关键词: 温性草甸草原, 物种构成, 植物多样性, 有效磷, 磷活化系数

CLC Number:

S812.2

WEI Kai-qiang, WANG Meng-tao, ZHOU Yu-jing, DIAO Zhao-yan, HE Jing. Relationship Between Plant Diversity and Topsoil Phosphorus Activation Coefficient of Temperate Meadow Steppe Under Different Utilization Regimes[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(9): 3354-3364.

魏凯强, 王萌韬, 周雨静, 刁兆岩, 贺晶. 不同利用方式下温性草甸草原植物多样性与表层土壤磷活化系数的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(9): 3354-3364.

References

[1] ZHU X Y，XU D W，XIN X P，et al. The spatial-temporal distribution of different grassland types in Hulunber grassland based on remote sensing from 1992 to 2015[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica，2020，53（13）：2715-2727 朱晓昱，徐大伟，辛晓平，等. 1992—2015年呼伦贝尔草原区不同草地类型分布时空变化遥感分析[J]. 中国农业科学，2020，53（13）：2715-2727
[2] YANG D L. Relationship between productivity and species diversity of plant community in hulunber grassland[D]. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，2005：1-11 杨殿林. 呼伦贝尔草原群落植物多样性与生产力关系的研究[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2005：1-11
[3] QIAN N， JIA Z J， NA M H，et al. Investigation and analysis on the status of grassland plant resources in Hulunbuir[J]. Journal of Dalian Minzu University，2023，25（5）：389-394 倩娜，贾子金，那木汗，等. 呼伦贝尔草原植物资源现状调查研究[J]. 大连民族大学学报，2023，25（5）：389-394
[4] ZHOU Y J， HE J， WANG X S，et al. Distribution characteristics of soil salinity under different utilization patterns in Hulunbuir grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2024，32（2）：470-479 周雨静，贺晶，王雪松，等. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式下土壤盐分分布特征[J]. 草地学报.2024，32（2）：470-479
[5] ZHANG Z L. Statistical analysis of factors affecting grassland degradation in Hulunbuir grassland[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University（Natural Science Edition），2020，51（6）：608-614 张志莉. 呼伦贝尔草原草地退化的影响因素的统计分析[J]. 内蒙古大学学报（自然科学版）.2020，51（6）：608-614
[6] ZHU Y J. Grassland plant diversity-ecosystem function relationship and its response to management regimes in HulunBuir[D]. Beijing：Chinese Academy of Forestry，2021：147-161 朱媛君. 呼伦贝尔草原生物多样性-生态系统功能关系及其对利用方式的响应[D]. 北京：中国林业科学研究院，2021：147-161
[7] XU D W. Dynamic change and analysis of different grassland types distribution in the Hulunber grassland[D]. Beijing：Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences，2019：1-9 徐大伟. 呼伦贝尔草原区不同草地类型分布变化及分析[D]. 北京：中国农业科学院，2019：1-9
[8] WEN D R L. Study on vegetation characteristics， soil properties and microbial diversity of main grassland types in Hulunbeier[D]. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，2011：87-91 文都日乐. 呼伦贝尔主要草地类型植被特征、土壤特性与微生物多样性研究[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2011：87-91
[9] ZHAO X Y， HAN G Q， ZHANG S W，et al. Effects of grazing on plant diversity and their carbon stocks in different types of grasslands[J]. Environmental Science，2024，45（9）：5395-5405 赵星宇，韩国强，张圣微，等. 放牧对不同类型草原植物多样性及其碳储量的影响[J]. 环境科学，2024，45（9）：5395-5405
[10] YAN R R， ZHANG Y， XIN X P，et al. Effects of mowing disturbance on grassland plant functiona groups and diversity in Leymus chinensis meadow steppe[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica，2020，53（13）：2573-2583 闫瑞瑞，张宇，辛晓平，等. 刈割干扰对羊草草甸草原植物功能群及多样性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学，2020，53（13）：2573-2583
