人工灌-草群落建植初期草本对灌木幼苗的竞争及密度制约效应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.09.022

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 2884-2890.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.09.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

人工灌-草群落建植初期草本对灌木幼苗的竞争及密度制约效应

吕曦冉¹, 李晓娜², 王超², 侯彦会², 史瑞双², 巩闪闪²

1. 河南农业大学风景园林与艺术学院, 河南郑州 450002;
2. 北京市农林科学院草业花卉与景观生态研究所, 北京 100097

收稿日期:2024-01-31 修回日期:2024-04-24 发布日期:2024-10-09
通讯作者: 李晓娜,E-mail:lxn1977@126.com
作者简介:吕曦冉(2000-),女,汉族,河南商丘人,硕士研究生,主要从事灌草植物配置研究,E-mail:lxr66780712@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1302802);北京市农林科学院创新能力专项(KJCX20230111，KJCX20230305)资助

Competition and Density Dependent Effect between Herb and Shrub seedlings

LYU Xi-ran¹, LI Xiao-na², WANG Chao², HOU Yan-hui², SHI Rui-shuang², GONG Shan-shan²

1. School of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450002, China;
2. Institute of Grassland, Flowers and Ecology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China

Received:2024-01-31 Revised:2024-04-24 Published:2024-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在人工灌-草群落建植初期，灌木幼苗生长经常受到草本植物的抑制。为了明确草本植物及其种植密度对灌木幼苗生长特征的影响，为人工灌-草群落构建提供理论依据。本研究以柠条锦鸡儿(Caragana korshinskii Kom.)、荆条(Vitex negundo Var. Heterophylla)、紫穗槐(Amorpha fruticosa)为研究对象，设置4个草本种植密度，分别比较3种灌木幼苗生长特征在4个草本种植密度处理之间的差异。结果表明：3种灌木幼苗都受到了草本的抑制和草本种植密度的影响，株高与灌木单一种植相比降低幅度达71%~87%；生物量降低达96%以上。此外，3种灌木幼苗在灌-草群落中竞争能力较弱，且在高密度草本植物种植处理中，出现灌木幼苗死亡现象。在构建人工灌-草群落时，以柠条为灌木物种的灌-草群落，草本植物种植密度建议小于200株·m^-2；荆条和紫穗槐草本植物种植密度建议小于500株·m^-2。

关键词: 人工灌-草群落, 密度制约, 生物量, 比叶面积

Abstract: In the early stage of artificial shrub-herb community,the growth of shrub seedlings was inhibited by herb and it is difficult that shrub grew in the artificial shrub-herb community. However,it is not clear that the competition between herb and shrub seedlings and the influence of herbaceous density on the growth of shrub seedlings. Therefore,the effect of herbaceous density to biomass,morphological characteristics and interspecific competition between herb and shrub seedlings were studied to provide experimental evidence for the construction of artificial shrub-herb community. In this study,pot experiment was carried out and soil condition were simulated according to highway slope restoration. Three species of shrubs (Caragana korshinskii Kom.,Vitex negundo Var. Heterophylla,Amorpha fruticosa) were selected,and biomass,height,specific leaf area (SLA) and root surface area (RSA) of three shrubs among different herb density were compared. The competitive ability between herb and shrub seedlings was compared by calculating the relative yield,relative competition intensity and competitive attack coefficient. The results showed that the growth of three shrubs was inhibited by herb in shrub-herb mixed sowing treatment,and the height of three shrubs decreased by 71%-87%,and the biomass of three shrubs decreased more than 96% under shrub-herb mixed sowing treatment compared to that under shrub monoculture treatment. The seedlings growth of the three shrubs was affected by herbaceous density. And herbs were of more strong competitiveness than shrub seedlings,and herbaceous density has significant impact on the relative competition strength of the three shrub seedlings. At the same time,Caragana korshinskii Kom. seedlings died in high herbaceous density,so herbaceous density need be control when construct artificial shrub-herb community. Herbaceous density should be less than 200 plants·m^-2 in Caragana korshinskii Kom shrub-herb community,and herbaceous density should be less than 500 plants·m^-2 in Vitex negundo var. heterophylla and Amorpha fruticose-herb community.

Key words: Artificial shrub-herb community, Density dependence, Biomass, Specific leaf area

中图分类号:

S352.3

吕曦冉, 李晓娜, 王超, 侯彦会, 史瑞双, 巩闪闪. 人工灌-草群落建植初期草本对灌木幼苗的竞争及密度制约效应[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2884-2890.

LYU Xi-ran, LI Xiao-na, WANG Chao, HOU Yan-hui, SHI Rui-shuang, GONG Shan-shan. Competition and Density Dependent Effect between Herb and Shrub seedlings[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(9): 2884-2890.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.09.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I9/2884

参考文献

[1] CALLAWAY R M,WALKER L R. Competition and facilitation:a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities[J]. Ecology,1997,78(7):1958-1965
[2] HACKER S D,BERTNESS M D. Experimental evidence for factors maintaining plant species diversity in a New England salt marsh[J]. Ecology,1999,80(6):2064-2073
[3] 徐佳文,罗晓敏,涂运健,等. 毛竹林下丛枝菌根类和外生菌根类树种幼树种内和种间竞争研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2021,43(5):1107-1115
[4] CONNELL J H. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition:evidence from field experiment[J]. The American Naturalist,1983,122(5):661-696
[5] 张静,赵成章,盛亚萍,等. 高寒山区混播草地燕麦和毛苕子种间竞争对密度的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2012,31(7):1605-1611
[6] 祝燕,米湘成,马克平. 植物群落物种共存机制:负密度制约假说[J]. 生物多样性,2009,17(6):594-604
[7] PIAO S L,FANG J Y,CIAIS P,et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Nature,2009,458,1009-1013
[8] LICZNER A R,FILAZZOLA A,WESTPHAL M,et al. Shrubs facilitate native forb re-establishment in an invaded arid shrubland[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2019(170):103998
[9] ZHANG Z H,LI X Y,YANG X T,et al. Changes in soil properties following shrub encroachment in the semiarid Inner Mongolian grasslands of China[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2020,66(2):369-378
[10] KIMURA K,KONO A,YAMADA S,et al. Grazing and heat stress protection of native grass by a sand-fixing shrub in the arid lands of northern China[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2022,14(8):867-876
[11] 胡雄蛟,宋昌素,范馨悦,等. 中国灌丛生态系统主要调节服务及价值评估[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(3):58-61
[12] MICHALET R,PUGNARIE F I. Facilitation in communities:underlying mechanisms,community and ecosystem implicaitons[J]. Funcitonal Ecology,2016,30(1):3-9
[13] IBÁÑEZ I,RODRÍGUEZ A. Understanding neighborhood effects to increase restoration success of woody plant communities[J]. Ecological Applications,2020,30(5):e02098
[14] 刘泽正,傅宇,马旭,等. 促进作用理论在生态修复中的应用进展与发展趋势[J]. 环境生态学,2020,2(ZI):41-47
[15] 崔光帅,罗天祥,梁尔源,等. 干旱半干旱区灌丛对草本植物的促进作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2022,46(11):1321-1333
[16] SHIPONENI N,ALLSOPP N,CARRICK P J,et al. Competitive interactions between grass and succulent shrubs at the ecotone between an arid grassland and succulent shrubland in the Karoo[J]. Plant Ecology,2011,212:795-808
[17] 陶岩,江源,顾卫,等. 草灌植被护坡群落中草本对灌木生长的竞争关系研究[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版),2011,43(2):140-144
[18] MORCILLO L,BAUTISTA S. Interacting water,nutrients,and shrub age control steppe grass-no-shrub competition:Implications for restoration[J]. Ecosphere,2022,13(5):e4093
[19] SHIPONENI N,CARRICK P J,ALLSOPP N,et al. Effects of root competition and soils on seedling establishment at the ecotone between an arid grassland and succulent shrubland in South Africa[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,2014,25(2):402-410
[20] 祁鲁玉,陈浩楠,库丽洪·赛热别力,等. 基于植物功能性状的暖温带6种灌木幼苗生长策略[J]. 植物生态学报,2022,46(11):1388-1399
[21] CUI G S,PUGNAIRE F I,YANG L,et al. Shrub-mediated effects on soil nitrogen determines shrub-herbaceous interactions in drylands of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2023,14:1137365
[22] WIECZORKOWSKI J D,LEHMANN C E R. Encroachment diminishes herbaceous plant diversity in grassy ecosystems worldwide[J]. Global Change Biology,2022,28(18):5532-5546
[23] RODRÍGUEZ M V,BERTILLER M B. Temporal asynchrony in fine-root biomass may contribute to shrub and grass coexistence in mixed patches[J]. Austral Ecology,2014,39(5):501-510
[24] 杜俊颖,李鑫洋,杨莉,等. 冀西北坝上地区豆禾混播草地建植第三年草地生产力变化研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(7):1855-1861
[25] 徐怀秀,马淼. 意大利苍耳与乌拉尔甘草种间竞争能力比较[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(16):6644-6653
[26] DE WIT C T,VAN DEN BERGH J P. Competition between herbage plants[J]. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science,1965,13:212-221
[27] GRACE J B. On the measurement of plant competition intensity[J]. Ecology,1995,76(1):305-308
[28] MCGILCHRIST C A,TRENBATH B R. A revised analysis of plant competition experiments[J]. Biometrics,1971,27(3):659-671
[29] 王森森,贾宏定,张志飞,等. 入侵植物美洲商陆与3种牧草的竞争效应研究[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(1):95-102
[30] 赵思金,韩烈保,宋桂龙,等. 不同人工灌木与草混播群落中4种灌木根系分布的研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2008,28(4):4799-4804
[31] 刘静,曹雄,李婷,等. 不同高粱品种主要农艺性状及产量的相关分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2019,47(20):29-30,36
[32] 刘可佳,何念鹏,侯继华. 中国温带典型森林植物比叶面积的空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(3):872-883
[33] KUMAR K,GARKOTI S C. Functional traits,growth patterns,and litter dynamics of invasive alien and cooccurring native shrub species of chir pine forest in the central Himalaya,India[J]. Plant Ecology,2021,222(6):723-735
[34] XUE L,HAGIHARA A. Density effects on organs in self-thinning Pinus densiflora Sieb. Et Zucc. Stands[J]. Ecological Research,2008,23(4):689-695
[35] 冯琴,王斌,海艺蕊,等. 毛苕子不同播种量与燕麦混播对群落竞争及燕麦生物量分配的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(9):2423-2429
[36] 姜玉东,张军民,熊佑清,等. 荆条和多花胡枝子叶片形态和光合生理特性的耐阴适应性研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(31):49-60
[37] 刘卫敏. 草本竞争对云杉更新幼苗叶片特性的影响[D]. 太谷:山西农业大学,2022:5

