3种冷季型草坪草对持续干旱、高温及其互作的生理生态响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.025

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 705-717.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.025

3种冷季型草坪草对持续干旱、高温及其互作的生理生态响应

宋娅丽¹, 王克勤¹, 王莎², 钱夏吉¹, 徐璟²

1. 西南林业大学生态与水土保持学院, 云南昆明 650224;
2. 北京林业大学水土保持学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2017-12-13 修回日期:2018-05-15 出版日期:2018-06-15 发布日期:2018-08-24
通讯作者: 王克勤
作者简介:宋娅丽(1985-),女,山西长治人,博士,讲师,主要从事植物逆境生理生态学研究,E-mail:songyali19851205@sina.com
基金资助:
云南省应用基础研究青年项目（2016FD044）；西南林业大学科研启动基金（111443）；云南省高校优势特色重点学科（生态学）建设项目（050005113111）；国家林业局生态学重点学科资助

Physiological Responses of Three Kinds of Cool Season Turfgrasses under Continuous Drought Stress, Heat Stress and Their Interaction

SONG Ya-li¹, WANG Ke-qin¹, WANG Sha², QIAN Xia-ji¹, XU Jing²

1. School of Ecology and Soil and Water Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650224, China;
2. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2017-12-13 Revised:2018-05-15 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-08-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对3种冷季型草坪草黑麦草（Lolium perenne L.）、高羊茅（Festuca arundinacea L.）和早熟禾（Poa pratensis L.）进行持续干旱、高温及其互作处理，通过测定生理生态指标，揭示3种冷季型草坪草对持续干旱高温环境的生理响应机制。结果表明，处理28 d时，各处理下3种草坪草的草坪外观质量TQ和叶片萎蔫系数LWS均显著降低，干旱和高温互作对TQ的影响具有叠加效应，干旱胁迫对LWS起到关键作用。28 d时，各处理下黑麦草和早熟禾叶片相对含水量均低于50%，比胁迫第21 d分别下降了36.2%和46.9%，说明逆境胁迫明显导致草坪草叶片水分亏缺，而高羊茅叶片持水能力强于黑麦草和早熟禾，早熟禾叶片脱水速度最快。各处理下草坪草根系生物量的下降幅度高于地上部分，逆境对根系生长的影响比地上部分更敏感。3种草坪草的光合速率在逆境下显著降低，相反地叶片暗呼吸速率显著增加，两者互作下的降低或增加幅度高于单一胁迫下。各处理下早熟禾的脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量的变化幅度均高于黑麦草和高羊茅，且对干旱高温互作胁迫表现的更为敏感。通过隶属函数综合分析方法对试验测定的9个生理指标进行综合评价，3种冷季型草坪草抗干旱高温能力由强到弱依次为：高羊茅>黑麦草>早熟禾。

关键词: 干旱, 高温, 冷季型草坪草, 生理生态响应

Abstract:

In order to explore the physiological mechanisms of cool season turfgrass responding to adverse environments, continuous drought stress, heat stress and their combination were applied to three kinds of cool season turfgrasses, including perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea L.) and kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.). The results showed that after 28 days of the treatment, turf quality and leaf wilting score of three kinds of turf grasses were significantly reduced; synergistic effects to turf quality were explored under interaction of drought and heat stress, and drought stress played a key role in leaf wilting score. After 28 days, leaf relative water contents of ryegrass and tall fescue under each treatment were all below 50%, reduced 36.2% and 46.9% than 21 d treatments, respectively, which showed adverse stresses lead to the water deficit in leaf. Leaf water-holding ability in tall fescue was higher than that in ryegrass and kentucky bluegrass. Kentucky bluegrass had the fastest blade dehydration. The decrease of root biomass was higher than shoot, and root growth was more sensitive than shoot growth. The photosynthetic rate of three kinds of turf grasses decreased significantly under stresses, while the dark respiration rate increased significantly, and the changes under interaction of drought and heat stress was higher than those of single stress. The changes of proline and soluble sugar content of kentucky bluegrass were higher than those of ryegrass and tall fescue, and it was more sensitive to the interaction of drought and heat stress. According to a comprehensive evaluation based on subordinate function of fuzzy mathematics, the order of drought and heat resistance was:Festuca arundinacea > Lolium perenne > Poa pratensis.

