低纬高原季风区青贮玉米品种筛选与综合评价—以云南大理为例

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.019

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1776-1786.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.019

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

低纬高原季风区青贮玉米品种筛选与综合评价—以云南大理为例

韦姗姗¹, 李成², 蔡雄卫¹, 赵涵¹, 刘方材¹, 王萍¹, 张晓娟³, 姜华¹, 周凯¹

1. 云南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 云南昆明 650201;
2. 云南省洱源县草山饲料工作站, 云南大理 671200;
3. 云南省洱源县畜牧工作站, 云南大理 671299

收稿日期:2025-09-16 修回日期:2025-11-19 发布日期:2026-05-08
通讯作者: 周凯，E-mail:zhoukai1988@126.com
作者简介:韦姗姗（2000-），女，壮族，广西来宾人，硕士研究生，主要从事草类植物逆境生理研究，E-mail:2256898547@qq.com；
基金资助:
洱源县饲草产业科技特派团（202304BI090008）资助

Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Silage Maize Varieties in Low—Latitude Plateau Monsoon Regions： A Case Study of Dali， Yunnan

WEI Shan-shan¹, LI Cheng², CAI Xiong-wei¹, ZHAO Han¹, LIU Fang-cai¹, WANG Ping¹, ZHANG Xiao-juan³, JIANG Hua¹, ZHOU Kai¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650201, China;
2. Grassland and Feed Workstation of Eryuan County, Dali, Yunnan Province 671200, China;
3. Animal Husbandry Workstation of Eryuan County, Dali, Yunnan Province 671299, China

Received:2025-09-16 Revised:2025-11-19 Published:2026-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为筛选适应低纬高原季风气候的高产优质青贮玉米（Zea mays L.）品种，缓解云贵高原草畜矛盾、支撑“粮改饲”政策落实，进而推动区域草牧业可持续发展，本研究以11个青贮玉米品种为试验材料，对其农艺性状、产量及营养成分等指标进行分析，采用灰色关联度分析法进行综合评价。结果表明：单株干重以‘和玉36’最高，达0.37 kg，‘京科932’次之为0.33 kg；‘曲辰513’鲜草产量最高为187.7 t·hm^-2；‘西抗18’粗蛋白含量最高为8.11%，‘曲辰513’的中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量最低，分别为40.88%和17.47%，其相对饲喂价值最高为171.52。灰色关联度分析显示，‘曲辰513’综合评分最高加权关联度0.5668，其次‘大天1416’为0.5482，‘和玉36’为0.5382。综上，‘曲辰513’‘大天1416’和‘和玉36’在鲜草产量、干物质产量、粗蛋白含量及持绿性等方面表现突出，适宜在低纬高原季风区进行推广种植。

关键词: 青贮玉米, 灰色关联度, 低纬高原季风气候, 农艺性状, 产量性状, 营养品质

Abstract: This study seeks to identify high-yield and high-quality silage maize varieties that are well-suited to the low-latitude plateau monsoon climate. The objective was to mitigate the imbalance between forage supply and livestock demand on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau， support the implementation of the ‘grain-to-feed’ policy， and ultimately to promote the sustainable development of regional grassland animal husbandry. This study analyzed 11 silage maize varieties based on their agronomic traits， yield， and nutritional composition， and conducted a comprehensive evaluation using the grey relational analysis method. The results indicated that ‘Heyu36’ had the highest dry weight per plant at 0.37 kg， followed by ‘Jingke932’ at 0.33 kg. ‘Quchen513’ achieved the highest fresh biomass of 187.7 t·hm^-2. ‘Xikang18’ contained the highest crude protein content at 8.11%， while ‘Quchen513’ exhibited the lowest neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber contents at 40.88% and 17.47%， respectively， resulting in the highest relative feed value of 171.52. Grey relational analysis revealed that ‘Quchen513’ had the highest comprehensive evaluation score with a weighted relational degree of 0.5668， followed by ‘Datian1416’ at 0.5482 and ‘Heyu36’ at 0.5382. In summary， ‘Quchen513’， ‘Datian1416’， and ‘Heyu36’ demonstrated outstanding performance in terms of fresh grass yield， dry matter yield， crude protein content， and stay-green characteristics， making them suitable for widespread cultivation in low-latitude plateau monsoon regions.

Key words: Silage maize, Gray correlation, Monsoon climate of low-latitude plateaus, Agronomic traits, Yield traits, Nutritional quality

中图分类号:

S513

韦姗姗, 李成, 蔡雄卫, 赵涵, 刘方材, 王萍, 张晓娟, 姜华, 周凯. 低纬高原季风区青贮玉米品种筛选与综合评价—以云南大理为例[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1776-1786.