人工灌-草群落建植初期草本对灌木幼苗的竞争及密度制约效应

Competition and Density Dependent Effect between Herb and Shrub seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周清格, 李邵宇, 白梅, 李雅男, 杨立山, 王文琼, 邢佳庆, 乌云嘎, 赵萌莉. 内蒙古两种草地类型土壤微生物量氮、磷分布特征及影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2854-2861.
[2]	徐文印, 马昀峤, 柴瑜, 段成伟, 把熠晨, 张静, 李希来. 商品有机肥对不同坡向退化高寒草甸土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2638-2647.
[3]	阿的哈则, 常涛, 苏洪烨, 魏晶晶, 秦瑞敏, 胡雪, 马丽, 张中华, 史正晨, 李珊, 袁访, 李宏林, 周华坤. 单播和混播禾草对土壤理化性质和微生物生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2072-2080.
[4]	孙煜焱, 董建军, 王秀梅. 基于ASD地物光谱仪反演锡林郭勒典型草原地上生物量模型研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2234-2244.
[5]	齐志远, 马腾飞, 伊李凯, 宁亚楠, 武帅楷, 刁华杰, 苏原, 徐沛东, 郝杰, 董宽虎. 短期OTC增温对晋北农牧交错带温性草地土壤微生物的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1789-1799.
[6]	安海涛, 孙彩彩, 董全民, 杨晓霞, 张春辉, 赵新全. 青藏高原土壤微生物生物量对放牧强度响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1913-1922.
[7]	吴佳芯, 张育涵, 李邵宇, 韩国栋. 长期放牧对内蒙古荒漠草原土壤不同组分有机磷含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1479-1488.
[8]	李航, 徐维新, 黄坤琳, 代娜, 肖强智, 祝存兄, 王淇玉, 司荆柯, 李自翔, 李利东. 基于枯草指数的冬季草畜平衡动态评估方法[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1629-1641.
[9]	周志东, 张煜, 李湘如, 杨世鉴, 杨菁, 谭婧, 刘莹成, 陈远其. 渍水和生物炭对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1087-1093.
[10]	袁惠, 张鲜花, 韩禧卿, 熊辉, 撒成辉. 盐、碱胁迫对4份梯牧草苗期生物量及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1184-1193.
[11]	王婷, 史倩倩, 祁得胜, 陈克龙, 杜岩功. 青海湖地区紫花针茅型高寒草原群落特征变化[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1204-1209.
[12]	张霞, 刘仰乔, 张灿浩, 吴萨其拉, 朱琳, 康萨如拉. 荒漠草原生物量空间异质性对长期不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1243-1251.
[13]	李玮, 汪军, 徐汝民, 杜世州, 乔玉强, 陈欢. 污泥生物炭添加对黑麦草和土壤养分特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1295-1302.
[14]	王雨欣, 卢素锦, 杨青, 尹鑫. 三江源地区人工植物群落多样性对生物量的影响研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 899-906.
[15]	常风云, 陈启航, 史建国, 李佳奇, 李正雄, 王飞云, 纪俊娥, 段义忠, 亢福仁, 罗竹梅. 留茬高度对陕北采煤沉陷区饲料桑生长特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 952-957.