不同诱虫色板及悬挂方式对紫花苜蓿田牧草盲蝽的诱集效果

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.031

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1226-1233.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.031

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

不同诱虫色板及悬挂方式对紫花苜蓿田牧草盲蝽的诱集效果

谭瑶¹, 乔浪¹, 李玲¹, 杨佳乐¹, 韩海斌², 朱猛蒙³, 张志强⁴, 倪鹏⁵

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原昆虫研究中心, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
2. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010020;
3. 宁夏农林科学院, 植物保护研究所, 宁夏银川 750002;
4. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 国家林业草原北方抗旱耐寒草品种育繁工程技术研究中心, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
5. 蒙草生态环境(集团)股份有限公司, 内蒙古呼和浩特 011500

收稿日期:2022-10-10 修回日期:2023-01-02 发布日期:2023-04-28
作者简介:谭瑶(1985-),女,内蒙古呼和浩特人,副教授,主要从事牧草害虫适应性机制研究,E-mail：850310.tanhuaf4@163.com;乔浪(1998-),男,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草害虫发生与综合防治研究,E-mail：562926654@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32160651)；内蒙古科技攻关项目(2021GG0057，2022YFHH0034)资助

The Effect of Different Color and Hanging Methods of Sticky Boards on Trapping the Tarnished Lygus pratensis (Hemiptera:Miridae) in Alfalfa Field

TAN Yao¹, QIAO Lang¹, LI Ling¹, YANG Jia-le¹, HAN Hai-bin², ZHU Meng-meng³, ZHANG Zhi-qiang⁴, NI Peng⁵

1. Research Center for Grassland Entomology, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010020, China;
2. Institute of Grassland Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
3. Institute of Plant Protection, Academy of Ningxia Agricultural and Forestry Science, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750002, China;
4. Technology Engineering Center of Drought and Cold-resistant Grass Breeding in North of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Institute of Grassland and Resources Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
5. Mengcao Ecological Environment (Group) Co. LTD, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China

Received:2022-10-10 Revised:2023-01-02 Published:2023-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究诱虫板对紫花苜蓿田(Medicago sativa L.)中牧草盲蝽(Lygus pratensis Linnaeus)的诱集作用，本研究分别于2021和2022年，在生长期苜蓿田设置8种不同颜色诱虫板、20 cm和50 cm两个不同悬挂高度、田间边缘和中央两个不同挂板地段和每日早上(7:00—11:00)、中午(11:00—15:00)、下午(15:00—19:00)及晚上(19:00—次日7:00)4个不同挂板时段，调查不同诱虫板及悬挂方式对牧草盲蝽的诱集效果。结果表明两年中牧草盲蝽均对绿色诱虫板趋性最强，试验期间每5 d的平均诱集量分别为9.41 头·板^-1和10.79 头·板^-1，显著高于其他7种色板(P＜0.05)；绿色诱虫板悬挂高度在50 cm处诱集效果显著高于20 cm处(P＜0.05)；在田间边缘地段较中央地段诱虫板的诱集效果好(P＜0.05)；在每日监测的4个时段内，下午时段诱集到的虫量最多；5月下旬和6月下旬牧草盲蝽为害达到高峰，第二茬苜蓿及前两茬苜蓿现蕾期诱集到的牧草盲蝽数量最多。

关键词: 牧草盲蝽, 紫花苜蓿, 诱虫板, 诱集作用, 绿色防控

Abstract: The aim of the study was to clarify the trapping effects of the sticky trap on Lygus pratenss in alfalfa field. Here,eight different color sticky boards,two different hanging heights of 20 cm and 50 cm,two different hanging locations of the edge and the central of alfalfa field,and four different hanging times in the morning (7:00-11:00),noon (11:00-15:00),afternoon (15:00-19:00) and evening (19:00-7:00 next day) were set in the growing alfalfa field in 2021 and 2022,respectively,to investigate the attracting effects of different color sticky boards and hanging methods on collecting number of the tarnished L. pratensis in alfalfa field. The results showed that the green sticky board had the best trapping effect towards L. pratensis,the average trapping number were 9.41 and 10.79 individuals per board in 2021 and 2022 respectively,significantly higher than those from the other seven color boards. The trapping effect of green board hanged at the 50 cm height was significantly higher than that at the 20 cm (P < 0.05). The trapping effect was better when the sticky traps were set at the margin of the alfalfa field than that in the central section (P＜0.05). The number of L. pratensis individuals trapped at afternoon was more than those at other times within the same one trapping day. In the year,it was found out that the damage of L. pratensis appeared to its peak in late May and late June;the most L. pratensis attracted in the second crop of alfalfa;and the number of L. pratensis population were the highest in the budding stage of the first and second crop.

