秦岭山地松栎混交林优势草本N,P化学计量特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.04.002

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 637-642.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.04.002

秦岭山地松栎混交林优势草本N,P化学计量特征

侯琳^1,2, 白娟¹, 李银¹, 陈军军¹, 张硕新^1,2

1. 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 陕西秦岭森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 陕西宁陕 711603

收稿日期:2013-02-02 修回日期:2013-04-07 出版日期:2013-08-15 发布日期:2013-08-14
作者简介:侯琳(1969- ),男,陕西武功人,副研究员,博士,主要从事森林生态系统结构与功能的研究,E-mail: houlin_1969@nwsuaf.edu.cn
基金资助:
林业公益性行业科研专项(201004036);西北农林科技大学西部环境与生态教育部重点实验室共同资助

Stoichiometric Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorous of Dominant Herbaceous Species in a Pine-oak Mixed Forest in the Qinling Mountains

HOU Lin^1,2, BAI Juan¹, LI Yin¹, CHEN Jun-jun¹, ZHANG Shuo-xin^1,2

1. College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Qinling National Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Ningshan, Shaanxi Province 711603, China

Received:2013-02-02 Revised:2013-04-07 Online:2013-08-15 Published:2013-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 氮(N)和磷(P)是影响陆地生态系统生产力的重要元素,而植物氮磷(N-P)生态化学计量特征为研究植物的养分利用状况提供了有效途径。研究林下草本优势种叶片N,P元素含量,可为判断其生长限制性元素及探索提高其生产力的途径提供参考依据。以秦岭松栎混交林内优势草本为研究对象,在群落调查的基础上,确定秦岭山地松栎混交林内草本优势种,分析优势草本叶片N,P化学计量特征。结果表明:林内草本偶见种较多;优势草本叶中N,P含量和N:P比的均值分别为(17.51±3.01) mg·g^-1,(1.74±0.79) mg·g^-1和(11.67±4.01);优势草本叶片中N与P的含量间存在线性关系;随着草本叶片中P含量增加,N:P比总体呈下降趋势;研究区松栎混交林内草本优势种披针叶苔草(Carex lanceolata)和野青茅(Deyeuxia sylvatica)生长受土壤中可利用的N限制,升麻(Astilbe chinensis)不受土壤中可利用的N,P含量限制;开展森林抚育,促进凋落物分解有利于提高松栎混交林内草本生产力。

关键词: 松栎混交林, N, P, 养分限制, 生态化学计量

Abstract: Nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) are vital elements and have crucial impacts on the productivity of terrestrial ecosystem. Ecological stoichiometry of plant N and P provides an efficient way for understanding plant nutrient utilization. Based on field investigation, dominant herbaceous species in a pine and oak mixed forest were assured and their stoichiometric characteristics were analyzed. Results indicated as follows. Casual species could be found frequently in the forest. The mean concentrations of N, P and N:P ratio in the leaves of dominant herbaceous species were (17.51±3.01) mg·g^-1, (1.74±0.79 ) mg·g^-1and (11.67±4.01), respectively. Relationships between the concentrations of N and P in the leaves of dominant herbaceous species were explored by linear regression. The N:P ratio generally negatively related to the concentration of P. Both Carex lanceolata and Deyeuxia sylvatica were limited by soil available N in their growing processes. In contrast, Astilbe chinensis growth was unlimited by either soil available N or P. These results suggested forest thinning promoted litter decomposition and increased the productivity of herbaceous species in the pine-oak mixed forest.

Key words: Pine and oak mixed forest, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Nutrient limitation, Ecological stoichiometry

中图分类号:

S718.51.6

侯琳, 白娟, 李银, 陈军军, 张硕新. 秦岭山地松栎混交林优势草本N,P化学计量特征[J]. , 2013, 21(4): 637-642.

HOU Lin, BAI Juan, LI Yin, CHEN Jun-jun, ZHANG Shuo-xin. Stoichiometric Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorous of Dominant Herbaceous Species in a Pine-oak Mixed Forest in the Qinling Mountains[J]. , 2013, 21(4): 637-642.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.04.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2013/V21/I4/637

