黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.03.004

›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 282-287.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.03.004

黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响

王兵^1,4, 刘国彬^1,4, 薛萐^1,2, 李占斌^1,2, 李鹏^1,2, 刘娴³

1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所/西北农林科技大学, 陕西, 杨凌, 712100;
2. 西安理工大学水利水电学院, 西安, 710048;
3. 沈阳药科大学, 辽宁, 沈阳, 110016;
4. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049

收稿日期:2009-02-01 修回日期:2009-03-23 出版日期:2009-06-15 发布日期:2009-06-15
通讯作者: 刘国彬,E-mail:gbliu@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:王兵(1982- ),男,陕西杨凌人,博士生,研究方向为生态系统健康评价,E-mail:enaboo@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院西部行动计划(二期)项目(KZCX2-XB2-05-03)

Effect of Farmland Abandonment on Soil Enzyme Activities in Loess Hilly Region

WANG Bing^1,4, LIU Guo-bin^1,4, XUE Sha^1,2, LI Zhan-bin^1,2, LI Peng^1,2, Liu Xian³

1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources/Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Xi′an University of Technology, Xi′an, Shaanxi Province 710048, China;
3. ShenYang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province 110016, China;
4. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2009-02-01 Revised:2009-03-23 Online:2009-06-15 Published:2009-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解侵蚀环境下植被恢复对土壤酶活性的影响,以典型侵蚀环境黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域生态恢复1至50年撂荒地长期定位试验点为研究对象,选取坡耕地为对照,分析了植被恢复过程中土壤脲酶、磷酸酶、蔗糖酶、淀粉酶、纤维素酶、过氧化氢酶、多酚氧化酶及理化性质的演变特征。结果表明,土壤酶活性前期变化波动较大,后期(20-30a)年变化趋于稳定;尿酶、碱性磷酸酶、蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶和多酚氧化酶与其他因子相关性相对较强,可以作为评价土壤质量的生物学指标;尿酶、淀粉酶、碱性磷酸酶、蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶和纤维素酶活性随恢复年限而增加,多酚氧化酶则减少;土壤酶指数可以作为评价土壤质量的方法。

关键词: 黄土丘陵区, 植被恢复, 土壤酶活性, 土壤酶指数

Abstract: In order to determine the effect of vegetation restoration on soil enzyme activities of abandoned farmland under erosion environment,seven kinds of soil enzyme(urease,amylase,alkaline phosphatase,catalase,sucrase,polyphenol oxidase,and cellulase) activities of farmland with an abandoned age sequence of 0,1,5,7,10,15,20,25,30,40,and 50 years in Zhifanggou watershed(8.73 km²),Shaanxi province were studied and 0-year abandoned slope farmland as CK.The results show that soil enzyme activities showed a fluctuant variation in the beginning,and then showed a stable increase or decrease tendency later(>25 a).Urease,alkaline phosphatase,catalase,sucrase,and polyphenol oxidase could be used as biological indicator to evaluate soil quality because of a significant correlation between those enzyme activities and soil physicochemical and microbiological properties.The activities of urease,amylase,alkaline phosphatase,sucrase,catalase,and cellulose increased along with increasing restoration age,while polyphenol oxidase decreased.Soil enzyme index could be used as a way to assess soil quality.

Key words: Loess Hilly Region, Vegetation recovery, Soil enzyme activity, SEI

中图分类号:

S154.36

王兵, 刘国彬, 薛萐, 李占斌, 李鹏, 刘娴. 黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. , 2009, 17(3): 282-287.

WANG Bing, LIU Guo-bin, XUE Sha, LI Zhan-bin, LI Peng, Liu Xian. Effect of Farmland Abandonment on Soil Enzyme Activities in Loess Hilly Region[J]. , 2009, 17(3): 282-287.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.03.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2009/V17/I3/282