[11] NIE Y Y， XIN X P， XU L J，et al. Effects of enclosure measures on grassland and productivity in Hulunbeier meadow steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning，2022，43（8）：74-82 聂莹莹，辛晓平，徐丽君，等. 封育措施对呼伦贝尔草甸草原区草地生产力的影响[J]. 中国农业资源与区划，2022，43（8）：74-82
[12] SUN C Z， TANG S M， WANG Z，et al. Effects of the enclosure on plant communities in temperate grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2023，31（5）：1481-1489 孙崇之，唐士明，王珍，等. 温带草原围封对植物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报，2023，31（5）：1481-1489
[13] YANG G J， LÜ X T， STEVENS C J，et al. Mowing mitigates the negative impacts of N addition on plant species diversity[J]. OECOLOGIA，2019，189（3）：769-779
[14] WANG J Y， TIAN Y J， ZHANG P J，et al. Effects of different utilization methods on vegetation community and soil characteristics in Erdos desert steppe[J]. Modern Animal Husbandry，2024，44（1）：8-12 王静宜，田彦军，张璞进，等. 不同利用方式对鄂尔多斯荒漠草原植被群落与土壤特性的影响[J]. 当代畜禽养殖业，2024，44（1）：8-12
[15] ZHENG J H. The effects of different management regimes on the biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality of Stipa grandis steppe[D]. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，2021：4-40 郑佳华. 利用方式对大针茅草原生物多样性和生态系统多功能性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2021：4-40
[16] SA R Q L M， JING J Q， QIN J，et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of plants and soil in stipa baicalensis grassland under different utilization modes[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland，2022，44（1）：20-29 萨仁其力莫格，荆佳强，秦洁，等. 不同利用方式下贝加尔针茅草原植物和土壤的生态化学计量特征[J]. 中国草地学报，2022，44（1）：20-29
[17] ZHANG M. The effects of grazing and mowing on soil phosphorus pools and microbes related to phosphorus transformation in Inner Mongolia grassland[D]. Urumqi：Xinjiang Agricultural University，2022：21-77 张梅. 放牧和刈割对内蒙古草原土壤磷库和磷转化相关功能菌群的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐：新疆农业大学，2022：21-77
[18] GUAN W T，ZHENG Z R，DIAO Z Y，et al. Stoichiometric characteristics and their storage of soil carbon ，nitrogen and phosphorus in the temperate meadow steppe under different disturbances[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2022，30（11）：2959-2966 关伟涛，郑志荣，刁兆岩，等. 不同干扰方式下温性草甸草原土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征及其储量研究[J]. 草地学报，2022，30（11）：2959-2966
[19] QIN L P， LUO T X， FENG Z L，et al. Study on soil fertility of natural grassland under different utilization modes[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences，2023，51（10）：46-49 秦丽萍，罗天旭，冯兆林，等. 不同利用方式天然草原土壤肥力研究[J]. 安徽农业科学， 2023，51（10）：46-49
[20] YAO X X， CAI H， LI C H. Effects of fencing and grazing on vegetation community characteristics and soil properties in an alpine meadow[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2021，29（S1）：128-136 姚喜喜，才华，李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报，2021，29（S1）：128-136
[21] LI J P， ZHENG Z R， ZHAO N X，et al. Relationship between ecosystem multifuntionality and species diversity in grassland ecosystems under land-use types of clipping， enclosure and grazing[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology，2016，40（8）：735-747 李静鹏，郑志荣，赵念席，等. 刈割、围封、放牧三种利用方式下草原生态系统的多功能性与植物物种多样性之间的关系[J]. 植物生态学报，2016，40（8）：735-747
