2种典型荒漠植物细根序级结构及功能特征分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.015

草地学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 1014-1019.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.015

2种典型荒漠植物细根序级结构及功能特征分析

单立山, 李毅, 张正中, 种培芳, 王洋, 苏铭, 王珊

甘肃农业大学林学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2017-03-09 修回日期:2017-06-12 出版日期:2017-10-15 发布日期:2018-01-25
通讯作者: 李毅,E-mail:liyi@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:单立山(1975-),男,湖南衡东人,博士,副教授,研究方向为荒漠植物根系生态学,E-mail:shanls@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31560135，41361100，31360205，41461044）；甘肃省科技支撑项目（1604FKCA088）；甘肃农业大学青年研究生指导教师扶持基金（GAU-QNDS-201605）资助

Analysis of Architecture and Functions of Fine Roots of Two Dominant Desert Plants Among Different Branch Orders in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas in Northwest, China.

SHAN Li-shan, LI Yi, ZHANG Zheng-zhong, CHONG Pei-fang, WANG Yang, SU Ming, WANG Shan

College of Forestry Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2017-03-09 Revised:2017-06-12 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2018-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在根序水平上，细根具有高度形态和功能异质性，进行不同根序细根形态与养分特征的研究，对认识根系内部异质性具有重要意义。在西北干旱和半干旱区以典型荒漠植物红砂（Reaumuria soongorica）和白刺（Nitraria tangutorum）为研究对象，采用挖掘法收集根序完整细根，按照Pregitzer根系分级法对其分级，用细根分析软件（Win-RHIZO）对细根形态参数进行测定，同时对各序级根C、N含量进行测定。结果发现：随着序级的升高，2种荒漠植物细根直径、根长均增加，而比根长则降低。随根序的升高，2种荒漠植物C含量和C/N比逐渐增加，而N含量逐渐降低，1级根C、N含量与2、3级根之间差异显著。根直径和根长与C含量及C/N呈显著或极显著正相关，而与N含量呈显著负相关，而比根长刚好相反。综上所述，2种典型荒漠植物形态的变化与功能相适应，支持短命根模式假说，末端细根的形态、结构决定其功能是吸收养分和水，而高级根的形态、结构决定其功能是运输和贮存养分。

关键词: 细根, 序级, 细根结构, 红砂, 白刺

Abstract:

Fine roots are highly heterogeneous in structure and function at the level of root orders. The study of fine roots morphology and nutrient content in different branch root orders is important to understand the variation pattern of fine root morphology and chemical composition and know internal heterogeneity of root. Reaumuria soongorica and Nitraria tangutorum are dominant species of the arid region of Northwest China. A field experiment was conducted to understand architecture and morphology of fine root systems of two species. Intact fine root segments of two desert plants were collected by excavation. Individual roots were dissected according to the branching order, starting from the distal end of the root system that was numbered as the first order and then increasing sequentially with each branch from the first order to higher order roots. Root length and diameter of different root orders were analyzed by Win-RHIZO system. The contents of C and N in a given order were determined using the Walkley-Black wet combustion and the semimicro-Kjeldahl methods, respectively. The results showed that with increasing root order, root diameter and root length increased and specific root length (SRL) decreased. C concentration and C/N ratio increased, but N concentrations decreased from low to high root order of fine root for two type of desert species. There were significant differences in C and N concentrations between first order and second and third order. There were significantly or extremely significantly positive correlation between root diameter and SRL and the contents of C and C/N ratio, which were significant negative correlation with the contents of N, and then SRL were opposite. Fine-root functions might be closely related to their morphology, these responses were supported by the concept of ephemeral root modules. Lower-order roots (First-order roots) represented absorptive roots, and higher-order roots (second and third-order roots) might have limited uptake capacity and function in transportation and storage.

Key words: Fine root, Root order, Fine root architecture, Reaumuria soongorica, Nitraria tangutorum

中图分类号:

Q944.54

单立山, 李毅, 张正中, 种培芳, 王洋, 苏铭, 王珊. 2种典型荒漠植物细根序级结构及功能特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1014-1019.