WEI Shan-shan, LI Cheng, CAI Xiong-wei, ZHAO Han, LIU Fang-cai, WANG Ping, ZHANG Xiao-juan, JIANG Hua, ZHOU Kai. Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Silage Maize Varieties in Low—Latitude Plateau Monsoon Regions： A Case Study of Dali， Yunnan[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(5): 1776-1786.

参考文献

[1] XIE M E, YAO Y, DUAN W, et al. Study on the characteristics of climatic seasonal variation over the low latitude plateau—taking Kunming and Dali in Yunnan as an example[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2023, 39(2):171-182 解明恩, 姚愚, 段玮, 等. 低纬高原气候季节变化特征研究——以云南昆明大理为例[J]. 热带气象学报, 2023, 39(2):171-182
[2] XU Z, WU W Q, RAN F J. Some contradictions and countermeasures in sustainable agricultural development in the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2000, 17(S1):1-5 徐震, 吴维群, 冉繁军. 云贵高原草地畜牧业可持续发展中的矛盾及其对策[J]. 草业科学, 2000, 17(S1):1-5
[3] ZHONG S. Seasonal contradictions between forage and livestock in the grassland beef cattle grazing system of Yunnan province and corresponding countermeasures[J]. Journal of Yellow Cattle Science, 2002, 28(2):45-47 钟声. 云南省草地肉牛放牧系统中的草畜季节矛盾及对策[J]. 黄牛杂志, 2002, 28(2):45-47
[4] ALI F, KANWAL N, AHSAN M, et al. Multivariate analysis of grain yield and its attributing traits in different maize hybrids grown under heat and drought stress[J]. Scientifica, 2015, 12:563869
[5] HRISTOV A, HARPER M, ROTH G, et al. Effects of ensiling time on corn silage neutral detergent fiber degradability and relationship between laboratory fiber analyses and in vivo digestibility[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2020, 103(3):2333-2346
[6] NI Y F, WANG M L. Spatiotemporal evolution of China’s silage corn industry and the factors driving its development[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(7):1915-1924 倪印锋, 王明利. 中国青贮玉米产业发展时空演变及动因[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(7):1915-1924
[7] YANG Z S, XU S, ZHAO Y L, et al. Development status and restrictive factors of corn industry in Yunnan Province[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2022, 42(5):63-67, 71 杨子姗, 徐率, 赵苑伶, 等. 云南玉米产业发展状况与制约因素[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2022, 42(5):63-67, 71
[8] BI Y F, MA X L. Development potential analysis of Yunnan plateau characteristics of grassland agriculture[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2013, 7(3):11-15 毕玉芬, 马向丽. 云南高原特色草地农业的发展潜力分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 7(3):11-15
[9] YANG F Y. New concept “forage is a part of grains” to utmost spurring the development of forage industry[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2):311-313 杨富裕. 树立“饲草就是粮食” 理念, 大力发展饲草产业[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2):311-313
[10] SANG R J, DONG C Y, ZHANG X X, et al. Selection and evaluation of silage maize varieties in northern Henan province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024(11):3472-3479 桑瑞娟, 董春阳, 张晓霞, 等. 豫北地区青贮玉米品种筛选与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024(11):3472-3479
[11] ZHENG A R, ZHANG X L. Grain-to-forage conversion steadily advanced in Henan province to boost rural revitalization[J]. China Animal Industry, 2020(19):17 郑爱荣, 张小玲. 河南稳步推进粮改饲助力乡村振兴[J]. 中国畜牧业, 2020(19):17
[12] WANG Q Q, GE Z P, PEI Y H, et al. Comparison of agronomic traits and quality of 38 silage maize varieties[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(3):487-493 王茜茜, 葛兆鹏, 裴玉贺, 等. 38个青贮玉米品种的农艺性状及品质比较[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(3):487-493
[13] QIN W N, JIAO T, SHI S L, et al. Evaluation of silage quality of 10 green-fed corn varieties under different hydrothermal resource conditions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5):1070-1079 秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 等. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5):1070-1079
[14] WANG H N, QIN W N, JIAO T, et al. Evaluation of milk yield, agronomic traits, and nutritional quality of different green-feeding maize varieties in Gansu Province[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(6):1617-1628 王虎宁, 秦伟娜, 焦婷, 等. 甘肃不同青饲玉米品种产量、农艺性状及营养品质评定[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40(6):1617-1628
[15] ZHANG S X, WANG X, MA L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of performance and forage quality of silage maize in farming-pastoral ecotone[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6):1517-1524 张书兴, 王筱, 马琳, 等. 农牧交错带青贮玉米生产性能和饲草品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6):1517-1524
[16] CAO J, WU Z F, CHEN X J, et al. Selection and comprehensive evaluation of suitable silage maize varieties in Jiuquan[J]. Feed Research, 2023, 46(16):121-125 曹健, 武志锋, 陈学俊, 等. 酒泉适宜青贮玉米品种综合评价与筛选[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(16):121-125
[17] SHI J, LIU X J, JIA J J, et al. Study on adaptability of silage maize varieties in Hexi Corridor[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2025(1):220-226 石菁, 刘晓静, 贾娟娟, 等. 青贮型玉米品种在河西走廊的适应性研究[J]. 草原与草坪, 2025(1):220-226
