裸果木种群遗传多样性特点及与地理气候因子关联研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.01.008

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 70-76.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.01.008

裸果木种群遗传多样性特点及与地理气候因子关联研究

徐振朋¹, 宛涛¹, 蔡萍², 张晓明¹, 伊卫东³, 宛诣超¹

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010019;
2. 锡林郭勒职业学院, 内蒙古锡林浩特 026000;
3. 内蒙古农业大学农学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010019

收稿日期:2017-07-07 修回日期:2018-03-15 出版日期:2018-02-15 发布日期:2018-05-25
通讯作者: 宛涛
作者简介:徐振朋(1988-),男,内蒙古赤峰人,博士,主要从事牧草种质资源研究,E-mail:947464263@qq.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自然科学基金项目（2016MS0324）；内蒙古自治区研究生科研创新项目（B20151012919）资助

Study on the Relevance between Genetic Diversity of Gymnocarpos przewalskii Populations and Geographic Climatic Factors

XU Zhen-peng¹, WAN Tao¹, CAI Ping², ZHANG Xiao-ming¹, YI Wei-dong³, WAN Yi-chao¹

1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010019, China;
2. Xilingol Vocational College, Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia 026000, China;
3. College of Agricultural, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010019, China

Received:2017-07-07 Revised:2018-03-15 Online:2018-02-15 Published:2018-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文利用ISSR标记技术，选取15对引物，对分布于西北荒漠区12个裸果木种群的遗传多样性以及与地理气候因子的相关性进行了分析。结果表明：群体内多态性位点百分率（PPL）为88.81%，种群水平为69.93%；Nei’s基因多样性指数（He）变化范围为0.2356~0.2697，Shannom信息指数（I）变化范围为0.3509~0.4057，具较高的遗传多样性水平。基因分化系数（Gst）为0.2790，种群间遗传分化较小，种群内存有丰富的遗传变异。经Mantel检验，种群遗传距离与地理距离有相关性（R²=0.2144）。利用NTSYSpc-2.1软件进行UPGMA法聚类，各种群样品间的遗传相似系数在0.81～0.99之间，按照遗传距离远近，裸果木12个种群可分为4大类群。经相关性分析，种群遗传多样性与纬度、海拔存在正相关（P<0.05）与年均温存在负相关（P<0.05）。

关键词: 裸果木, 遗传多样性, 遗传结构, 环境因子

Abstract:

To study 12 species of Gymnocarpos przewalskii in Northwest desert area，15 pairs of primers selected by ISSR marker were used to analyze the correlation of genetic diversity and geographic and climatic factors. The results showed that the polymorphic loci percentage (PPL) was 88.81%, the population level was 69.93%; and the variation range of Nei's gene diversity index (He) was 0.2356~0.2697. The variation range of Shannon's Information index (I) was 0.3509~0.4057, which indicated high genetic diversity. The coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst) was 0.2790, with a small genetic differentiation between each group and a rich genetic variation in group. Mantel test showed that the population genetic distance was related to geographical distance(R²=0.2144). Using the ntsyspc-2.1 software to do the unweighted averages (UPGMA) cluster analysis, the genetic similarity coefficient for each group ranged from 0.81 to 0.99. According to the genetic distance, 12 Gymnocarpos przewalskii species divided into four groups. According to the correlation analysis, the latitude and altitude had a positive effect and average annual temperature had negative influence on the population genetic diversity.

Key words: Gymnocarpos przewalskii, Genetic diversity, Genetic structure, Environmental factors

中图分类号:

徐振朋, 宛涛, 蔡萍, 张晓明, 伊卫东, 宛诣超. 裸果木种群遗传多样性特点及与地理气候因子关联研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 70-76.

XU Zhen-peng, WAN Tao, CAI Ping, ZHANG Xiao-ming, YI Wei-dong, WAN Yi-chao. Study on the Relevance between Genetic Diversity of Gymnocarpos przewalskii Populations and Geographic Climatic Factors[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1): 70-76.

