昭通南方草山退化及人工改造对土壤种子库的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.06.006

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 1359-1369.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.06.006

• 生态与草原修复 • 上一篇

昭通南方草山退化及人工改造对土壤种子库的影响

朱虹^1,3, 沈有信^1,2, 陈发军^1,3, 付珣^1,3, 王文⁴

1. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园热带森林生态学重点实验室, 云南昆明 650223;
2. 中国科学院核心植物园, 云南勐仑 666303;
3. 中国科学院大学生命科学学院, 北京 100049;
4. 云南省种羊繁殖推广中心, 云南寻甸 655204

收稿日期:2021-10-22 修回日期:2021-12-29 发布日期:2022-07-05
通讯作者: 沈有信,E-mail:yxshen@xtbg.ac.cn
作者简介:朱虹(1996-),女,汉族,云南楚雄人,硕士研究生,主要从事种子生态和恢复生态学研究,E-mail:zhuhong@xtbg.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项-昭通南方草地恢复技术与优质牧草群落构建（XDA26020203-2）资助。

Impacts of the Degraded Grassy Hill and Artificial Reconstruction on Soil Seed Bank in Southern Zhaotong

ZHU Hong^1,3, SHEN You-xin^1,2, CHEN Fa-jun^1,3, FU Xun^1,3, WANG Wen⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650223, China;
2. Core Botanical Gardens, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan Province 666303, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. Yunnan Sheep Breeding Promotion Center, Kunming, Yunnan Province 655204, China

Received:2021-10-22 Revised:2021-12-29 Published:2022-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤种子库在退化生态系统的恢复中发挥着重要作用。本研究选取了昭通南方草山的4类草地，采集土样后通过萌发实验揭示其土壤种子库特征。结果表明：4类样地的土壤样品中共萌发出45种植物，隶属于20科39属，种子库储量为3 087～18 553粒·m^-2，种子库密度随土层加深均在逐渐降低。与轻度放牧草地相比，过度放牧草地的土壤种子库密度下降，但物种数量和多样性增加；严重退化的稀草裸斑土地种子库密度则显著降低（P<0.05），物种数量和多样性减少；而人工改造后的草地种子库密度显著增高（P<0.05）、物种数量和多样性也达到最高。昭通南方草山种子库与地上植被的总相似性系数为0.22～0.45，过度放牧草地、稀草裸斑土地和人工改造草地种子库与地上植被的相似系数均高于轻度放牧草地。总之，昭通南方草山退化和人工改造对土壤种子库产生巨大影响，上述结果可为后期退化草地治理提供理论依据。

关键词: 土壤种子库, 草山, 恢复潜力, 干扰

Abstract: Soil seed banks play important roles in the restoration of degraded ecosystems. In this study,four types of grassland in the grassy hill of southern Zhaotong were selected,and the characteristics of soil seed banks were revealed through germination experiments. The results show that:there were 45 plant species appeared in the soil seed banks,which belong to 20 families and 39 genera. The density of soil seed banks was between 3 087~18 553 seeds·m^-2,and the seed density decreased with increase of soil depth. Compared with light grazing grassland,the density of soil seed bank in overgrazing grassland decreased,but the number and diversity of species increased. However,the density of soil seed bank in bare grassland decreased significantly (P< 0.05),and the number and diversity of species decreased. After artificial reconstruction,the density of seed bank increased significantly (P< 0.05),and the number and diversity of species reached the highest number. The total similarity coefficient between seed bank and aboveground vegetation in grassy hill of southern Zhaotong is between 0.22 and 0.45. This similarity coefficient in overgrazing grassland,bare grassland and artificial grassland was higher than light grazing grassland. In conclusion,the degraded grassy hill and artificial reconstruction has a huge impact on soil seed banks in southern Zhaotong,and those results can provide a basis for the management of degraded grasslands at a later stage.

Key words: Soil seed bank, Grassy hill, Disturbance, Restoration potentiality

中图分类号:

S812.5

朱虹, 沈有信, 陈发军, 付珣, 王文. 昭通南方草山退化及人工改造对土壤种子库的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1359-1369.

ZHU Hong, SHEN You-xin, CHEN Fa-jun, FU Xun, WANG Wen. Impacts of the Degraded Grassy Hill and Artificial Reconstruction on Soil Seed Bank in Southern Zhaotong[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1359-1369.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.06.006

