草地学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 1287-1294.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.06.023

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

藏北草原牧民可持续生计分析—以班戈县为例

宋连久1, 孙自保1, 孙前路1, 方江平2, 苗彦军3, 徐雅梅3, 刘天平1   

  1. 1. 西藏大学农牧学院植物科学学院, 西藏 林芝 860000;
    2. 西藏大学农牧学院研究生处, 西藏 林芝 860000;
    3. 西藏大学农牧学院动物科学学院, 西藏 林芝 860000
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-13 修回日期:2015-01-23 出版日期:2015-12-15 发布日期:2016-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 徐雅梅
  • 作者简介:宋连久(1976-),男,蒙古族,内蒙古突泉人,管理学硕士,副教授,主要研究方向为农业经济管理和农户行为,E-mail:351267449@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAC04B03)(2011BAD17B05);西藏自治区科技厅地区基金项目(2013NM016);国家社会科学基金项目“西藏生态经济系统结构与功能研究”;西藏自治区科技厅软科学项目“基于冲突管理理论的西藏草原生态补偿机制研究”资助

Analysis of Sustainable Livelihoods of Grassland Herdsmen: a Case of Baingoin County in Northern Tibet

SONG Lian-jiu1, SUN Zi-bao1, SUN Qian-lu1, FANG Jiang-ping2, MIAO Yan-jun3, XU Ya-mei3, LIU Tian-ping1   

  1. 1. School of plant science, Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College of Tibet University, Linzhi, Tibet 860000, China;
    2. Graduate Department, Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College of Tibet University, Linzhi, Tibet 860000, China;
    3. School of animal science, Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College of Tibet University, Linzhi, Tibet 860000, China
  • Received:2014-11-13 Revised:2015-01-23 Online:2015-12-15 Published:2016-02-01

摘要:

运用实地调查的方法,对藏北草原牧业户和兼业户进行比较分析和回归分析,以期提高人们对藏北草原牧民生计状况的认识,并对藏北草原牧民生活水平提升和收入增长提供一定的参考依据。结果表明:班戈县牧业户呈现“低质化”特征;兼业户的资本禀赋要好于牧业户;拥有较多自然资本和经济资本的牧户习惯于以单纯依靠牧业收入作为其生计策略;拥有较多人力资本、物质资本和社会资本的牧户更愿意选择多种经营方式来获取更多收入;物质资本对牧户生计策略的影响最为显著,社会资本显著程度不高,而人力资本存量偏低。总体来说,牧民生计在提升藏北草原牧民生活水平和促进牧民收入提高过程中显得更加急迫和重要。

关键词: 生计资本, 生计策略, 兼业户, 牧业户

Abstract:

We utilized the method of field investigation and combined comparative analysis and regression analysis to evaluate the livelihood condition of grassland herdsmen in Northern Tibet. Through this study, it was to increase the cognition of the livelihood condition of grassland herdsmen in Northern Tibet and to provide some reference data for increasing herdsmen's living standard and income. Results showed that households only depending on the animal husbandry owned high natural capital and economic capital; households selected diversifying operations to obtain more income, who owned high human capital, material capital, and social capital. Material capital had the most significant effect on herdsmen's livelihood strategy, social capital effect was slight, and stock of human capital was low. As a whole, herdsmen's livelihood appeared more urgently and importantly in the process of improving their living standard and income.

Key words: Livelihood capital, Livelihood strategy, Household with combined occupations, Animal husbandry household

中图分类号: