模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸阴山扁蓿豆根系特征的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.02.011

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 348-355.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.02.011

模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸阴山扁蓿豆根系特征的影响

肖红, 张德罡, 徐长林, 潘涛涛, 柴锦隆, 李亚娟, 鱼小军

甘肃农业大学草业学院, 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室, 中美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃省草业工程实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2017-09-21 修回日期:2018-04-10 出版日期:2018-04-15 发布日期:2018-07-05
通讯作者: 鱼小军
作者简介:肖红(1990-),女,甘肃省兰州人,硕士,主要从事牧草种质与草地生态研究,E-mail:1181827215@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31360570）资助

Effects of Simulated Yak and Tibetan Sheep Trampling and Rainfall on Root Characteristics of Medicago ruthenica var. inschanica on Alpine Meadow

XIAO Hong, ZHANG De-gang, XU Chang-lin, PAN Tao-tao, CHAI Jin-long, Li Ya-juan, YU Xiao-jun

Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education in Sino-U. S. Centers for Grazing land Ecosystem Sustainability/Pratacultural Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2017-09-21 Revised:2018-04-10 Online:2018-04-15 Published:2018-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

放牧家畜主要通过践踏、采食和排泄物三方面影响草地稳定性、恢复力和生产力。研究践踏与降水对高寒草甸植物根系特征的影响，有助于全面理解放牧对草地的影响，进而为草地放牧管理提供依据。以天祝高寒草甸分布的阴山扁蓿豆为研究材料进行了为期2年的野外试验，研究了模拟牦牛和藏羊践踏及模拟降水量对阴山扁蓿豆根系特征的影响。结果表明，同一放牧强度下，牦牛践踏对阴山扁蓿豆根系生长的不利影响大于藏羊践踏。随着模拟牦牛和藏羊践踏强度的增加、降水量的降低，阴山扁蓿豆根表面积、根体积和根系生物量在各土层（0～10 cm，10～20 cm，20～30 cm）均呈下降趋势。少雨和牦牛重度践踏抑制了阴山扁蓿豆0～20 cm土层的根系生长；平水和丰水处理下阴山扁蓿豆根体积和根系生物量在各处理间均无显著差异，家畜践踏对深层根系（20～30 cm）的影响较小。总体来看，降水减少会极显著地影响各土层根表面积、根体积和根系生物量，水分对阴山扁蓿豆根系的影响大于家畜践踏。

关键词: 牦牛, 藏羊, 模拟践踏, 模拟降水, 阴山扁蓿豆, 根系特征

Abstract:

Grassland stability, resilience and productivity were influenced by grazing livestock mainly through trampling, intaking and excrement. The study of the effects of trampling and precipitation on the reproductive characteristics of alpine meadow plant are helpful to fully understand the influence of grazing on grassland and provide the basis for grassland grazing management. In this study, Medicago ruthenica var. inschanica, which naturally distribute in Tianzhu alpine meadow, was used as the research material, a series of field experiments lasted for two years that were conducted at the Tianzhu alpine meadow in Gansu Province, and the effects of simulated yak and Tibetan sheep trampling and simulated precipitation on root characteristics of M. ruthenica var. inschanica were studied. The results showed that the adverse effect of yak trampling on the root growth was more serious than that of Tibetan sheep under the same grazing intensity. The root surface area, root volume and root biomass of M. ruthenica var. inschanica decreased in different soil layers (from 0 to 10 cm, 10 to 20 cm, 20 to 30 cm) with increasing yak and Tibetan sheep trampling intensity and declining rainfall. The root growth (0~20 cm) was inhibited by lower level rainfall and yaks heavy trampling. There was no significant difference in root volume and root biomass between treatments under average and high level of rainfall, and the effects of livestock trampling on the deep root of M. ruthenica var. inschanica (20~30 cm) was small. Overall, rainfall reduction significantly affects the root surface area, root volume and root biomass of M. ruthenica var. inschanica in different soil layers, and the effect of water on the root of M. ruthenica var. inschanica is greater than the trampling.

Key words: Yak, Tibetan sheep, Simulated trampling, Simulated rainfall, Medicago ruthenica var. inschanica, Root characteristics

中图分类号:

Q541.9

肖红, 张德罡, 徐长林, 潘涛涛, 柴锦隆, 李亚娟, 鱼小军. 模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸阴山扁蓿豆根系特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 348-355.

