草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1293-1301.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.003

• 专论与进展 • 上一篇    下一篇

非生物胁迫下牧草抗逆性研究进展

黄小芳1,2, 石培礼1,2, 余成群1,2, 孙维1,2, 侯阁1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-21 修回日期:2023-01-19 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 石培礼,E-mail:shipl@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:黄小芳(1997-),女,汉族,湖南邵阳人,博士研究生,主要从事高寒草地生态研究,E-mail:huangxiaofang5960@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    西藏自治区中央引导地方项目(XZ202202YD0028C);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项子课题(XDA26050501);西藏自治区中央引导地方资金项目(XZ202301YD0012C);国家重点研发项目课题(2021YFD1000303);西藏“十四五”科技重大专项(XZ202101ZD0003N)资助

A Review of Abiotic Stress Resistance of Forages

HUANG Xiao-fang1,2, SHI Pei-li1,2, YU Cheng-qun1,2, SUN Wei1,2, HOU Ge1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2022-11-21 Revised:2023-01-19 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-31

摘要: 非生物胁迫(低温、高温、干旱、水涝、盐害等)是影响牧草生长和发育的重要因素,因而探究牧草抗逆性响应特征、指标、评价方法和提升途径,对于提升和稳定牧草生产有重大意义。本文通过文献资料调研和计量分析方法,综述了牧草对温度、水分和盐分等非生物胁迫作用的响应,概述了牧草的形态结构、生理生化和生产性能抗逆性指标,总结了6类牧草综合评价方法的原理和优缺点,综述了4种牧草抗逆性提升途径,并对今后在非生物胁迫下牧草抗逆性方向上需开展的3个方面研究工作进行展望,以期为选取牧草抗逆性指标和评价方法,提升牧草质量和产量提供参考依据。

关键词: 抗逆性指标, 非生物胁迫, 评价方法, 牧草

Abstract: Abiotic stresses,especially low temperature,high temperature,drought,waterlogging,salt damage,etc.,are important factors affecting the growth and development of forages. Therefore,it is of great significance to explore the characteristics,indicators,evaluation methods and measures for improving forage stress resistance and stabilizing forage production. In this paper,the responses of forages to abiotic stresses such as temperature,water and salt were investigated through literature review and quantitative analysis. We reviewed the morphological structure,physiological and biochemical indicators and production performance resistance indices of forages,summarized the principles,advantages and disadvantages of six types of comprehensive evaluation methods for the abiotic stress resistance of forage,proposed four measures to improve the stress resistance of forages,and pointed out three aspects of future research in the field of abiotic stress resistance of forages. This review is expected to provide insight into selecting forage stress resistance indicators and evaluation methods to improve forage quality and yield.

Key words: Stress resistance indicators, Abiotic stress, Evaluation method, Forages

中图分类号: