水分变化对荒漠植物红砂和珍珠猪毛菜细根性状的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.022

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3530-3538.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

水分变化对荒漠植物红砂和珍珠猪毛菜细根性状的影响

申惠¹, 单立山¹, 马静¹, 解婷婷¹, 王红永¹, 杨洁¹, 何彩^1,2

1. 甘肃农业大学林学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 武威市林业科学研究院, 甘肃武威 733000

收稿日期:2024-03-08 修回日期:2024-04-29 发布日期:2024-11-29
通讯作者: 单立山,E-mail:shanls@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:申惠(1999-),女,汉族,甘肃临洮人,硕士研究生,主要从事荒漠植物生理生态研究,E-mail:2475872846@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32160253)；国家自然科学基金(U23A2061)；甘肃省重点研发计划项目(22YF7FA117)；甘肃省优秀博士生项目(23JRRA1452)；甘肃省科技重大专项计划(22ZD6FA052)资助

Effects of Moisture Change on Fine Root Characteristics of Desert Plants Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina

SHEN Hui¹, SHAN Li-shan¹, MA Jing¹, XIE Ting-ting¹, WANG Hong-yong¹, YANG Jie¹, HE Cai^1,2

1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Wuwei Academy of Forestry, Wuwei, Gansu Province 733000, China

Received:2024-03-08 Revised:2024-04-29 Published:2024-11-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究在我国西北干旱区沿生物地理梯度，量化了红砂(Reaumuria soongorica)和珍珠猪毛菜(Salsola passerina)细根性状的变异，并分析了细根性状与环境因子的关系。结果表明：随着水分减少(从武威到酒泉)，红砂平均直径(Average diameter，AD)逐渐增大，比根长(Specific root length，SRL)、比根面积(Specific root area，SRA)逐渐减小，根氮含量(Root nitrogen content，RNC)降低；而珍珠猪毛菜得到相反的结果。红砂和珍珠猪毛菜部分性状间均存在显著或极显著的相关关系；年均降水量(Average precipitation，AP)、土壤磷含量(Soil phosphorus content，SP)与红砂的比根长、比根面积、根氮含量正相关，与平均直径负相关，而珍珠猪毛菜的结果与红砂相反。综上，随水分的变化，红砂趋向保守策略，珍珠猪毛菜趋向获取策略；年均降水量、土壤磷含量是影响两物种细根性状的主要环境因子，两种植物均会通过性状间的权衡或协同使自身在荒漠复杂多变的生境中存活和生长。

关键词: 细根性状, 水分变化, 环境因子, 生存策略

Abstract: In this study,the fine root characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina were quantified along the biogeographic gradient in the arid region of Northwest China,and the relationship between fine root characteristics and environmental factors was analyzed. The results showed that with the decrease of moisture content (from Wuwei to Jiuquan),the average diameter (AD) of Reaumuria soongorica increased gradually,the specific root length (SRL) and specific root area (SRA) decreased gradually,and the root nitrogen content (RNC) decreased. The opposite results were obtained for Salsola passerina. There were significant correlations between some characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina. The average annual precipitation (AP) and soil phosphorus content (SP) were positively correlated with the specific root length,specific root area and root nitrogen content of Reaumuria soongorica,and negatively correlated with the average diameter,while the results of Salsola passerine were opposite to those of Reaumuria soongorica. In summary,with the change of moisture content,Reaumuria soongorica tended to be conservative strategy,and Salsola passerina tended to be acquisition strategy;the average annual precipitation and soil phosphorus content were the main environmental factors affecting the fine root characteristics of the two species. Both plants could survive and grow in the complex and changeable habitats of the desert through the trade-off or synergy between characteristics.

Key words: Fine root characteristics, Moisture variation, Environmental factors, Survival strategies

中图分类号:

S812.2

申惠, 单立山, 马静, 解婷婷, 王红永, 杨洁, 何彩. 水分变化对荒漠植物红砂和珍珠猪毛菜细根性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3530-3538.

