干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.02.022

›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 336-341.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.02.022

干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响

高悦^1,2, 朱永铸², 杨志民¹, 杜红梅²

1. 南京农业大学草坪研究与开发工程技术中心, 江苏南京 210095;
2. 上海交通大学农业与生物学院, 上海 200240

收稿日期:2011-08-12 修回日期:2011-12-05 出版日期:2012-04-15 发布日期:2012-07-05
通讯作者: 杜红梅,E-mail:hmdu@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:高悦(1987- ),女,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,主要从事草坪抗逆生理方面的研究,E-mail: gaoyue0720@126.com
基金资助:
上海交通大学青年基金项目(06DBX040)资助

Effects of Drought Stress and Recovery on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Agropyron cristatum

GAO Yue^1,2, ZHU Yong-zhu², YANG Zhi-ming¹, DU Hong-mei²

1. Turf Engineering and Technology Center, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210095, China;
2. School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2011-08-12 Revised:2011-12-05 Online:2012-04-15 Published:2012-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 干旱胁迫是干旱与半干旱地区限制植物生长的一个最主要的环境因子。本文研究了15 d的干旱胁迫和6 d的复水对冰草(Agropyron cristatum)叶片抗旱相关生理指标及抗氧化酶活性的影响。结果表明:在干旱胁迫下冰草叶片具有较强的水分保持能力,并且在复水过程中叶片相对含水量快速恢复;干旱胁迫对冰草光化学系统的影响较小,10 d的干旱胁迫下,F_v/F_m仅下降了6.62%;5 d和10 d的干旱胁迫对冰草叶片电解质外渗的影响与对照差异不显著,而随着干旱胁迫时间的延长,叶片电解质外渗显著升高。在水分胁迫下, 冰草超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性逐渐降低,CAT对干旱胁迫最敏感,而POD活性下降最慢;复水后3种酶的活性升高,复水6 d后都恢复到干旱处理前的水平。由此表明,冰草的抗旱性可能和短期干旱胁迫下叶片的保水能力以及复水后叶片生理功能的快速恢复有关。

关键词: 冰草, 干旱, 复水, 超氧化物歧化酶, 过氧化物酶, 过氧化氢酶, 丙二醛

Abstract: Drought stress is the dominant environmental factor limiting plant growth in arid and semi-arid areas. The effects of 15 d drought stress and 6 d re-watering on physiological indices relating drought tolerance and enzyme activities of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) were analyzed. Results showed that the leaves of crested wheatgrass could keep relatively high water content under drought stress and relative water content (RWC) recovered rapidly in leaves during re-watering. There was no severe drought damage on photochemical system. Photochemical efficiency (F_v/F_m) only decreased 6.62% after 10 days drought stress. Electrolyte leakage (EL) of leaves had no significant difference after 5 or 10 days drought stress compared with well-water control. With extended drought stress, EL increased significantly. Under drought stress, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities gradually decreased. CAT was the most sensitive enzyme to drought stress and POD activities decreased the slowest. The activities of three antioxidant enzymes increased after re-watering and did not show any significant differences 6 days later compared with well-water control. These results suggest that drought tolerance of crested wheatgrass could be related with water retaining capacity during short-time drought stress and rapid recovery of physiological functions after re-watering.

Key words: Agropyron cristatum, Drought, Re-watering, Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Peroxidase (POD), Catalase (CAT), Malondialdehyde (MDA)

中图分类号:

高悦, 朱永铸, 杨志民, 杜红梅. 干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 336-341.

GAO Yue, ZHU Yong-zhu, YANG Zhi-ming, DU Hong-mei. Effects of Drought Stress and Recovery on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Agropyron cristatum[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 336-341.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.02.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2012/V20/I2/336