SHAN Li-shan, LI Yi, ZHANG Zheng-zhong, CHONG Pei-fang, WANG Yang, SU Ming, WANG Shan. Analysis of Architecture and Functions of Fine Roots of Two Dominant Desert Plants Among Different Branch Orders in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas in Northwest, China.[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(5): 1014-1019.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.015

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2017/V25/I5/1014

参考文献

[1] Gordo W S, Jachson R B. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots[J]. Ecology,2000,81(1):275-280
[2] Liu B, He J, Zeng F, et al. Life span and structure of ephemeral root modules of different functional groups from a desert system[J]. New Phytologist,2016,211(1):103-112
[3] 张毓涛,胡莎莎,李吉玫,等. 新疆3种主要森林类型根系生物量变化特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理,2013,36(2):269-276
[4] 单立山,张希明,魏疆, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地两种灌木有效根系密度分布规律的研究[J]. 干旱区地理,2007,30(3):400-405
[5] 杨小林,张希明,李义玲,等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地几种植物根系分形特征[J]. 干旱区地理,2009,32(2):249-254
[6] 曾凡江,郭海峰,刘波,等. 多枝柽柳和疏叶骆驼刺幼苗生物量分配及根系分布特征[J]. 干旱区地理,2010,33(1):59-64
[7] Pregitzer K S, Deforest J L, Burton A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees[J]. Ecological Monographs,2002,72(2):293-309
[8] Mccormack M L, Dickie I A, Eissenstat D M, et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes[J]. New Phytologist,2015,207(3):505-518
[9] 刘佳,项文化,徐晓,等. 湖南会同5个亚热带树种的细根构型及功能特征分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(8):938-945
[10] 曾凡江,刘波. 骆驼刺根系生态[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:175-176
[11] Wells C E, Eissenstat D M. Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age:a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae)[J]. American Journal of Botany,2002,89(1):79-87
[12] 王政权,郭大立. 根系生态学[J]. 植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1213-1216
[13] 许旸,谷加存,董雪云,等. 海南岛4个热带阔叶树种前5级细根的形态、解剖结构和组织碳氮含量[J]. 植物生态学报,2011,35(9):955-964
[14] 梁泉,廖红,严小龙. 植物根构型的定量分析[J]. 植物学通报,2007,24(6):695-702
[15] Pregitzer K S, Kubiske M E, Yu C K, et al. Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species[J]. Oecologia,1997,111(3):302-308
[16] Xia M, Guo D, Pregitzer K S. Ephemeral root modules in Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. New Phytologist,2010,188(4):1065-1074
[17] Fitter A H. Morphometric analysis of root systems:application of the technique and influence of soil fertility on root system development in two herbaceous species[J]. Plant Cell and Environment,1982,5(4):313-322
[18] 熊德成,黄锦学,杨智杰,等. 亚热带6种树种细根序级结构和形态特征[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(6):1888-1897
[19] Pregitzer K S. Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth[J]. Tree Physiology,1998,18(10):665-670
[20] 朱天琦,刘晓静,张晓玲. 氮营养调控对紫花苜蓿根系形态及其解剖结构的影响[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(6):1290-1295
[21] 郝凤,刘晓静,齐敏兴,等. 磷水平和接根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿根系形态特征和根瘤固氮特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(4):818-822
[22] 黄彩变,曾凡江,雷加强. 极端干旱区骆驼刺对水氮条件变化的生长响应[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(3):581-589
[23] Guo D L, Mitchell R J, Hendricks J J. Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest[J]. Oecologia,2004,140(3):450-457
[24] 师伟,王政权,刘金梁,等. 帽儿山天然次生林20个阔叶树种细根形态[J]. 植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1217-1226
[25] 贾淑霞,赵妍丽,丁国泉,等. 落叶松和水曲柳不同根序细根形态结构、组织氮浓度与根呼吸的关系[J]. 植物学报,2010,45(2):174-181
[26] Gang H, Zhao X Y, Zhao H L, et al. Linking root morphology, longevity and function to root branch order:a case study in three shrubs[J]. Plant and Soil,2010,336(1):197-208
[27] 严小龙,廖红,戈振扬,等. 植物根构型特性与磷吸收效率[J]. 植物学报,2000,17(6):511-519
[28] 常文静,郭大立. 中国温带、亚热带和热带森林45个常见树种细根直径变异的研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1248-1257
[29] Guo D, Li H, Mitchell R J, et al. Heterogeneity by root branch order:exploring the discrepancy in root longevity and turnover estimates between Minirhizotron and C isotope methods[J]. New Phytologist,2008,177(2):443-456
[30] 贺金生,王政权,方精云. 全球变化下的地下生态学:问题与展望[J]. 科学通报,2004,49(13):1226-1233
[31] Hendricks J J, Aber J D, Nadelhoffer K J, et al. Nitrogen controls on fine root substrate quality in temperate forest ecosystems[J]. Ecosystems,2000,3(1):57-69
[32] Nadelhoffer K J. The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine root production in forest ecosystems[J]. New Phytologist,2000,147(1):131-139
[33] Matamala R, Gonzàlez-Meler M A, Jastrow J D, et al. Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential.[J]. Science,2003,302(5649):1385-1387
[34] 唐仕姗,杨万勤,熊莉,等. 川西亚高山三种优势树种不同根序碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2015,26(2):363-369

