PEG处理下两个甜高粱品种渗透调节物质积累特征比较研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.10.011

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 3642-3652.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.10.011

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

PEG处理下两个甜高粱品种渗透调节物质积累特征比较研究

闫世杰, 徐九晖, 赵鑫, 马紫晨, 赵英杰, 刘佳, 杨浩儒, 马樾, 崔彦农, 曹玉曼

西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2025-12-22 修回日期:2026-01-23 发布日期:2026-10-10
通讯作者: 崔彦农, E-mail: cuiyn@nwafu.edu.cn;曹玉曼, E-mail: yumancao@nwafu.edu.cn
作者简介:闫世杰（2001-），男，汉族，山西运城人，硕士研究生，主要从事牧草逆境生理与分子生物学研究，E-mail：yjay@nwafu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（32301505）；中国博士后科学基金（2024M762652）；大学生创新创业训练计划项目（S202410712691；202510712065）资助

A Comparative Study on the Accumulation Characteristics of Osmolytes in Two Sweet Sorghum Cultivars under PEG Treatments

YAN Shi-jie, XU Jiu-hui, ZHAO Xin, MA Zi-chen, ZHAO Ying-jie, LIU Jia, YANG Hao-ru, MA Yue, CUI Yan-nong, CAO Yu-man

College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2025-12-22 Revised:2026-01-23 Published:2026-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解析干旱胁迫下甜高粱[Sorghum bicolor（L.）Moench]渗透调节机制，本研究以甜高粱品种‘绿巨人’和‘丰甜’为材料，比较了不同浓度（10%，20%，30%）聚乙二醇（Polyethylene glycol，PEG）处理下二者生长、光合性能和渗透调节物质积累的差异，分析了20% PEG处理下K⁺和NO₃^-转运以及有机渗透调节物合成关键基因的表达情况。结果表明，PEG处理下‘丰甜’生长及光合作用相关指标下降幅度显著小于‘绿巨人’，且前者叶中K⁺、NO₃^-、可溶性糖和甜菜碱含量显著高于后者。20% PEG处理6 h和48 h后，‘丰甜’K⁺转运基因AKT1和SKOR、NO₃^-转运基因NPF7.3、蔗糖代谢基因SUS1、海藻糖合成基因TPS6、棉子糖合成基因RAFS2、甜菜碱合成基因BADH2以及支链氨基酸合成关键基因BCAT2的表达量显著高于‘绿巨人’，但前者叶中游离脯氨酸含量及其合成关键基因P5CS2和P5CR的表达量均显著低于后者。上述结果为揭示甜高粱抗旱机制提供了理论依据。

关键词: 干旱胁迫, 甜高粱, 渗透调节物质, 基因表达

Abstract: Osmotic adjustment is a key strategy of plants to cope with water deficit. To investigate the osmotic adjustment mechanisms of sweet sorghum under drought stresses， the growth， photosynthesis and accumulation of osmolytes in two sweet sorghum cultivars ‘Lvjuren’ and ‘Fengtian’ under 10%，20% and 30% PEG treatments were analyzed. Then， the expression of genes involved in K⁺ and NO₃^- transport as well as biosynthesis of organic osmolytes after 20% PEG treatment were determined. The results showed that the decline of growth and photosynthesis related parameters in ‘Fengtain’ was significantly smaller than that in ‘Lvjuren’， while the leaf K⁺，NO₃^-， soluble sugars and betaine contents in the former were significantly higher than those in the latter under PEG treatments. After 20% PEG treatment for 6 and 48 h， the expressions AKT1 and SKOR （mediating K⁺ transport）， NPF7.3 （mediating NO₃^- transport）， SUS1 （involved in sugar metabolism）， TPS6 （involved in trehalose biosynthesis）， RAFS2 （involved in raffinose biosynthesis）， BADH2 （involved in betaine biosynthesis） and BCAT2 （catalyzing the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids） in ‘Fengtian’ were significantly higher than those in ‘Lvjuren’， while the free proline content as well as the expressions of P5CS2 and P5CR （involved in proline biosynthesis） in the former were significantly lower than those in the latter. The above results provide a theoretical basis for uncovering the drought resistance mechanisms of sweet sorghum and large-scale cultivation of this species in arid and semi-arid regions.

Key words: Drought stress, Sweet sorghum, Osmolyte, Gene expression

中图分类号:

S544.9

闫世杰, 徐九晖, 赵鑫, 马紫晨, 赵英杰, 刘佳, 杨浩儒, 马樾, 崔彦农, 曹玉曼. PEG处理下两个甜高粱品种渗透调节物质积累特征比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(10): 3642-3652.

YAN Shi-jie, XU Jiu-hui, ZHAO Xin, MA Zi-chen, ZHAO Ying-jie, LIU Jia, YANG Hao-ru, MA Yue, CUI Yan-nong, CAO Yu-man. A Comparative Study on the Accumulation Characteristics of Osmolytes in Two Sweet Sorghum Cultivars under PEG Treatments[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(10): 3642-3652.

