低温胁迫对5份苜蓿品种根系形态特征的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.014

草地学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 101-106.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.014

低温胁迫对5份苜蓿品种根系形态特征的影响

王运涛^1,2, 于林清², 李景柱¹, 孙娟娟², 谢继红²

1. 张家口学院, 河北张家口 075000;
2. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010

收稿日期:2014-12-11 修回日期:2015-07-06 出版日期:2016-02-15 发布日期:2016-04-26
通讯作者: 于林清
作者简介:王运涛(1985-),男,河北保定人,硕士研究生,从事牧草育种研究,E-mail:wytao88@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑"奶牛营养调控与粗饲料高效利用关键技术(2012BAD12B02)";中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(中国农业科学院草原研究所)(1610332014007);河北省奶牛产业技术体系资助

Effects of Chilling Stress on the Root Characteristics of 5 Alfalfa Varieties

WANG Yun-tao^1,2, YU Lin-qing², LI Jing-zhu¹, SUN Juan-juan², XIE Ji-hong²

1. Zhangjiakou University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China;
2. Grassland Research Institute of CAAS, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China

Received:2014-12-11 Revised:2015-07-06 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2016-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究低温胁迫对苜蓿(Medicago stativa)根系形态特征的影响,本文以国内外的5个苜蓿品种为试验材料,对其进行低温胁迫。观测比较缓苗成活率和根系形态指标,并进行方差及相关性分析。结果表明:不同苜蓿品种经低温胁迫后的成活率和根系指标差异显著;成活率与主根直径、侧根直径呈显著(P<0.05)或极显著(P<0.01)正相关,与侧根位置呈负相关,与侧根数目无相关性;植株总重与主根长度、主根直径、侧根直径和侧根数呈极显著(P<0.01)正相关,与侧根位置呈显著(P<0.05)负相关;成活率随着低温处理时间的延长逐渐降低;‘公农1号’和‘龙牧801’可作为优良品种在高寒地区推广种植。

关键词: 苜蓿, 低温胁迫, 根系

Abstract:

The effects of chilling stress on alfalfa root morphology were studied using 5 alfalfa varieties as material. The survival rates and related root morphology of tested varieties were observed and compared by variance analysis, correlation analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the survival rates and the root characteristics of different alfalfa varieties were obvious difference after low temperature stress. The survival rate was significant or extremely significant positive correlated with the diameters of taproot and lateral root, negative correlated with lateral root position, not correlated with lateral root number. The biological production was extremely significant positive correlated with taproot length, taproot diameter, lateral root diameter and lateral root number, was significantly negative correlated with lateral root position. The survival rate decreased as the time of chilling stress increasing. Therefore, ‘Gongnong No.1’ and ‘Longmu 801’ can be used as popularized varieties in cold area.

Key words: Alfalfa, Chilling stress, Root system

中图分类号:

S541

王运涛, 于林清, 李景柱, 孙娟娟, 谢继红. 低温胁迫对5份苜蓿品种根系形态特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 101-106.

WANG Yun-tao, YU Lin-qing, LI Jing-zhu, SUN Juan-juan, XIE Ji-hong. Effects of Chilling Stress on the Root Characteristics of 5 Alfalfa Varieties[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 101-106.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2016/V24/I1/101

