黄土高原典型草原植被及土壤化学计量对降水变化的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.004

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 532-543.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.004

• 生态与草原修复 • 上一篇

黄土高原典型草原植被及土壤化学计量对降水变化的响应

尉剑飞¹, 王誉陶¹, 张翼¹, 张昊¹, 李建平^1,2

1. 宁夏大学农学院, 宁夏银川 750021;
2. 西北退化生态系统恢复与重建国家重点实验室培育基地, 宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2021-08-14 修回日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2022-03-30
通讯作者: 李建平,E-mail:lijianpingsas@163.com
作者简介:尉剑飞(1995-),男,汉族,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态与资源研究,E-mail:yjf17899318859@163.com
基金资助:
宁夏重点研发计划项目(2020BEG03046)；宁夏大学草学一流学科建设项目(NXYLXK2017A01)资助

Response of Vegetation and Soil Stoichiometry to Precipitation Gradients of Typical Steppe in the Loess Plateau

YU Jian-fei¹, WANG Yu-tao¹, ZHANG Yi¹, ZHANG Hao¹, LI Jian-ping^1,2

1. School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China;
2. Breeding Base of State Key Laboratory for Preventing Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China

Received:2021-08-14 Revised:2021-10-20 Published:2022-03-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究植被和土壤生态化学计量及其耦合关系，是解析气候变化背景下草地植被养分动态平衡和能量流动的重要途径。本研究以宁夏固原云雾山典型草原为研究对象，采用控雨-滴灌装置模拟3个降水梯度(自然降水的50%，100%和150%)，分析了植物叶片、根系、凋落物及土壤的碳(Carbon，C)、氮(Nitrogen，N)、磷(Phosphorus，P)化学计量特征随降水变化的响应规律，结果表明：叶片C，N，P含量和凋落物C，N，C∶N，C∶P和N∶P值在50%降水处理下较高，根系C，P，N∶P在150%降水处理下较高；土壤全氮含量在150%降水处理显著低于50%和100%降水处理。降水变化下，叶片、根系、凋落物与土壤之间的碳氮磷化学计量均有显著相关关系。本研究表明：黄土高原草地植物叶片、凋落物、根系及土壤之间元素耦合关系较强；植物生长易受N，P元素限制，降水量不足P元素限制作用加强。

关键词: 降水格局变化, 生态化学计量, 养分限制, 凋落物, 黄土高原

Abstract: Studying the ecological stoichiometry of vegetation and soil and their coupling relationship is an important way to analyze the dynamic balance and energy flow of grassland vegetation under the background of climate change. This study takes the typical grassland of Yunwu Mountain in Guyuan,Ningxia as the research object,a rain control-drip irrigation device was used to simulate three precipitation gradients (50%,100%,and 150% of natural precipitation). The response and interrelationship of stoichiometric characteristics of carbon (C),nitrogen (N),and phosphorus (P) in leaves,roots,litter,and soil of plant community with precipitation gradient were analyzed. Results showed that:leaf C,N,P content and litter C,N,C∶N,C∶P and N∶P values were high under 50% precipitation treatment,root C,P,N∶P were high under 150% precipitation treatment;The content of soil total nitrogen (TN) in 150% precipitation was significantly lower than that in 50% and 100% precipitation treatments. Under precipitation gradients,there was a significant correlation between the carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus stoichiometry of leaves,roots,litter,and soil,The results showed that there was a strong element coupling relationship among plant leaves,litter,root system,and soil in the grassland of the Loess Plateau. The plants in the study area were restricted by N and P elements,and the P element restriction was strengthened by insufficient precipitation.

Key words: Changes in precipitation pattern, Ecological stoichiometry, Nutrient limitation, Litter, The Loess Plateau

中图分类号:

S812

尉剑飞, 王誉陶, 张翼, 张昊, 李建平. 黄土高原典型草原植被及土壤化学计量对降水变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 532-543.

YU Jian-fei, WANG Yu-tao, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Hao, LI Jian-ping. Response of Vegetation and Soil Stoichiometry to Precipitation Gradients of Typical Steppe in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 532-543.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I3/532

