基于叶绿体基因rbcL和trnL-F序列的河北省野生苔草属亲缘关系分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.09.006

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 2728-2736.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.09.006

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

基于叶绿体基因rbcL和trnL-F序列的河北省野生苔草属亲缘关系分析

周欣莹¹, 董彦娜², 邱玉鹏¹, 孙浩男¹, 刘亚伟¹, 李艳¹, 刘冬云¹

1. 河北农业大学园林与旅游学院, 河北保定 071000;
2. 石家庄信息工程职业学院, 河北石家庄 050000

收稿日期:2024-01-15 修回日期:2024-04-06 发布日期:2024-10-09
通讯作者: 李艳,E-mail:123360961@qq.com;刘冬云,E-mail:liudongyun0505@163.com
作者简介:周欣莹(1999-),女,汉族,河北保定人,硕士研究生,主要从事园林植物遗传育种与栽培研究,E-mail:1240260550@qq.com
基金资助:
河北省苔草属植物种质资源收集与新种质创制项目(21326348D)资助

Genetic Relationship Analysis of Wild Carex Species in Hebei Province Based on Sequences of Chloroplast Genes rbcL and trnL-F

ZHOU Xin-ying¹, DONG Yan-na², QIU Yu-peng¹, SUN Hao-nan¹, LIU Ya-wei¹, LI Yan¹, LIU Dong-yun¹

1. Collage of Landscape and Travel, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei Province 071000, China;
2. Shijiazhuang Information Engineering Vocational College, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province 050000, China

Received:2024-01-15 Revised:2024-04-06 Published:2024-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究河北省野生苔草属(Carex)植物的亲缘关系，本研究以43种河北省野生苔草及国外引种的27份苔草种质为试验材料，克隆了叶绿体基因rbcL和trnL-F序列，进行遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析，并构建了系统发育树。结果表明，从70份苔草属植物中成功克隆到的rbcL和trnL-F序列数量分别为67条、60条，测序成功率分别为95.7%、85.7%，经正反序列拼接对齐获得序列长度分别为716 bp、976 bp，并上传至NCBI获得登录号。二者合并得到59条序列，长度为1692 bp。rbcL,trnL-F以及合并序列分别定义了43，56，58个单倍型。基于合并序列的59份种质间遗传距离为0~0.0421，平均遗传距离为0.0142，整体划分为3大类，与形态学分类基本相符。trnL-F序列有望开发为DNA条形码，以期为苔草属的分类鉴定、系统发育等研究提供依据。

关键词: 苔草属, rbcL, trnL-F, 亲缘关系, 遗传多样性

Abstract: To study the genetic relationships of wild Carex plants in Hebei Province,43 species of wild Carex plants in Hebei Province and 27 germplasms of Carex introduced from abroad were used as experimental materials. The chloroplast genes rbcL and trnL-F sequences were cloned for genetic diversity and phylogenetic analyses. And a phylogenetic tree was constructed. The results showed that the number of rbcL and trnL-F sequences successfully cloned from 70 plants of the genus Carex was 67 and 60,with sequencing success rates of 95.7% and 85.7%,respectively. The sequence lengths obtained after forward and backward sequence splicing and alignment were 716 bp and 976 bp, respectively and were uploaded to NCBI to obtain the GenBank accession number. The rbcL and trnL-F sequences combination obtained 59 sequences with a length of 1 692 bp. The rbcL,trnL-F and combined sequence define 43,56 and 58 haplotypes. Based on the combined sequence,the genetic distance between 59 germplasms is 0~0.0421,with an average genetic distance of 0.0142. Based on NJ phylogenetic tree of combined sequence,59 germplasms could be divided into 3 groups,which was basically consistent with morphological classification. The trnL-F sequence is expected to be developed as DNA barcodes,in order to provide basis for the classification,identification and phylogenetic research of Carex.

Key words: Carex, rbcL, trnL-F, Genetic Relationship, Genetic Diversity

中图分类号:

周欣莹, 董彦娜, 邱玉鹏, 孙浩男, 刘亚伟, 李艳, 刘冬云. 基于叶绿体基因rbcL和trnL-F序列的河北省野生苔草属亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2728-2736.