[22] WU Q H， ZHANG S X， ZHU P，et al. Characterizing differences in the phosphorus activation coefficient of three typical cropland soils and the influencing factors under long-term fertilization[J]. PLoS One，2017，12（5）：e0176437
[23] ZHANG N， QIN Y， JIN K，et al. Effects of grazing on vegetation community and soil physical properties in typical steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland，2020，42（4）：91-100 张娜，秦艳，金轲，等. 放牧对典型草原群落特征及土壤物理性状的影响[J]. 中国草地学报，2020，42（4）： 91-100
[24] GAO Y，AN Y，QI B L，et al. Grazing exclusion mediates the trade-off between plant diversity and productivity in Leymus chinensis meadows along a chronosequence on the Songnen Plain ， China[J]. Ecological Indicators，2021，126：107655
[25] CUI Z， SUN J， WU G L. Plant diversity increases spatial stability of aboveground productivity in alpine grasslands[J]. OECOLOGIA，2024，205（1）：27-38
[26] LUO T X， LIU S. Influence of the intermediate grazing disturbance on the biodiversity of grassland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences，2007（21）：6567-6568 罗天相，刘莎. 中度放牧干扰对草地生物多样性影响的思考[J]. 安徽农业科学，2007（21）：6567-6568
[27] GAO S B， LIU L， WANG Y K，et al. The annual variation of effects under different grassland utilization types on typical steppe species interactions in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica，2017，37（19）：6562-6570 高韶勃，刘磊，王宇坤，等. 不同利用方式下内蒙古典型草原群落物种相互关系的年际变化[J]. 生态学报，2017，37（19）：6562-6570
[28] ZHANG Z， SUN H Y， ZHENG Y N，et al. Effects of different utilization methods on ecological water use of major plant communities of typical grassland in Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland，2023，45（4）：1-10 张泽，孙贺阳，郑云暖，等. 不同利用方式对内蒙古典型草原主要群系生态用水的影响[J]. 中国草地学报，2023，45（4）：1-10
[29] LI J X， ZHANG Q S， WU Y，et al. Research progress on the effects of enclosure on grassland vegetation growth and soil properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland，2023，45（5）：137-150 李佳秀，张青松，吴勇，等. 围封对草地植被生长和土壤特性的影响研究进展[J]. 中国草地学报，2023，45（5）：137-150
[30] HE C. Effects of grazing exclusion duration on plant functional traits， diversity and productivity in an alpine meadow[D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou University，2023：21-52 贺聪. 围封年限对高寒草甸植物功能性状、多样性和生产力的影响[D]. 兰州：兰州大学，2023：21-52
[31] YANG T C， LI X J. Effects of land use patterns on community characteristics and grassland health in Inner Mongolia[J]. Pratacultural Science，2022，39（5）：841-849 杨天成，李晓佳. 不同草地利用方式对内蒙古典型草原群落特征及草地健康的影响[J]. 草业科学，2022，39（05）：841-849
[32] JIN S L， DIAO Z Y， LÜ S H，et al. Response characteristics of plant functional groups to enclosure and grazing in Hulunbuir grassland[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment，2022，36（1）：151-158 靳三玲，刁兆岩，吕世海，等. 呼伦贝尔草原植物功能群对围封及放牧的响应特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，2022，36（1）：151-158
[33] NIE Y Y， CHEN J Q， XIN X P，et al. Responses of niche characteristics and species diversity of main plant populations to duration of enclosure in the Hulun Buir meadow steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2021，30（10）：15-25 聂莹莹，陈金强，辛晓平，等. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原区主要植物种群生态位特征与物种多样性对封育年限响应[J]. 草业学报，2021，30（10）：15-25
[34] YAN W M， ZHANG S B， YANG Y W. Effects of grazing intensity on the relationship between plant species diversity and primary productivity in an alpine meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2024，41（3）：539-547 闫卫民，张世彬，杨元武. 放牧强度对高寒草甸物种多样性和生产力关系的影响[J]. 草业科学，2024，41（3）：539-547
