陕西省天然草地生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.006

草地学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 825-835.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.006

陕西省天然草地生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素

邓蕾, 上官周平

西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨陵 712100

收稿日期:2012-02-24 修回日期:2012-05-10 出版日期:2012-10-15 发布日期:2012-11-01
通讯作者: 上官周平,E-mail:shangguan@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:邓蕾(1986-),男,河南西平人,博士,主要从事植物生态学研究,E-mail:denglei011124@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA05050403)资助

Distribution of Natural Grassland Biomass and Its Relationship with Influencing Factors in Shaanxi

DENG Lei, SHANGGUANG Zhou-ping

State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2012-02-24 Revised:2012-05-10 Online:2012-10-15 Published:2012-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 草地生态系统是全球陆地生态系统的重要组成部分,在全球碳循环中扮演着重要角色。以陕西省天然草地为研究对象,基于57个调查样地的地上、地下和凋落物生物量资料,分析不同植被类型草地生物量的空间分布特征及其影响因素,并揭示其之间的相互关系,为我国草地生态系统碳汇研究提供基础数据。结果表明:7种草地类型(暖性草丛类、暖性灌草丛类、温性山地草甸类、温性草甸草原、温性草原、温性荒漠草原类和低地盐化草甸类)的各部分生物量存在显著差异(P<0.05),其地上生物量分别为:238.3,293.6,157.0,350.5,156.9,99.9和144.6 g·m^-2,地下生物量分别为:670.2,560.5,726.3,1072.5,719.5,1156.7和775.0 g·m^-2,凋落物生物量分别为:332.2,294.0,328.5,271.4,107.4,97.2和155.7 g·m^-2;但是其群落总生物量差异不显著,分别为:1353.9,1240.8,1405.3,1501.0,983.8,1148.1和1075.3 g·m^-2。地下生物量均大于地上生物量和凋落物生物量,其分配比例介于38.8%~77.4%之间;地上生物量和凋落物生物量随海拔高度增加而极显著减少(P<0.01);地上生物量随生长期降雨量增加而极显著增加(P<0.01),随年均温增加而减少(P>0.05);地下生物量对降雨和温度的响应均不显著。因此,降水是陕西省天然草地生态系统地上生物量最主要的限制因子,且主要受生长期水分供给的制约,温度尚不是主要限制因子。

关键词: 天然草地, 生物量, 地上生物量, 地下生物量, 环境因子

Abstract: Grassland ecological system is an important component in the land ecological system, which played an important role in the global carbon cycle. This paper analyzed the spacial distribution pattern of natural grassland biomass of different vegetation types and its influencing factors in Shaanxi province, based on the 57 survey samples of the above- and belowground biomasses and litter biomasses, in order to provide some basic data for grassland ecological system carbon research in China. The results showed that every part of biomass in 7 kinds grass types, including warm-temperate hassock, warm-temperate hassock with shrubs, temperate mountain meadow, temperate meadow, temperate steppe, temperate desert steppe and low-land salinized meadow, were varied significantly (P<0.05). Their aboveground biomasses were 238.3, 293.6, 157.0, 350.5, 156.9, 99.9 and 144.6 g穖^-2,respectively; belowground biomasses were 670.2, 560.5, 726.3, 1072.5, 719.5, 1156.7 and 775.0 g穖^-2, respectively; and litter biomasses were 332.2, 294.0, 328.5, 271.4, 107.4, 97.2 and 155.7 g穖^-2, respectively. However, the community total biomasses had no significant difference in 7 kinds vegetation types. The value of them were 1353.9, 1240.8, 1405.3, 1501.0, 983.8, 1148.1 and 1075.3 g穖^-2, respectively. The belowground biomasses were larger than the aboveground and litter, and its distribution proportion ranged from 38.8% to 77.4%.The aboveground biomasses and litter biomasses significantly reduced with the increasing elevation (P<0.01) and aboveground biomasses significantly increased with the increasing precipitation (P<0.01), but reduced with the increasing annual mean temperature (P>0.05). The belowground biomasses responded to precipitation and temperature both were not significant. Therefore, precipitation is the major factor limiting the grassland ecological system biomass, and mainly restricted by the supply of water in the growing period. Temperature is not the main factor restricting the productivity of grassland ecological system.

Key words: Natural grassland, Biomass, Aboveground biomass, Belowground biomass, Environment factors

中图分类号:

Q948.155

邓蕾, 上官周平. 陕西省天然草地生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(5): 825-835.

DENG Lei, SHANGGUANG Zhou-ping. Distribution of Natural Grassland Biomass and Its Relationship with Influencing Factors in Shaanxi[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(5): 825-835.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.006