ZHOU Xin-ying, DONG Yan-na, QIU Yu-peng, SUN Hao-nan, LIU Ya-wei, LI Yan, LIU Dong-yun. Genetic Relationship Analysis of Wild Carex Species in Hebei Province Based on Sequences of Chloroplast Genes rbcL and trnL-F[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(9): 2728-2736.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.09.006

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I9/2728

参考文献

[1] 张玉,王丽媛,王继丰,等. 基于文献计量学的苔草属植物研究进展[J]. 黑龙江科学,2018,9(20):17-19
[2] TENG K,TENG W J,WEN H F,et al. PacBio single-molecule long-read sequencing shed new light on the complexity of the Carex breviculmis transcriptome[J]. BMC Genomics,2019,20(1):789
[3] 河北省植物智编辑委员会. 河北植物志III[M]. 石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,1991:408-439
[4] 张全刚,孙建华,郝爱,等. 浅谈苔草在园林绿地中的应用[J]. 农业与技术,2022,42(24):127-129
[5] 豆豆,李红. 黄河源区退化草地褐鳞苔草种植技术及对土壤改良效果研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2022,57(5):171-180
[6] 中国科学院中国植物委员会. 中国植物志.第十二卷[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2000:56-519
[7] 刘凌云,范希峰,滕珂,等. 苔草属植物遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(6):1148-1157
[8] 冷建红,楼炉焕,魏琦,等. 薹草属植物研究进展及园林应用前景研究[J]. 北方园艺,2011(6):196-201
[9] SHEKHOVTSOV S V,SHEKHOVTSOV I N,PELTEK S E. Phylogeny of Siberian species of Carex sect. Vesicariae based on nuclear and plastid markers[J]. Nordic Journal of Botany,2012,30(3):343-351
[10] LÉVEILLÉ-BOURRET,ÉTIENNE,STARR J R,FORD B A. Why are there so many sedges? Sumatroscirpeae,a missing piece in the evolutionary puzzle of the giant genus Carex (Cyperaceae)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2018,119:93-104
[11] PERDEREAU A,KLAAS M,BARTH S,et al. Plastid genome sequencing reveals biogeographical structure and extensive population genetic variation in wild populations of Phalaris arundinacea L. in north-western Europe.[J].Global Change Biology Bioenergy,2017,9(1):46-56
[12] 姜栋柱. 基于叶绿体基因组和ITS序列的姜属植物系统发育研究[D]. 荆州:长江大学,2023:3-4
[13] AMAR M H,MAGDY M,WANG L,et al. Peach chloroplast genome variation architecture and phylogenomic signatures of cpDNA introgression in Prunus[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,2019,99(6):885-896
[14] 苗艺明,黄松殿,覃永华,等. 基于三个叶绿体基因序列的广西盾翅藤遗传多样性分析[J/OL]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20231020.1334.006.html,2023-10-20/2024-03-19
[15] 龙炳宏,蒋向辉,宋荣,等. DNA条形码在黄精属药用植物鉴定与遗传多样性分析中的应用[J]. 植物科学学报,2022,40(4):533-543
[16] 钱志瑶,饶海,曹旭林,等. 黔产宽叶缬草叶绿体trnL-F,matK基因遗传关系的分析[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2018,24(5):36-42
[17] ODA J,FUSE S,YAMASHITA J,et al. Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Carex (Cyperaceae) in Japan I. C. sect. Rarae[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica:APG,2019(2):69-85
[18] STARR J R,NACZI R F C,CHOUINARD B N. Plant DNA barcodes and species resolution in sedges (Carex,Cyperaceae)[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources,2010,9(s1):151-163
[19] YANO O,IKEDA H,HOSHINO T. Phylogeography of the Japanese common sedge,Carex conica complex (Cyperaceae),based on chloroplast DNA sequence data and chromosomal variation[J]. American Journal of Botany,2010,97(8):1365-1376
[20] KRESS W J,ERICKSON D L,SHIU S H. A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants:The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region[J]. Plos One,2007,2(6):e508
[21] TABERLET P,GIELLY L,PAUTOU G,et al. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,1991,17(5):1105-1109
[22] 孙浩男,李蓉,王鑫,等. 基于三种分子标记的栽培金鸡菊遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(11):2922-2936
[23] KIM Y,SHIN J,OH D R,et al. Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences and Insertion-Deletion (Indel) Polymorphisms to distinguish five vaccinium species[J]. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute,2020,11(9):927
[24] 王崇,焦春海,杨新笋,等. 基于叶绿体基因trnL-trnF、trnH-psbA和trnT-trnL序列的甘薯种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 南方农业学报,2021,52(6):1536-154
[25] 张仕兰,王屿岑,刘文亮. 海三棱藨草及其近缘种的DNA条形码研究[J]. 广西植物,2024,44(4):699-709
[26] 蒋喻林. 基于trnL-F、rbcL基因的四川省鸢尾属植物系统分类进化研究[D]. 成都:四川农业大学,2016:31-32
[27] 朱斌,胡利娟,田忠静,等. 基于叶绿体基因组序列对50种菊科植物亲缘关系分析[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,39(2):15-25
[28] 王霞,刘艳,贾秀秀,等. 矩镰荚苜蓿与近缘种花苜蓿的DNA条形码筛选[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(8):2323-2333
[29] CLERC-BLAIN J L,STARR J R,BULL R D,et al. A regional approach to plant DNA barcoding provides high species resolution of sedges (Carex and Kobresia,Cyperaceae) in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources,2010,10(1):69-91
[30] FAZEKAS A J，BURGESS K S，KESANAKURTI P R，et al. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well[J]. Plos One,2008,3(7):e2802
[31] 万诚,李蕾嘉,陈胜,等. 贵州老鹰基于叶绿体DNA的遗传多样性分析[J]. 农业与技术,2022,42(15):22-25
[32] 赵字陈,赵玉娟,龚洵,等. 龙血树柴胡的遗传多样性及其分布特征研究[J]. 植物科学学报,2022,40(1):1-10
[33] 李钰莹,董宽虎. 山西白羊草种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(1):217-222
[34] 文亚峰,韩文军,吴顺. 植物遗传多样性及其影响因素[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(12):80-87
[35] 林鹏,杨虎彪. 吊罗山薹草开花生物学特征及繁育系统研究[J]. 热带作物学报,2021,42(3):689-694
[36] BOLTON P E,ROLLINS L A,BRAZILL-BOAST J,et al. Genetic diversity through time and space:diversity and demographic history from natural history specimens and serially sampled contemporary populations of the threatened Gouldian finch (Erythrura gouldiae)[J]. Conservation Genetics,2018,19(3):737-754
[37] VILLAVERDE T,JIMÉNEZ-MEJÍAS P,LUCENO M,et al. A new classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) subgenera supported by a HybSeq backbone phylogenetic tree[J]. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,2020,194(2):141-163
[38] 周欣莹,耿宇航,贾艳艳,等. 河北省野生苔草属植物ISSR分子标记开发及亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(10):2949-2959