Key words: Lygus pratensis, Medicago sativa, Color sticky boards, Trapping effect, Green management

中图分类号:

S433

谭瑶, 乔浪, 李玲, 杨佳乐, 韩海斌, 朱猛蒙, 张志强, 倪鹏. 不同诱虫色板及悬挂方式对紫花苜蓿田牧草盲蝽的诱集效果[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1226-1233.

TAN Yao, QIAO Lang, LI Ling, YANG Jia-le, HAN Hai-bin, ZHU Meng-meng, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, NI Peng. The Effect of Different Color and Hanging Methods of Sticky Boards on Trapping the Tarnished Lygus pratensis (Hemiptera:Miridae) in Alfalfa Field[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1226-1233.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I4/1226

参考文献

[1] 谭瑶,王春媛,孟超,等. 内蒙古地区紫花苜蓿半翅目昆虫群落结构与多样性[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,36(6):24-28
[2] 岳彦红,齐晓,王彦荣,等. 35个10龄紫花苜蓿品种的持久性比较[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(1):58-64
[3] MAY W,SOROKA J,LOEPPKY H A,et al. The effects of trichlorfon and deltamethrin on alfalfa plant bug and lygus bug (Heteroptera:Miridae) populations in alfalfa grown in Canada[J]. Crop Protection,2003,22(6):883-889
[4] SUN T,LI Z Z. Alfalfa-corn rotation and row placement affects yield,water use,and economic returns in Northeast China[J]. Field Crop Research,2019,241:1-9
[5] TAN Y,JIA B,CHI Y M,et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of the plant bug Lygus pratensis Linnaeus (Hemiptera:Miridae)[J]. Journal of Insect Science,2018,18(2):41:1-8
[6] TAN Y,JIA B,FOSTER P S,et al. Sublethal and transgenerational effects of lambda-cyhalothrin on the mirid bugs Lygus pratensis Linnaeus and Polymerus cognatus Fieber[J]. Crop Protection,2020,139:105354
[7] 贾冰,马亿,庞保平,等. 牧草盲蝽实时定量PCR内参基因的筛选[J]. 昆虫学报,2019,62(12):1379-1391
[8] ZHANG L J,CAI W Z,LUO J Y,et al. Phylogeographic patterns of Lygus pratensis (Hemiptera:Miridae):evidence for weak genetic structure and recent expansion in northwest China[J]. PLOS ONE,2017,12:1-19
[9] LU Y H,WU K M,JIANG Y Y,et al. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China[J]. Science,2010,328:1151-1154
[10] DORMAN S J,TAYLOR S V,MALONE S,et al. Sampling optimization and crop interface effects on Lygus lineolaris populations in southeastern USA cotton[J]. Insects,2022,13(1):88
[11] BACKUS E A,CERVANTES F A,GODFREY L,et al. Certain applied electrical signals during EPG cause negative effects on stylet probing behaviors by adult Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera:Miridae)[J]. Journal of Insect Physiology,2018,105:64-75
[12] 张仁福,王伟,刘海洋,等. 取食不同夏季寄主对牧草盲蝽若虫生长发育和成虫寿命的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2022,59(1):124-133
[13] 王伟,张仁福,刘海洋,等. 牧草盲蝽对5种寄主植物的行为反应及其种群动态[J]. 新疆农业科学,2020,57(4):671-678
[14] TAN Y,MA Y,JIA B,et al. Laboratory selection,cross-resistance,risk assessment to lambda-Cyhalothrin resistance and monitoring of insecticide resistance for plant bug Lygus pratensis (Hemiptera:Miridae) in farming-pastoral ecotones of northern Chin[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology,2021,114(2):891-902
[15] 马亿,张文兵,张宏玲,等. 牧草盲蝽CYP6A13和钠离子通道LPVSSC基因的克隆及参与高效氯氟氰菊酯的抗性分析[J]. 环境昆虫学报,2022,44(5):1252-1263
[16] ZHANG R F,WANG W,LIU H Y,et al. Field evaluation of sunflower as a potential trap crop of Lygus pratensis in cotton fields[J]. PLOS ONE,2020,15(8):e0237318