参考文献

[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013-The Physical Science Basis [EB/OL]. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324,2014-06/2021-06-28
[2] 任国玉,柳艳菊,孙秀宝,等. 中国大陆降水时空变异规律——Ⅲ.趋势变化原因[J]. 水科学进展,2016,27(3):327-348
[3] NIELSEN U N,BALL B A. Impacts of Altered Precipitation Regimes on Soil Communities and Biogeochemistry in Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology,2015,21(4):1407-1421
[4] 刘海威. 黄土丘陵区草地群落生物学及生态化学计量学特征对降水改变的响应分析评价[D]. 杨凌:中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2018:10-43
[5] ZENG Q C,LI X,DONG Y H,et al. Soil and Plant Components Ecological Stoichiometry in Four Steppe Communities in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Catena,2016,147:481-488
[6] 聂明鹤,沈艳,陆颖,等. 宁夏盐池县荒漠草原区不同群落优势植物叶片-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(1):131-140
[7] REN C J,ZHAO F Z,SHI Z,et al. Differential Responses of Soil Microbial Biomass and Carbon-Degrading Enzyme Activities to Altered Precipitation[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,115:1-10
[8] 苏卓侠,苏冰倩,上官周平. 黄土高原刺槐叶片-土壤生态化学计量参数对降雨量的响应特征[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(19):7000-7008
[9] 朱湾湾,许艺馨,王攀,等. 降水量及N添加对荒漠草原植物和土壤微生物C∶N∶P生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2020,40(4):676-687
[10] 罗叙,王誉陶,张娟,等. 黄土高原典型草原优势种植物及其根际土壤化学计量对降雨变化的响应[J].生态学报,2022,42(3):1-13
[11] 黄菊莹,余海龙,刘吉利,等. 控雨对荒漠草原植物、微生物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(15):5362-5373
[12] ZHANG H,WU H,YU Q,et al.Sampling Date,Leaf Age and Root Size:Implications for the Study of Plant C:N:P Stoichiometry[J]. Plos One,2013,8(4):1-8
[13] 高江平,赵锐锋,张丽华,等. 降雨变化对荒漠草原植物群落多样性与土壤C∶N∶P生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 环境科学,2021,42(2):977-987
[14] NA X F,YU H L,WANG P,et al. Vegetation Biomass and Soil Moisture Coregulate Bacterial Community Succession Under Altered Precipitation Regimes in a Desert Steppe in Northwestern China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019,136:107520
[15] 李建平,谢应忠. 封育对黄土高原天然草地深层土壤碳、氮储量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(10):1981-1988
[16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:268
[17] TANG Z,XU W,ZHOU G. Patterns of Plant Carbon,Nitrogen,and Phosphorus Concentration in Relation to Productivity in China’s Terrestrial Ecosystems[J]. PNAS,2018,115(16):4033-4038
[18] 郑淑霞,上官周平. 黄土高原地区植物叶片养分组成的空间分布格局[J]. 自然科学进展,2006,16(8):965-973
[19] 刘冬,张剑,包雅兰,等. 水分对敦煌阳关湿地芦苇叶片与土壤C、N、P生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(11):3804-3812
[20] 张萍,章广琦,赵一娉,等. 黄土丘陵区不同森林类型叶片-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(14):5087-5098
[21] 岳喜元,左小安,庾强,等. 降水量和短期极端干旱对典型草原植物群落及优势种羊草(Leymus chinensis)叶性状的影响[J].中国沙漠,2013,8(5):1009-1016
[22] 丁小慧,罗淑政,刘金巍,等. 呼伦贝尔草地植物群落与土壤化学计量学特征沿经度梯度变化[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(11):3467-3476
[23] 姜沛沛,曹扬,陈云明. 陕西省森林群落乔灌草叶片和凋落物C、N、P生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2016,27(2):365-372
[24] 曾昭霞,王克林,刘孝利,等. 桂西北喀斯特森林植物-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(7):682-693
[25] KOERSELMAN W,MEULEMAN A F M. The Vegetation N:P Ratio:a New Tool to Detect the Nature of Nutrient Limitation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450
[26] HAN W X,FANG J Y,GUO D L,et al. Leaf Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Across 753 Terrestrial Plant Species in China[J]. New Phytologist,2005,168(2):377-385
[27] 温晨,杨智姣,杨磊,等. 半干旱黄土小流域不同植被类型植物与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(5):1824-1834
[28] 康扬眉. 降水量对荒漠草原凋落物碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响[D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2019:30-37
[29] 向元彬,周世兴,肖永翔,等. 模拟氮沉降和降雨对华西雨屏区常绿阔叶林凋落物分解的影响[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(2):455-463
[30] 潘复静,张伟,王克林,等. 典型喀斯特峰丛洼地植被群落凋落物C∶N∶P生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(2):335-343
[31] 崔超.人工增雨和布氏田鼠对内蒙古草原植物凋落物分解和群落结构的影响[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2019:11-20
[32] 李明军,喻理飞,杜明凤,等. 不同林龄杉木人工林植物-凋落叶-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征及互作关系[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(21):7772-7781
[33] 赵晓单,曾全超,安韶山,等. 黄土高原不同封育年限草地土壤与植物根系的生态化学计量特征[J]. 土壤学报,2016,53(6):1541-1551
[34] GÜSEWELL S. N∶P Ratios in Terrestrial Plants:Variation and Functional Significance[J]. New Phytologist,2004,164(2):243-266
[35] 陈佳瑞,王国梁,孟敏,等. 干旱胁迫对3种灌木不同器官化学计量特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2021,32(1):73-81
[36] YU Q,ELSER J J,HE N,et al. Stoichiometric Homeostasis of Vascular Plants in the Inner Mongolia grassland[J]. Oecologia,2011,166:1-10
[37] 赫凤彩,张婧斌,邢鹏飞,等. 围封对晋北赖草草地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响及其与植被多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(3):644-650
[38] 罗艳,贡璐,朱美玲,等. 塔里木河上游荒漠区4种灌木植物叶片与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(24):8326-8335
[39] 田耀武,和武宇恒,翟淑涵,等. 陶湾流域草本植物土壤及土壤微生物量碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(6):1643-1650
[40] 王誉陶,李建平,井乐,等. 模拟降雨对黄土高原典型草原土壤化学计量及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(5):1517-1531
[41] HUANG J Y,YU H L,LI L H,et al. Water Supply Changes N and P Conservation in a Perennial Grass Leymus chinensis[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2009,51(11):1050-1056
[42] YU Z P,WANG M H,HUANG Z Q,et al. Temporal Changes in Soil C-N-P Stoichiometry Over the Past 60 Years Across Subtropical China[J]. Global Change Biology,2018,24(3):1308-1320
[43] MÜller M,OELMANN Y,SCHICKHOFF U,et al. Himalayan Treeline Soil and Foliar C∶N∶P Stoichiometry Indicate Nutrient Shortage with Elevation[J]. Geoderma,2017,291:21-32
[44] SUN J N,GAO P,LI C,et al. Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of the Leaf-Litter-Soil Continuum of Quercus Acutissima Carr. and Pinus Densiflora Sieb. In Northern China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2019,78(1):20
[45] LIU R S,WANG D M. C∶N∶P Stoichiometric Characteristics and Seasonal Dynamics of Leaf-Root-Litter-Soil in Plantations on the Loess Plateau[J]. Ecological Indicators,2021,127
[46] ROBBINS C J,MATTHAEUS W J,COOK S C. Leaf Litter Identity Alters the Timing of Lotic Nutrient Dynamics[J]. Freshwater Biology,2019,64(12):2247-2259
[47] FRANKLIN O,ÅGREN G I. Leaf Senescence and Resorption As Mechanisms of Maximizing Photosynthetic Production During Canopy Development at N Limitation[J]. Functional Ecology,2002,16(6):727-733
[48] ZHANG J,ZHAO N,LIU C,et al. C∶N∶P Stoichiometry in China’s Forests:From Organs to Ecosystems[J]. Functional Ecology,2018,32(1):50-60

