青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.004

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 1954-1963.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.004

• 生态与草原修复 • 上一篇

青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应

费璇^1,2, 锁才序^1,2, 向双^1,2, 孙书存³

1. 中国科学院山地生态恢复与生物资源利用重点实验室, 生态恢复与生物多样性保育四川省重点实验室, 中国科学院成都生物研究所, 四川成都 610041;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 南京大学生命科学学院, 江苏南京 210023

收稿日期:2022-03-08 修回日期:2022-04-14 发布日期:2022-09-01
通讯作者: 向双,E-mail:xiangshuang@cib.ac.cn
作者简介:费璇(1998-),女,浙江建德人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态学研究,E-mail:feixuan@cib.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家“十三五”重点研发计划项目课题（2019YFC0507704）资助

Responses of Plant Community Structure and Functional Group Characteristics to Long-term Seasonal Grazing in an Alpine Meadow on Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

FEI Xuan^1,2, SUO Cai-xu^1,2, XIANG Shuang^1,2, SUN Shu-cun³

1. CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization, Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 College of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210023, China

Received:2022-03-08 Revised:2022-04-14 Published:2022-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为阐明高寒草甸植物群落对长期季节放牧的响应机制，本试验选取有10年以上冷、暖季放牧历史的湿生、中生、旱生高寒草甸进行探究。结果显示暖季放牧(6月至10月)下，湿生草甸香农指数与物种丰富度均显著小于冷季放牧(11月至翌年5月)(P＜0.05)，而旱生草甸多样性指数显著大于冷季放牧(P＜0.05)；冷季放牧地上生物量显著高于暖季放牧(P＜0.05)，其中暖季放牧下莎草科地上生物量所占比例最高。湿生草甸暖季牧场与旱生草甸冷季牧场莎草科重要值最高，其余牧场均为双子叶杂草重要值最高(P＜0.05)；经ANOSIM检验，季节性放牧下群落结构均有显著差异(P＜0.01)，湿生、旱生草甸群落结构差异较大，而中生草甸群落结构差异较小。本研究表明长期季节性放牧会影响植物群落结构特征，研究可为不同生境草甸的放牧制度和可持续发展提供理论基础。

关键词: 季节性放牧, 物种多样性, 植物功能群, 生物量分配, 青藏高原高寒草甸

Abstract: To explain the mechanism of community structure,diversity,and functional group characteristics of plants responding to seasonal grazing in alpine meadows on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, in this paper,three types of habitat meadow with a seasonal grazing history for more than 10 years were selected on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:Hydric meadow,Mesophytic meadow,Xerophytic meadow. The results showed that the Shannon's Wiener index and species richness under warm season grazing (June to October) were significantly lower than that under cold season grazing(November to April of the following year) in the hydric meadow(P < 0.05). However,the plant diversity index under warm season grazing was significantly higher than that of cold season grazing in xerophytic meadows (P<0.05). The aboveground biomass of plant communities under warm season grazing was significantly lower than that under cold season grazing and the proportion of Sedge was highest in all three types of meadows under warm season grazing. The importance values of Sedge were the highest in warm season grazing of hydric meadow and cold season grazing of xerophytic meadow,and the important values of forb were the highest in other pastures under seasonal grazing (P<0.05). By principal component analysis and the similarity analysis (ANOSIM) test,the ANOSIM test R values were 0.877 and 0.761 under cold and warm season grazing,respectively,showing extremely significant differences (P<0.01). Seasonal grazing had great effects on the hydric and xerophytic meadows,but little effect on the mesophytic meadow. Therefore,long-term seasonal grazing will affect the characteristics of plant community structure,alpine meadows of different habitat types had different changes in response to long-term seasonal grazing. The findings could provide a theoretical basis to set up a reasonable seasonal grazing system as well as sustainable development of alpine meadows along the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Key words: Seasonal grazing, Diversity of species, Plant functional groups, Biomass allocation, Qinghai-Tibet plateau

中图分类号:

Q948.1

费璇, 锁才序, 向双, 孙书存. 青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 1954-1963.