[17] TANG Y C,ZHOU C L,CHEN X M,et al. Visual and olfactory responses of seven butterfly species during foraging[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior,2013,26(3):387-401
[18] BLAKE A J,GO M C,HAHN G S,et al. Polarization of foliar reflectance:novel host plant cue for insect herbivores[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2019,286(1915):20192198
[19] 边磊,孙晓玲,高宇,等. 昆虫光趋性机理及其应用进展[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2012,49(6):1677-1686
[20] 宋海燕,李丽莉,王凤月,等. 不同颜色粘虫板对棉田绿盲蝽、中黑盲蝽和赤须盲蝽的诱诱集效果[J]. 植物保护学报,2016,43(5):713-721
[21] 迪丽努尔·艾麦提,刘端春,冯宏祖. 不同颜色粘虫板对牧草盲蝽的诱集作用[J]. 中国棉花,2018,45(9):23-25
[22] 秦焕荣,刘珠珠,贺亚红,等. 粘虫板不同颜色和悬挂高度对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J]. 中国植保导刊,2020,40(8):57-59
[23] ZHANG T,ZHANG X F,WYCKHUYS K A G,et al. Optimization and field demonstration of the Lygus pratensis (Hemiptera:Miridae) sex pheromone[J]. Pest Management Science,2020,77(2):817-823
[24] MAJIDPOUR M,MAROOFPOUR N,GHANE-JAHROMI M. Potential demographic impact of the insecticide mixture between thiacloprid and deltamethrin on the cotton aphid and two of its natural enemies[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research,2033,113(1):37-48
[25] ARMOLD S E J,CHITTKA L. Illumination preference,illumination constancy and colour discrimination by bumblebees in an environment with patchy light.[J]. The Journal of Experimental Biology,2012,215(13):2173-2180
[26] LAZOPULO S,LAZOPULO A,BAKER J D,et al. Daytime colour preference in Drosophila depends on the circadian clock and TRP channels[J]. Nature,2019,574(7776):108-111
[27] 张仁福,王伟,刘海洋,等. 新疆南部绿洲农田牧草盲蝽季节性寄主转移规律及迁移能力[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(1):171-179
[28] ANA L,LORRAINE L. Visual responses of Lygus lineolairs and Lygocoris spp. (Hemiptera:Miridae) on peaches[J]. Florida Entomologist,2003,86(4):424-428
[29] 王丽丽,王洪涛,刘学卿,等. 不同颜色粘虫板对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J]. 果树学报,2014,31(2):288-291
[30] 桑文,刘燕梅,邱宝利. 柑橘木虱绿色防控技术研究进展[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2018,55(4):557-564
[31] 陆宴辉,张永军,吴孔明. 植食性昆虫的寄主选择机理及行为调控策略[J]. 生态学报,2008(10):5113-5122
[32] 孙鹏,迪丽努尔·艾麦提,苟长青,等. 牧草盲蝽对七种寄主植物不同挥发物的EAG和行为反应[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2019,56(2):316-326
[33] WU K M,LI W,FENG H,et al. Seasonal abundance of the mirids,Lygus lucorum and Adelphocoris spp. (Hemiptera:Miridae) on Bt cotton in northern China[J]. Crop Protection,2002,21(10):997-1002
[34] 梁启富,郭天娥,张正群,等. 棉田使用诱虫板对绿盲蝽和非靶标昆虫的诱集作用[J]. 中国棉花,2012,39(5):10-14
[35] 曹娜,冷凌云,刘端春,等. 牧草盲蝽的寄主种类及取食选择性研究[J]. 中国棉花,2017,44(3):27-29，38
[36] 李燕,杨奥,冯丽凯,等. 不同温度对牧草盲蝽种群生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 植物保护,2015,41(1):59-62
[37] LIU B,LI H Q,ALI A,et al. Effects of temperature and humidity on immature development of Lygus pratensis (L.) (Hemiptera:Miridae)[J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology,2015,18(2):139-143
[38] GUO G,SHEN C,LIU Q,et al. Fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of first and second cut alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silages harvested at three stages of maturity[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2019,257(C):114274
[39] YUAN N,SUN L,DU S,et al. Effects of harvesting period and storage duration on volatile organic compounds and nutritive qualities of alfalfa[J]. Agriculture,2022,12(8):1115

