高燕麦草苗期对盐胁迫的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.01.016

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 90-96.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.01.016

高燕麦草苗期对盐胁迫的响应

闫洪唯^1,2, 王赞², 阳曦², 王学敏², 高洪文²

1. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 兰州, 730020;
2. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京, 100193

收稿日期:2010-11-10 修回日期:2010-12-07 出版日期:2011-02-15 发布日期:2011-02-15
通讯作者: 高洪文,E-mail:gaohongwen@263.net
作者简介:闫洪唯(1983- ),男,河南鹿邑人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草种质资源研究,E-mail:yhwgood@163.com;
基金资助:
现代牧草产业技术体系(2060302);中国农业科学院基本科研业务费(2011cj-15);牧草种质资源保护项目(2130135)资助

Response of Tall Oatgrass to Salinity Stress at the Seedling Stage

YAN Hong-wei^1,2, WANG Zan², YANG Xi², WANG Xue-min², GAO Hong-wen²

1. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, China;
2. Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2010-11-10 Revised:2010-12-07 Online:2011-02-15 Published:2011-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以高燕麦草(Arrhenatherum elatius L.)ZXY03P-367和ZXY03P-443两种基因型为材料,研究其对不同浓度盐胁迫的响应。幼苗生长至三叶期,分别用浓度为0,65,100和135 mM NaCl处理21 d,测定4个盐浓度下的高燕麦草地上、地下生物量、离子含量、光合气体交换、脂质过氧化物、脯氨酸的积累。结果表明:在100和135 mMNaCl条件下,2种基因型高燕麦草大部分参数都存在显著差异(P<0.05)。盐处理导致地上和地下生物量、光合速率(A)、气孔导度(g_s)和K⁺含量降低的同时,Na⁺含量显著增加。而在叶片快速生长期,脂质过氧化物和脯氨酸显著积累。推测在高盐浓度胁迫下,这些有机物可能在高燕麦草叶片渗透调节和保护膜的稳定性上发挥着重要作用。综合分析,2种高燕麦草基因型对盐度的敏感度不同,ZXY03P-367相对ZXY03P-443具有较强的耐盐性。

关键词: 高燕麦草, 苗期, 盐胁迫

Abstract: This experiment was conducted to evaluate the responses of tall oatgrass plants for salinity stress.Two tall oatgrass genotypes,ZXY03P-367 and ZXY03P-443,were grown for 14 days at greenhouse conditions and treated with four NaCl concentrations(0,65,100,and 135 mM) for 21 days.The plant growth,ion contents,photosynthetic gas exchange,lipid peroxidation,and proline accumulation were measured.Most parameters for the two genotypes were significantly different after treated in 100 and 135 mM NaCl.Salt treatment decreased in root and shoot biomass,photosynthetic rate(A) and stomatal conductance(g_s),and K⁺ content,and increase in Na⁺ content.Larger reductions in the parameters occurred in ZXY03P-443.A significant accumulation of lipid peroxidation and proline in leaves was found during the period of intensive leaf growth.These organic compounds maybe play a role in leaf osmotic adjustment and in protection of membrane stability at severe salinity levels.Our results indicated that the two tall oatgrass genotypes differed in their sensitivity to salinity,with ZXY03P-367 being classified as relatively salt tolerant and ZXY03P-443 as sensitive.

Key words: Tall oatgrass, Seedling, Salinity stress

中图分类号:

Q945.78

闫洪唯, 王赞, 阳曦, 王学敏, 高洪文. 高燕麦草苗期对盐胁迫的响应[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 90-96.

YAN Hong-wei, WANG Zan, YANG Xi, WANG Xue-min, GAO Hong-wen. Response of Tall Oatgrass to Salinity Stress at the Seedling Stage[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 90-96.

