杂交水稻茎秆物理性状与饲用品质相关性研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.022

草地学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 879-888.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

杂交水稻茎秆物理性状与饲用品质相关性研究

孙镕基¹, 高文婧¹, 丁磊¹, 肖定福², 张志飞¹, 陈桂华¹

1. 湖南农业大学农学院, 湖南长沙 410128;
2. 湖南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 湖南长沙 410128

收稿日期:2024-07-18 修回日期:2024-10-08 发布日期:2025-04-07
通讯作者: 张志飞,E-mail:zhangzf@hunau.edu.cn;陈桂华,E-mail:158531879@qq.com
作者简介:孙镕基（1999-）,男,壮族,广西南宁人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草学研究,E-mail：1907305487@qq.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-37）;湖南省教育厅科学研究项目一般项目（19C0922）资助

Study on the Correlation between Stem Physical Properties and Feeding Quality of Hybrid Rice

SUN Rong-ji¹, GAO Wen-jing¹, DING Lei¹, XIAO Ding-fu², ZHANG Zhi-fei¹, CHEN Gui-hua¹

1. College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410128, China;
2. College of Animal Science And Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410128, China

Received:2024-07-18 Revised:2024-10-08 Published:2025-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本试验以35个籼型杂交稻（Oryza sativa L.）组合为材料,研究水稻茎秆物理性状与稻谷产量、饲用品质的内在联系,为稻谷高产及秸秆饲用品质优良的品种选育提供筛选指标。结果表明：35个组合材料的11个饲用品质相关指标表现出明显的差异性,其中淀粉含量变异系数最大,为67.38%；9个茎秆物理性状指标中机械组织面积比例变异系数最大,为15.79%。35个组合材料中‘芯香S/R227-2’与‘886S-6/7W565’的饲用品质最佳。Pearson相关性分析发现单穗干重与茎粗呈极显著正相关（P=0.001）,与茎壁厚、小维管束数目呈显著正相关（P值分别为0.014和0.026）；SPEARMAN等级相关分析发现秸秆饲用品质综合评价排序与9个茎秆物理性状指标中的茎粗、茎壁厚、薄壁组织面积比例、机械组织面积比例、维管组织面积比例等5个指标排序及5个指标的加权隶属函数综合排序等级呈极显著正相关（P值分别为0.000,0.000,0.001,0.008,0.008和0.000）。因此,水稻倒三节茎粗、茎壁厚、薄壁组织面积比、机械组织面积比、维管组织面积比等物理性状指标可用于指示水稻秸秆饲用品质。

关键词: 水稻, 茎秆, 物理性状, 饲用品质, 相关性分析

Abstract: In this study, 35 indica hybrid rice combinations were used as materials to explore the internal relationship between the physical properties of rice stem and rice yield as well as straw feeding quality, thereby providing screening indicators for the breeding of rice varieties with high yield and good straw feeding quality. The results showed that there were significant differences in 11 feed quality related indexes of the 35 combination materials. The coefficient of variation of starch content was the largest, which was 67.38%, and the coefficient of variation of mechanical tissue area ratio was the largest among the 9 stem physical traits, which was 15.79 %. Among the 35 composite materials, XinxiangS/R227-2' and '886S-6/7W565' exhibited the best feeding quality. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a highly significant positive correlation between the dry weight of one panicle and culm diameter （P=0.001）, as well as significant positive correlations with stem wall thickness and the number of small vascular bundles （P=0.014, 0.026, respectively）. SPEARMAN rank correlation analysis indicated that the comprehensive evaluation ranking of straw feeding quality was significantly positively correlated with the ranking of five indicators, namely culm diameter, stem wall thickness, proportion of parenchyma area, proportion of mechanical tissue area, and proportion of vascular bundle area, among the nine physical traits of stems. Additionally, it was positively correlated with the weighted membership function comprehensive ranking of these five indicators （P=0.000, 0.000, 0.001, 0.008, 0.008 and 0.000, respectively）. Therefore, physical indicators such as culm diameter, wall thickness, parenchyma area ratio, mechanical tissue area ratio, and vascular bundle area ratio can be used to indicate the feeding quality of rice straw.

Key words: Rice, Stem, Physical properties, Feeding quality, Correlation analysis

中图分类号:

S544.9

孙镕基, 高文婧, 丁磊, 肖定福, 张志飞, 陈桂华. 杂交水稻茎秆物理性状与饲用品质相关性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 879-888.

SUN Rong-ji, GAO Wen-jing, DING Lei, XIAO Ding-fu, ZHANG Zhi-fei, CHEN Gui-hua. Study on the Correlation between Stem Physical Properties and Feeding Quality of Hybrid Rice[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(3): 879-888.

0
/ 收藏文章 0 / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2025/V33/I3/879

参考文献

[1] 张晓庆,王梓凡,参木友,等.中国农作物秸秆产量及综合利用现状分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(9):30-41
[2] AI B L,SHENG Z W,ZHENG L L, et al. Collectable amounts of straw resources and their distribution in China[C]//International Conference on Advances in Energy, Environment and Chemical Engineering, Atlantis Press, 2015:441-444
[3] 丁晓艳.农村有机废弃物能源化利用综合评价研究[D].成都:西华大学,2016:3
[4] 马钱波,王琳,李志威,等.不同收获期揉丝水稻秸秆在奶牛瘤胃内的降解特性[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(11):4695-4703
[5] 陈熙,张徐彬,朱旺,等.我国水稻秸秆利用现状和饲用加工技术研究进展[J].中国稻米,2023,29(2):24-27,33
[6] 王举勇,胡祖余,栗新,等.脆秆水稻秸秆饲喂湖羊效果研究[J].现代农业科技,2021(24):171-172
[7] 张智鹏,熊伟曼,赵玥,等.汉中市水稻秸秆资源在反刍动物生产中的应用研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2017,49(6):196-199
[8] VIRK P, XIANGLIN L, BLÜMMEL M. A note on variation in grain and straw fodder quality traits in 437 cultivars of rice from the varietal groups of aromatic, hybrids, indica, new planting types and released varieties in the Philippines[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 233:96-100
[9] 冯文晓,陶莲,陈国顺,等.小麦和水稻秸秆作为反刍动物饲料资源的生物降解技术研究进展[J].中国草食动物科学,2016,36(3):59-62
[10] 董臣飞,丁成龙,许能祥,等.稻草饲用品质及茎秆形态特征的研究[J].草业学报,2013,22(4):83-88
[11] DONG C F,XU N X,DING C L, et al. Rapid evaluation method for rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw feeding quality[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 228:204-209
[12] 程云辉,董臣飞,张文洁,等.全株饲用大麦品系筛选及赤霉素对其产量的影响[J].草地学报,2016,24(5):1108-1113
[13] 袁木松.水稻品种演替过程中茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物积累与转运特征的变化及其机理研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2017:9-10
[14] COCK J, YOSHIDA S, FORNO D A. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice[M]. Philippines:Los Banos, IRRI, 1976:43
[15] VAN SOEST P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10):3583-3597
[16] 陈贤情,商晋,宋慧芳,等.秸秆中纤维素/半纤维素和木质素的几种测定方法对比[C]//.中国农业工程学会2011年学术年会论文集.中国农业工程学会,2011:1899-1904
[17] 张睿.基于模糊理论的电动汽车动力电池分选及性能评估研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨理工大学,2018:37-38
[18] 李诗琴,于洪柱,刘艺杉,等.混合盐碱胁迫对16个紫花苜蓿品种萌发期的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(3):194-198
[19] 范若璇.不同品种冬小麦间混播对茎秆抗倒伏性能与产量的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2022:2-6
[20] 杨红,张庆,侯建建,等.生物添加剂对羊草青贮饲料超微结构和纤维变化的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(12):94-101
[21] TAYLOR N G. Cellulose biosynthesis and deposition in higher plants[J]. New Phytologist, 2008, 178(2):239-252
[22] MAYLAND H F, SHEWMAKER G E, HARRISON P A, et al. Nonstructural carbohydrates in tall fescue cultivars:Relationship to animal preference[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(6):1203-1206
[23] 高旭,冯周,丁延庆,等. 257份高粱种质资源农艺性状的遗传多样性[J].西南农业学报,2023,36(1):1-10
[24] 余苗,王卉,问鑫,等.牧草品质的主要评价指标及其影响因素[J].中国饲料,2013(13):1-3,7
[25] FISHER D S, MAYLAND H F, BURRNS J C. Variation in ruminants'preference for tall fescue hays cut either at sundown or at sunup[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1999, 77(3):762-768
[26] GINANE C, BAUMONT R, FAVREAU-PEIGNÉ A. Perception and hedonic value of basic tastes in domestic ruminants[J]. Physiology& Behavior, 2011, 104(5):666-674
[27] 汪涛,张毅,赵晓雪,等.小麦抗倒伏茎秆形态指标及QTL分析[J].华北农学报,2023,38(2):99-105
[28] 陈秀英,黄乾龙,李贤勇,等.茎秆形态性状和产量构成因子对高产型水稻品种抗倒性的影响[J].南方农业,2024,18(1):113-116
[29] 王晓飞,陆展华,刘维,等.高产优质水稻品种粤禾丝苗抗倒伏性状及遗传分析[J].广东农业科学,2023,50(12):140-149
[30] 邵庆勤.叶面喷施多效唑提高小麦抗倒伏能力的生理机理研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2017:134-135
[31] 刘夏琳.四个饲用燕麦品种在晋北农牧交错带的农艺性状和品质比较分析[D].太原:山西农业大学,2020:23-24
[32] 王香群.中籼水稻产量性状和茎秆性状相关性分析[J].农业科技通讯,2015(8):128-130
[33] 许乃霞.高产水稻株型指标与产量形成及籽粒增重关系的研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2002:36-39
[34] ZHANG G, CUI K, LI G, et al. Stem small vascular bundles have greater accumulation and translocation of non‐structural carbohydrates than large vascular bundles in rice[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2022,174(3):e13695
[35] DONG C F, LIU X B, QU H, et al. Dynamical partition of photosynthates in tillers of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during late growth period and its correlation with feeding value of rice straw at harvest[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 123(3):273-280
[36] 金袆婷.青藏高原老芒麦种质资源评价及优异种质筛选[D].西宁:青海大学,2023:27-28
[37] 张明聪.养分管理对寒地水稻抗倒伏性能和产量的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2011:29-30
[38] DONG C F, DING C L, XU N X, et al. Double-purpose rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety selection and their morphological traits[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 149:276-282
[39] 于跃,孙健,张静,等. 198份大麻种质资源农艺及品质性状综合评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2021,22(4):1021-1030
[40] 冯国郡.甜高粱种质资源的遗传多样性与高光效种质生理机制的研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2013:

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	22

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	19	3
比例	86%	14%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	50

	来源	本网站

	次数	50
	比例	100%

杂交水稻茎秆物理性状与饲用品质相关性研究

Study on the Correlation between Stem Physical Properties and Feeding Quality of Hybrid Rice

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高阳阳, 林茂, 梁雯君, 郝杰, 刁华杰, 王常慧, 苏原, 董宽虎. 氮添加降低晋北草地建群种赖草叶片钾重吸收效率[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 806-812.
[2]	杨金鹏, 牟兰, 仇嘉悦, 吴宗烨, 张鑫亮, 张美艳, 蔡明, 黄必志. 生草对滇中苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(2): 419-428.
[3]	冯晓云, 李媛, 张鹏, 刘文辉, 鲍根生, 李春刚. 10份豌豆种质在青海半干旱和高寒地区适应性评价的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2910-2918.
[4]	张晓玉, 张定海, 宁婷, 马玉婧. 古尔班通古特沙漠土壤水分-地形-植被关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1548-1557.
[5]	马彪, 南丽丽, 王学敏, 汪堃, 夏静, 姚宇恒. 30份苜蓿种质资源农艺与品质性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3845-3854.
[6]	寇江涛, 张甲雄. 同/异型乳酸菌添加对水稻秸秆青贮饲料营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3980-3987.
[7]	王净杰, 刘钟元, 高鑫, 喻雅雯, 李小熊, 杨东升. 西藏雅鲁藏布江中游草本植物群落多样性与海拔因子的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3579-3590.
[8]	陈远航, 程明军, 李洪泉, 李小梅, 文兴金, 刘海平, 张磊, 闫艳红. 不同添加剂对水稻秸秆黄贮饲料营养品质及适口性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3646-3653.
[9]	赵雅姣, 刘晓静, 蔺芳. 兰州地区不同间套作饲草组合对其营养和饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3241-3251.
[10]	杨丹, 周雨歆, 尹含雪, 陈丹丹, 张庆. 纤维素降解菌和温度对水稻秸秆纤维降解和发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3305-3312.
[11]	周雨歆, 杨丹, 杨伟涛, 陈丹丹, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 黄梁木叶精油对柱花草和水稻秸秆发酵品质及细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(10): 3326-3334.
[12]	谭兵兵, 种培芳, 刘行行, 刘泽华. 外源NaHS对盐胁迫下红砂根系形态及碳氮磷含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 139-147.
[13]	孙亚菲, 柴永青. 祁连山西端不同生境孑遗植物裸果木群落物种多样性及其与土壤水分、盐分的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2059-2067.
[14]	胡伟, 梁国玲, 刘凯强, 刘文辉, 李文. 青藏高原9个燕麦品种抗倒伏能力及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1788-1797.
[15]	师微柠, 苏世平, 李毅, 张䶮, 席杰. 干旱生境下外源脯氨酸对红砂气孔形态的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 777-784.