参考文献

[1] 傅立国. 中国植物红皮书[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1992:368-371
[2] 刘媖心. 中国沙漠植物志[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1985
[3] 马松梅,张明理,张宏祥,等. 利用最大熵模型和规则集遗传算法模型预测孑遗植物裸果木的潜在地理分布及格局[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(11):1327-1335
[4] 柴永青,曹致中,蔡卓山,等. 肃北地区稀有植物裸果木种群的空间分布格局[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(5):239-249
[5] 王立龙,王亮,张丽芳,等. 不同生境下濒危植物裸果木种群结构及动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(10):980-989
[6] Petrusson L,Thulin M. Taxonomy and biogeography of Gymnocarpos (Caryophyllaceae)[J]. Edinburgh Journal of Botany,1996,53(01):1-26
[7] Oxelman B,Ahlgren B,Thulin M. Circumscription and phylogenetic relationships of Gymnocarpos(Caryophyllaceae-Paronychioideae)[J]. Edinburgh Journal of Botany,2002,59(02):221-237
[8] 李新蓉,唐欣,付文洁. 荒漠孑遗植物裸果木的花部特征及繁育系统[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(10):2592-2598
[9] 汪之波,高清祥,孙继周. 稀有植物裸果木的组织培养及植株再生[J]. 西北植物学报,2004, 24(7):1319-1321
[10] 刘生龙,郭志中,王理德,等. 裸果木引种栽培试验研究[J]. 中国沙漠,1995,15(1):88-91
[11] Gienapp P,Teplitsky C,Alho J S,et al. Climate change and evolution:disentangling environmental and genetic responses[J]. Molecular ecology,2008,17(1):167-178
[12] Barrière A,Félix M A. High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations[J]. Current Biology,2005,15(13):1176-1184
[13] Forrest A,Escudero M,Heuertz M,et al. Testing the hypothesis of low genetic diversity and population structure in narrow endemic species:the endangered Antirrhinum charidemi (Plantaginaceae)[J]. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,2017,183(2):260-270
[14] Wang A,Zhou G,Lin C,et al. Genetic diversity study of Brassica campestris L.ssp.chinensis Makino based on ISSR markers[J]. Caryologia,2017,70(1):48-54
[15] Sharma S S,Islam M A,Singh V K,et al. Genetic diversity,population structure and association study using TE-AFLP markers in Pongamia pinnata (L.)Pierre germplasm[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes,2017,13(1):6-12
[16] 李金璐,王硕,于婧,等. 一种改良的植物DNA提取方法[J]. 植物学报,2013,48(1):72-78
[17] Mousadik A,Petit R J. High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree(Argania spinosa)endemic to Morocco[J]. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1996,92(7):832-839
[18] 张永明,金洪,马万里,等. 濒危植物绵刺8个种群遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(5):2686-2693
[19] 张杰,王佳,李浩宇,等. 濒危植物蒙古扁桃不同地理种群遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(14):4443-4452
[20] 张颖娟,王玉山. 濒危小灌木长叶红砂种群的遗传多样性[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(12):43-47
[21] Ge X J,Yu Y,Zhao N X,et al. Genetic variation in the endangered Inner Mongolia endemic shrub Tetraena mongolica Maxim.(Zygophyllaceae)[J]. Biological Conservation,2003,111(3):427-434
[22] Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants[J]. Molecular ecology,2004,13(5):1143-1155
[23] Hamrick J L,Godt M J W. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B:Biological Sciences,1996,351(1345):1291-1298
[24] 贾舒雯. 中国西北干旱区裸果木遗传多样性分析及裸果木属的进化历史研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学,2016
[25] 吴征镒,王荷生. 中国自然地理——植物地理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1983
[26] Silwood Park U K,Dytham C,Perrin N. The evolutionary ecology of dispersal[J]. Trends Ecol Evol,1999,14(3):88-90
[27] Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations[J]. Science(Washington),1987,236(4803):787-792
[28] Ma S M,Zhang M L,Sanderson S C. Phylogeography of the rare Gymnocarpos przewalskii (Caryophyllaceae):indications of multiple glacial refugia in north-western China[J]. Australian Journal of Botany,2012,60(1):20-31
[29] Liu J,Miller M,Provan J,et al. Geological and ecological factors drive cryptic speciation of yews in a biodiversity hotspot[J]. New Phytologist,2013,199(4):1093-1108
[30] Li Y,Zhai S N,Qiu Y X,et al. Glacial survival east and west of the ‘Mekong-Salween Divide’ in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains region as revealed by AFLPs and cpDNA sequence variation in Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Berberidaceae)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2011,59(2):412-424
[31] Wang B,Mao J F,Zhao W,et al. Impact of geography and climate on the genetic differentiation of the subtropical pine Pinus yunnanensis[J]. Plos One,2013,8(6):37-45
[32] Wu Z,Yu D,Wang Z,et al. Great influence of geographic isolation on the genetic differentiation of Myriophyllum spicatum under a steep environmental gradient[J]. Scientific reports,2015,5(1):1-9
[33] Pope L C,Riginos C,Ovenden J,et al. Population genetic diversity in the Australian ‘seascape’:a bioregion approach[J]. Plos One,2015,10(9):1-10
[34] Yin H,Yan X,Shi Y,et al. The role of East Asian monsoon system in shaping population divergence and dynamics of a constructive desert shrub Reaumuria soongarica[J]. Sci Rep-UK,2015,5(1):1-14
[35] Jump A S,Hunt J M,Martinez J A,et al. Natural selection and climate change:temperature-linked spatial and temporal trends in gene frequency in Fagus sylvatica[J]. Molecular Ecology,2006,15(11):3469-3480
[36] Semagn K,Bjornstad A,Stedje B,et al. Comparison of multivariate methods for the analysis of genetic resources and adaptation in Phytolacca dodecandra using RAPD[J]. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2000,101(7):1145-1154

