种植行距与施肥量对柳枝稷产量及粗蛋白质含量的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.020

›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 594-597.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.020

种植行距与施肥量对柳枝稷产量及粗蛋白质含量的影响

沈文彤^1,2, 王静^1,2, 张蕴薇², 杨富裕², 姚拓¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃, 兰州, 730070;
2. 中国农业大学草地研究所, 北京, 100193

收稿日期:2010-01-18 修回日期:2010-03-26 出版日期:2010-08-15 发布日期:2010-08-15
通讯作者: 杨富裕,E-mail:yfuyu@126.com;姚拓,E-mail:yaotuo@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:沈文彤(1983- ),女,甘肃省兰州市人,硕士研究生,研究方向为能源草柳枝稷的种植方式与固碳减排,E-mail:rabbit-108@163.com.
基金资助:
“十一五”国家科技支撑计划课题项目(2008BAD95B03)、(2009BADA7B04)、(2008BAD95B12)资助

Effect of Planting Row Distance and Nitrogen Rate on Switchgrass Yield and the Content of Crude Protein

SHEN Wen-tong^1,2, WANG Jing^1,2, ZHANG Yun-wei², YANG Fu-yu², YAO Tuo¹

1. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Institute of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2010-01-18 Revised:2010-03-26 Online:2010-08-15 Published:2010-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在选出最优的种植行距与施肥量的组合,为柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum L.)在国内种植时的耕作方式提供理论依据,因此研究了不同种植行距(20、60 cm)和施肥量(0、150和225 kg·hm^-2)对其产量和粗蛋白质含量的影响。结果表明:施肥量对干草产量的影响差异极显著(P<0.01),种植行距偏密有利于柳枝稷的高产;施肥水平具有主要作用;提高柳枝稷干草产量的种植行距和施肥量最优组合为A1B3(行距20 cm和施氮肥225 kg·hm^-2),干草产量为5615.31 kg·hm^-2;在柳枝稷生长初期粗蛋白质含量较高,营养品质最好;随着时间的推延,柳枝稷粗蛋白质含量逐渐降低,营养品质也逐渐变差;氮肥的施用量对柳枝稷粗蛋白质的含量影响较大;提高粗蛋白质含量的种植行距和施肥量最优组合为施肥量为225 kg·hm^-2的2个组合A₁B₃、A₂B₃,分蘖期粗蛋白质含量分别为17.75%、17.6%;开花期粗蛋白质含量分别为11.16%、12.81%。

关键词: 柳枝稷, 种植行距, 施肥量, 产量, 粗蛋白质

Abstract: The effects of row spacing and fertilizer application on yield of switchgrass have been widely reported overseas,but related domestic research is seldom available.In order to select the best combination of those factors,the effect of different planting row spacing and nitrogen application rate on switchgrass yield and crude protein content were studied in 2009 at China Agricultural University Experiment Station located in Daming County,Handan,Hebei Province.The results show that the fertilizer input significantly influenced the yield and low row spacing was favorable to the higher yield.The optimum combination for improved yield comprised was row spacing at 20 cm and nitrogen fertilizer application rate at 225 kg·hm^-2 and the resulted yield was 5615.31 kg·hm^-2.The nutritive quality of switchgrass biomass was best at tillering stage with higher crude protein content.Fertilizer input amount had significant effect on the biomass quality and the optimum combinations were row spacing at 20 cm or 60 cm with nitrogen fertilizer application rate at 225 kg·hm^-2;the content of crude protein under such combination treatments was 17.75% or 17.6% at tillering stage and 11.16% or 12.81% at florescence stage,respectively.

Key words: Panicum virgatum L., Row spacing, Nitrogen application rate, Yield, Crude protein

中图分类号:

Q949.9

沈文彤, 王静, 张蕴薇, 杨富裕, 姚拓. 种植行距与施肥量对柳枝稷产量及粗蛋白质含量的影响[J]. , 2010, 18(4): 594-597.