[35] LIU Q， XI Q H， WU R Q Q G. Effects of different utilization modes of plant community characteristics on hulunbuir meadow grassland[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland，2020，42（6）：58-66 刘琼，席青虎，乌仁其其格. 不同利用方式对呼伦贝尔草甸草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报，2020，42（6）：58-66
[36] CUI H Y， SUN W， DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M，et al. Phosphorus addition regulates the responses of soil multifunctionality to nitrogen over-fertilization in a temperate grassland[J]. Plant and Soil，2022，473（1-2）：73-87
[37] WU Y Q. Effects of different utilization methods on stoichiometric characteristics in the grassland ecosystem of Hulunbuir[D]. Beijing：Beijing Forestry University，2020：14-43 吴雨晴. 不同利用方式对呼伦贝尔草原生态系统化学计量特征的影响[D]. 北京：北京林业大学，2020：14-43
[38] WU L J. Effects of grazing on phosphorus balance in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，2020：90-110 乌力吉. 放牧对内蒙古典型草原生态系统磷平衡的影响[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2020：90-110
[39] YUAN S Y， HE J， SU D R. Advances in the effects of precipitation pattern change and grazing on soil phosphorus conversion in grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2024，32（1）：25-36 袁淑雅，贺晶，苏德荣. 降水格局变化和放牧对草地土壤磷转化影响的研究进展[J]. 草地学报，2024，32（1）：25-36
[40] WANG M， ZHANG C， CHEN S S，et al. Moderate grazing increased carbon， nitrogen and phosphorus storage in plants and soil in the Eurasian meadow steppe ecosystem[J]. Science of The Total Environment，2024，914：169864
[41] LI H. Effects of long-term enclosure and grazing intensity on spatial heterogeneity of plant diversity and soil nutrient in typical steppe[D]. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia University，2021：14-69 李浩. 长期围封与放牧对典型草原群落和土壤空间异质性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古大学，2021：14-69
[42] WAN Z Q， YANG J Y， GU R，et al. Effects of different mowing frequeney on the community characteristics and soil element contents in a Stipa grandis steppe ecosystem[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica，2016，36（17）：5477-5484 万志强，杨九艳，谷蕊，等. 不同刈割频度对大针茅草原群落特征及土壤元素含量的影响[J]. 生态学报，2016，36（17）：5477-5484
[43] WU L J， LI X， ZHAO M L，et al. Grazing regulation of phosphorus cycling in grassland ecosystems： Advances and prospects[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin，2020，65（23）：2469-2482 乌力吉，李响，赵萌莉，等. 放牧对草地生态系统磷循环调控机制的研究进展与展望[J]. 科学通报，2020，65（23）：2469-2482
[44] LI J P， ZHENG Z R， XIE H T，et al. Increased soil nutrition and decreased light intensity drive species loss after eight years grassland enclosures[J]. Scientific Reports，2017，7（1）：44525
[45] ZHANG C P， LI Q， FENG R Q，et al. Ecosystem compartment stoichiometry drives the secondary succession processes of zokor-disturbed grassland[J]. European Journal of Soil Science，2024，75（5）：e70000
[46] YAN X. Mechanisms and interaction effects of short-term nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization and cold-season grazing on plant diversity and productivity of alpine meadow[D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou University，2021：28-60 颜熙. 短期氮磷施肥和冷季放牧对高寒草甸植物多样性与生产力的影响及机制研究[D]. 兰州：兰州大学，2021：28-60