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2012/V20/I5/825

参考文献

[1] Scurlock J M O, Johnson K, Olson R J. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements [J]. Global Change Biology,2002,8(8):736-753
[2] Schenk H J, Jackson R B. The global biogeography of roots [J]. Ecological Monographs,2002,72(3):311-328
[3] Turner D P, Ritts W D, Cohen W B, et al. Site-level evaluation of satellite-based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring [J]. Global Change Biology,2005,11(4):666-684
[4] Scurlock J M O, Hall D O. The global carbon sink: a grassland perspective [J]. Global Change Biology,1998,4(2):229-233
[5] Jobbágy E G, Sala O E. Controls of grass and shrub aboveground production in the Patagonian steppe [J]. Ecological Applications,2000,10(2):541-549
[6] Garnett M H, Ineson P, Stevenson A C, et al. Terrestrial organic carbon storage in a British moorland [J]. Global Change Biology,2001,7(4):375-388
[7] Piao S L, Fang J Y, Zhou L M, et al. Changes in biomass carbon stocks in China’s grasslands between 1982 and 1999 [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2007,21(2):1-10
[8] Jones M B, Donnelly A. Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO₂ [J]. New Phytologist,2004,164(3):423-439
[9] Ni J. Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: estimates at different resolutions and their responses to climate change [J]. Climate Change,2001,49(3):339-358
[10] Ni J. Carbon storage in grasslands of China [J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2002,50(2):205-218
[11] 方精云,刘国华,徐嵩龄. 中国陆地生态系统的碳库[M]//王庚辰,温玉璞,编著. 温室气体浓度和排放监测及相关过程. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1996
[12] Ni J. Forage yield-based carbon storage in grasslands of China[J]. Climate Change,2004,67(2/3):237-246
[13] 朴世龙,方精云,贺金生,等. 中国草地植被生物量及其空间分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报,2004,28(4):491-498
[14] Ni J. Estimating net primary productivity of grasslands from field biomass measurements in temperate northern China [J]. Plant Ecology,2004,174(2):217-234
[15] 马文红,方精云. 中国北方典型草地物种丰富度与生产力的关系[J]. 生物多样性,2006,14(1):21-28
[16] Bai Y F, Han X G, Wu J G, et al. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland [J]. Nature,2004,431(9):181-184
[17] 陈佐忠,汪诗平. 中国典型草原生态系统[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2000
[18] 廖国藩,贾幼陵. 中国草地资源[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,1996
[19] Coupland R T. Grassland ecosystems of the world: Analysis of grasslands and their uses [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,1979
[20] Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, et al. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes[J]. Oecologia,1996,108(3):389-411
[21] 马文红,杨元和,贺金生,等. 内蒙古温带草地生物量及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国科学C辑:生命科学,2008,38(1):84-92
[22] 马文红,方精云,杨元和,等. 中国北方草地生物量动态及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 中国科学:生命科学,2010,40(7):632-641
[23] 杜国祯,覃光莲,李自珍,等. 高寒草甸植物群落中物种丰富度与生产力的关系研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2003,27(1):125-132
[24] 王玉辉,周广胜. 内蒙古羊草草原植物群落地上初级生产力时间动态对降水变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(6):1140-1145
[25] 韩彬,樊江文,钟华平. 内蒙古草地样带植物群落生物量的梯度研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2006,30(4):553-562
[26] 张丽霞,张炎,陈佐忠. 内蒙古锡林河流域草原植物群落功能群植物组成沿水热梯度变化的样带研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2002,26(3):308-316
[27] 白永飞,李凌浩,王其兵,等. 锡林河流域草原群落植物多样性和初级生产力沿水热梯度变化的样带研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2000,24(6):667-673
[28] 李凯辉,胡玉昆,王鑫,等. 不同海拔梯度高寒草地地上生物量与环境因子关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(9):2019-2024
[29] Bai Y F, Wu J G, Pan Q M, et al. Positive linear relationship between productivity and diversity: evidence from the Eurasian steppe [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,44(5):1023-1034
[30] Trumbore S E, Grandinski J B. The secret lives of roots [J]. Science,2003,302(5649):1344-1345
[31] Baer S G, Blair S L, Collins S L, et al. Soil resources regulate productivity and diversity in newly established tallgrass prairie [J]. Ecology,2003,84(3):724-735

陕西省天然草地生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素

Distribution of Natural Grassland Biomass and Its Relationship with Influencing Factors in Shaanxi

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[2]	张中华, 马丽, 周秉荣, 宋明华, 徐文华, 邓艳芳, 王芳, 佘延娣, 张骞, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 高寒草甸优势种功能多样性对增温和模拟放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[3]	麻莹, 张洪嘉, 库都斯·阿布都沙拉木, 耿淑娟, 薛傲然, 赵翰韦, 菅柏涵. 盐碱胁迫对盐地碱蓬生长、有机酸等溶质积累及其生理功能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1934-1940.
[4]	黄家兴, 吴静, 李纯斌, 秦格霞, 钱娟冰, 李怀海. 基于Sentinel-2和Landsat 8数据的天祝县草地地上生物量遥感反演[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[5]	高宏元, 侯蒙京, 葛静, 包旭莹, 李元春, 刘洁, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚, 贺金生, 钱大文. 基于随机森林的高寒草地地上生物量高光谱估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1757-1768.
[6]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[7]	孙宇, 张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 赵萌莉, 张彬. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原物种多样性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[8]	沃野, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 卢轩, 林志玲, 赵力兴, 李天琦, 高凯. 现蕾期磷添加对菊芋块茎产量及物质分配规律的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1594-1598.
[9]	郭超凡, 陈泽威, 张志高. 基于最优模型选择的牧草地上生物量遥感估算研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 946-955.
[10]	丁成翔, 刘禹. 光伏园区建设对青藏高原高寒荒漠草地土壤原核微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1061-1069.
[11]	郭艳红, 蒲小剑, 蒲小朋, 杜文华. 青藏高寒牧区天然草地地上生物量和营养品质的变化规律[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 734-742.
[12]	杜崇宣, 刘云根, 王妍, 包宁颖, 陈天. 砷污染对香蒲生长及根系分泌正构烷烃的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 349-355.
[13]	韩梦丽, 白史且, 孙盛楠, 鄢家俊, 张传杰, 张昌兵, 张靖雪, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 严学兵. 基于MaxEnt模型青藏高原老芒麦适生区模拟预测[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.
[14]	张力天, 刘炜, 刘德梅, 董瑞珍, 王晓丽, 张敏, 仁增曲扎, 边巴普尺, 杨时海, 马玉寿. 青藏高原白草生殖生长期植株器官生物量分配特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2694-2702.
[15]	岳丽楠, 师尚礼, 祁娟, 杨培志, 刘刚, 刘文辉, 张英俊, 荆晶莹. 免耕补播对北方退化草地生产力及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2583-2590.