藜麦种质资源对霜霉病的抗性鉴定与评价

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.012

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 2626-2634.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.012

藜麦种质资源对霜霉病的抗性鉴定与评价

王昶¹, 杨发荣³, 李敏权⁴, 陆建英⁴, 魏玉明³, 赵桂琴¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所, 甘肃兰州 730070;
3. 甘肃省农业科学院畜草与绿色农业研究所, 甘肃兰州 730070;
4. 甘肃省农业科学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2022-01-20 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-10-15 发布日期:2022-11-05
通讯作者: 赵桂琴,E-mail:zhaogq@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:王昶(1979-),男,汉族,甘肃陇南人,博士研究生,主要从事藜麦病害研究,E-mail:chang288@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31760420)；科技重大专项(18ZD2 NA008)/甘肃省科技计划(18ZD2 NA008-2)；甘肃省现代农业科技支撑体系区域创新中心重点科技项目(2019GAAS51)资助

Identification and Evaluation of Downy Mildew (Peronospora variabilis) Resistance in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Germplasm Resources

WANG Chang¹, YANG Fa-rong³, LI Min-quan⁴, LU Jian-ying⁴, WEI Yu-ming³, ZHAO Gui-qin¹

1. College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Institute of Crops Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
3. Institute of Pasture and Green Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
4. Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2022-01-20 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-10-15 Published:2022-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa)种质资源在本土环境条件下对霜霉病的抗性，采用田间自然感病和室内离体叶片接菌鉴定方法对50份国内外藜麦种质资源进行了霜霉病抗性鉴定和评价。结果表明：霜霉菌Preonos variabilis对藜麦的侵染程度存在较大变异(发病率变化13.30%～100.00%；病情指数1.00～100.00)，藜麦种质对霜霉病的抗性存在明显差异；筛选到1份高抗材料'台湾红藜’，占参试材料的2.00% 1份抗病材料'QA064’，占比2.00%，2份中抗材料'陇藜2号’和'HL-Q5’，占比4.00%，3份感病材料'QA045’'QA050-2’和'青海-02’，占比6.00%；其余43份材料均表现高感，占比86.00%。本研究首次发现'台湾红藜’能够被P. variabilis侵染，表现为高抗，还进一步证实田间藜麦霜霉病抗性鉴定采用“三叶法”在藜麦盛花期进行效果较好，相比而言，室内离体叶片接菌鉴定技术更具优势，应作为抗性鉴定的首选。

关键词: 藜麦, 种质资源, 霜霉病, 抗性

Abstract: In order to explore the resistance level of downy mildew of quinoa germplasm resources under local environmental conditions,the downy mildew resistance of 50 quinoa germplasm resources was identified and evaluated,by adopted natural infection and indoor inoculation of the detached leaves. The results showed that there existed great variations in the infection degree of P. variabilis (Disease incidence 13.30%~100.00%;Disease index 1.00~100.00) and significant differences in the resistance degree of downy mildew among quinoa germplasms. We respectively screened one highly resistant material 'Taiwan red quinoa',which accounted for 2.00% of the tested materials;One resistant material 'QA064',accounted for 2.00%;Two moderately resistant materials 'Long li No.2' and 'HL-Q5',accounted for 4.00%;Three susceptible materials 'QA045','QA050-2' and 'Qinghai-02',accounted for 6.00%;The remaining 43 materials showed highly susceptible,accounted for 86.00%. It was first discovered that 'Taiwan red quinoa' could be infected by quinoa downy mildew and showed high resistance. It was further confirmed that the resistance identifications of quinoa downy mildew in the field were better to adopt "Three-leaf method" in the full flowering stage of quinoa. In comparison,indoor identification technology of the detached leaves has more advantages for researchers to study quinoa downy mildew and characterize germplasm for resistance,which should be the first choice in resistance identification.

Key words: Quinoa, Germplasm resources, Downy mildew, Resistance

中图分类号:

S332.2

王昶, 杨发荣, 李敏权, 陆建英, 魏玉明, 赵桂琴. 藜麦种质资源对霜霉病的抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2626-2634.