不同诱虫色板及悬挂方式对紫花苜蓿田牧草盲蝽的诱集效果

The Effect of Different Color and Hanging Methods of Sticky Boards on Trapping the Tarnished Lygus pratensis (Hemiptera:Miridae) in Alfalfa Field

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	任明辉, 张雨蓬, 许涛, 朱慧森, 岑慧芳. 紫花苜蓿R2R3-MYB亚家族鉴定与干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 972-983.
[2]	谭璐娜, 彭嘉文, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 夏厚胤, 苗愉祺, 崔祎琳, 苑旺, 马志超, 同雨涛, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿胚性愈伤组织诱导与增殖的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1057-1063.
[3]	刘育书, 曹岭, 余舟昌, 田兴芳, 孙琳, 时嘉翊, 张伟, 谢治国, 雷秀云, 俞靓, 杨培志. 紫花苜蓿生物量分配对植物-土壤化学计量的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1143-1153.
[4]	苏立娜, 麻冬梅, 李嘉文, 张玲, 侯汶君. 外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下两种紫花苜蓿生理及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 726-732.
[5]	刘琳絮, 王铁梅, 张霁, 苏德荣. 紫花苜蓿根系主要功能性状对分根区交替灌溉的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 852-859.
[6]	侯燕红, 生小燕, 韩博, 姜华, 何承刚. 干旱和高温胁迫下紫花苜蓿PEPC酶活性变化及其基因序列分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 330-336.
[7]	刘艳君, 胡桂馨, 温雅洁, 周生英. 施K对苜蓿N，P，K吸收利用及其抗蓟马的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 418-425.
[8]	张宏, 黄荣, 姚博, 张玉娟, 张振粉. 桃色欧文氏菌Cp2脂多糖对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 615-622.
[9]	徐小博, 王鑫尧, 郁伟杰, 苗一凡, 徐博. 紫花苜蓿MsJMT基因的克隆及其与育性的关联分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2306-2314.
[10]	孟翔, 孙伶俐, 谢开云, 刘伟, 褚皓清, 赵越. 灌溉、施磷量及AM真菌对紫花苜蓿产量和水磷利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2356-2364.
[11]	王瑜, 代先林, 马晓颖, 韦宝, 何峰, 李向林, 仝宗永. 划区轮牧对放牧型紫花苜蓿人工草地产量与品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2477-2482.
[12]	郝俊峰, 于浩然, 贾玉山, 王志军, 格根图, 李宇宇, 孙林. 青贮密度和青贮时间对紫花苜蓿发酵品质及营养成分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2492-2496.
[13]	王勃, 王聪聪, 夏方山, 陈奕霖, 赵萍, 朱慧森. 硒引发对不同品种紫花苜蓿种子抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2037-2044.
[14]	张辉辉, 师尚礼, 武蓓, 李自立, 李小龙, 吴芳, 康文娟, 陈新栋. 紫花苜蓿与不同生活型多年生禾本科牧草混播生长生理特征[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2144-2157.
[15]	李军, 杜俊颖, 杨莉, 宋连昭, 李鑫洋, 薛祝林, 刘贵河. 冀西北地区错期交叉混播对第3年草地生产力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2167-2172.