青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.Z1.022

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (S1): 190-198.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.Z1.022

青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析

晏和飘^1,2, 李文龙^1,2, 梁天刚^1,2, 周华坤³, 曹亚鹏¹, 廖元成¹

1. 草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室, 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室, 兰州大学草地农业教育部工程研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海西宁 810008

收稿日期:2021-04-08 修回日期:2021-05-24 出版日期:2021-10-30 发布日期:2021-11-17
通讯作者: 李文龙,E-mail:wllee@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:晏和飘(1996-),男,贵州盘县人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态遥感研究,E-mail:yanhp19@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC0406602）；国家自然科学基金项目（41471450）；现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-34）；中央高校基本科研业务专项资金（lzujbky-2019-it03）；中科院西北高原生物研究所青海省寒区恢复生态学重点实验室开放课题（2020-KF-09）；三江源国家公园生态系统承载力评估与区域民保障模式研究（LHZX-2020-08）共同资助

Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis

YAN He-piao^1,2, LI Wen-long^1,2, LIANG Tian-gang^1,2, ZHOU Hua-kun³, CAO Ya-peng¹, LIAO Yuan-cheng¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou University; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China;
3. Northwest Plateau Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province 810001, China

Received:2021-04-08 Revised:2021-05-24 Online:2021-10-30 Published:2021-11-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为定量评估不同退化程度高寒草地的植物生产力、植物多样性与土壤质量对不同恢复措施的综合响应，本研究基于92篇文献，通过荟萃分析（Meta分析），对2 478组恢复实验数据进行综合分析。结果表明：在未退化草地上，自然恢复显著提高植被生产力和植物多样性，且不会使土壤质量下降；在轻度退化草地上，自然和人工辅助恢复均显著提高植被生产力和土壤质量；但人工辅助恢复显著降低植物多样性，而自然恢复则相反。具体措施以中期围栏封育恢复效果最好；在中度退化草地上，人工辅助恢复比自然恢复效果好。具体措施以短期施肥以及短期和中期补播恢复效果较好；在重度退化草地上，人工建植效果最好，但人工建植恢复植物多样性以及土壤质量所需年限较长。

关键词: 退化高寒草地, 恢复措施, 植物生产力, 植物多样性, 土壤质量, Meta分析

Abstract: To quantitatively evaluate the effects of different restoration measures applied on alpine grasslands with different degrees of degradation, a meta analysis was performed using 2, 478 sets of data from 92 papers published on Chinese or international journals. The main findings were as follows:In un-degraded alpine grasslands, natural restoration measures can significantly improve plant productivity and plant diversity without decreasing soil quality;In mildly degraded alpine grasslands, both natural and intervening restoration significantly improve vegetation primary productivity and soil quality, but intervening restoration decreases plant diversity while the former turns out to be the opposite. Therefore, it is more suitable to restore mildly degraded alpine grasslands naturally by using enclosure;In moderately degraded grasslands, intervening restoration is more effective than natural restoration. The specific measures are more effective with short-term fertilization and short-term and medium-term reseeding for restoration;In severely degraded alpine grassland, artificial grassland is the most effective measure, but it takes a long time to restore plant diversity and soil quality.

Key words: Degraded alpine grassland, Restoration measures, Plant productivity, Plant diversity, Soil quality, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

S283

晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.

YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.Z1.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/IS1/190