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I6/1359

参考文献

[1] ESKELINEN A E,ELWOOD S,HARRISON E,et al. Vulnerability of grassland seed banks to resource-enhancing global changes[J]. Ecology,2021,e03512
[2] 曹敏,唐勇,张建侯,等. 西双版纳热带森林的土壤种子库储量及优势成分[J]. 云南植物究,1997,19(02):77-83
[3] DEANDRAD L G A,SANCHEZ-TAPIA A,DEANDRADE A C S. Germination,viability and dormancy of 47 species from threatened tropical montane grassland in southeast Brazil:Implications for ex situ conservation[J].Plant Biology,2021,23(5):735-742
[4] MA M,ZHOU X,MA Z,et al. Composition of the soil seed bank and vegetation changes after wetland drying and soil salinization on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2012(44):18-24
[5] 李聪,马真,武林,等. 种子大小和原位埋藏对17种高寒草甸植物种子萌发率和死亡率的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(10):2169-2175
[6] WARR S J,THOMPSON K,KENT M. Seed banks as a neglected area of biogeographic research:a review of literature and sampling techniques[J]. Progress in Physical Geography-Earth and Environment,1993,17(3):329-347
[7] MA M,DU G,ZHOU X. Role of the Soil Seed Bank during Succession in a Subalpine Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research,2009,41(4):469-477
[8] 李博. 我国草地资源现况、问题及对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊,1997,12(1):49-51
[9] 张新时,李博,史培军. 南方草地资源开发利用对策研究[J]. 自然资源学报,1998,13(1):1-7
[10] 云南省第三次全国国土调查领导小组办公室,云南省自然资源厅,云南省统计局. 云南省第三次全国国土调查主要数据公报[R]. http://dnr.yn.gov.cn/html/2021-12/101559_1.html,2021-12-22
[11] 洪世奇,李晓兵,刘学敏,等. 云南省生态建设与常绿草地畜牧业基地的建设[J]. 资源科学,2004,26(3):35-43
[12] 陈功,余成群,沈振西,等. 草地质量监控[M]. 云南大学出版社,2018:313-315
[13] TEKLE K,BEKELE T. The role of soil seed banks in the rehabilitation of degraded hillslopes in southern Wello,Ethiopia[J]. Biotropica,2000,32(1):23-32
[14] 孙映通,夏礼庆,林琳,等. 香格里拉亚高山森林带退化群落土壤种子库特征与土壤理化性质分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(5):1014-1026
[15] 牛瑞芳,吴铁航,柴宝峰. 黄土高原亚高山草地退化对土壤种子库的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(05):972-981
[16] 冯昶栋,郭小平,罗超,等. 干旱矿区不同干扰强度下土壤种子库特征[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(03):443-452
[17] GANN G D,MCDONALD T,WALDER B,et al. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition[J]. Restoration Ecology,2019,27(S1):S3-S46
[18] VALKO O,TOROK P,TOTHMERESZ B,et al. Restoration Potential in Seed Banks of Acidic Fen and Dry-Mesophilous Meadows:Can Restoration Be Based on Local Seed Banks?[J]. Restoration Ecology,2011,19(101):9-15
[19] LIU M,JIANG G,YU S,et al. The Role of Soil Seed Banks in Natural Restoration of the Degraded Hunshandak Sandlands,Northern China[J]. Restoration Ecology,2009,17(1):127-136
[20] SANOU L,ZIDA D,SAVADOGO P,et al. Comparison of aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank composition at sites of different grazing intensity around a savanna-woodland watering point in West Africa[J]. Journal of Plant Research,2018,131(3):773-788
[21] 白文娟,焦菊英,张振国. 黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地土壤种子库对植被恢复的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2008,30(04):65-71
[22] 张涛,陈智平,车克钧.等. 干旱区矿区不同立地类型土壤种子库特征[J]. 干旱区研究,2017,34(1):51-58
[23] 赵晓男,唐进年,樊宝丽,等. 高寒地区不同程度沙化草地土壤种子库特征[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(12):2431-2443
[24] 赵丽娅,李锋瑞. 沙漠化过程土壤种子库特征的研究[J]. 干旱区研究,2003,20(04):317-321
[25] 刘洪来,毛林灿,靳瑰丽,等. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠不同退化阶段草地土壤种子库分析[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(3):413-418
[26] 力志,操瑜,付文龙,等. 天鹅洲湿地退化区土壤种子库与地面植被关系初探[J]. 水生态学杂志,2016,37(3):34-41
[27] 云南植被编写组. 云南植被[M]. 科学出版社,1987:591-608
[28] TERHEERDT G N J,VERWEIJ G L,BEKKER R M,et al. An improved method for seed-bank analysis:Seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving[J]. Functional Ecology,1996,10(1):144-151
[29] 沈有信,刘文耀,官会林. 土壤种子库样品萌发的前处理方法:水洗减量[J]. 土壤学报,2008,45(6):1199-1202
[30] 李国旗,李淑君,蒙静,等. 土壤种子库研究方法评述[J]. 生态环境学报,2013,22(10):1721-1726
[31] JACQUEMYN H,MECHELEN C V,BRYS R,et al. Management effects on the vegetation and soil seed bank of calcareous grasslands:An 11-year experiment[J]. Biological Conservation,2011,144(1):416-422
[32] SILVERTOWN J W. Introduction to plant population ecology[M]. New York:Longman Group Limited,1982:35-56
[33] 沈有信,赵春燕. 中国土壤种子库研究进展与挑战[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(2):467-473
[34] 李嵘,李恒. 大山包黑颈鹤国家级自然保护区的植物生态生活型研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2012,41(1):69-76
[35] GONZALEZ S L,GHERMANDI L. Overgrazing causes a reduction in the vegetation cover and seed bank of Patagonian grasslands[J]. Plant and Soil,2021,464(1-2):75-87
[36] MA M,WALCK J L,ZHEN M,et al. Grazing disturbance increases transient but decreases persistent soil seed bank[J]. Ecological Applications,2018,28(4):1020-1031
[37] 赵丽娅,李元哲,陈红兵,等. 科尔沁沙地恢复过程中地上定植群落与土壤种子库特征及其关系研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2018,27(02):5-14
[38] 申波,马青青,程云湘,等. 不同放牧制度对土壤种子库的影响——以青藏高原东缘高寒草甸为例[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(04):791-799
[39] 李志强,王明玖,陈海军,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤种子库对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(06):184-188
[40] 蒋德明,李荣平,刘志民,等. 科尔沁草甸草地放牧和割草条件下土壤种子库研究[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(10):170-174
[41] 张起鹏,赵成章,王倩,等. 高寒干旱退化草地披针叶黄华群落土壤种子库[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(2):305-311
[42] TEMPLETON A R,LEVIN D A. Evolutionary consequences of seed pools[J]. The American Naturalist,1979,114(2):232-249
[43] 季青梅. 浅析外来杂草大爪草在昭通市的分布及危害[J]. 云南农业,2014(06):16-17
[44] LI X W,MA W J,XING F. A review of seed ecology of poisonous plants in the world's grasslands[J]. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology,2021(110),103711
[45] 李国旗,邵文山,赵盼盼,等. 荒漠草原区4种植物群落土壤种子库特征及其土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(17):6282-6292
[46] 沈有信,江洁,陈胜国,等. 滇东南岩溶山地退化植被土壤种子库的储量与组成[J]. 植物生态学报,2004,28(1):101-106
[47] BOSSUYT B,HONNAY O. Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration?An overview of seed bank characteristics in European communities[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,2008,19(6):875-884
[48] GONZALEZ S,GHERMANDI L. Postfire seed bank dynamics in semiarid grasslands[J]. Plant Ecology,2008,199(2):175-185

