CO2浓度升高、干旱胁迫和氮沉降对白羊草光响应曲线的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.010

草地学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 69-75.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.010

CO₂浓度升高、干旱胁迫和氮沉降对白羊草光响应曲线的影响

肖列^1,4, 刘国彬^1,2, 张娇阳³, 杨婷³, 薛萐^1,2

1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
4. 西安理工大学西北旱区生态水利工程国家重点实验室培育基地, 陕西西安 710048

收稿日期:2014-11-13 修回日期:2015-03-31 出版日期:2016-02-15 发布日期:2016-04-26
通讯作者: 薛萐
作者简介:肖列(1987-),男,河北保定人,博士,讲师,主要从事土壤微生物方面研究,E-mail:xiaosha525@163.com
基金资助:
中科院西部青年学者项目(XAB2015A05);国家自然科学基金(41371510,41371508,41471438);西北农林科技大学重大项目培育专项(ZD2013021)资助

Effects of Elevated CO₂, Drought Stress and Nitrogen Deposition on Photosynthesis Light Response Curves of Bothriochloa ischaemum

XIAO Lie^1,4, LIU Guo-bin^1,2, ZHANG Jiao-yang³, YANG Ting³, XUE Sha^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. College of Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province, 712100, China;
4. State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710048, China

Received:2014-11-13 Revised:2015-03-31 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2016-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示白羊草(Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng.)对全球气候变化的光合生理特征响应规律,采用盆栽控制试验,研究了白羊草在不同CO₂浓度、水分条件和施氮水平下叶片的叶绿素含量和光响应曲线特征。结果表明:随CO₂浓度升高和施氮量增加,白羊草叶片SPAD值,最大净光合速率(P_max),表观量子效率(AQE)和光饱和点(LSP)均呈增加趋势;干旱胁迫降低了SPAD值,P_max和LSP。多因素方差分析表明,CO₂浓度,水分处理和施氮水平对SPAD值,P_max和LSP有极显著影响,施氮水平对AQE有极显著影响。CO₂浓度和水分处理对P_max,AQE和LSP有显著的交互作用;CO₂浓度和施氮水平对P_max,AQE和光补偿点(LCP)有极显著的交互作用;水分处理和施氮水平对P_max,AQE和LSP有极显著的交互作用。RDA分析表明氮素是影响白羊草光合特征的最重要因素。全球CO₂浓度升高和氮沉降增加对干旱胁迫引起的白羊草光合速率下降有显著的缓解作用。

关键词: 白羊草, CO₂浓度升高, 干旱胁迫, 氮沉降, 光响应曲线

Abstract:

In order to study the photo-physiological characteristics of old world bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng.) from loess hilly-gully region under the background of global climate change, the chlorophyll content (SPAD) and photosynthesis light response curves were determined under potted conditions with different atmospheric CO₂ conditions, soil moisture conditions and nitrogen deposition treatments. The results showed that elevated CO₂ and nitrogen deposition increased the SPAD value, maximum photosynthetic rate (P_max), apparent quantum efficiency (AQE), light saturation point (LSP); drought stress decreased the SPAD value, P_max and LSP. Multi-factor analysis of variance indicated that CO₂ concentration, soil water conditions and nitrogen deposition level all had highly significant influence on SPAD value, P_max and LSP; and nitrogen deposition level had significant influence on AQE. CO₂ concentration and soil water conditions had significant interaction effects on P_max, AQE and LSP; CO₂ concentration and nitrogen deposition level had significant interaction effects on P_max, AQE and light compensation point (LCP); soil water conditions and nitrogen deposition levels had significant interaction effects on P_max, AQE and LSP. RDA analysis indicated that nitrogen was the most important factor that affected the photosynthesis characteristics of B. ischaemum. Elevated CO₂ concentration and nitrogen deposition had compensation effect on the photosynthetic reduction of B. ischaemum induced by drought stress under the background of global climate change.

Key words: Bothriochloa ischaemum, Elevated CO₂ concentration, Drought stress, Nitrogen deposition, Photosynthetic response curves

中图分类号:

肖列, 刘国彬, 张娇阳, 杨婷, 薛萐. CO₂浓度升高、干旱胁迫和氮沉降对白羊草光响应曲线的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 69-75.