WANG Chang, YANG Fa-rong, LI Min-quan, LU Jian-ying, WEI Yu-ming, ZHAO Gui-qin. Identification and Evaluation of Downy Mildew (Peronospora variabilis) Resistance in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Germplasm Resources[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(10): 2626-2634.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.012

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I10/2626

参考文献

[1] BAZILE D,FUENTES F,MUJICA A. Historical perspectives and domestication[M]//Bhargava A and Srivastava S eds. in Quinoa:Botany,Production and Uses. Wallingford:CABI,2013:16-35
[2] STIKIC R,GLAMOCLIJA D,DEMIN M,et al. Agronomical and nutritional evaluation of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as an ingredient in bread formulations[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,2012,55(2):132-138
[3] WU G,MURPHY K M,MORRIS C. Evaluation of texture differences among varieties of cooked quinoa[J]. Journal of Food Science,2014,79(11):S2337-S2345
[4] MIRANDA M,VEGA-GÁLVEZ A,QUISPE-FUENTES I,et al. Aspectos nutricionales de seis ecotipos de Quínoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) de tres zonas geográficas de Chile[J]. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research,2012,72(2):175-181
[5] RAZZAGHI F,JACOBSEN S E,JENSEN C R,et al. Ionic and photosynthetic homeostasis in quinoa challenged by salinity and drought-mechanisms of tolerance[J]. Functional Plant Biology,2015,42(4):136-148
[6] BHARGAVA A,SHUKLA S,OHRI D. Genetic variability and interrelationship among various morphological and quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Field Crops Research,2007,101(1):104-116
[7] JACOBSE S E,MUJICA A,JENSEN C R. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abioticfactors[J]. Food Reviews International,2003,19(1-2):99-109
[8] BAZILE D,BERTEROH D,NIETO C. State of the Art Reporton Quinoa Around the World in 2013[R]. Rome:FAO and CIRAD,2014:603
[9] 刘敏国,杨倩,杨梅,等.藜麦的饲用潜力及适应性[J].草业科学,2017,34(6):1264-1271
[10] BHARGAVA A,SHUKLA S,OHRI D. Chenopodium quinoa-an Indian perspective[J]. Industrial Crops and Products,2006,23(1):73-87
[11] DWIVEDI S L,SAHRAWAT K L,UPADHYAYA D,et al. Food,nutrition and agrobiodiversity under global climate change[J]. Advances in Agronomy,2013,120:1-128
[12] CHOI Y J,DANIELSEN S,LUBECK M,et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of the causal agent of downy mildew on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)[J]. Mycopathologia,2010,169(5):403-412
[13] DANIELSEN S,BONIFACIO A,AMES T. Diseases of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)[J]. Food Reviews International,2003,19(1-2):43-59
[14] MHADA M,EZZAHIRI B,BENLHABIB O. Assessment of downy mildew resistance (Peronospora farinosa) in a quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) germplasm[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering,2014,8(3):277-280
[15] DANIELSEN S,JACOBSEN S E,ECHEGARAY J,et al. Impact of downy mildew on the yield of quinoa[R]. CIP Program Report,1999:397-401
[16] SALAS B, OTAZU'O. Enfermadades de la quinua (Chenopodium quinoa) en el Departamento de Puno. In:Convencio'n International de Quenopodiaceas 2 da[R]. Bolivia:IICA Potosı',1976
[17] 殷辉,周建波,常芳娟,等.藜麦霜霉病病原菌鉴定[J].植物病理学报,2018,48(3):413-417
[18] NOLEN H. Assessing disease concerns on quinoa and evaluating sources of disease resistance in chenopodium species in new England[D]. New Hampshire:the University of New Hampshire,2019:2
[19] DANIELSEN S. Heterothallism in Peronospora farinosa f.sp. chenopodii,the causal agent of downy mildew of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology,2001,41(5):305-308