SHEN Hui, SHAN Li-shan, MA Jing, XIE Ting-ting, WANG Hong-yong, YANG Jie, HE Cai. Effects of Moisture Change on Fine Root Characteristics of Desert Plants Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3530-3538.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I11/3530

参考文献

[1] 何睿橦,钟全林,李宝银,等. 氮磷配施对刨花楠幼林细根性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(2):337-343
[2] 邓磊,朱春云,于世川,等. 祁连山青海云杉中龄林混交度对细根形态特征的影响[J]. 林业科学,2020,56(1):191-200
[3] MCCORMACK M L,DICKIE I A,EISSENSTAT D M,et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes[J]. New Phytologist,2015,207(3):505-518
[4] 王珺,刘茂松,盛晟,等. 干旱区植物群落土壤水盐及根系生物量的空间分布格局[J]. 生态学报,2008(9):4120-4127
[5] ZHOU M,BAI W M,ZHANG Y S,et al. Multi-dimensional patterns of variation in root traits among coexisting herbaceous species in temperate steppes[J]. Journal of Ecology,2018,106:2320-2331
[6] 赵文武,赵鑫,谢文辉,等. 干旱胁迫下白刺花幼苗根系生长和生理特性的响应[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(1):120-129
[7] ZHOU M,WANG J,BAI W M,et al. The response of root traits to precipitation change of herbaceous species in temperate steppes[J]. Functional Ecology,2019,33(10):2030-2041
[8] DING J X,KONG D L,ZHANG Z L,et al. Climate and soil nutrients differentially drive multidimensional fine root traits in ectomycorrhizal-dominated alpine coniferous forests[J]. Journal of Ecology,2020(108)：2544-2556
[9] ISAAC E M,ISAAC E M,MARTIN R A,et al. Intraspecific trait variation and coordination:root and leaf economics spectra in coffee across environmental gradients[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2017,8:1196
[10] ALBERT C H,GRASSEIN F,SCHURR F M,et al. When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology?[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2011,13(3)217-225
[11] ZADWORNY M,MCCORMACK M L,MUCHA J,et al. Scots pine fine roots adjust along a 2000 km latitudinal climatic gradient[J]. New Phytol，2016,212389-399
[12] DEFRENNE E C,MCCORMACK L M,ROACH J W,et al. Intraspecific fine-root trait-environment relationships across interior douglas-fir forests of western canada[J]. Plants,2019,8(7):199
[13] MA Z Q,GUO D L,XU X L,et al. Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits[J].Nature,2018,555(7694):94-97
[14] 苗乐乐,刘旻霞,肖音迪,等. 不同纬度植物群落系统发育与功能性状结构研究[J]. 生态学报,2024,44(1):317-329
[15] ACKERLY D D,CORNWELL W K. A trait-based approach to community assembly:partitioning of species trait values into within-and among-community components[J]. Ecology Letter,2007,10(2):135-145
[16] 周玮,李洪波,曾辉. 西藏高寒草原群落植物根系属性在降水梯度下的变异格局[J]. 植物生态学报,2018,42(11):1094-1102
[17] SU P X,YAN Q D,XIE T T,et al. Associated growth of C₃ and C₄ desert plants helps the C₃ species at the cost of the C₄ species[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2012,34(6):2057-2068
[18] 单立山,苏铭,张正中,等. 不同生境下荒漠植物红砂-珍珠猪毛菜混生根系的垂直分布规律[J]. 植物生态学报,2018,42(4):475-486
[19] 单立山. 西北典型荒漠植物根系形态结构和功能及抗旱生理研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013:19-20
[20] GUO L D,MITCHELL R J，HENDRICKS J J. Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest.[J]. Oecologia,2004,140(3):450-457
[21] 苏宇,吴世磊,贺维,等. 弓杠岭不同海拔云杉细根生物量及形态特征[J]. 西北植物学报,2022,42(1):138-144
[22] BAUHUS J,KHANNA P K,MENDEN N. Aboveground and belowground interactions in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus globulus,and Acacia mearnsii[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2000,30(12):1886-1894
[23] HUI D F,JACKSON R B. Geographical and interannual variability in biomass partitioning in grassland ecosystems:a synthesis of field data[J]. New Phytologist,2006,169(1):85-93