基于叶绿体基因rbcL和trnL-F序列的河北省野生苔草属亲缘关系分析

Genetic Relationship Analysis of Wild Carex Species in Hebei Province Based on Sequences of Chloroplast Genes rbcL and trnL-F

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄春琼, 何潇, 罗丽娟, 董荣书, 刘国道. 结缕草属种质资源EST-SSR遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2386-2393.
[2]	曲荣举, 刘玉萍, 陈金元, 苏旭, 张朋辉, 靳佳瑞, 余明君, 杨倩. 苦马豆(Sphaerophysa salsula)6个不同居群的染色体核型分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2469-2477.
[3]	张秀山, 祁娟, 孟祥君, 沈李瑜, 独双双, 杜旺毅, 路欣, 祁希明. 西北干旱区10份披碱草属种质表型遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2531-2539.
[4]	汪阳, 闫三博, 张睿, 黄琳凯, 张新全, 聂刚. 白三叶杂交F1代群体的表型鉴定及SSR分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1657-1664.
[5]	常宏兵, 王晨, 何美敬, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 曹晓良, 宋炜, 吕爱枝. 60份玉米种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1162-1168.
[6]	陈彩锦, 王学敏, 刘文辉, 曾燕霞, 包明芳, 尚继红, 张尚沛, 朱新忠, 高婷, 崔峻岭, 张国辉, 陈志龙, 沙晓弟. 草种质资源遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 349-357.
[7]	贾艳艳, 邱玉鹏, 周欣莹, 耿宇航, 孙浩男, 刘冬云. 基于形态标记和ISSR分子标记的长瓣铁线莲遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 75-86.
[8]	王凤宇, 梁国玲, 刘文辉. 590份燕麦种质资源营养器官表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 158-167.
[9]	孙艳楠, 路耿新, 唐超, 李冠义, 王欣欣, 时梓涵, 张明飞. 134份皮燕麦种质资源生物学性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2684-2692.
[10]	余静菠, 陈仕勇, 桑杰多吉, 张昌兵, 叶莉, 姬文琴, 李进. 川西北高原短芒型老芒麦种质形态变异及遗传亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2787-2795.
[11]	伊然, 王子玥, 刘凌云, 常智慧. 基于EST-SSR标记的60份苇状羊茅遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2041-2048.
[12]	周涛, 卢蕊, 刘宁芳, 徐倩, 胡龙兴. 基于表型性状的老鸦谷种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2049-2058.
[13]	张鹏, 鲍根生, 贾志锋, 刘文辉. 高寒区150份豌豆种质资源农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2116-2127.
[14]	郑春林, 喻望晨, 刘宁芳, 胡龙兴, 徐倩. 85份不同类型籽粒苋种质资源表型多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1435-1444.
[15]	武敬也, 马琳, 吴欣明, 石永红, 陈菲儿, 王学敏, 赵威. 180份饲用燕麦种质资源表型遗传多样性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1501-1510.