放牧强度对半干旱草地优势植物赖草功能性状的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.022

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 2108-2117.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

放牧强度对半干旱草地优势植物赖草功能性状的影响

张琦^1,2,3,4, 郭琛文^1,2,3,4, 姚蒙蒙^1,2,3,4, 董宽虎^1,2,3,4, 王常慧^1,2,3,4, 任国华^1,2,3,4

1. 山西农业大学草业学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 草地生态保护与乡土草种质创新山西省重点实验室, 山西太谷 030801;
3. 山西右玉黄土高原草地生态系统定位观测研究站, 山西右玉 037200;
4. 农业农村部饲草高效生产模式创新重点实验室, 山西太谷 030801

收稿日期:2022-01-06 修回日期:2022-03-29 发布日期:2022-09-01
通讯作者: 任国华,E-mail:rengh07@126.com
作者简介:张琦(1995-),女,汉族,山西临汾人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地资源与管理研究,E-mail:17865622120@163.com
基金资助:
山西省自然科学基金（20210302123379）；国家自然科学基金（31501998）；山西省重点实验室项目（202104010910017）资助

Effects of Grazing Intensities on Functional Traits of the Dominant Plant Leymus secalinus in Semi-arid Grassland

ZHANG Qi^1,2,3,4, GUO Chen-wen^1,2,3,4, YAO Meng-meng^1,2,3,4, DONG Kuan-hu^1,2,3,4, WANG Chang-hui^1,2,3,4, REN Guo-hua^1,2,3,4

1. College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecological Protection and Native Grass Germplasm Innovation, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
3. Youyu Loess Plateau Grassland Ecosystem Research Station, Shanxi Agricultural University, Youyu, Shanxi Province 037200, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China

Received:2022-01-06 Revised:2022-03-29 Published:2022-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 放牧是草原生态系统中草地利用的主要方式，研究草地植物功能性状对长期放牧干扰的响应策略具有重要意义。本文以晋北农牧交错带半干旱草地为例，研究优势植物赖草(Leymus secalinus)功能性状在不同放牧强度下的变化，结果表明：放牧显著降低了赖草株高等形态结构性状以及茎叶比等生产力性状(P<0.05)，中度放牧与不放牧的差异最小；整株干重(地上部分)的变异系数(52.92%)和可塑性指数(93.17%)最大；生产力性状、光合生理性状和化学计量3类性状内部指标之间的相关性均为极显著正相关(P<0.01)；茎氮磷比等性状是赖草响应放牧干扰的主要功能性状。本研究表明，中度放牧下，赖草具有补偿性生长的能力，矮化型变特征和非对称性响应机制是赖草在放牧干扰下的主要适应方式。

关键词: 放牧强度, 赖草, 功能性状, 资源权衡

Abstract: Grazing is the main way of grassland utilization in grassland ecosystems. It is of great significance to study the response strategies of functional traits of grassland plants to long-term grazing disturbance. In this paper,we studied the changes of functional traits of the dominant plant Leymus secalinus under different grazing intensities,with the semi-arid grassland of farming-pastoral transition zone in northern Shanxi Province as an example. The results showed as follows:grazing significantly lowered the morphological structure traits such as plant height and the productivity traits such as the ratio of stem to leaf of L. secalinus (P<0.05),with the least difference between moderate grazing and no grazing;the coefficient of variation (52.92%) and plasticity index (93.17%) of whole plant dry weight (aboveground) were the highest;the correlation among the internal indexes of three functional traits such as productivity traits,photosynthetic physiological traits and stoichiometry was very significant positive correlation (P<0.01);stem N/P ratio,stem length,ratio of stem to leaf,leaf N/P ratio,plant height,leaf length,leaf area and whole plant dry weight (aboveground) were the main functional traits of L. secalinus in response to grazing disturbance. This study showed that under moderate grazing,L. secalinus had the ability of compensatory growth,and dwarf morphological characteristics and asymmetric response mechanism were the main adaptation modes of L. secalinus under grazing disturbance.

Key words: Grazing intensity, Leymus secalinus, Functional trait, Trade-off

中图分类号:

S812

张琦, 郭琛文, 姚蒙蒙, 董宽虎, 王常慧, 任国华. 放牧强度对半干旱草地优势植物赖草功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2108-2117.

ZHANG Qi, GUO Chen-wen, YAO Meng-meng, DONG Kuan-hu, WANG Chang-hui, REN Guo-hua. Effects of Grazing Intensities on Functional Traits of the Dominant Plant Leymus secalinus in Semi-arid Grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2108-2117.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I8/2108