2种典型荒漠植物细根序级结构及功能特征分析

Analysis of Architecture and Functions of Fine Roots of Two Dominant Desert Plants Among Different Branch Orders in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas in Northwest, China.

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨洁, 单立山, 苏铭, 张正中, 解婷婷, 李毅. 降水量和生长方式对红砂和珍珠根系形态特征的影响研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 936-945.
[2]	易丹, 王博, 段慧荣, 李毅, 王丽蓉. 白刺14-3-3基因家族的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 443-456.
[3]	张鹏, 李毅, 单立山, 解婷婷. 降水变化对混生红砂-珍珠生物量及分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 478-487.
[4]	杨洁, 单立山, 苏铭, 魏晓芸, 马静, 解婷婷, 李毅. 降水变化和生长方式对红砂和珍珠化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2221-2232.
[5]	田艳丽, 种培芳, 陆文涛, 贾向阳. 不同光合途径植物红砂和珍珠猪毛菜幼苗对氮沉降及降水变化的光合响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 121-130.
[6]	魏晓芸, 单立山, 解婷婷, 张婉婷, 王珊, 马静, 贾海娟, 白亚梅. 6个种源红砂幼苗光合作用特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1657-1663.
[7]	刘成功, 孙高洁, 段娜, 李清河, 朱甜甜, 李慧卿. 氮磷添加对唐古特白刺叶绿素含量和光合活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 694-702.
[8]	李佩佩, 李毅, 苏世平, 种培芳, 李珍. 18个红砂家系的抗旱指标筛选与分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 412-419.
[9]	种培芳, 贾向阳, 田艳丽, 陆文涛. 荒漠植物红砂地上和地下生物量分配关系对大气CO₂浓度升高及降水量变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1537-1544.
[10]	马静, 单立山, 王珊, 张正中, 苏铭, 解婷婷, 李毅, 杨洁. 不同降水量条件下C₃植物红砂—C₄植物珍珠混生光合特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 921-927.
[11]	段娜, 李清河, 陈晓娜, 高君亮, 多普增, 张冉昊, 汪季. 模拟干旱和氮沉降对唐古特白刺根系生长特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 956-961.
[12]	贾向阳, 种培芳, 张玉洁, 李毅, 苏世平. 外源NO对NaCl胁迫下红砂幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 628-636.
[13]	种培芳, 刘晟彤, 李毅, 苏世平, 单立山. 红砂对大气CO₂浓度升高及降水变化的生长响应[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1061-1068.
[14]	马长明, 苏琪琪. 河北片麻岩山区核桃×苜蓿模式早期细根分布特征[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 538-544.
[15]	孙平生, 任成杰, 邓健, 康迪, 冯永忠, 任广鑫, 杨改河, 韩新辉. 黄土丘陵区退耕植被细根生物量及其碳氮磷库动态变化[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1203-1210.