Relationship Between Plant Diversity and Topsoil Phosphorus Activation Coefficient of Temperate Meadow Steppe Under Different Utilization Regimes

不同利用方式下温性草甸草原植物多样性与表层土壤磷活化系数的关系

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Jia-le, MENG Ling-xu, MAO Nan, BAI Yan-nan, ZHANG Ying-jun, LIU Nan. Vertical Differentiation of Soil Structure and Water Retention under Different Grassland Management Practices and Their Relationships with Root Systems [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(7): 2355-2365.
[2]	DONG Wen-wen, CHEN Li-juan, ZHANG Rui-xuan, WANG Yi-ming, YUE Lei, YANG Jian, SUN Hao, ZHOU Jie, XUE Ling-yu, MENG Tian-le, WEN Ai-fang, CHEN Guang-jun, MA Jing, ZHANG Xiao-juan, CHEN Xian-min, BAI Yu-jie, YANG Jie, TANG Zhuang-sheng. Effects of Plowing and Nutrient Addition on Plant Community Diversity and Biomass in Alpine Meadows [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(7): 2579-2591.
[3]	GUO Wan-li, LIU Shuang-da, WU Fan, WANG Lan-lan, LIU Min-xia, ZHANG Ji-yu. Analysis of Plant Diversity Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Different Grassland Types of Yongdeng County， Lanzhou City [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(7): 2603-2614.
[4]	SHUAI Zheng-feng, LEI Xian-dao, WANG Chang-ming, HUANG Chen, WEI Xue-wen, WU Rui, LIN Chang-cun. Study on the Impact Mechanism of Photovoltaic Power Plant Construction on Plant Diversity in the Northern Desert Grassland Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(4): 1137-1145.
[5]	LONGZHU Duojie, ZHANG Xu-ping, LIU Qiang, WANG Jin, HU Xiao-mei, LA Ben. Relationships Between Plant Diversity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality Along a Water-Salt Gradient in the Gahai Wetland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(7): 2262-2276.
[6]	LI Zhen-wei, MIAO Yu-jue, ZONG Ning. Effects of Grazing Exclusion on Plant Diversity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality of Alpine Grasslands in Northern Xizang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(2): 596-608.
[7]	TIAN Miao, AN Hang, LIU Zhi-jun, YANG Ting, WANG Wen-bi, HAO Biao-biao, GONG Jun-qiang, OU Ke-jie, LIU Yong-jie, SU Jun-hu. The Response Characteristics of Grassland Species Diversity and Productivity to Environmental Factors in the Three-River-Source Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(12): 3983-3993.
[8]	CHEN Li, ZHAO Dan, LU Ming-yue, WANG Wen-yi, YANG Yun-rui, WANG Zhi-hui, WANG Hong-yi. Response of Functional Traits of Leymus chinensis and Potentilla bifurca Plants in Hulunbeir Grassland to Long-Term Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(11): 3756-3765.
[9]	YANG Yun-tao, QIU Kai-yang, WANG Yu-juan, SI Hao-yu, BAO Ping-an, HUANG Ye-yun, HE Yi, XIE Ying-zhong. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition on Plant Species Diversity and Community Stability in the Desert Steppe of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(1): 222-230.
[10]	WANG Yu-xin, LU Su-jin, YANG Qing, YIN Xin. Study on the Effects of Diversity on the Biomass of Artificial Plant Communities in the Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 899-906.
[11]	ZHANG Xin-yong, LI Shao-wei, LIU Zeng-hui, CHEN Lin-yao, WU Jian-shuang. Nutritional Quality of Common Forage Species and Their Influences across Natural Alpine Rangelands,Northern Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3797-3806.
[12]	HAN Bei-lei, LI Nan, WANG Zhong-wu, HOU Dong-jie. Comparison and Optimization of Plant Diversity Survey Methods in the Grazed Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3932-3940.
[13]	LEI Lei, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, YANG Li-shan, WANG Wen-qiong, LI Shao-yu, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Grazing Intensities on Ecosystem Multifunctionality in a Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 275-283.
[14]	HU Guang-de, ZHOU Ji-qiang, DA Jun-shan, LEI Long-ju, ZHAO Chang-xing, LI Chao-nan, ZHOU Zi-qiang, LIU Jin-rong. Relationship Between Understory Plant Diversity and Soil Properties of Different Forests in Sandy Land of Jinta [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1834-1841.
[15]	SUN Chong-zhi, TANG Shi-ming, WANG Zhen, LI Na, XU Xue-bao, YUAN Feng-qin, WANG Cheng-jie, LI Yuan-heng, ZHANG Yu-juan, LI Shu-cheng, JIN Ke. Effects of the Enclosure on Plant Communities in Temperate Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1481-1489.