参考文献

[1] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986
[2] 周礼恺.土壤酶学.[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:118-159
[3] 南京土壤所主编.土壤微生物研究法[M] ,北京:科学出版社,1985
[4] 巩杰,陈利顶.黄土丘陵区小流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应研究[J] ,水土保持学报,2005,19(1):93-96
[5] 焦峰,温仲明.黄土丘陵区退耕土壤养分变异特征[J] ,植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):724-730
[6] 王国梁,刘国彬.黄土丘陵区小流域植被建设的土壤水文效应[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(3):339-344
[7] Liu G.Soil conservation and sustainable agriculture on Loess Plateau:challenge and prospective[J].Ambio,1999,28(8):663-668
[8] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999
[9] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[10] 杨万勤,王开运.土壤酶研究动态与展望[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(5):564-570
[11] 张咏梅,周国逸,吴宁.土壤酶学的研究进展[J].热带亚热带植物学报.2004,12(1):83-90
[12] Diamantidis G,Eosse A,Potier P,Bally R.Purification and characterization of the first bacteriallaecase in the rhizospheric bacterium Azospirillum lipoferum[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2000,32:919-927
[13] Toseano G,Letizia Colarieti M,Greco G.Oxidative polymerisation of phenols by a phenol oxidase from green olives[J].Enzyme and Microbial Technology,2003,33:47-54
[14] Fog K.The effect of added nitrogen on the rate of decomposition of organic matter.Biol.Rev.,1988,63:433-462
[15] Korner C,Arnone III J A.Responses to elevated carbon dioxide in artificial tropical ecosystems.Science,1992,257:1672-l675
[16] 安韶山,黄懿梅,郑粉莉.黄土丘陵区草地土壤脲酶活性特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):233-237
[17] Rogers G S,Milham P J,Thibaud M C.Interactions between rising CO₂ concentration and nitrogen supply in cotton growth and leaf nitrogen concentration.Austr.J.Plant Physiol.,1996,23:119-125
[18] Henriksen T M,Breland T A.Nitrogen availability effects on carbon mineralization,fungal and bacterial growth,and enzyme activities during decomposition of wheat straw in soil.Soil Biol.Biochem.,1999,31:1121-1134
[19] 杨海君,肖启明,谭周进,等.放牧对张家界索溪峪景区土壤酶活性及微生物作用强度的影响[J].农业环境科学学报2006,25(4):913-91
[20] 谈嫣蓉,蒲小鹏,张德罡,等.不同退化程度高寒草地土壤酶活性的研究[J].草原与草坪,2006,3:20-22
[21] Cao C,Jiang D,Teng X,et al.Soil chemical and microbiological properties along a chronosequence of Caragana microphylla Lam.plantations in the Horqin sandy land of Northeast China.Applied Soil Ecology,2008.40(1):78-85
[22] Durin N,Esposito E.Potential applications of oxidative enzymes and phenoloxidase-like compounds in wastewater and soil treatment:a review[J].Applied Catalysis B:Environmental,2000,28:83-99
[23] Heribert Insam.Developments in soil microbiology since the mid 1960s[J].Geoderma,2001,100:389-402
[24] Frey S D,Knorr M,Parrent J L,Simpson R T.Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests.Forest Ecology and Management,2004,196:159-171
[25] Waldrop M P,Zak D R,Sinsabaugh R L,Gallo M,Lauber C.Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity.Ecological Applications,2004,14:1172-1177[26] Sinsabaugh R L,Carreiro M M,Repert D A.Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition,N deposition,and mass loss.Biogeochemistry,2002,60:1-24
[27] 杜峰,山仑,梁宗锁.陕北黄土丘陵区撂荒演替研究-群落组成与结构分析[J] 草地学报2005,13(2):140-144
[28] 杜峰,山仑,陈小燕,等.陕北黄土丘陵区撂荒演替研究-撂荒演替序列[J] 草地学报2005,13(4):328-333
[29] 张健,刘国彬,许明祥,等.黄土丘陵区沟谷地植被恢复群落特征研究[J].草地学报,2008,16(5):485-49
[30] 戴全厚.黄土丘陵区侵蚀环境生态恢复过程及健康评价[D].杨凌:中科院水土保持研究所,2006.24-37

黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响

Effect of Farmland Abandonment on Soil Enzyme Activities in Loess Hilly Region

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[2]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[3]	常明. 火烧后亚高山草甸恢复过程中物种组成和群落特征变化规律的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.
[4]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[5]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[6]	王子婷, 杨磊, 李广, 柴春山, 张洋东, 刘冬皓. 半干旱黄土丘陵区微地形变化对人工柠条林草本分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 364-373.
[7]	姚蒙蒙, 郭琛文, 赫凤彩, 张琦, 任国华. 晋北盐碱草地土壤化学计量特征及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2800-2807.
[8]	米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.
[9]	赵思腾, 师尚礼, 陈建纲, 陈鑫, 何佳. 陇中旱作区不同轮作方式对土壤碳、氮含量及酶活性的影响特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 817-824.
[10]	王锐, 李希来, 张静, 周华坤. 高寒矿区人工种草对露天排土场渣山表层基质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 938-948.
[11]	贾志锋, 马祥, 雷生春, 徐成体, 魏小星, 刘文辉. 施肥对贵南县轻度退化草甸植被特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 987-996.
[12]	李晓娜, 张微微, 赵春桥, 宋进库, 史瑞双, 薛瑞彬, 王超. 延庆区荒滩地土壤理化性质及其对植物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 695-701.
[13]	杨满元, 杨宁, 欧阳美娟, 万丽, 刘浩, 姜琳, 吴磊. 紫色土丘陵坡地土壤水溶性有机碳对植被恢复的响应及其与土壤因子的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 784-788.
[14]	杨宁, 杨满元, 姜琳, 万丽, 吴磊, 邹冬生. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地植被恢复过程中土壤可矿化碳库特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 320-325.
[15]	李争艳, 徐智明, 师尚礼, 贺春贵. 江淮地区不同品种光敏型高丹草对土壤微生态环境的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 326-335.