参考文献

[1] 刘思洋,李雪华,骆永明,等. 围封和放牧草地植物多样性对氮添加的响应差异[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(12):3635-3641
[2] LOUAULT F,PILLAR V D,AUFRÈRE J,et al. Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,2005,16(2):151-160
[3] 李西良,刘志英,侯向阳,等. 放牧对草原植物功能性状及其权衡关系的调控[J]. 植物学报,2015,50(2):159-170
[4] 王晓芳,马红彬,刘杰,等. 放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(2):569-576
[5] ZHANG J H,HUANG Y M,CHEN H Y,et al. Response of plant functional traits at species and community levels to grazing exclusion on Inner Mongolian steppe,China[J]. Rangeland Journal,2018,40(2):179-189
[6] WRIGHT I J,REICH P B,WESTOBY M,et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature,2004,428(6985):821-827
[7] 何芸雨,郭水良,王喆. 植物功能性状权衡关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2019,43(12):1021-1035
[8] 赵娜,赵新全,赵亮,等. 植物功能性状对放牧干扰的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(7):1916-1926
[9] LAVOREL S,GRIGULIS K,LAMARQUE P,et al. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Ecology,2011,99(1):135-147
[10] 安慧. 放牧干扰对荒漠草原植物叶性状及其相互关系的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(11):2991-2996
[11] DÍAZ S,LAVOREL S,DE BELLO F,et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America,2007,104(52):20684-20689
[12] WESTOBY M. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme[J]. Plant and Soil,1998,199(2):213-227
[13] RUSCH G M,SKARPE C,HALLEY D J. Plant traits link hypothesis about resource-use and response to herbivory[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2009,10(5):466-474
[14] KLIMESOVA J,LATZEL V,DE BELLO F,et al. Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing:towards a use of more specific traits[J]. Preslia,2008,80(3):245-253
[15] 李西良,侯向阳,吴新宏,等. 草甸草原羊草茎叶功能性状对长期过度放牧的可塑性响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(5):440-451
[16] DAMHOUREYEH S A,HARTNETT D C. Variation in grazing tolerance among three tallgrass prairie plant species[J]. American Journal of Botany,2002,89(10):1634-1643
[17] CHAVE J,COOMES D,JANSEN S,et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum[J]. Ecology Letters,2009,12(4):351-366
[18] WEEMSTRA M,MOMMER L,VISSER E J W,et al. Towards a multidimensional root trait framework:a tree root review[J]. The New phytologist,2016,211(4):1159-1169
[19] 张浩阳,刘美君,卫丹丹,等. 不同秋眠级苜蓿越冬前后叶片光合作用的比较研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(4):983-991
[20] SCHLEIP I,LATTANZI F A,SCHNYDER H. Common leaf life span of co-dominant species in a continuously grazed temperate pasture[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2013,14(1):54-63
[21] 孙建平,张志华,董宽虎. 晋北地区不同紫花苜蓿品种生产性能比较[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(11):2300-2305
[22] 杜利霞,樊鹏鹏,董宽虎,等. 山西不同居群野生赖草光合特性研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,36(10):715-719,750
[23] 银晓瑞,梁存柱,王立新,等. 内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):39-47
[24] 孙一梅,田青,郭爱霞,等. 放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(3):563-571
[25] 崔猛. 不同放牧强度对北方农牧交错带地下净初级生产力和根系动态的影响[D]. 长春:东北师范大学,2020:51
[26] 申颜,孙建平,罗玉坤,等. 短期放牧对半干旱草地生态系统CO₂和N₂O排放的影响[J]. 环境科学,2018,39(11):5237-5245
[27] 任国华,张宾宾,张智袁,等. 放牧和围封对赖草草地群落空间分布特征的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,35(5):504-508
[28] 申颜. 不同放牧强度对北方农牧交错带半干旱草地生态系统温室气体通量的影响[D]. 晋中:山西农业大学,2019:8
[29] 龚时慧,温仲明,施宇. 延河流域植物群落功能性状对环境梯度的响应[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(20):6088-6097
[30] 国家林业局. LY/T 1269-1999 森林植物与森林枯枝落叶层全氮的测定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1999:274-278
[31] 国家林业局. LY/T 1270-1999 森林植物与森林枯枝落叶层全硅、铁、铝、钙、镁、钾、钠、磷、硫、锰、铜、锌的测定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1999:288-289
[32] 王飞,郭树江,樊宝丽,等. 不同年代梭梭叶功能性状差异及其与土壤因子的关系[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(12):2486-2496
[33] 张璐,白天晓,郝匕台,等. 季节性放牧对羊草功能性状的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2017,39(5):96-101
[34] 邢小青,郝匕台,齐丽雪,等. 放牧对克氏针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2019,28(1):57-64
[35] 中华人民共和国农业部畜牧兽医司,全国畜牧兽医总站. 中国草地资源[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,1996:59-60
[36] 李永宏,汪诗平. 放牧对草原植物的影响[J]. 中国草地,1999(3):11-19
[37] MCNAUGHTON S J. Grazing as an optimization process:grass-ungulate relationships in the serengeti[J]. The American Naturalist,1979,113(5):691-703
[38] 胡梦瑶,张林,罗天祥,等. 西藏紫花针茅叶功能性状沿降水梯度的变化[J]. 植物生态学报,2012,36(2):136-143
[39] WILSON P J,THOMPSON K,HODGSON J G. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies[J]. New Phytologist,1999,143(1):155-162
[40] POORTER H,NIINEMETS V,POORTER L,et al. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA):a meta-analysis[J]. New Phytologist,2009,182(3):565-588
[41] 晏欣,龚吉蕊,张梓瑜,等. 狼针草光合特性对放牧干扰的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2013,37(6):530-541
[42] 米雪,李晓兵,王宏,等. 内蒙古典型草原不同放牧强度下羊草光合生理生态特性分析[J]. 中国草地学报,2015,37(3):92-98
[43] 杨浩,罗亚晨. 糙隐子草功能性状对氮添加和干旱的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(1):32-42
[44] HUANG W J,ZHOU G Y,LIU J X,et al. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen addition on foliar stoichiometry of nitrogen and phosphorus of five tree tree species in subtropical model forest ecosystems[J]. Environmental Pollution,2012,168:113-120
[45] 冯斌,杨晓霞,刘文亭,等. 不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):1063-1070
[46] GVSEWELL S. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants:variationand functional significance[J]. New Phytologist,2004,164(2):243-266
[47] KOERSELMAN W,MEULEMAN A F M. The vegetation N:P ratio:A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450
[48] 道日娜,宋彦涛,乌云娜,等. 克氏针茅草原植物叶片性状对放牧强度的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2016,27(7):2231-2238
[49] 张秀芳,穆振北,林美娇,等. 琅岐岛4种优势植物叶功能性状及其影响因子[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2020,26(3):667-673
[50] 李江文,韩国栋,李治国,等. 无芒隐子草地上部分功能性状对长期放牧的变异性响应[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(5):1179-1187
[51] 何芸雨,郭水良,王喆. 植物功能性状权衡关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2019,43(12):1021-1035
[52] 汪诗平,王艳芬,陈佐忠. 气候变化和放牧活动对糙隐子草种群的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2003(3):337-343
[53] CRUZ P,DE QUADROS F L F,THEAU J P,et al. Leaf traits as functional descriptors of the intensity of continuous grazing in native grasslands in the south of brazil[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2010,63(3):350-358
[54] MANGWE M C,BRYANT R H,MORENO GARCÍA C A,et al. Functional traits,morphology,and herbage production of vernalised and non-vernalised chicory cv. choice (Cichorium intybus L.) in response to defoliation frequency and height[J]. Plants,2020,9(5):doi:10.3390/plants9050611