参考文献

[1] 曲涛,南志标.作物和牧草对干旱胁迫的响应及机理研究进展[J].草业学报,2008,17(2):126-135
[2] Carrow R N. Drought avoidance characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars [J]. Crop Science, 1996, 36:371-377
[3] Perdomo P, Murphy J A, Berkowitz G A. Physiological changes associated with performance of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars during summer stress [J]. HortScience, 1996, 31:1182-1186
[4] Du H M, Wang Z L, Huang B R. Differential responses of tall fescue and zoysiagrass to drought and heat stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2008, 783:207-214
[5] Fu J M, Huang B R. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2001, 45:105-114
[6] 时丽冉,刘志华.干旱胁迫对苣荬菜抗氧化酶和渗透调节物质的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(5):673-677
[7] DaCosta M, Huang B R. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation for bentgrass species in response to drought stress [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2007, 132:319-326
[8] Bian S, Jiang Y. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 120(2):264-270
[9] 云锦凤,米福贵.冰草的种子萌发、生长发育及其开花生物学[J].中国草地,1989,11(4):16-21
[10] 李立会,董玉琛.冰草属研究进展[J].遗传,1993,15(1):45-48
[11] DaCosta M, Wang Z L, Huang B R. Physiological adaptation of Kentucky bluegrass to localized soil drying [J]. Crop Science, 2004, 44:1307-1314
[12] Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K. Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants [J]. Plant Physiology, 1977, 59:309-314
[13] Chance B, Maehly A C. Assay of catalases and peroxidases [J]. Methods in Enzymology, 1955, 2:764-775
[14] Heath R L, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts.I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation [J]. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1968, 125:189-198
[15] Xu L L, Han L B, Huang B R. Membrane fatty acid composition and saturation levels associated with leaf dehydration tolerance and post-drought rehydration in Kentucky bluegrass [J]. Crop Science, 2011, 51(1):273-281
[16] Shah N H, Paulsen G M. Interaction of drought and high temperature on photosynthesis and grain-filling of wheat [J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 257:219-226
[17] Xu L X, Han L B, Huang B R. Antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought and post-drought recovery [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2011, 136(4):247-255
[18] Zhang J X, Kirkham M B. Antioxidant responses to drought in sunflower and sorghum seedlings [J]. New Phytologist, 1996, 132:361-373
[19] de Carvalho M H C. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production, scavenging and signaling [J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2008, 3(3):156-165
[20] Smirnoff N. The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water-deficit and desiccation [J]. New Phytologist, 1993, 125(1):27-58
[21] Arora A, Sairam R K, Srivastava G C. Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants [J]. Current Science, 2002, 82:1227-1238

干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响

Effects of Drought Stress and Recovery on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Agropyron cristatum

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王秀英, 郝云, 胡骏楠, 李璠, 余迪. 气象干旱过程识别及致灾因子特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 35-42.
[2]	赵梦凡, 周秉荣, 赵彤, 周华坤, 校瑞香, 颜亮东, 李璠. 青海省草地植被干旱评估及驱动力分析研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 93-103.
[3]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[4]	谢开云, 孟翔, 徐珍珍, 张力文, 万江春, 颜安, 李陈建. 新疆半干旱地区不同种类混播草地的牧草产量和营养价值研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1835-1842.
[5]	范菠菠, 张学峰, 于卓, 赵彦, 马艳红. 与蒙古冰草抗旱相关的NAC转录因子生物信息学及其表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1183-1192.
[6]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[7]	徐洪雨, 甄莉丽, 李钰莹, 董宽虎, 李向林. 低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 724-733.
[8]	李文晶, 王俊锋, 高晓荻, 石玉杰, 穆春生. 干旱条件下氮磷添加对羊草干草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 743-748.
[9]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[10]	王子婷, 杨磊, 李广, 柴春山, 张洋东, 刘冬皓. 半干旱黄土丘陵区微地形变化对人工柠条林草本分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 364-373.
[11]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[12]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[13]	齐晨汐, 易观涛, 付晓璇, 王海龙, 王佳琳, 吴建慧. 丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫下鹅绒委陵菜生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[14]	王星, 宋珂辰, 许冬梅, 李永康, 撒春宁, 杨越. 荒漠草原人工柠条对冠下蒙古冰草种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2470-2476.
[15]	刘亚兰, 赵月, 徐梦琦, 柴旭田, 曾凡江, 李向义, 李磊, 黄彩变. 极端干旱区种植行距对油莎豆生长及土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2486-2493.