参考文献

[1] 牛得草,董晓玉,傅华.长芒草不同季节碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J].草业科学,2011,28(6):915-920
[2] 曾德慧,陈广生.生态化学计量学:复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J]. 植物生态学报,2005,29(6):1007-1019
[3] Kang H Z, Zhuang H L,Wu L L, et al. Variation in leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Picea abies across Europe: An analysis based on local observations[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2011,261(2):195-202
[4] Adams M B, Campbell R G, Allen H L, et al. Root and foliar nutrient concentrations in loblolly pine: Effects of season, site and fertilization[J]. Forest Science,1987,33(4):984-996
[5] Gusewell S. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance[J].New Phytologist,2004,164(2):243-266
[6] 刘万德,苏建荣,李帅锋,等.云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林演替系列植物和土壤 C、N、P 化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2010,30(23):6581-6590
[7] 阎凯,付登高,何峰,等.滇池流域富磷区不同土壤磷水平下植物叶片的养分化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(4):353-361
[8] Harpole S W, Ngai J T, Cleland E E, et al. Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities[J].Ecology Letters,2011,14(9):852-862
[9] Richardson S J, Allen R B, Doherty J E. Shifts in leaf N:P ratio during resorption reflect soil P in temperate rainforest[J]. Functional Ecology,2008,22(4):738-745
[10] Townsend A R, Cleveland C C, Asner G P, et al. Controls over foliar N:P ratios in tropical rain forests[J]. Ecology,2007,88(1):107-118
[11] 任书杰,于贵瑞,陶波,等.中国东部南北样带654种植物叶片氮和磷的化学计量学特征研究[J].环境科学,2007,28(12):2665-2673
[12] 阎恩荣,王希华,周武.天童常绿阔叶林演替系列植物群落的N:P化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(1):13-22
[13] 宋彦涛,周道玮,李强,等. 松嫩草地80种草本植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2012,36(3):222-230
[14] 刘兴诏,周国逸,张德强,等. 南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N、P的化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2010,34 (1):64-71
[15] 顾大形,陈双林,黄玉清. 土壤氮磷对四季竹叶片氮磷化学计量特征和叶绿素含量的影响[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1219-1225
[16] 张文彦,樊江文,钟华平,等.中国典型草原优势植物功能群氮磷化学计量学特征研究[J].草地学报,2010,18(4):503-509
[17] 银晓瑞,梁存柱,王立新,等. 内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):39-47
[18] 杨惠敏,王冬梅. 草-环境系统植物碳氮磷生态化学计量学及其对环境因子的响应研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2011,20(2):244-252
[19] 杨雪栋,孙卫国,宝音陶格涛.内蒙古荒漠草原小针茅群落土壤养分的化学计量学特征[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(5):30-34
[20] 侯琳,雷瑞德,王得祥,等. 秦岭火地塘天然次生油松林间草本层碳密度[J].草地学报,2009,16(3):262-266
[21] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:268-270
[22] 李传龙,谢宗强,赵常明,等. 三峡库区磷化工厂点源污染对陆生植物群落组成和物种多样性的影响[J].生物多样性,2007,15(5):523-532
[23] Han W X, Fang J Y, Reich P B, et al. Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China[J].Ecology Letters,2011,14(8):788-796
[24] Sterner R W, Elser J J. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002:906-907
[25] gren G I. The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs-theory and observations[J].Ecology Letters,2004,7(3):185-191
[26] Ellison A M. Nutrient limitation and stoichiometry of carnivorous plants[J].Plant Biology,2006,8(6):740-747
[27] Wu T G, Yu M K, Wang G G, et al. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across forty-two woody species in Southeast China[J].Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2012,44(10):255-263
[28] Tuomi M, Thum T, Jrvinen H, et al. Leaf litter decomposition-estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model[J]. Ecological Modelling,2009,220(23):3362-3371
[29] 刘超,王洋,王楠,等.陆地生态系统植被氮磷化学计量研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(11):1205-216

秦岭山地松栎混交林优势草本N,P化学计量特征

Stoichiometric Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorous of Dominant Herbaceous Species in a Pine-oak Mixed Forest in the Qinling Mountains

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李若玮, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 韩国栋, 孙建. 基于InVEST模型的青藏高原碳储量估算及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 43-51.
[2]	兰翔宇, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 曾涛, 孙建. 1995—2014年青藏高原水源涵养功能时空演变特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[3]	马骢毓, 韩重阳, 马赛男, 李旭旭, 蔡家邦, 汪阳, 张新全, 聂刚. 基于SSR分子标记的13个白三叶(Trifolium repens L.)品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1892-1899.
[4]	麻莹, 张洪嘉, 库都斯·阿布都沙拉木, 耿淑娟, 薛傲然, 赵翰韦, 菅柏涵. 盐碱胁迫对盐地碱蓬生长、有机酸等溶质积累及其生理功能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1934-1940.
[5]	侯路路, 王旭, 张翔, 闫玉春, 闫瑞瑞, 程利, 辛晓平. 放牧强度对肉牛行为的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1974-1982.
[6]	罗铭欣, 刘凤民, 陈纪言, 崔均涛, 张伟丽. ⁶⁰Coγ辐射柱花草M₃代的农艺性状及遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1992-2000.
[7]	黄家兴, 吴静, 李纯斌, 秦格霞, 钱娟冰, 李怀海. 基于Sentinel-2和Landsat 8数据的天祝县草地地上生物量遥感反演[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[8]	肖云飞, 陈文业, 王斌杰, 谈嫣蓉, 邴丹珲, 朱丽, 刘鸿源. 祁连山国家级自然保护区土地利用时空变化及与气候因子关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2049-2057.
[9]	金一锋, 陈阳, 齐欣, 高岩松, 金忠民, 赵清峰, 王琦. 草地早熟禾NRT1/PTR FAMILY 8.3基因的克隆及表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1397-1405.
[10]	叶刚, 张笑笑, 陈静波, 李建建, 李玲, 刘建秀, 郭爱桂, 郭海林. 结缕草属植物杂交后代形态特征和SRAP分子标记鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1406-1415.
[11]	董超, 方香玲. 植物病原真菌尖孢镰刀菌检测与定量研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1599-1604.
[12]	杨鑫, 唐庄生, 鱼小军, 曹文侠, 蒲小鹏, 郝媛媛. 近二十年中外文草地遥感研究热点及前沿演进——基于CiteSpace的数据可视化分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1136-1147.
[13]	范菠菠, 张学峰, 于卓, 赵彦, 马艳红. 与蒙古冰草抗旱相关的NAC转录因子生物信息学及其表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1183-1192.
[14]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[15]	郭超凡, 陈泽威, 张志高. 基于最优模型选择的牧草地上生物量遥感估算研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 946-955.