XIAO Lie, LIU Guo-bin, ZHANG Jiao-yang, YANG Ting, XUE Sha. Effects of Elevated CO₂, Drought Stress and Nitrogen Deposition on Photosynthesis Light Response Curves of Bothriochloa ischaemum[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 69-75.

参考文献

[1] Smith T M, Karl T R, Reynolds R W. How accurate are climate simulations[J]. Science,2002,296(5567):483-484
[2] CO₂ now. Earth's CO₂ home page[EB/OL]. http://www.co2.earth/monthly-co2,2014-11-05/2014-11-8
[3] IPCC, 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Avery K B, Tignor M, Miller H L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA:216-220
[4] Genthon Q, Barnola J M, Raynaud D,et al. Vostok ice core: climate response to CO₂ and orbit forcing changes over the last climatic cycle[J]. Nature,1987,329:414-418
[5] Galloway J N, Cowling E B. Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of change[J]. A Journal of the Human Environment,2002,31(2):64-71
[6] Liu X J, Zhang Y, Han W X, et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China[J]. Nature,2013,494(7438):459-462
[7] 孙良杰,齐玉春,董云社,等. 全球变化对草地土壤微生物群落多样性的影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(12):1715-1723
[8] Tuittila E, Vasander H, Laine J. Sensitivity of C sequestration in reintroduced Sphagnum to water-level variation in a cutaway peatland[J]. Restoration Ecology,2004,12(4):483-493
[9] 樊良新,刘国彬,薛萐,等. CO₂浓度倍增及干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿光合生理特性的协同影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(1):85-93
[10] 张弥,吴家兵,关德新,等. 长白山阔叶红松林主要树种光合作用的光响应曲线[J]. 应用生态学报,2006,17(9):1575-1578
[11] Xu J Z, Yu Y M, Peng S Z, et al. A modified nonrectangular hyperbola equation for photosynthetic light-response curves of leaves with different nitrogen status[J]. Photosynthetica,2014,52(1):117-123
[12] Xu W Z, Deng X P, Xu B C. Effects of water stress and fertilization on leaf gas exchange and photosynthetic light-response curves of Bothriochloa ischaemum L.[J]. Photosynthetica,2013,51(4):603-612
[13] 林伟宏. 植物光合作用对大气CO₂浓度升高的反应[J]. 生态学报,1998,18(5):529-538
[14] 郝兴宇,韩雪,李萍,等. 大气CO₂浓度升高对绿豆叶片光合作用及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(10):2776-2780
[15] 张香凝,孙向阳,王保平,等. 土壤含水量对Larrea tridentate苗木光合生理特性的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2008,30(2):95-101
[16] 韩刚,赵忠. 不同土壤水分下4种沙生灌木的光合光响应特性[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(15):4019-4026
[17] 陆燕元,马焕成,李昊民,等. 土壤干旱对转基因甘薯光合曲线响应的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(7):2155-2160
[18] 李德军,莫江明,方运霆,等. 模拟氮沉降对三种南亚热带树苗生长和光合作用的影响[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(5):876-882
[19] 张云海,何念鹏,张光明,等. 氮沉降强度和频率对羊草叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(21):6786-6794
[20] 徐伟洲,徐炳成,段东平,等. 不同水肥条件下白羊草光合生理生态特性研究II. 光响应曲线[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(6):773-779
[21] 张昌胜,刘国彬,薛萐,等. 干旱胁迫和CO₂浓度升高条件下白羊草的光合特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(11):3009-3015
[22] León A P, Viňa S Z, Frezza D, et al. Estimation of chlorophyll contents by correlations between SPAD-502 meter and chroma meter in butterhead lettuce[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2007,38(19-20):2877-2885
[23] Ruiz-Espinoza F H, Murillo-Amador B, García-Hernández J L, et al. Field evaluation of the relationship between chlorophyll content in basil leaves and a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502)[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition,2010,33(3):423-438
[24] Bloom A J, Smart D R, Nguyen D T, et al. Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2002,99(3):1730-1735
[25] 刘瑜,尹飞虎,曾胜和,等. 大气CO₂浓度升高对棉花叶绿素和光合指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2013,50(11):1991-1999
[26] 窦晶鑫,刘景双,王洋,等. 小叶章对氮沉降的生理生态响应[J]. 湿地科学,2009,7(1):40-46
[27] 闫慧,吴茜,丁佳,等. 不同降水及氮添加对浙江古田山4种树木幼苗光合生理生态特征与生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(14):4226-4236
[28] 施建敏,郭起荣,杨光耀. CO₂浓度倍增下毛竹光合作用对光照强度的季节响应[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2007,29(2):215-219
[29] 孟凡超,张佳华,郝翠,等. CO₂浓度升高和不同灌溉量对东北玉米光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(7):2126-2135
[30] 杨自立,马履一,贾忠奎,等. 不同供氮水平对栓皮栎播种苗光响应曲线的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2011,33(5):56-60
[31] 徐俊增,彭世彰,魏征,等. 不同供氮水平及水分调控条件下水稻光合作用光响应特征[J]. 农业工程学报,2012,28(2):72-76
[32] Allen Jr. L H, Kakani V G, Vu J C V, et al. Elevated CO₂ increases water use efficiency by sustaining photosynthesis of water-limited maize and sorghum[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2011,168(16):1909-1918
[33] Vu J C V, Allen Jr. L H. Growth at elevated CO₂ delays the adverse effects of drought stress on leaf photosynthesis of the C4 sugarcane[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2009,166(2):107-116
[34] Sefcik L T, Zak D R, Ellsworth D S. Seedling survival in a northern temperate forest understory is increased by elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and atmospheric nitrogen deposition[J]. Global Change Biology,2007,13(1):132-146
[35] 于佳,于显枫,郭天文,等. 施氮和大气CO₂浓度升高对春小麦拔节期光合作用的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2010,30(4):651-655
[36] 许育彬,沈玉芳,李世清. 分期施氮与CO₂浓度升高对小麦光合及其物质积累和产量的互作效应[J]. 西北植物学报,2012,32(5):1007-1012
[37] 周晓兵,张元明,王莎莎,等. 模拟氮沉降和干旱对准噶尔盆地两种一年生荒漠植物生长和光合生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(12):1394-1403