[18] ZHANG L Y. Feed analysis and quality test technology[M].4th ed. Beijing:China Agricultural University Press, 2016:53-89 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 4版. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2016:53-89
[19] ZHOU B, HAN X H, LI X H, et al. Comparison and comprehensive evaluation of summer-planting silage maize varieties in Henan Province[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(2):316-326 周波, 韩小花, 李小红, 等. 河南省夏播青贮玉米品种筛选与综合评价[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(2):316-326
[20] JIANG C Z, SHOU N, GAO W, et al. A multivariate evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of different varieties of silage maize in the dry plateau area of Longdong[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7):216-228 蒋丛泽, 受娜, 高玮, 等. 陇东旱塬区不同青贮玉米品种生产性能和营养品质综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(7):216-228
[21] LI S P, ZHANG S H, YUAN F J, et al. Study on the biomass and benefit of silage maize with different sowing patterns in Yunnan-Guizhou plateau[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2023(6):44-48 李世平, 张诗慧, 袁福锦, 等. 云贵高原区青贮玉米不同播种方式的饲草产量和效益[J]. 草学, 2023(6):44-48
[22] ZHANG Z J, HAO X Y, WANG X, et al. Selection and multi-trait evaluation of silage maize varieties suitable for cultivation in the Qiqihar area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(11):228-240 张仲鹃, 郝曦煜, 王雪, 等. 齐齐哈尔地区适宜青贮玉米品种的筛选及综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(11):228-240
[23] HE W Z, LIU Y H, YANG Q, et al. Screening and genetic research for biology yield key index in silage maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2009, 17(2):29-33 何文铸, 刘永红, 杨勤, 等. 影响青贮玉米生物产量关键指标的筛选及其遗传研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(2):29-33
[24] ZHANG J H, WANG Y B, YANG Q R, et al. Analysis of agronomic traits and nutritional components of different silage maize varieties in Longling county[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2019(9):47-52 张家华, 王永必, 杨庆然, 等. 龙陵县不同青贮玉米品种农艺性状及营养成分分析[J]. 中国奶牛, 2019(9):47-52
[25] YAN H Y, LI C X, TANG S H, et al. Production performance and quality evaluation of three silage maize varieties in dryland of Qinghai[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(9):1915-1921 闫慧颖, 李春喜, 唐生华, 等. 青海旱地3个青贮玉米品种的生产性能及品质评价[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(9):1915-1921
[26] LU W R, YUAN X H, LIU J Z, et al. Screening of different silage maize varieties in Qingshui area[J]. Feed Research, 2024, 47(15):129-134 路婉茹, 袁想红, 刘建忠, 等. 清水地区不同青贮玉米品种的筛选[J]. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(15):129-134
[27] LIU X, WANG B, ZHU X Y, et al. A comparison of 21 varieties of silage maize in Henan province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(8):49-60 刘晓, 王博, 朱晓艳, 等. 21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米在河南的品种比较试验[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8):49-60
[28] WANG G D, HAO S Y, GU X, et al. Evaluation of performance and nutritional value of 10 forage maize varieties in central Gansu Province[J]. Feed Research, 2022, 45(11):93-96 王国栋, 郝生燕, 顾娴, 等. 10个饲用玉米品种在甘肃中部的生产性能和营养价值评价[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(11):93-96
[29] COLEMAN W S, MOORE E J. Feed quality and animal performance[J]. Field Crops Research, 2003, 84(1-2):17-29
[30] LI X, ZHANG Y M, ZHU L L, et al. Evaluation of silage performance and nutritional quality of different corn cultivars in Qinghai Plateau[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(6):1194-1208 李想, 张业猛, 朱丽丽, 等. 青海高原地区不同玉米品种青贮性能及营养品质评价[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(6):1194-1208
[31] HAN Y D, XIONG B H, PAN X H, et al. Evaluation of the nutritional value of whole plant silage corn—based on the situation of Beijing area[J]. Feed Industry, 2014, 35(7):15-19 韩英东, 熊本海, 潘晓花, 等. 全株青贮玉米的营养价值评价——以北京地区为例[J]. 饲料工业, 2014, 35(7):15-19
[32] XUE L Z, SUN M T, WU Z, et al. LncRNA regulates tomato fruit cracking by coordinating gene expression via a hormone-redox-cell wall network[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1):162
[33] HOU P, CHEN C J, ZHANG J N, et al. Study on production performance and nutritional quality of different silage maize in Guyuan area of Ningxia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10):2346-2354 侯湃, 陈彩锦, 张静妮, 等. 宁夏固原地区不同青贮玉米品种生产性能及营养品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10):2346-2354
[34] LIANG W W, ZHANG H H, ZHANG X Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of 23 silage maize varieties in the Changji, Xinjiang[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(10):2180-2190 梁维维, 张荟荟, 张学洲, 等. 新疆昌吉地区23份青贮玉米品种综合评价[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(10):2180-2190
[35] ZHANG S X, WANG Y P, WANG X, et al. Adaptability of silage maize in semi-arid area of Inner Mongolia[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(6):1217-1224 张书兴, 王云平, 王筱, 等. 内蒙古半干旱区青贮玉米的适应性[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(6):1217-1224
[36] TONG C H, ZHOU W Z, MO B T, et al. Evaluation of different silage maize varieties in karst regions[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(2):482-490 童成昊, 周文章, 莫本田, 等. 喀斯特地区不同青贮玉米品种的综合评价[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40(2):482-490