[24] JACKSON R B,MOONEY H A,SCHULZE E D. A global budget for fine root biomass,surface area,and nutrient contents[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1997,94(14):7362-7366
[25] 郑颖. 延河流域植物叶片与细根功能性状的时空变化[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014:37-38
[26] BRUNNER I,HERZOG C,MELISSA A D,et al. How tree roots respond to drought[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2015,6(6):547
[27] NOH N J,CROUS K,LI J Q,et al. Does root respiration in Australian rainforest tree seedlings acclimate to experimental warming?[J]. Tree Physiology,2020,40(9):1192-1204
[28] HERTEL D,STRECKER T,MVLLER-HAUBOLD H,et al. Fine root biomass and dynamics in beech forests across a precipitation gradient-is optimal resource partitioning theory applicable to water-limited mature trees?[J]. Journal of Ecology,2013,101(5):1183-1200
[29] 马剑,冯起,赵维俊,等. 祁连山典型灌丛植物根系化学计量特征及其与土壤理化因子的关系[J]. 土壤,2022,54(2):329-337
[30] 白亚梅,李毅,单立山,等. 降水变化和氮添加对红砂幼苗根系形态特征的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2020,37(5):1284-1292
[31] 王凯,张大鹏,宋立宁,等.氮沉降和降水增加对榆树幼苗不同器官碳氮磷分配格局的影响[J]. 林业科学,2020,56(3):172-183
[32] 王凯,沈潮,宋立宁,等. 持续干旱下沙地樟子松幼苗C、N、P化学计量变化规律[J]. 生态学杂志,2020,39(7):2175-2184
[33] STEINWEG J M,DUKES J S,WALLENSTEIN M D. Modeling the effects of temperature and moisture on soil enzyme activity:Linking laboratory assays to continuous field data[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2012,55(6):85-92
[34] 孙彩丽,肖列,李鹏,等. 氮素添加和干旱胁迫下白羊草碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(4):1120-1127
[35] 马芳,曾辉,李洪波,等. 内蒙古草原植物根属性的变异格局及环境适应策略[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(2):387-396
[36] 金鹰,王传宽. 植物叶片水力与经济性状权衡关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(10):1021-1032
[37] 周洁,杨晓东,王雅芸,等. 梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异[J]. 植物生态学报,2022,46(9):1064-1076
[38] 王钊颖,程林,王满堂,等. 武夷山落叶林木本植物细根性状研究[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(22):8088-8097
[39] 牛山,夏尚文,王刚,等. 半附生榕树和非附生榕树的细根性状[J]. 生态学杂志,2020,39(3):715-722
[40] 王剑博,单立山,解婷婷,等. 环境异质性对红砂叶片功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(4):1048-1056
[41] WEEMSTRA M,ZAMBRANO J,ALLEN D,et al. Tree growth increases through opposing above-ground and below-ground resource strategies[J]. Journal of Ecology,2021,109(10):3502-3512
[42] KONG D L,WANG J J,WU H F,et al. Nonlinearity of root trait relationships and the root economics Spectrum[J]. Nature Communications,2019,10(1):2203
[43] 李曼. 武夷山主要森林类型植物根、茎、叶功能性状关联研究[D]. 福州:福建师范大学,2017:47-50
[44] 徐琨,李芳兰,苟水燕,等. 岷江干旱河谷25种植物一年生植株根系功能性状及相互关系[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(1):215-225
[45] 何芸雨,郭水良,王喆. 植物功能性状权衡关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2019,43(12):1021-1035
[46] MOMMER L,WEEMSTRA M. The role of roots in the resource economics spectrum[J]. New Phytologist,2012,195(4):725-727
[47] 唐洋. 黄土丘陵区刺槐关键功能性状与生长对环境变化及胁迫的响应[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019:24-28
[48] 孙婧珏. 两种生境下15种木本植物叶和细根功能性状的差异[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2020:51-52
[49] 尉剑飞,王誉陶,张翼,等. 黄土高原典型草原植被及土壤化学计量对降水变化的响应[J]. 草地学报,2022,30 (3):532-543
[50] ZHOU Y,MA H,LU Q,et al. Different responses of leaf and root economics spectrum to grazing time at the community level in desert steppe,China[J]. The Science of the Total Environment,2024,20(1):909
[51] 肖迪,王晓洁,张凯,等. 氮添加对山西太岳山天然油松林主要植物叶片性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2016,40(7):686-701