参考文献

[1] Wu M,L Xue,Y Yan.Review of adaptation mechanism of plants to salt stress[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2007,43(8):111-117
[2] Rogers M E.The response of four perennial grass species to sodium chloride salinity when irrigated with saline waters[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,2007,58:225-232
[3] Rogers M E,Craig A D,Munns R,et al.The potential for developing fodder plants for the salt-affected areas of southern and eastern Australia:an overview[J].Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,2005,45:301-329
[4] Takemura T,Hanagata N,Sugihara K,et al.Physiological and biochemical responses to salt stress in the mangrove,Bruguiera gymnorrhiza[J].Aquatic Botany,2000,68:15-28
[5] Alshammary S F,Qian Y L,Wallner S J.Growth response of four turfgrass species to salinity[J].Agricultural Water Management,2004,66:97-111
[6] Yamaguchi T,Blumwald E.Developing salt-tolerant crop plants:challenges and opportunities[J].Trends in Plant Science,2005,10(12):615-620
[7] Heidari-Sharifabada H,Mirzaie-Nodoushan H.Salinity-induced growth and some metabolic changes in three Salsola species[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2006,67:715-720
[8] Zhao G Q,Ma B L,Ren C Z.Growth,gas exchange,chlorophyll fluorescence,and ion content of naked oat in response to salinity[J].Crop Science,2007,47:123-131
[9] Flowers T J,Hajibagheri M A.Salinity tolerance in Hordeum vulgare:ion concentrations in root cells of cuhivars differing in salt tolerance[J].Plant Soil,2001,231:1-9
[10] Rengel Z.The role of calcium in salt toxicity[J].Plant Cell and Environment,1992,15:625-632
[11] Parida A K,Das A B.Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants,Ecotoxicol[J].Environment International,2005,60:324-349
[12] Wilson C,Liu X,Lesch S M,etal.Growth response of major USA cowpea cultivars Ⅱ.Effect of salinity on leaf gas exchange[J].Plant Science,2006,170:1095-1101
[13] Moradi F,Ismailr A M.Responses of photosynthesis,chlorophyll fluorescence and ROS-Scavenging systems to salt stress during seedling and reproductive stages in rice[J].Annals of Botany,2007,99:1161-1173
[14] Mitchell C C,Parkinson S E,Baker T J,etal.C-Banding and localization of 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA in tall oatgrass species[J].Crop Science,2003,43:32-36
[15] Leggett J M.Classification and speciation in Avena[A].In:Marshall H G,Sorrells M E ed.Oat science and technology,Agronomy Monograph 33.[C].American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America,Madison,Wisconsin,1992.32 52
[16] Maas E V.Crop salt tolerance[A].In:K K Tanji ed.Agricultural salinity assessment and management[C].New York:ASCE,1990.262-304
[17] Yang X,Zhang X Q,Wang Y Q,et al.Salt-Tolerance appraisal and comprehensive evaluation of wild Arrhenatherum elatius L.seedling[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2006,34(23):6105-6108
[18] Bates L S,Waldren R P,Teare I D.Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies[J].Plant Soil,1973,39:205-207
[19] Madhava Rao K V,Sresty T V S.Antioxidative parameters in the seedlings of pigeonpea(Cajanus cajan(L.)Mill spaugh)in response to Zn and Ni stresses[J].Plant Science,2000,157:113 128
[20] Kao W Y,Tsaic T T,Tsaic H C,et al.Response of three Glycine species to salt stress[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2006,56:120-125
[21] Hulusi K,Melike B,Filiz O,etal.The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation,antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2007,60(3):344-351
[22] Shani U,Ban-Gal A.Long-term response of grapevines to salinity:osmotic effects and ion toxicity[J].Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment,2005,56:148-154
[23] Kato T,Takeda K.Associations among characters related to yield sink capacity in spaced-planted rice[J].Crop Science,1996,36:1135-1139
[24] Gunasekera C P,Martin L D,Siddique K H M,et al.Genotype by environment interactions of Indian mustard(Brassica juncea L.)and canola(B.napus L.)in Mediterranean-type environments[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2006,25:1-12
[25] Misra N,Dwivedi U N.Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance of green gram cultivars[J].Plant Science,2004,166:1135-1142
[26] Katerji N,van Hoorn J W,Hamdy A,et al.Classification and salt tolerance analysis of barley varieties[J].Agricultural Water Management,2006,85:184-192
[27] Kurban H,Saneoka H,Nehira K,et al.Effect of salinity on growth,photosynthesis and mineral composition in leguminous plant Alhagi pseudoalhagi(Bieb.)[J].Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,1999,45:851-862
[28] Robinson J M.Does O2 photo reduction occur within chloroplast in vivo[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1988,72:666-680
[29] Iyengar E R R.,Reddy M P.Photosynthesis in highly salt tolerant plants[A].In:Pesserkali M ed.Handbook of photosynthesis[C].Marshal Dekar,Batch Rose,USA,1996.897-909
[30] Hasegawa P M,Bressan R A,Zhu J K,et al.Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,2000,51:463-499
[31] Maggio A,Reddy M P,Joly R J.Leaf gas exchange and solute accumulation in the halophyte Salvadora persica grown at moderate salt[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2000,44:31-38
[32] Lutts S,Kinet J M,Bouharmont J.Effects of salt stress on growth,mineral nutrition and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in rice cultivars differing in salt resistance[J].Plant Growth Regulation,1996,19:207-218
[33] Chaudhary M T,Merrett M J,Wainwright S J.Growth,ion content and proline accumulation in NaCl-selected and non-selected cell lines of Lucerne cultured on sodium and potassium salts[J].Plant Science,1997,127:71-79
[34] Rout N P,Shaw B P.Salt tolerance in aquatic macrophytes:probable role of proline,the enzymes involved in its synthesis and C4 type of metabolism[J].Plant Science,1998,136:121-130
[35] Colmer T D,Fan T W,Higashi R M,etal.Interactive effects of Ca²⁺and NaCl salt on the ionic relations and proline accumulation in the primary root tip of Sorghum bicolor[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1996,97:421-424
[36] Slama I,Ghnaya T,Messedi D,et al.Effect of sodium chloride on the response of the halophyte species Sesuvium portulacastrum grown in mannitol-induced water stress[J].Journal of Plant Research,2007,120:291-299
[37] Aubert S,Hennion F,Bouchereau A,et al.Subcellular compartmentation of proline in the leaves of the subantarctic Kerguelen cabbage in vivo ¹³C-NMR study[J].Plant Cell and Environment,1999,22:255-259
[38] Katsuhara M,Otsuka T,Ezaki B.Salt stress-induced lipid peroxidation is reduced by glutathione S-transferase,but this reduction of lipid peroxides is not enough for a recovery of root growth in Arabidopsis[J].Plant Science,2005,169:369-373
[39] Liang Y,Chen Q,Liu Q,et al.Exogenous silicon increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley(Hordeum vulgate L.)[J].Plant Physiology,2003,160(10):1157-1164
[40] Ruiz J M,Blasco B,Rivero RM,etal.Nicotine-free and salttolerant tobacco plants obtained by grafting to salinity-resistant rootstocks of tomato[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2005,124:465-475