[20] DANIELSEN S,MUNK L. Evaluation of disease assessment methods in quinoa for their ability to predict yield loss caused by downy mildew[J]. Crop Protection,2004,23(3):219-228
[21] OCHOA J,FRINKING H D and JACOBS T. Postulation of virulence groups and resistance factors in the quinoa downy mildew pathosystem using material from Ecuador[J]. Plant Pathology,1999,48(3):425-430
[22] PANKA D,LENC L,GESINSKI K. Preliminary observations in quinoa health status in Poland[J]. Phytopathologia Polonica,2004,31:61-66
[23] 杨发荣,刘文瑜,黄杰,等.河西地区2个藜麦品种引种试验研究[J].草地学报,2018,26(5):1273-1276
[24] 王艳青,李春花,卢文洁,等. 135份国外藜麦种质主要农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(5):887-894
[25] 袁飞敏,权有娟,陈志国.不同钠盐胁迫对藜麦种子萌发的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(11):182-187
[26] 王宝强,赵颖,朱晓林,等.盐碱胁迫对藜麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化系统的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(8):1689-1696
[27] 刘文瑜,杨发荣,黄杰,等.干旱胁迫对藜麦幼苗生长和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(4):171-177
[28] 王志恒,徐中伟,周吴艳,等.藜麦种子萌发阶段响应干旱和盐胁迫变化的综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2020,28(07):1033-1042
[29] 洪佳敏,林宝妹,张树河,等. 4种藜麦抗氧化活性比较研究[J].粮食与油脂,2020,33(8):51-53
[30] 傅钰,张禾,符群. 3种藜麦皂苷的超声提取及抗氧化活性比较[J].中国粮油学报,2020,35(11):40-47
[31] 朱满喜,张玉荣,杨雅舒,等.藜麦NLP转录因子家族的鉴定及表达分析[J].华北农学报,2021,36(4):37-46
[32] 孙梦涵,邢宝,崔宏亮,等.藜麦种质资源遗传多样性SSR标记分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2021,22(3):625-637
[33] KUMAR A,BHARGAVA A,SHUKLA S,et al. Screening of exotic Chenopodium quinoa accessions for downy mildew resistance under mid-eastern conditions of India[J]. Crop Protection,2006,25(8):879-889
[34] STAUDT D and KASSEMEYER H H. Evaluation of downy mildew resistance in various accessions of wild Vitis species[J]. Bioorganic&Medicinal Chemistry Letters,1995,10(11):1293-1295
[35] BONIFACIO A. Chenopodium sp.:genetic resources,ethnobotany,and geographic distribution[J]. Food Reviews International,2003,19(1-2):1-7
[36] COLQUE-LITTLE C,MIGUEL C A,OLE SØGAARD L,et al. Genetic variation for tolerance to the downy mildew pathogen Peronospora variabilis in genetic resources of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)[J]. BMC Plant Biology,2021,21(1):1-19
[37] WEBSTER J. Introduction to Fungi[M]. 2nd Edition. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1980:696
[38] ILOTT T W,DURGAN M E,MICHELMORE R W. Genetics of virulence in Californian populations of Bremia lactucae (Lettuce downy mildew)[J]. Phytopathology,1987,77(10):1381-1386
[39] TSAI P J. Sustainable utilization of nutrition and functional compounds form Chenopodium spp.,an ethnobotanical species (Translated from Chinese)[M]. Agricultural Section,2008:42-61
[40] BONIFACIO A,SARAVIA R. Evaluaci!on de la resistencia al mildiu en quinua[C]//Danial D L,Ed.Tercer Taller de Preduza en Resistencia Duradera en Cultivos Altos en la Zona Andina,PREDUZA. Cochabamba,Bolivia,1999:49-59
[41] DANIELSEN S,AMES T. Mildew (Peronospora farinosa) of quinoa (Chenopodium quinua Willd) in the Andean Region:practical manual for the study of the disease and the pathogen[M]. Lima,Peru:International Potato Center,2000:32
[42] 黄秀兰,崔永亮,徐菁,等.猕猴桃种质材料对褐斑病抗性评价[J].植物病理学报,2018,48(5):711-715
[43] 刘丽,刘长远,王辉,等.不同葡萄品种对霜霉病的抗性[J].植物保护,2017,43(2):177-182,195
[44] CALIXTRO M L,GO'MEZ-PANDO,IBAÑ EZ M. Evaluacio'n de la resistencia de quinua al mildiu'(Perenospora variabilis) y su transferencia por semillas en condiciones del valle del mantaro,jun'ın-peru'[C]//Resu'menes de exposiciones del VI Congreso Mundial de la Quinua y III Simposio Internacional de Granos Andinos,Peru',2017:29
[45] CONRATH U. Molecular aspects of defence priming[J]. Trends in plant Science,2011,16(10):524-531