水分变化对荒漠植物红砂和珍珠猪毛菜细根性状的影响

Effects of Moisture Change on Fine Root Characteristics of Desert Plants Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨小菊, 强巴克珠, 韩彦刚, 郝文渊, 罗大庆, 屈兴乐. 雅鲁藏布江中游河谷植物群落数量分类与排序[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2784-2793.
[2]	齐志远, 马腾飞, 伊李凯, 宁亚楠, 武帅楷, 刁华杰, 苏原, 徐沛东, 郝杰, 董宽虎. 短期OTC增温对晋北农牧交错带温性草地土壤微生物的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1789-1799.
[3]	徐林芳, 米媛婷, 柳兰洲, 温璐, 李永宏, 许继飞. 内蒙古不同类型草原土壤真菌群落结构及其影响因子的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 1977-1987.
[4]	华巾帼, 樊榕, 刘婉婷, 王晓琦, 吉文丽. 白马雪山莎草科胡萝卜状根植物的功能性状及环境响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 433-440.
[5]	方铧, 陈星彤, 刘明月, 张永彬, 苗正红, 满卫东, 张清文, 寇财垚, 李想. 基于Maxent模型的互花米草潜在生境适宜性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3514-3524.
[6]	刘万弟, 李小伟. 宁夏针茅属植物叶片碳稳定同位素特征及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2058-2065.
[7]	张林, 齐实, 周飘, 伍冰晨, 张岱, 崔冉冉, 黄宪, 马宁. 北京山区侧柏林下草本植物多样性的影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2199-2206.
[8]	王云英, 裴薇薇, 郭小伟, 杜岩功. 青藏高原高寒湿地生态系统碳水通量与水分利用效率研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1037-1042.
[9]	马丽, 单立山, 解婷婷, 种培芳, 杨洁, 师亚婷. 基于同质园实验的两种典型荒漠植物叶片功能性状变异研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 701-711.
[10]	郑浩, 刘明月, 杨晓芜, 宋敬茹, 毛德华, 张永彬, 满卫东. 中国大陆沿海地区互花米草生长特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3026-3034.
[11]	韩梦丽, 白史且, 孙盛楠, 鄢家俊, 张传杰, 张昌兵, 张靖雪, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 严学兵. 基于MaxEnt模型青藏高原老芒麦适生区模拟预测[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.
[12]	李超, 常馨, 闫卫东, 董宽虎. 刈割对晋西北赖草草地温室气体通量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 17-24.
[13]	米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.
[14]	朱瑞芬, 刘杰淋, 王建丽, 韩微波, 申忠宝, 李达. 两种不同生境羊草根际土壤细菌群落多样性与环境因子的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 652-660.
[15]	徐振朋, 宛涛, 蔡萍, 张晓明, 伊卫东, 宛诣超. 裸果木种群遗传多样性特点及与地理气候因子关联研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 70-76.