FEI Xuan, SUO Cai-xu, XIANG Shuang, SUN Shu-cun. Responses of Plant Community Structure and Functional Group Characteristics to Long-term Seasonal Grazing in an Alpine Meadow on Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 1954-1963.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.08.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I8/1954

参考文献

[1] 王德利,王岭. 草地管理新概念的新释义[J]. 科学通报,2019,64(11):1106-1113
[2] 李博. 我国草地资源现况、问题及对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊,1997(1):49-51
[3] WU G L,LIU Z H,ZHANG L,et al. Long-term Fencing Improved Soil Properties and Soil Organic Carbon Storage in An Alpine Swamp Meadow of Western China[J]. Plant and Soil,2010,332(1-2):331-337
[4] CHEN B X,ZHANG X Z,TAO J,et al. The Impact of Climate Change and Anthropogenic Activities on Alpine Grassland over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2014,189:11-18
[5] PAN Y,YU C Q,ZHANG X Z,et al. A Modified Framework for the Regional Assessment of Climate and Human Impacts on Net Primary Productivity[J]. Ecological Indicators,2016,60:184-191
[6] OBA G,VETAAS O R,STENSTETH N C. Relationships between Biomass and Plant Species Richness in Arid-zone Grazing Lands[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,38(4):836-845
[7] 姚喜喜,才华,李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(S1):128-136
[8] QIAN J Q,WANG Z W,LIU Z M,et al. Belowground Bud Bank Responses to Grazing Intensity in the Inner-mongolia Steppe,China[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2017,28(3):822-832
[9] MSADEK J,TLILI A,MOUMNI M,et al. Community Diversity,Functional Traits and Adaptation of Stipa tenacissima L. under Different Grazing Regimes in A North African Arid Montane Rangeland[J]. African Journal of Range & Forage Science,2021,38(1):122-129
[10] RIDDING L E,BULLOCK J M,WALKER K J,et al. Responses of Calcareous Grassland Plant Communities to Changed Seasonal Grazing Management:Results of A 31 Year Study[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation,2021,62:126026
[11] ZHANG C P,DONG Q M,CHU H,et al. Grassland Community Composition Response to Grazing Intensity Under Different Grazing Regimes[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2018,71(2):196-204
[12] 张桐瑞. 放牧对内蒙古典型草原植物养分回收的影响和作用机制[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2020:98-99
[13] 刘玉,刘振恒,邓蕾,等. 季节性放牧对草地植物多样性与功能群特征的影响[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(7):1403-1409
[14] LU X Y,KELSEY K C,YAN Y,et al. Effects of Grazing on Ecosystem Structure and Function of Alpine Grasslands in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau:A Synthesis[J]. Ecosphere,2017,8(1):e01656
[15] CHEN H,ZHU Q A,PENG C H,et al. The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Activities on Biogeochemical Cycles on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Global Change Biology,2013,19(10):2940-2955
[16] 席婷婷. 当游牧文明遭遇现代定居——对若县牧民定居工程的思考[J]. 学术探索,2016(9):73-79
[17] 唐刘燕,国慧,杨振安. 不同放牧模式下青藏高原高寒草甸植被群落和土壤差异[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(7):1209-1217
[18] LONG R J,DING L M,SHANG Z H,et al. The Yak Grazing System on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Its Status[J]. Rangeland Journal,2008(30):241-246
[19] 陈玫妃,曾辉,王钧. 青藏高原高寒草地土壤水分生态特征研究现状[J]. 中国草地报,2015,37(2):94-101
[20] 张大勇. 生活史进化与繁殖生态学[M]. 北京:科技出版社,2004:71-75
[21] 张晓玲,徐田伟,谭攀柱,等. 季节放牧对高寒草原植被群落和生物量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2019,28(10):1576-1582
[22] 曹全恒,胡健,陈雪玲,等. 川西北沙地植被恢复对土壤碳氮磷及生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(3):523-531
[23] XIANG S,GUO R Q,WU N,et al. Current Status and Future Prospects of Zoige Marsh in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2009,34(4):553-562
[24] 刘相模,周世永,王成志,等. 川西北草原开发利用研究[M]. 成都:四川民族出版社,1984:86-89
[25] 郑群英,刘刚,肖冰雪,等. 放牧对川西北高寒草甸植物物种丰富度和生物量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(7):1390-1396
[26] 方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等. 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J]. 生物多样性,2009,17(6):533-548
[27] 王超,王晓丽,施建军,等. 返青期休牧对玛多高寒草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(4):763-771
[28] GOLLUSCIO R A,AUSTIN A T,MARTINEZ G C G,et al. Sheep Grazing De Creases Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Pools in the Pata Gonian Steppe:Combination of Direct and Indirect Effects. Ecosystems,2009(12):686-697
[29] WU G L,WANG D,LIU Y,et al. Warm-season Grazing Benefits Species Diversity Conservation and Topsoil Nutrient Sequestration in Alpine Meadow[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2017,28(4):1311-1319
[30] TIAN L H,BAI Y F,WANG W W,et al. Warm- and Cold- Season Grazing Affect Plant Diversity and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Sequestration Differently in Tibetan Alpine Swamp Meadows[J]. Plant and Soil,2020,458:151-164
[31] GAO Y Z,GIESE M,LIN S,et al. Belowground Net Primary Productivity and Biomass Allocation of A Grassland in Inner Mongolia is Affected by Grazing Intensity[J]. Plant and Soil,2008,307(1-2):41-50
[32] ANGGASSA A. Effects of Grazing Intensity and Bush Encroachment on Herbaceous Species and Rangeland Condition in Southern Ethiopia[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2014,25(5):438-451
[33] 左有璐,王振孟,习新强,等. 川西北高寒草甸优势植物生物量分配对策[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(6):1195-1203
[34] TILMAN D,WEDIN D,KNOPS J. Productivity and Sustainability Influenced by Biodiversity in Grassland Ecosystems[J]. Nature,1996,379(6567):718-720
[35] 齐洋,姜群鸥,郭建斌,等. 季节性放牧对甘南高寒草地植被和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(2):306-314
[36] 陈冠光. 青藏高原东缘高寒草甸植物群落花期物候以及植物性状的研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2016:45-48
[37] HU X L,ZHOU W L,LI X N,et al. Changes in Community Composition Induced by Experimental Warming in An Alpine Meadow:Beyond Plant Functional Type[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,2020,9:569422
[38] 房昊天,翁白莎,常文娟,等. 高寒草甸根系分布特征及与土壤温湿度关系的研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(3):612-621
[39] ADLER P B,MILCHUNAS D G,SALA O E,et al. Plant Traits and Ecosystem Grazing Effects:Comparison of U.S. Sagebrush Steppe and Patagonian Steppe[J]. Ecological Applications,2005,15(2):774-792