藜麦种质资源对霜霉病的抗性鉴定与评价

Identification and Evaluation of Downy Mildew (Peronospora variabilis) Resistance in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Germplasm Resources

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张梦, 史鹏飞, 刘春增, 李本银, 丁丽, 张琳, 郑春风, 张成兰, 何春梅, 施海帆, 吕玉虎, 常单娜, 曹卫东. 基于ISSR分子标记的紫云英种质资源遗传多样性及结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 50-60.
[2]	谢文辉, 赵文武, 王雷挺, 赵丽丽, 王普昶. 22份百脉根种质资源表型数量性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 173-179.
[3]	丁明磊, 王京宏, 王伟伟, 李嵩, 王志成, 张超, 孙风丽, 刘曙东, 奚亚军. 粮饲兼用型小麦种质资源筛选与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2027-2036.
[4]	马紫薇, 牛陆, 杨向东, 任伟, 杨春明, 赵寒冬, 张原宇. 油莎豆种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2135-2143.
[5]	孙浩男, 李蓉, 李明阳, 郑妍, 刘志杰, 张存石, 刘冬云, 李鹤. 栽培金鸡菊EST-SSR分子标记开发与亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1430-1440.
[6]	赵小雪, 郭凤根, 罗富成. 添加纤维素酶与藜麦麸皮及小麦麸皮对台湾红藜青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 764-770.
[7]	王海瑾, 曾庆飞, 韦兴迪, 王佳楚函, 韦鑫, 陈超. 贵州尾矿区野生豆科牧草根瘤菌及其抗性测定[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3253-3262.
[8]	吴海艳, 旦增桑布, 曲珍, 沈宝斌, 王晓丽, 崔建钊, 拉巴顿珠, 赖可, 扎西平措, 旦增旺布, 刘鸿旭, 杨时海, 马玉寿. 20份穗花韭种质资源表型数量性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 2949-2958.
[9]	曾翰国, 岳佳铭, 张曙恒, 衣琨, 卫凯, 杨双凤, 刘桂霞, 李曼莉, 杨春华. 76份老芒麦种质资源的农艺性状综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3046-3055.
[10]	赵小雪, 王仕玉, 郭凤根, 罗富成. 乳酸菌及纤维素酶对不同藜麦秸秆青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2827-2833.
[11]	张靖雪, 盛伟, 李欣勇, 罗丽娟. 柱花草低落粒种质筛选及农艺性状综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 108-117.
[12]	王宝强, 赵颖, 朱晓林, 王旺田, 魏小红. 盐碱胁迫对藜麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1689-1696.
[13]	陈志祥, 罗小燕, 李拴林, 吴如月, 王文强, 丁西朋. 基于SSR标记的木豆种质资源遗传多样性与群体结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 904-911.
[14]	安明珠, 韩博, 姜华, 段新慧, 文亦芾, 周凯. 鸭茅物种起源与系统发育分析研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2637-2644.
[15]	路平乐, 魏玉明, 杨发荣, 江小帆, 李倩, 赵生国, 蔡原, 焦婷. 体外产气法评价全株藜麦与全株玉米混合青贮饲料饲用价值[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2391-2398.