XIAO Hong, ZHANG De-gang, XU Chang-lin, PAN Tao-tao, CHAI Jin-long, Li Ya-juan, YU Xiao-jun. Effects of Simulated Yak and Tibetan Sheep Trampling and Rainfall on Root Characteristics of Medicago ruthenica var. inschanica on Alpine Meadow[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(2): 348-355.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.02.011

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2018/V26/I2/348

参考文献

[1] 丁海君,韩国栋,王忠武,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原不同载畜率对植物群落特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2014,36(2):55-60
[2] 梁建生,张建华,曹显祖. 根系环境温度变化对根系吸水和叶片蒸腾的影响[J]. 植物学报,1998,40(12):1152-1158
[3] Peters D P C. Plant species dominance at a grassland-shrubland ecotone:an individual-based gap dynamics model of herbaceous and woody species[J]. Ecological Modelling,2002,152(1):5-32
[4] 王长庭,王启兰,景增春,等. 不同放牧梯度下高寒小嵩草草甸植被根系和土壤理化特征的变化[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(5):9-15
[5] 范国艳. 放牧对贝加尔针茅草原群落地上生物量和根系分布特征的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2010
[6] Parsons A J,Penning P D. The effect of the duration of regrowth on photosynthesis, leaf death and the average rate of growth in a rotationally grazed sward[J]. Grass and Forage Science,1988,44(1):15-27
[7] Kaiblinger C,Greisberger S,Teubner K,et al. Photosynthetic efficiency as a function of thermal stratification and phytoplankton size structure in an oligotrophic alpine lake[J]. Hydrobiologia,2007,578(1):29-36
[8] 侯扶江,任继周. 甘肃马鹿冬季放牧践踏作用及其对土壤理化性质影响的评价[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(3):486-495
[9] Coppolillo P B. Central-place analysis and modeling of landscape-scale resource use in an East African agropastoral system[J]. Landscape Ecology,2001,16(3):205-219
[10] 林慧龙. 放牧家畜模拟践踏器研究[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(5):636-642
[11] 林慧龙,任继周. 环县典型草原放牧家畜践踏的模拟研究[J]. 草地学报,2008,16(1):97-99
[12] 侯扶江,常生华,于应文,等. 放牧家畜的践踏作用研究评述[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(4):784-789
[13] Kobayashi T,Hori Y,Nomoto N. Effects of trampling and vegetation removal on species diversity and micro-environment under different shade conditions[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1997,8(6):873-880
[14] 俞斌华,侯扶江,林慧龙. 牧草种群生长对家畜践踏的短期响应[J]. 草业学报,2005,14(4):119-124
[15] Olff H,Vera F W M,Bokdam J,et al. Shifting mosaics in grazed woodlands driven by the alternation of plant facilitation and competition[J]. Plant Biology,1999,1(2):127-137
[16] 李金花,潘浩文,王刚. 草地植物种群繁殖对策研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2004,24(2):352-355
[17] 段春华. 不同处理对12种高寒植物种子萌发特性的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013
[18] 苗福泓. 青藏高原东北缘草地植物群落对放牧利用强度和降水变异的响应[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2015
[19] 齐高先,钱莉,汪作成. 天祝县近60年气候变化分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2014,42(16):5255-5257
[20] 林慧龙. 环县典型草原放牧家畜践踏的模拟研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2007
[21] 杨海磊. 天祝高寒草甸牦牛和藏羊蹄压与践踏强度的研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016
[22] 柴锦隆,徐长林,杨海磊. 模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸土壤物理特性和微生物数量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(2):30-42
[23] Imhoff S,Silva A P D,Tormena C A. Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties in areas under elephant-grass short-duration grazing system[J]. Plant and Soil,2000,219(1):161-168
[24] Clay G D,Worrall F. The response of CO₂, fluxes from a peat soil to variation in simulated sheep trampling[J]. Geoderma,2013,s197-198(3):59-66
[25] Taddese G,Saleem M A,Abyie A,et al. Impact of grazing on plant species richness, plant biomass, plant attribute, and soil physical and hydrological properties of vertisol in East African highlands[J]. Environmental Management,2002,29(2):279-89
[26] 高英志,韩兴国,汪诗平. 放牧对草原土壤的影响[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(4):790-797
[27] 任继周. 草原地下生物量的启示[J]. 草业科学,2006,23(6):91-91
[28] Rodgers L R,Day F P,Atkinson R. Root dynamics in restored and naturally regenerated Atlantic white cedar wetlands[J]. Restoration Ecology,2004,12(3):401-411
[29] 于轶. 家畜放牧行为分解模拟实验与植物小型化过程的研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2007
[30] 王东波. 内蒙古典型草原退化群落植物根系分布浅层化的现象分析与机理探讨[D]. 呼和浩特内蒙古大学,2007
[31] 柴锦隆,徐长林,张建文,等. 高寒草甸土壤物理特性和微生物数量对模拟践踏的响应[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(6):1234-1240
[32] 肖红. 模拟牦牛、藏羊践踏和降水对阴山扁蓿豆繁殖和光合特性的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2017
[33] Cole D N,Bayfield N G. Recreational trampling of vegetation:standard experimental procedures[J]. Biological Conservation,1993,63(3):209-215
[34] Cole D N,Spildie D R.Hiker, horse and llama trampling effects on native vegetation in Montana, USA[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53(1):61-71
[35] 徐满厚,刘敏,翟大彤,等. 模拟增温对青藏高原高寒草甸根系生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(21):6812-6822
[36] 林慧龙,王苗苗,李学玲,等. 在模拟降水和践踏处理复合作用下长芒草典型草原土壤可蚀性研究[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(3):76-87
[37] 林慧龙,侯扶江,李飞. 家畜践踏对环县草原地下生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2008,16(2):186-190