放牧强度对半干旱草地优势植物赖草功能性状的影响

Effects of Grazing Intensities on Functional Traits of the Dominant Plant Leymus secalinus in Semi-arid Grassland

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高昌宇, 齐志远, 郑慧, 陈玺洋, 秦加敏, 郝杰, 张乃莉, 王常慧, 董宽虎. 土壤有效养分和微生物特征对短期不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1641-1650.
[2]	马宁, 赵允格, 马昕昕, 李雯, 乔羽, 孙会, 许明祥. 黄土丘陵区退耕草地土壤碳库管理指数对放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1043-1053.
[3]	于志慧, 吕广一, 王新雅, 徐学宝, 贾东璇, 王成杰. 放牧强度对内蒙古荒漠草原土壤碳氮及其稳定同位素的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 544-552.
[4]	马丽, 单立山, 解婷婷, 种培芳, 杨洁, 师亚婷. 基于同质园实验的两种典型荒漠植物叶片功能性状变异研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 701-711.
[5]	王淼, 张宇, 张楚, 陈思思, 王旭, 陈金强, 李瑞强, 曹娟, 辛晓平, 周忠义, 闫瑞瑞. 放牧强度对草甸草原植物群落主要功能群碳氮磷贮量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 125-133.
[6]	孙彩彩, 冯斌, 董全民, 刘文亭, 时光, 刘玉祯, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 杨晓霞. 牦牛藏羊混合放牧对高寒草地紫花针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[7]	孙一梅, 田青, 郭爱霞, 张森溪, 吕朋, 左小安. 放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.
[8]	白玉婷, 代景忠, 夏江宝, 闫瑞瑞, 杨红军, 吕世杰, 卫智军. 施肥对割草地羊草功能性状和化学计量学的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2442-2453.
[9]	李雯, 马昕昕, 马宁, 赵允格, 乔羽, 王鹏, 孙会. 放牧强度对黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2547-2555.
[10]	李彤, 张宇, 赵晋灵, 闫瑞瑞, 辛晓平, 王旭, 陈金强, 吴冬秀, 李凌浩, 赵曼. 放牧对草甸草原土壤水热状况和地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2577-2582.
[11]	何源, 李星锐, 杨晓帆, 唐海萍. 内蒙古锡林郭勒盟典型草原固碳量及固碳潜力估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2274-2285.
[12]	李超, 常馨, 闫卫东, 董宽虎. 刈割对晋西北赖草草地温室气体通量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 17-24.
[13]	张紫薇, 高斌, 林长存, 王青, 刘佳乐, 杨娜, 苏德荣, 平晓燕. 放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 149-155.
[14]	刘伟, 畅宝花, 许庆方, 王凯鑫, 赵凯玥, 杜利霞. SA,ETH和IAA处理对破除赖草种子休眠的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 195-201.
[15]	杜利霞, 赵凯玥, 王凯鑫, 刘伟, 钟华, 夏方山, 朱慧森. 6-BA引发对赖草种子萌发、贮藏物质和内源激素的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 667-674.