黄土高原典型草原植被及土壤化学计量对降水变化的响应

Response of Vegetation and Soil Stoichiometry to Precipitation Gradients of Typical Steppe in the Loess Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	夏建强, 张勃, 李佳欣, 孙淑范, 汪睿. 高寒草地凋落物覆盖对狼毒生长微环境及种苗定居的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1909-1915.
[2]	李兴龙, 师尚礼, 黄宗昌, 李革革, 吴芳, 张辉辉. 黄土丘陵区不同饲草混播模式对种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1318-1326.
[3]	姚蒙蒙, 郭琛文, 赫凤彩, 张琦, 任国华. 晋北盐碱草地土壤化学计量特征及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2800-2807.
[4]	李雯, 马昕昕, 马宁, 赵允格, 乔羽, 王鹏, 孙会. 放牧强度对黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2547-2555.
[5]	张树振, 魏雨其, 刘楠, 谢开云, 张英俊, 张博. 天山北坡改良草地凋落物混合分解特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 10-16.
[6]	陈银萍, 李晓辉, 罗永清, 王旭洋, 牛亚毅. 科尔沁不同沙地类型植被动态特征及其与凋落物的关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 114-120.
[7]	聂明鹤, 沈艳, 陆颖, 王科鑫, 张小菊. 宁夏盐池县荒漠草原区不同群落优势植物叶片-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 131-140.
[8]	喻岚晖, 王杰, 廖李容, 张超, 刘国彬. 青藏高原退化草甸土壤微生物量、酶化学计量学特征及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1702-1710.
[9]	张永亮, 于铁峰, 郝凤. 豆禾混播牧草碳氮磷钾生态化学计量特征对施肥与混播比例的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1386-1394.
[10]	田耀武, 和武宇恒, 翟淑涵, 王聪. 陶湾流域草本植物土壤及土壤微生物量碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1643-1650.
[11]	郭建鑫, 李金升, 唐士明, 李佳欢, 王堃. 黄土高原与内蒙古高原草原种子植物区系比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 298-305.
[12]	聂志刚, 吴江琪, 马维伟, 李广, 闫丽娟. 甘南尕海湿地不同退化程度植物碳、氮、磷的化学计量特征及动态变化[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 386-392.
[13]	刘文兰, 师尚礼, 田福平, 罗永忠. 种植密度对紫花苜蓿不同生育时期叶片C、N、P生态化学计量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 114-124.
[14]	张建文, 杨海磊, 徐长林, 陈陆军, 肖红, 柴锦隆, 潘涛涛, 鱼小军. 牦牛和藏羊夏季划区轮牧对高寒草甸3种植物凋落物分解的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 732-742.
[15]	刘文兰, 师尚礼, 田福平, 罗永忠. 紫花苜蓿生物量空间层次分布与叶片C、N、P化学计量特征对P添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 322-329.