Key words: Drought stress, Heat stress, Cool-season turfgrasses, Physiological responses

中图分类号:

Q948.5
Q949

宋娅丽, 王克勤, 王莎, 钱夏吉, 徐璟. 3种冷季型草坪草对持续干旱、高温及其互作的生理生态响应[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 705-717.

SONG Ya-li, WANG Ke-qin, WANG Sha, QIAN Xia-ji, XU Jing. Physiological Responses of Three Kinds of Cool Season Turfgrasses under Continuous Drought Stress, Heat Stress and Their Interaction[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(3): 705-717.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.025

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2018/V26/I3/705

参考文献

[1] Seager R,Ting M,Held I,et al. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America[J]. Science,2007,316(5828):1181-1184
[2] Allen C D,Macalady A K,Chenchouni H,et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2010, 259(4):660-684
[3] Root T L,Price J T,Hall K R,et al. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants[J]. Nature, 2003,421(6918):57-60
[4] 杜建雄,师尚礼,刘金荣,等. 干旱胁迫和复水对草地早熟禾3个品种生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(1):73-77
[5] 江佳琳,孙彦. 不同地区白颖苔草在热胁迫下的生理反应[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(3):539-545
[6] 余玲,王彦荣,Trevor G,等. 紫花苜蓿不同品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 草业学报,2006,15(3):75-85
[7] 胡化广,刘建秀,宣继萍,等. 结缕草属植物的抗旱性初步评价[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(1):47-51
[8] 黄溦溦,张念念,胡庭兴,等. 高温胁迫对不同种源希蒙得木叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(23):7047-7055
[9] 李力,刘玉民,王敏,等. 3种北美红枫对持续高温干旱胁迫的生理响应机制[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(22):6471-6480
[10] 吴永波,叶波. 高温干旱复合胁迫对构树幼苗抗氧化酶活性和活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(2):403-410
[11] Emmons R D. Turfgrass science and management[M]. New York,USA:Delmar publisher Inc,1984,36-78
[12] 张巨明,解新明,董朝霞.高温胁迫下冷季型草坪草的耐热性评价[J].草业科学,2007,24(2):105-109
[13] Albert K R,Mikkelsen T N,Michelsen A. Interactive effects of drought, elevated CO₂and warming on photosynthetic capacity and photosystem performance in temperature heath plants[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2011,168:1550-1561
[14] Qian Y L,Fu J M. Responses of creeping bentgrass to salinity and mowing management:Carbohydrate availability and ion accumulation[J]. Hort Science,2005,40(7):2170-2174
[15] Turgeon A J. Turfgrass management[C]. 9^th ed.Pearson Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River,NJ,USA.2011
[16] Barrs H D,Weatherly P E. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves[J]. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences,1962,15:413-428
[17] 刘春霞,王康英,郭正刚. 不同水分条件下硅对紫花苜蓿生理特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2011,33(3):21-27
[18] 萧浪涛,王三根. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005
[19] 王忠. 植物生理学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005:500-570
[20] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006
[21] Du H M,Wang Z L,Yu W J,et al. Differential metabolic responses of perennial grass Cynodon transvaalensis×Cynodon dactylon (C₄) and Poa Pratensis (C₃) to heat stress[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2011,141:251-264
[22] 张鸭关,吴丽芳,刘品华,等. 4个紫花苜蓿品种幼苗抗旱性的模糊隶属函数分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2010,(6):349-352
[23] Pallardy S G. Physiology of Woody Plants[M]. 3^rded.New York,USA:Elsevier Inc,2008
[24] Lee T D,Barrott S H,Reich P B. Photosynthetic responses of 13 grassland species across 11 years of free-air CO₂enrichment is modest, consistent and independent of N supply[J]. Global change biology,2011,17:2893-2904
[25] Ge Z M,Zhou X,Kellomäki S,et al. Measured and modeled biomass growth in relation to photosynthesis acclimation of a bioenergy crop (Reed canary grass) under elevated temperature, CO₂enrichment and different water regimes[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2012,46:251-262
[26] Pote J,Wang Z,Huang B. Timing and temperature of physiological decline for creeping bentgrass[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2006,131:608-615
[27] 周洪华,陈亚宁,李卫红,等. 干旱区胡杨光合作用对高温和CO₂浓度的响应[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(6):2797-2810
[28] Taiz L,Zeiger E. Plant Physiology[M]. 2^nd ed.Sunderland, Mass,USA:Sinauer Associates Press,1998
[29] Berry J A,Bjorman O. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plant[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology,1980,31:491-543
[30] 张宗申,利容千,王建波. 外源Ca²⁺预处理对高温胁迫下辣椒叶片细胞膜透性和GSH,AsA含量及Ca²⁺分布的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2001,25(2):230-234
[31] 史彦江,罗青红,宋锋会,等. 高温胁迫对新疆榛光合参数和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(9):2477-2482
[32] 赵龙飞,李潮海,刘天学,等. 花期前后高温对不同基因型玉米光合特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,45(23):4947-4958
[33] 赵丽丽,邓蓉,向清华,等. 高温对金荞麦光和气体交换和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草业科学,2015,32(4):560-569
[34] 徐胜,何兴元,陈玮,等. 高羊茅对高温的生理生态响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(10):2219-2226
[35] 周中亮,包满珠,王文恩. 高温胁迫对6个高羊茅株系生理指标的影响[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(7):1284-1290
[36] 田莉华,周青平,卢素锦,等. 不同种类早熟禾苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(3):561-566
[37] 赵昕,李玉霖. 高温胁迫下冷地型草坪草几项生理指标的变化特征[J]. 草业学报,2001,10(4):85-91
[38] 刘金荣,杜建雄,谢晓蓉. 干热胁迫和复水对草坪草光合生理生态特性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(05):2698
[39] 史小玲,薛立,任向荣,等. 华南地区4种阔叶幼苗水分胁迫条件下的抗旱性初探[J]. 林业科学研究,2011,24(6):760-767
[40] Blum A,Ebercon A. Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress 3 proline accumulation and drought resistance[J]. Crop Science,1976,16(3):428-431
[41] 史燕山,骆建霞,王煦,等. 5种草本地被植物抗旱性研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(5):130-134
[42] 韩春梅. 18个高羊茅品种系耐热性及其坪用价值比较研究[D]. 成都:四川农业大学,2005
[43] 苏慧敏,何丙辉,蔡兴华,等. 水分胁迫对太阳扇扦插苗形态和生理特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2011,30(10):2185-2190