模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸阴山扁蓿豆根系特征的影响

Effects of Simulated Yak and Tibetan Sheep Trampling and Rainfall on Root Characteristics of Medicago ruthenica var. inschanica on Alpine Meadow

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙彩彩, 冯斌, 董全民, 刘文亭, 时光, 刘玉祯, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 杨晓霞. 牦牛藏羊混合放牧对高寒草地紫花针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[2]	杨阳, 章妮, 蒋莉莉, 陈克龙. 青海湖高寒草地土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征对模拟降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[3]	夏洪泽, 张琳琳, 王银梦, 孙璐, 王磊, 刘书杰, 崔占鸿, 刘明莲. 体外产气法评价不同分级指数玉米青贮—苜蓿干草组合发酵特性[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1136-1144.
[4]	张建文, 杨海磊, 徐长林, 陈陆军, 肖红, 柴锦隆, 潘涛涛, 鱼小军. 牦牛和藏羊夏季划区轮牧对高寒草甸3种植物凋落物分解的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 732-742.
[5]	柴锦隆, 徐长林, 张建文, 杨海磊, 肖红, 潘涛涛, 王艳, 鱼小军. 高寒草甸土壤物理特性和微生物数量对模拟践踏的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1234-1240.
[6]	吴铁成, 吴建平, 赵生国, 焦婷, 九麦扎西, 梁建勇, 刘振恒, 卡召加. 甘南玛曲不同年龄欧拉型藏羊放牧采食量季节动态研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 317-321.
[7]	李积兰, 刘书杰, 柴沙驼, 王迅, 崔占鸿, 张晓卫, 牛建章. 体外产气法评价精补料与冷季天然牧草组合发酵营养特性[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 850-858.
[8]	董全民, 赵新全, 李世雄, 施建军, 王彦龙, 郑伟, 候宪宽, 宋磊. 基于高寒草地放牧系统次级生产力的优化放牧强度研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 919-923.
[9]	苗彦军, 付娟娟, 孙永芳, 褚希彤, 益西措姆, 呼天明, 许岳飞. 牦牛放牧模式对西藏高山嵩草草甸群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 935-941.
[10]	刁波, 崔占鸿, 赵月平, 张晓卫, 刘书杰. 燕麦青干草与5种天然牧草的组合效应对产气量及发酵产物的影响[J]. , 2013, 21(4): 789-797.
[11]	王宏博, 丁学智, 郎侠, 梁春年, 阎萍, 李发弟. 甘南玛曲夏季牧场欧拉型藏羊牧食行为的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(3): 583-588.
[12]	董全民, 赵新全, 马玉寿, 施建军, 王彦龙, 李世雄, 杨时海, 盛丽. 放牧强度对高寒混播人工草地群落特征及地上现存量的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 10-16.
[13]	林慧龙. 放牧家畜模拟践踏器研究[J]. , 2009, 17(5): 636-642.
[14]	刘发央, 徐长林, 龙瑞军. 牦牛放牧强度对金露梅灌丛草地群落物种多样性的影响[J]. , 2008, 16(6): 613-618.
[15]	董全民, 马玉寿, 李青云. 放牧强度对牦牛生长的影响[J]. , 2003, 11(3): 256-260,276.