低纬高原季风区青贮玉米品种筛选与综合评价—以云南大理为例

Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Silage Maize Varieties in Low—Latitude Plateau Monsoon Regions： A Case Study of Dali， Yunnan

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张金凤, 张婷, 张运婷, 左爱玲, 杨子森, 侯东来, 赵祥, 高鹏. 晋北黄土旱塬区38个饲用燕麦品种的适应性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1262-1274.
[2]	牛浴林, 仝宗永, 陈鹏伟, 秦燕. 土壤改良剂对柴达木盐碱地燕麦生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1483-1491.
[3]	禹丽红, 余易泽, 道吉草, 龙思, 冉姝琪, 李晗玉, 许岳飞. 生物炭配施有机肥对青贮玉米生长及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1502-1509.
[4]	李霄坤, 张利平, 单新河, 杨军卫, 任伟, 杨朝伟, 王显国. 青贮玉米与拉巴豆不同混播方式对饲草产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1053-1059.
[5]	原野, 邹雨琪, 白宝超, 孟和高勒, 宝乐尔, 格根图. 玉米-笤帚糜子秸秆比例对TMR发酵特性及腐败机制的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1060-1076.
[6]	刘盼婷, 张朝辉, 张邦彦, 武晋民, 张家豪, 蔺美玲, 张百含, 王彬. 盐碱地湖南稷子间作大豆对作物光合特性和生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1077-1086.
[7]	杨禾雨, 郝俊峰, 王志军, 贾玉山, 范美超, 格根图. 地表水与地下水灌溉对紫花苜蓿水分利用效率及生产特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1128-1136.
[8]	薛一凡, 赵方媛, 杜文华. 陇中沟壑区有机肥与化肥配施对不同小黑麦品种产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 734-744.
[9]	麻涛, 李伶伶, 侯向阳. 基于多元分析的野生赖草种质资源评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(1): 254-265.
[10]	王雪丽, 王云玲, 齐开源, 严海军, 王显国, 孟根其格木, 周立业. 水分调控对不同品种紫花苜蓿生产性能及土壤酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2808-2819.
[11]	鞠馨, 王新雅, 王冰莹, 韩国栋, 武倩. 放牧强度对荒漠草原植物群落组成和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2962-2972.
[12]	徐欣欣, 王莉娜, 丁雪妍, 刘庭玉, 孙志强, 马西青. 通辽地区不同类型玉米品种生产性能和青贮品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3068-3076.
[13]	袁玉涛, 吴莉, 魏小星, 刘文辉, 陈有军, 何克燕, 周青平. 河西走廊半干旱区12个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能及品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3088-3098.
[14]	王恕平, 齐帅, 陈彦龙, 张蓓, 曹文侠, 焦婷. 河西灌区不同青贮玉米品种生产性能与发酵品质的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3099-3107.
[15]	刘钟歌, 常建萍, 祁鹤兴. 青贮玉米链格孢叶斑病菌全基因组解析及不同菌株中毒素合成基因的分布[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2433-2442.