高燕麦草苗期对盐胁迫的响应

Response of Tall Oatgrass to Salinity Stress at the Seedling Stage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张韦钰, 王春勇, 杜红梅. 富氢水对草地早熟禾耐盐性的影响以及与抗氧化酶活性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1436-1445.
[2]	潘平新, 倪强, 马瑞, 杨永义, 马彦军. 不同盐分处理对黑果枸杞种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 342-348.
[3]	张银翠, 姚拓, 赵桂琴, 徐茜, 王振龙, 包康, 撖冬荣. 耐盐促生菌筛选鉴定及对盐胁迫燕麦生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2645-2652.
[4]	万婷, 段钧译, 李蒙, 陈智勇. 南荻MlNAC2基因差异表达与耐盐生理响应的相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2685-2693.
[5]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[6]	王菲, 谭怡, 吕亚茹, 苏文欣, 姜宛彤, 刘宇乐, 严俊鑫. 水杨酸和赤霉素预处理对NaCl胁迫下神香草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2862-2870.
[7]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[8]	朱依晗, 刘宁芳, 胡龙兴, 徐倩. 8份绿穗苋种子萌发期耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2176-2183.
[9]	卫昭君, 牛冰洁, 王永新, 赵祥, 朱慧森, 郭秀萍, 乔栋. 茉莉酸甲酯对盐胁迫下偏关苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 998-1005.
[10]	贾会丽, 王学敏, 高涛, 石永红, 王运琦, 吴欣明, 刘建宁, 方志红, 董宽虎. 转MsLEA4-4基因拟南芥株系的耐盐性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 597-605.
[11]	卢锐, 李培英. 偃麦草盐胁迫下转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 31-44.
[12]	梁欢, 韦宝, 陈静, 宫文龙, 马琳, 王学敏, 王赞. 基于叶绿素荧光参数的紫花苜蓿种质苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 45-55.
[13]	张则宇, 李雪, 王焱, 常巍, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 59份苜蓿种质材料苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 112-121.
[14]	张金青, 陈金龙, 李凡, 赵炳森, 贾新凤, 马晖玲. 草地早熟禾种子萌发和幼苗生长对铅胁迫的适应性[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 130-140.
[15]	荆照, 曹倩, 宁亚明, 常媛飞, 张玉霞, 周岩, 达布希拉图, 王显国. 科尔沁沙地苜蓿苗期除草剂的筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 259-267.