昭通南方草山退化及人工改造对土壤种子库的影响

Impacts of the Degraded Grassy Hill and Artificial Reconstruction on Soil Seed Bank in Southern Zhaotong

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邵梓桐, 秦彧. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草地碳循环的影响研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1086-1094.
[2]	张彩军, 王小燕, 刘倩倩, 安康, 蒲强胜, 王志成, 苏军虎. 人为活动干扰对甘南高寒草甸喜马拉雅旱獭食性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1219-1226.
[3]	牛瑞芳, 吴铁航, 柴宝峰. 黄土高原亚高山草地退化对土壤种子库的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 972-981.
[4]	李聪, 马真, 武林, 任彦梅, 孙建平, 傅延锦, 孟洁, 宁鑫蕊, 周华坤, 张春辉. 种子大小和原位埋藏对17种高寒草甸植物种子萌发率和死亡率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2169-2175.
[5]	罗鑫萍, 张祖欣, 陈大立, 胡小文. 黄土高原人工灌草系统不同立地条件土壤种子库特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 940-946.
[6]	杨晶, 张倩, 姚宝辉, 蔡志远, 王缠, 郭怀亮, 苏军虎. 高原鼢鼠扰动对高寒草甸土壤理化特性及植物生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 492-499.
[7]	田梦, 孙宗玖, 李培英, 汪洋. 增温对蒿类荒漠草地可萌发土壤种子库及其多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 141-148.
[8]	任伟, 赵允格, 许明祥, 徐安凯. 黄土丘陵区草地根系生物量对踩踏干扰生物结皮的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1702-1709.
[9]	才文代吉, 张静, 谈静, 孙海群. 高寒草甸鼠丘土壤种子库结构特征的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1181-1187.
[10]	陈学平, 杨艳刚, 尚占环, 陈济丁, 孔亚平, 王九峦. 青藏高原公路两侧草地土壤种子库特征研究—以国道214公路共玉公路段为例[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 85-91.
[11]	韩炳宏, 牛得草, 袁晓波, 任运涛, 石明明, 吴让, 傅华. 围封与放牧措施下生物土壤结皮发育及其微生境土壤养分特征[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1218-1225.
[12]	陈珂璐, 余欣超, 姚步青, 马真, 王文颖, 王慧春, 周华坤, 赵新全. 不同放牧强度下门源草原毛虫在高寒草甸上的空间分布[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 191-197.
[13]	罗黎鸣, 苗彦军, 潘影, 武建双, 武俊喜, 余成群, 赵延, 赵贯锋. 不同干扰强度对拉萨河谷草甸草原群落特征和功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1161-1166.
[14]	李春鸣, 龙玲, 徐长林, 王明明, 张德罡. 祁连山东麓高寒草甸不同退化程度草地土壤种子库特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 957-962.
[15]	杨涵越, 聂梅, 黄永梅, 张景慧. 蜥蜴对内蒙古典型草原群落多样性和地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 246-251.