3种冷季型草坪草对持续干旱、高温及其互作的生理生态响应

Physiological Responses of Three Kinds of Cool Season Turfgrasses under Continuous Drought Stress, Heat Stress and Their Interaction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王秀英, 郝云, 胡骏楠, 李璠, 余迪. 气象干旱过程识别及致灾因子特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 35-42.
[2]	赵梦凡, 周秉荣, 赵彤, 周华坤, 校瑞香, 颜亮东, 李璠. 青海省草地植被干旱评估及驱动力分析研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 93-103.
[3]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[4]	谢开云, 孟翔, 徐珍珍, 张力文, 万江春, 颜安, 李陈建. 新疆半干旱地区不同种类混播草地的牧草产量和营养价值研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1835-1842.
[5]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[6]	徐洪雨, 甄莉丽, 李钰莹, 董宽虎, 李向林. 低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 724-733.
[7]	李文晶, 王俊锋, 高晓荻, 石玉杰, 穆春生. 干旱条件下氮磷添加对羊草干草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 743-748.
[8]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[9]	王子婷, 杨磊, 李广, 柴春山, 张洋东, 刘冬皓. 半干旱黄土丘陵区微地形变化对人工柠条林草本分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 364-373.
[10]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[11]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[12]	齐晨汐, 易观涛, 付晓璇, 王海龙, 王佳琳, 吴建慧. 丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫下鹅绒委陵菜生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[13]	刘亚兰, 赵月, 徐梦琦, 柴旭田, 曾凡江, 李向义, 李磊, 黄彩变. 极端干旱区种植行距对油莎豆生长及土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2486-2493.
[14]	秦立刚, 李雪, 李韦瑶, 胡尧, 李俊, 崔国文. PEG干旱胁迫对3种葱属植物种子萌发期渗透调节物质及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 72-79.
[15]	康振山, 张莎, 白雲, Malak Henchiri, 张佳华. 内蒙古草地净初级生产力时空变化及其对干旱的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 156-165.