羊草晾晒过程中淋雨后进行青贮的研究

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 196-201.

羊草晾晒过程中淋雨后进行青贮的研究

张庆, 玉柱, 田吉鹏

中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193

收稿日期:2012-09-03 修回日期:2012-09-29 出版日期:2013-02-15 发布日期:2013-02-27
通讯作者: 玉柱
作者简介:张庆(1988-),男,河南信阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为饲草加工,E-mail:zqing1988@126.com;
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目"优质牧草资源开发与多元化草产品加工利用关键技术研究与集成示范"(2011BAD17B02);国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-35);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303061)资助

Effects of Rain and Drying on Leymus chinensis Ensiling

ZHANG Qing, YU Zhu, TIAN Ji-peng

College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2012-09-03 Revised:2012-09-29 Online:2013-02-15 Published:2013-02-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究乳酸菌和晾晒时间对干燥过程中羊草(Leymus chinensis)淋雨后青贮的影响。将晾晒12 h的羊草人工模仿雨淋,设定降雨量为20 mm,晾晒4 h后再次对羊草进行20 mm的人工模仿雨淋,分别在第1次人工雨淋后晾晒第0 h, 2 h和4 h,第2次雨淋后晾晒4 h和8 h时取样切短,与乳酸菌混合后袋装密封青贮,室温贮藏60 d开封取样分析。结果表明:随着晾晒时间的推移,羊草青贮饲料中粗蛋白含量显著降低;乳酸菌可以显著降低青贮饲料的pH值,显著增加乳酸含量(P<0.05),改善青贮饲料的发酵品质。2种乳酸菌对青贮饲料品质影响差异不明显,羊草淋雨后应当及时调制青贮饲料。

关键词: 雨淋, 乳酸菌, 青贮饲料, 发酵品质

Abstract: Effects of lactic acid bacteria and drying time on the quality of Leymus chinensis silage ensiled after simulated rain during drying process was studied. Leymus chinensis (drying 12 h) was drenched by 20 mm simulated rain at four-hour intervals. Samples were collected at 0 h, 2 h, 4 h after first simulated rain and 4 h, 8 h after the second rain. After adding lactic acid bacteria, Leymus chinensis was chopped and ensiled in plastic film bags for 60 days at room temperature. Results showed that the crude protein (CP) content of silage was significantly reduced as drying time increased. Lactic acid bacteria significantly decreased pH value, increased lactic acid content (P<0.05), and improve the fermentation quality of silage. However, no significant difference was found in silage quality when treated with the two kinds of lactic acid bacteria. Leymus chinensis should be ensiled timely after simulated rain during drying process.

Key words: Rain, Lactic acid bacteria, Silage, Fermentation quality

中图分类号:

S816.53

张庆, 玉柱, 田吉鹏. 羊草晾晒过程中淋雨后进行青贮的研究[J]. , 2013, 21(1): 196-201.

ZHANG Qing, YU Zhu, TIAN Ji-peng. Effects of Rain and Drying on Leymus chinensis Ensiling[J]. , 2013, 21(1): 196-201.

参考文献

[1] 张玉芬,周道玮.羊草分化及育种研究进展[J].中国草地,2002,24(2):54-58
[2] 田昆.刈割管理对羊草的干物质产量及质量的影响[D].长春:东北师范大学,2010:5-7
[3] 白春生,朱若蝉,白龙,等.持续降雨时间对紫花苜蓿干草品质的影响[C]//中国畜牧业协会.第三届中国苜蓿发展大会论文集.北京:中国知网数字出版,2010:446-452
[4] 毛培胜.草产品质量与安全监测[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2012:53
[5] Saarisalo E,Skytta E,Haikara A,et al.Screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria strains suitable for ensiling grass[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,2007,102(2):327-336
[6] Nkosi B D,Meeske R,Palic D,et al. Effects of ensiling whole crop maize with bacterial inoculants on the fermentation,aerobic stability,and growth performance of lambs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,154(3/4):193-203
[7] JalČ D,Laukova A,Simonova M,et al. The use of bacterial inoculants for grass silage: Their effects on nutrient composition and fermentation parameters in grass silages[J].Czech Journal of Animal Science,2009,54(2):84-91
[8] 玉柱,孙启忠.饲草青贮技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2011:103
[9] 韩立英,玉柱. 3种乳酸茵制剂对苜蓿和羊草的青贮效果[J].草业科学,2009,26(2):66-71
[10] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1999:58-63
[11] Dubois M,Gilles K A,Hamilton J K,et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances [J]. Analytical Chemistry,1956,28(3):350-356
[12] Han K J,Collins M,Vanzant E S,et al. Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage [J]. Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919
[13] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等. 高效液相色谱法测定紫花苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J].草原与草坪,2007(2):63-65
[14] Broderica G A,Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(2):64-75
[15] 许庆方,王保平,董宽虎,等.淋雨对苜蓿干草品质的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(6):848-853
[16] 陈喜斌,丁斌鹰,陈宏.豆粕霉变过程中品质变化规律的研究[J].中国粮油学报,2003,18(1):65-69
[17] Paster N,Lisker N. The nutritional value of moldy grains for broiler chicks [J]. Poultry Science,1982,61(11):2247-2254
[18] 陈喜斌,丁斌鹰,陈宏. 霉变对豆粕营养价值的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2004,19(3):69-73
[19] 孙娟娟,玉柱,薛艳林,等. 添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响[J].草地学报,2007,15(3):238-242
[20] Aksu T,Baytok E,Bolat D. Effects of a bacterial silage inoculant on corn silage fermentation and nutrient digestibility [J]. Small Ruminant Research,2004,55(1/3):249-252
[21] Shockey W L,Dehority B A,Conrad H R. Effects of microbial inoculant on fermentation of alfalfa and corn[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1985,68(11):3076-3080
[22] Liu Q H,Chen M X,Zhang J G,et al. Characteristics of isolated lactic acid bacteria and their effectiveness to improve stylo (Stylosanthes guianensis Sw.) silage quality at various temperatures[J]. Animal Science Journal,2012,83(2):128-135
[23] Jonas J,Vilma V. The effects of silage inoculants on the fermentation and aerobic stability of legume-grass silage[J]. Žemdirbyste,2011,98(4):367-374
[24] 陶莲,孙启忠,玉柱,等.乳酸菌添加剂对全株玉米和苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J].中国奶牛,2009(2):13-16
[25] Liu Q H,Zhang J G,Shi S L,et al. The effects of wilting and storage temperatures on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of stylo silage [J].Animal Science Journal,2011,82(4):549-553