SHEN Wen-tong, WANG Jing, ZHANG Yun-wei, YANG Fu-yu, YAO Tuo. Effect of Planting Row Distance and Nitrogen Rate on Switchgrass Yield and the Content of Crude Protein[J]. , 2010, 18(4): 594-597.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.020

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2010/V18/I4/594

参考文献

[1] Boylan D,Bush V,Bransby D I.Switchgrass cofiring:pilotscale and field evaluation[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2000,19:411-417
[2] 左海涛,李继伟,郭斌,等.盐分和土壤水量对营养生长期柳枝稷的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(6):760-766
[3] Anon.Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutans L.Nash) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)[M].Stillwater,OK:Oklahoma Agricultural Research Station.Forage Crops Leaflet,1954.17
[4] Porter C L.Ananalysis of variation between uplan and lowland switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)[J].Central Oklahoma Ecology,1966,47:980-992
[5] Keshwani D R,Cheng J J.Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications:A review[J].Bioresource Technology,2009,100:1515-1523
[6] 胡松海,龚泽修.生物能源植物柳枝稷简介[J].草业科学,2008,6:29-33
[7] Joe B.The economic benefits of forage improvement in the United States[J].Euphytica,2007,154:263-270
[8] Lee D K,Doolittle J J.Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in established switchgrass land managed for biomass production[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2007,39:178-186
[9] Cassida K A,Muir J P.Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) grown for biofuel in the south central United States[J].Nematropica,2005,35(1):1-10
[10] Stroupa J A,Sanderson M A.Comparison of growth and performance in upland and lowland switchgrass types to water and nitrogen stress[J].Bioresource Technology,2003,86:65-72
[11] Roque L,Charles B E.Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in large fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa,USA[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2008,32:1187-1194
[12] Cuomo G J,Anderson B E.Nitrogen fertilization and burning effects on rumen protein degradation and nutritive value of native grasses[J].Agronomy Journal,1996,88:439-442
[13] Ma Z,Wood C W,Bransby D I.Impact of row spacing,nitrogen rate,and time on carbonpartitioning of switchgrass[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2001,20:413-419
[14] 武晓宏,杨风宝.饲料苜蓿中粗蛋白含量的测定及分析[J].中国动物保健,2009,8:98-99
[15] 唐启义.DPS统计软件简介[J].中国医院统计,2008,15
[16] Wright L.Production technology status of woody and herbaceous crops[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,1994,6(3):191-209
[17] Anderson B E,Moore K J.Native warm season grasses:research trends and issues[M].Iowa:Soil Science Society of America,Inc.,2000.34
[18] David J P,John H F.The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels[J].Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,2005,24(5/6):423-459

种植行距与施肥量对柳枝稷产量及粗蛋白质含量的影响

Effect of Planting Row Distance and Nitrogen Rate on Switchgrass Yield and the Content of Crude Protein

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卢家顶, 杨旭, 朱晓艳, 崔亚垒, 王成章, 李德锋, 史莹华. 河南地区21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[3]	姚喜喜, 才华, 刘皓栋, 李长慧. 不同季节高寒草甸牧草瘤胃发酵特性和体外消化率分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[4]	何振富, 贺春贵, 王斐, 陈平. 不同类型饲草高粱生产性能与饲用品质的差异分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[5]	张峰, 赵天启, 乔荠瑢, 赵萌莉, 张心玥, 吴建新. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原生产力及可持续利用的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1491-1498.
[6]	付志慧, 格根图, 贾玉山, 王志军, 吕世杰, 侯美玲, 南丁罕, 意如乐, 阿希达, 金国. 茬次与品种对多花黑麦草在北方地区种植的产量及营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1571-1577.
[7]	董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 聂聪, 杨建, 张建波, 苟文龙, 马啸. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[8]	韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 罗会英, 赵琼玲, 廖承飞, 薛世明, 范建成, 金杰. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[9]	李雯, 马琳峰, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 佘智慧, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 播期对冀西北坝上农牧交错区青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[10]	聂聪, 杨晓鹏, 刘浙川, 赵煜晗, 陈婉婷, 何润濠, 刘伟, 苟文龙, 马啸. 不同前作处理及后作饲用玉米种植密度对玉米饲草生产性能和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 709-716.
[11]	李文晶, 王俊锋, 高晓荻, 石玉杰, 穆春生. 干旱条件下氮磷添加对羊草干草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 743-748.
[12]	陈立强, 白小明. 成熟过程中细齿草木樨种子结构及产量和质量的变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 465-471.
[13]	王伟强, 刘晶, 田新会, 杜文华. ‘甘农2号’黑麦品种在青海省不同区域的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 504-514.
[14]	王斌, 杨彦军, 董秀, 李满有, 沈笑天, 曹立娟, 兰剑. 补播禾草对退化苜蓿草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 618-624.
[15]	王燕, 赵晓晓, 王伟伟. 柳枝稷PvJAZ1基因的克隆、表达特性与亚细胞定位[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 234-243.