CO₂浓度升高、干旱胁迫和氮沉降对白羊草光响应曲线的影响

Effects of Elevated CO₂, Drought Stress and Nitrogen Deposition on Photosynthesis Light Response Curves of Bothriochloa ischaemum

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[2]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[3]	吴建波, 王小丹. 藏北高寒草原土壤酶活性对氮添加的响应及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 555-562.
[4]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[5]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[6]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[7]	齐晨汐, 易观涛, 付晓璇, 王海龙, 王佳琳, 吴建慧. 丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫下鹅绒委陵菜生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[8]	秦立刚, 李雪, 李韦瑶, 胡尧, 李俊, 崔国文. PEG干旱胁迫对3种葱属植物种子萌发期渗透调节物质及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 72-79.
[9]	田艳丽, 种培芳, 陆文涛, 贾向阳. 不同光合途径植物红砂和珍珠猪毛菜幼苗对氮沉降及降水变化的光合响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 121-130.
[10]	张然, 马祥, 朱瑞婷, 牛奎举, 赵春旭, 马晖玲. 青海野生草地早熟禾响应干旱胁迫的代谢通路及转录调控分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1508-1518.
[11]	刘凯强, 刘文辉, 贾志锋, 马祥, 梁国玲. 干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[12]	王晓雪, 李越, 张斌, 贾举庆, 冯美臣, 张美俊, 杨武德. 干旱胁迫及复水对燕麦根系生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
[13]	李春艳, 王曦, 周胜花, 李希, 钟华, 董宽虎. 白羊草R2R3-MYB转录因子的挖掘及对干旱胁迫反应的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1784-1790.
[14]	陈爱萍, 隋晓青, 王玉祥, 靳瑰丽, 王堃, 安沙舟. 干旱胁迫及复水对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1216-1225.
[15]	方志红, 刘建宁, 张燕, 郭璞, 池惠武, 吴欣明, 贾会丽, 李莲芬, 王运琦, 石永红. 白羊草NAC转录因子家族生物信息学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1266-1274.