裸果木种群遗传多样性特点及与地理气候因子关联研究

Study on the Relevance between Genetic Diversity of Gymnocarpos przewalskii Populations and Geographic Climatic Factors

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马骢毓, 韩重阳, 马赛男, 李旭旭, 蔡家邦, 汪阳, 张新全, 聂刚. 基于SSR分子标记的13个白三叶(Trifolium repens L.)品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1892-1899.
[2]	罗铭欣, 刘凤民, 陈纪言, 崔均涛, 张伟丽. ⁶⁰Coγ辐射柱花草M₃代的农艺性状及遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1992-2000.
[3]	丁杰, 张和钰, 李志鹏, 张谱, 冯益明. 天山南麓中段戈壁区裸果木种群空间异质性特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2067-2073.
[4]	梁小玉, 季杨, 胡远彬, 易军, 白史且, 张靓, 张新全. 菊苣EST-SSR分子标记开发及通用性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2081-2090.
[5]	刘凌云, 范希峰, 滕珂, 岳跃森, 常智慧, 武菊英. 苔草属植物遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1148-1157.
[6]	陈志祥, 罗小燕, 李拴林, 吴如月, 王文强, 丁西朋. 基于SSR标记的木豆种质资源遗传多样性与群体结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 904-911.
[7]	梁国玲, 刘文辉, 马祥. 590份皮燕麦种质资源穗部性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[8]	张琦, 魏臻武, 闫天芳, 耿小丽. 燕麦种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性的鉴定评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 309-316.
[9]	韩梦丽, 白史且, 孙盛楠, 鄢家俊, 张传杰, 张昌兵, 张靖雪, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 严学兵. 基于MaxEnt模型青藏高原老芒麦适生区模拟预测[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.
[10]	安明珠, 韩博, 姜华, 段新慧, 文亦芾, 周凯. 鸭茅物种起源与系统发育分析研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2637-2644.
[11]	李超, 常馨, 闫卫东, 董宽虎. 刈割对晋西北赖草草地温室气体通量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 17-24.
[12]	米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.
[13]	王建丽, 刘杰淋, 朱瑞芬, 钟鹏, 尤佳, 邸桂俐, 韩微波, 申忠宝. 28份籽粒苋种质资源的主要农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1050-1059.
[14]	杨艳婷, 石凤翎, 徐舶, 张雨桐, 闫伟. 苜蓿品种鉴定及其遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1060-1067.
[15]	朱瑞芬, 刘杰淋, 王建丽, 韩微波, 申忠宝, 李达. 两种不同生境羊草根际土壤细菌群落多样性与环境因子的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 652-660.