参考文献

[1] 刘晓东, 尹国丽, 武均, 等. 青藏高原东部高寒草甸草地土壤物理性状对氮元素添加的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10):12-21
[2] DONG S, SHANG Z, GAO J, et al. Enhancing sustainability of grassland ecosystems through ecological restoration and grazing management in an era of climate change on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020(287):106684
[3] ZHANG W, XUE X, PENG F, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of grassland degradation on plant and soil properties in the alpine meadows of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019(20):e774
[4] 张骞, 马丽, 张中华, 等. 青藏高寒区退化草地生态恢复:退化现状、恢复措施、效应与展望[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20):7441-7451
[5] WU G, REN G, DONG Q, et al. Above and Belowground Response along Degradation Gradient in an Alpine Grassland of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water, 2014, 42(3):319-323
[6] DONG Q, ZHAO X, WU G, et al. A review of formation mechanism and restoration measures of "black-soil-type" degraded grassland in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 70(5):2359-2370
[7] 贺金生, 卜海燕, 胡小文, 等. 退化高寒草地的近自然恢复:理论基础与技术途径[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(34):3898-3908
[8] YAN Y, LU X. Is grazing exclusion effective in restoring vegetation in degraded alpine grasslands in Tibet, China?[J]. PeerJ, 2015(3):e1020
[9] SHANG Z H, MA Y S, LONG R J, et al. Effect of fencing, artificial seeding and abandonment on vegetation composition and dynamics of ‘black soil land’ in the headwaters of the Yangtze and the Yellow Rivers of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2008, 19(5):554-563
[10] WEN L, WANG J L, ZHANG X J, et al. Effect of degradation and rebuilding of artificial grasslands on soil respiration and carbon and nitrogen pools on an alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018(111):134-142
[11] 程雨婷. 围栏封育后我国草地植被与土壤恢复的Meta分析研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2020:61-64
[12] REN Y, LYU Y, FU B. Quantifying the impacts of grassland restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in China:A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016(95):542-550
[13] 蒋翔, 马建霞. 我国草地生态恢复对不同因素响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2):14-31
[14] 刘鑫, 王一博, 吕明侠, 等. 基于主成分分析的青藏高原多年冻土区高寒草地土壤质量评价[J]. 冰川冻土, 2018, 40(3):469-479
[15] 杨文静, 王一博, 刘鑫, 等. 基于BP神经网络的青藏高原土壤养分评价[J]. 冰川冻土, 2019, 41(1):215-226
[16] 马玉寿, 郎百宁, 李青云, 等. 江河源区高寒草甸退化草地恢复与重建技术研究[J]. 草业科学, 2002(9):1-5
[17] HEDGES L V G J. The meta-analysis of response ratios The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology[J]. Ecology, 1999, 80(4):1150-1156
[18] 尚占环, 董全民, 施建军, 等. 青藏高原"黑土滩"退化草地及其生态恢复近10年研究进展——兼论三江源生态恢复问题[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1):1-21
[19] 董全民, 马玉寿, 许长军, 等. 三江源区黑土滩退化草地分类分级体系及分类恢复研究[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3):441-447
[20] YANN HAUTIER D T F I. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity[J]. Science, 2015, 348(6232):336-340
[21] 李媛媛, 董世魁, 李小艳, 等. 围栏封育对黄河源区退化高寒草地植被组成及生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(2):275-279, 286
[22] 贺金生, 刘志鹏, 姚拓, 等. 青藏高原退化草地恢复的制约因子及修复技术[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(17):66-80
[23] 王德利, 王岭, 辛晓平, 等. 退化草地的系统性恢复:概念、机制与途径[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(13):2532-2540
[24] 石红霄, 范月君, 侯向阳, 等. 三江源区围栏与放牧高山嵩草草甸植物群落特征分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(3):67-72.
[25] 宗宁, 石培礼, 蔣婧, 等. 施肥和围栏封育对退化高寒草甸植被恢复的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2013, 19(6):905-913
[26] LI W, LIU Y, WANG J, et al. Six years of grazing exclusion is the optimum duration in the alpine meadow steppe of the north-eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):17269
[27] 刘建, 张克斌, 程中秋, 等. 围栏封育对沙化草地植被及土壤特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(4):180-184
[28] 杨晓霞, 任飞, 周华坤, 等. 青藏高原高寒草甸植物群落生物量对氮、磷添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报.2014, 38(2):159-166
[29] 宗宁, 石培礼, 赵广帅, 等. 降水量变化对藏北高寒草地养分限制的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 45(5):444-455
[30] WANG C, WANG G, LIU W, et al. Effects of establishing an artificial grassland on vegetation characteristics and soil quality in a degraded meadow[J]. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2013, 59(3):141-153
[31] WANG W, WANG Q, WANG H. The effect of land management on plant community composition, species diversity, and productivity of alpine Kobersia steppe meadow[J]. Ecological Research, 2006(21):181-187
[32] 周华坤, 赵新全, 赵亮, 等. 高山草甸垂穗披碱草人工草地群落特征及稳定性研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2007(2):13-25
[33] 潘攀, 王长庭, 胡雷, 等. 植物群落和土壤对人工草地恢复演替的协同响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(12):2355-2364

青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析

Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	向雪梅, 德科加, 林伟山, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体, 钱诗祎. 氮素添加对高寒草甸植物群落多样性和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2769-2777.
[2]	刘亚兰, 赵月, 徐梦琦, 柴旭田, 曾凡江, 李向义, 李磊, 黄彩变. 极端干旱区种植行距对油莎豆生长及土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2486-2493.
[3]	朱鸣鸣, 徐镀涵, 陈光燕, 李平, 成启明, 陈超. 基于最小数据集的喀斯特不同利用方式下土壤质量评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2323-2331.
[4]	王悦骅, 靳宇曦, 王忠武, 韩国栋. 8年围封对内蒙古荒漠草原植物和土壤的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2339-2345.
[5]	王健宇, 孟泽昕, 王瑞, 田晨, 王新宇, 陈康丽, 王泽宇, 呼天明, 陈文青. 局地尺度高寒草原土壤真菌多样性对地上植物多样性与生产力关系的调控作用[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1498-1507.
[6]	冯艳琼, 何彤慧, 陈向全, 崔乔, 何玉实. 盐生草甸群落的植物多样性与土壤质地、盐分关系的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1682-1689.
[7]	田梦, 孙宗玖, 李培英, 汪洋. 增温对蒿类荒漠草地可萌发土壤种子库及其多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 141-148.
[8]	陈蔚, 黄兴科, 刘任涛, 张安宁, 常海涛. 宁夏荒漠草原植物多样性对地面节肢动物功能群多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1587-1595.
[9]	宋洁, 王凤歌, 温璐, 王立新, 李金雷, 武胜男, 徐智超. 放牧对温带典型草原植物物种多样性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1694-1701.
[10]	赫凤彩, 张婧斌, 邢鹏飞, 赵祥, 任国华. 围封对晋北赖草草地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响及其与植被多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 644-650.
[11]	李晓娜, 张微微, 赵春桥, 宋进库, 史瑞双, 薛瑞彬, 王超. 延庆区荒滩地土壤理化性质及其对植物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 695-701.
[12]	郭明英, 卫智军, 吴艳玲, 闫瑞瑞, 乌仁其其格. 贝加尔针茅草原植物多样性与地上生物量及其关系对刈割的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1516-1519.
[13]	徐恒康, 刘晓丽, 史雅楠, 李晶晶, 尕藏太, 索南加, 邵新庆. 生物结皮对高寒退化草地植物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 539-544.
[14]	许亚东, 王涛, 李慧, 杨改河, 韩新辉, 冯永忠, 任广鑫. 黄土丘陵区人工柠条林土壤酶活性与养分变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 363-370.
[15]	陈璟, 杨宁. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地植被恢复过程中土壤质量评价[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 160-167.