参考文献

[1] 徐斌,杨秀春,白可喻,等. 中国苜蓿综合气候区划研究[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(2):316-321
[2] 耿华珠. 中国苜蓿[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1995
[3] Ray S S. 小麦根重分布模式的定量研究[J]. 国外农学-麦类作物,1994,1(1):25-26
[4] 彭幼芬. 生命科学与绿色产业[M]. 湖南:中南工业大学出版社,1999
[5] 吴承祯,洪伟. 杉木数量经营学引论[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2000
[6] 纪荣花,于磊,鲁为华,等. 不同苜蓿品种建植当年田间生长发育与根系特征的比较[J]. 草原与草坪,2011,31(5):21-26
[7] Ventroni L M, Volenec J J, Cangiano C A. Fall dormancy and cutting frequency impact on alfalfa yield and yield components[J]. Field Crops Research,2010,119(2):252-259
[8] Brummer E C, Shah M, Luth D. Reexamining the relationship between fall dormancy and winter hardiness in alfalfa[J]. Crop Science,2000,40(4):971-977
[9] Castonguay Y, Bertrand A, Michaud R, et al. Cold-induced biochemical and molecular changes in alfalfa populations selectively improved for freezing tolerance[J]. Crop Science,2011,51(5):2132-2144
[10] 王运涛. 不同苜蓿材料的抗寒性差异研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2013
[11] Johnson L D, Marquez J J, Lamb J F S, et al. Root morphology of alfalfa plant introductions and cultivars [J]. Crop Science,1998,38(2):497-502
[12] Russell R S. Plant Root Systems: Their Function and Interaction with the Soil[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1978,125(4):12-15
[13] Marquez-Ortiz J J, Johnson L D, Basigalup D H, et al. Crown morphology relationships among alfalfa plant introduction and cultivars[J].Crop Science,1996,36(3):766-770
[14] Marquez-Ortiz J J, Lamb F S ,Johnson L D, et al. Heritability of crown trait in alfalfa[J]. Crop Science,1999,39(1):38-43
[15] Perfect E, Miller R D, Burton B. Root morphology and vigor effects on winter heading of established alfalfa[J]. Agronomy Journal,1987,79(6):1061-1067
[16] Avice J C, Ourry A, Lemaire G, et al. Root protein and vegetative storage protein are key organic nutrients for alfalfa shoot regrowth[J]. Crop Science,1997,37(4):1187-1193
[17] Mcintosh M S, Miller D A. Genetic and soil meatier effects on the branching-root traits in alfalfa[J]. Crop Science,1981,21(1):15-18
[18] Salter R ,Melton B, Wilson M, et al. Selection in alfalfa for forage yield with three moisture levels in drought boxes[J]. Crop Science,1984,24(2):345-349
[19] Hwang S F, Gaudet D A. Effects of plant age and late-season hardening on development of resistance to winter crown rot in first-year alfalfa[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1995,75(2):421-428
[20] 南丽丽,师尚礼,陈建纲,等. 不同根型苜蓿根系对低温胁迫的响应及其抗寒性评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2011,19(3):619-625
[21] 王月胜. 不同苜蓿品种根系特征及其与抗寒性关系的研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2008
[22] 刘志英,李西良,李峰,等. 越冬紫花苜蓿根系性状与秋眠性的关系及其抗寒效应[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1689-1701
[23] 赵艳. 不同苜蓿品种根系特征及其与草产量关系的研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2008
[24] 彭岚清,李欣勇,齐晓,等. 紫花苜蓿品种根系特性与持久性和生物量的关系[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(2):147-153
[25] 明炜,莫本田,陈超,等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种根系生长特性研究[D]. 呼和浩特:第五届中国苜蓿发展大会,2013,4:202-209

低温胁迫对5份苜蓿品种根系形态特征的影响

Effects of Chilling Stress on the Root Characteristics of 5 Alfalfa Varieties

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	牟丹, 杨帆, 卡着才让, 祁学忠, 顾智辉, 谢久祥, 李希来. 高加索三叶草响应不同降温模式低温胁迫的代谢组学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1877-1884.
[2]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[3]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[4]	孙伟, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 赵敏, 杨合龙, 宋倩, 肖红, 王开丽, 曹婧, 戎郁萍. 补播羊草和黄花苜蓿对退化草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[5]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[6]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[7]	李天琦, 林志玲, 卢轩, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 沃野, 高凯, 柳小妮, 王显国. 灌溉量对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿土壤速效养分分布及淋失的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[8]	李红, 李波, 方志坚, 杨曌, 张超, 冯成龙, 金姗姗, 王思琦, 石婉莹. 冻融和冻融+苏打盐碱复合胁迫下苜蓿幼苗的生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[9]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[10]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[11]	潘新怡, 史昆, 龚攀, 韦宝, 吴欣明, 王赞. 紫花苜蓿花青苷合成的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.
[12]	刘允熙, 罗佳佳, 雷健, 刘国道, 刘攀道. 柱花草磷高效种质筛选及根系形态对低磷胁迫的响应分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 876-883.
[13]	孙雷雷, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 刘富渊, 聂秀美, 王军. 贮藏方式和贮藏时间对苜蓿干草霉菌数量和种类的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 884-893.
[14]	陈彩锦, 张尚沛, 师尚礼, 曾燕霞, 吴娟, 尚继红, 高婷, 张蓉. 基于GGE双标图对苜蓿品种丰产性和稳定性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 912-918.
[15]	其美拉姆, 普布卓玛, 崔彤彤, 张新飞, 姜惠娜, 付娟娟, 呼天明. 外源钙对低温胁迫下西藏野生垂穗披碱草生理及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 919-928.