青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应

Responses of Plant Community Structure and Functional Group Characteristics to Long-term Seasonal Grazing in an Alpine Meadow on Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王俐媛, 王坚, 丁西朋, 欧芳秀, 李佳旭, 李雪枫. 3种圭亚那柱花草根系分泌物对杂草幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1500-1508.
[2]	袁小强, 王敏, 张鲜花, 檀嘉琦, 袁惠, 韩禧卿. 乌鲁木齐周边典型荒漠草地群落物种多样性及生物量关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1253-1262.
[3]	孙会, 赵允格, 刘广亮, 高丽倩, 王鹏, 马昕, 李雯, 许明祥. 放牧强度对黄土丘陵区草地植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 810-817.
[4]	杨雪, 晏昕辉, 李美慧, 拓行行, 张博, 温仲明, 李伟. 时间尺度上草地物种多样性和地上生产力的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 259-268.
[5]	张豪睿, 付刚. 藏北高寒草地土壤真菌群落系统发育多样性对放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 21-28.
[6]	李想, 于红博, 刘月璇, 常帅. 锡林郭勒不同草原类型群落生物量及多样性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 196-204.
[7]	郭丽珠, 吕进英, 王堃, 范希峰, 黄顶, 武菊英. 不同草地利用方式对河北坝上天然草地植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 245-252.
[8]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[9]	吕婷, 刘玉萍, 亢俊铧, 刘涛, 梁瑞芳, 苏旭. 德令哈-哈拉湖沿线不同生境下群落的物种组成及其多样性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 146-155.
[10]	孙宇, 张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 赵萌莉, 张彬. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原物种多样性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[11]	常明. 火烧后亚高山草甸恢复过程中物种组成和群落特征变化规律的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.
[12]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[13]	张力天, 刘炜, 刘德梅, 董瑞珍, 王晓丽, 张敏, 仁增曲扎, 边巴普尺, 杨时海, 马玉寿. 青藏高原白草生殖生长期植株器官生物量分配特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2694-2702.
[14]	王玉琴, 宋梅玲, 王宏生, 尹亚丽, 马玉寿. 添加氮素对退化高寒草地植被及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2742-2751.
[15]	张紫薇, 高斌, 林长存, 王青, 刘佳乐, 杨娜, 苏德荣, 平晓燕. 放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 149-155.