参考文献

[1] SHAN L. To cope rationally with agricultural drought[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas，2011，29（2）：1-5 山仑. 科学应对农业干旱[J]. 干旱地区农业研究，2011，29（2）：1-5
[2] CAO X F，SUN B，CHEN H B，et al. Approaches and research progresses of marginal land productivity expansion and ecological benefit improvement in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences，2021，36（3）：336-348 曹晓风，孙波，陈化榜，等. 我国边际土地产能扩增和生态效益提升的途径与研究进展[J]. 中国科学院院刊，2021，36（3）：336-348
[3] YANG Z，LI J L，LIU L N，et al. Photosynthetic regulation under salt stress and salt-tolerance mechanism of sweet sorghum[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science，2020，10：1722
[4] LÓPEZ-SANDIN I，ZAVALA-GARCÍA F，LEVIN L，et al. Evaluation of bioethanol production from sweet sorghum variety Roger under different tillage and fertilizer treatments[J]. BioEnergy Research，2021，14（4）：1058-1069
[5] ZHENG L Y，GUO X S，HE B，et al. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sweet and grain sorghum （Sorghum bicolor）[J]. Genome Biology，2011，12（11）：R114
[6] CUI J H，REN G Z，QIAO H Y，et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of seedling stage of two sorghum cultivars under salt stress[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation，2018，37（3）：986-998
[7] CUI Y N，YAN S J，ZHANG Y N，et al. Physiological， metabolome and gene expression analyses reveal the accumulation and biosynthesis pathways of soluble sugars and amino acids in sweet sorghum under osmotic stresses[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences，2024，25（16）：8942
[8] MA Q，YUE L J，ZHANG J L，et al. Sodium chloride improves photosynthesis and water status in the succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum[J]. Tree Physiology，2012，32（1）：4-13
[9] SHIM J S，JEONG H I，BANG S W，et al. Drought-induced branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase enhances drought tolerance in rice[J]. Plant Physiology，2023，191（2）：1435-1447
[10] CUI Y N，LI X T，YUAN J Z，et al. Chloride is beneficial for growth of the xerophyte Pugionium cornutum by enhancing osmotic adjustment capacity under salt and drought stresses[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany，2020，71（14）：4215-4231
[11] MA Q，HU J，ZHOU X R，et al. ZxAKT1 is essential for K⁺ uptake and K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis in the succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum[J]. The Plant Journal，2017，90（1）：48-60
[12] FENG X，LIU W X，CAO F B，et al. Overexpression of HvAKT1 improves drought tolerance in barley by regulating root ion homeostasis and ROS and NO signaling[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany，2020，71（20）：6587-6600
[13] HU J，MA Q，KUMAR T，et al. ZxSKOR is important for salinity and drought tolerance of Zygophyllum xanthoxylum by maintaining K⁺ homeostasis[J]. Plant Growth Regulation，2016， 80（2）：195-205
[14] CHEN C Z，LV X F，LI J Y，et al. Arabidopsis NRT1.5 is another essential component in the regulation of nitrate reallocation and stress tolerance[J]. Plant Physiology，2012， 159（4）：1582-1590
[15] WANG Y Y，HSU P K，TSAY Y F. Uptake，allocation and signaling of nitrate[J]. Trends in Plant Science，2012，17（8）：458-467
[16] WU G Q，WANG C M，SU Y Y，et al. Assessment of drought tolerance in seedlings of sugar beet （Beta vulgaris L.） cultivars using inorganic and organic solutes accumulation criteria[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition，2014，60（4）：565-576
[17] LIANG Y C，WEI G F，NING K，et al. Increase in carbohydrate content and variation in microbiome are related to the drought tolerance of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry，2021，165：19-35
[18] KAUR G，ASTHIR B. Proline： a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance[J]. Biologia Plantarum，2015，59（4）：609-619
[19] DU H M，WANG Z L，YU W J，et al. Metabolic responses of hybrid bermudagrass to short-term and long-term drought stress[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science，2012，137（6）：411-420
[20] SUN Y Y，ZHOU Y T，LONG Q Y，et al. OsBCAT2， a gene responsible for the degradation of branched-chain amino acids， positively regulates salt tolerance by promoting the synthesis of vitamin B5[J]. New Phytologist，2024，241（6）：2558-2574
[21] CHOŁUJ D，KARWOWSKA R，CISZEWSKA A，et al. Influence of long-term drought stress on osmolyte accumulation in sugar beet （Beta vulgaris L.） plants[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum，2008，30（5）：679-687
[22] INSKEEP W P，BLOOM P R. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N，N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone[J]. Plant Physiology，1985，77（2）：483-485
[23] GUO H，NIE C Y，LI Z，et al. Physiological and transcriptional analyses provide insight into maintaining ion homeostasis of sweet sorghum under salt stress[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences，2023，24（13）：11045
[24] DRECHSLER N，ZHENG Y，BOHNER A，et al. Nitrate-dependent control of shoot K homeostasis by the nitrate transporter1/peptide transporter family member NPF7.3/NRT1.5 and the stelar K⁺ outward rectifier SKOR in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiology，2015，169（4）：2832-2847
[25] PAN Y Q，GUO H，WANG S M，et al. The photosynthesis，Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis and osmotic adjustment of Atriplex canescens in response to salinity[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science，2016，7：848
[26] PE’ER S，COHEN Y. Sugar accumulation in tobacco plants systemically protected against blue mold （Peronospora tabacina）[J]. Phytoparasitica，1987，15（4）：307-315
[27] KANG J，WANG X L，YAN S J，et al. Comparative physiological and gene expression analyses provide insights into ion transports and osmotic adjustment of sweet sorghum under salt stress[J]. Agronomy，2024，14（8）：1849
[28] MUNNS R，TESTER M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology，2008，59：651-681
[29] AKHTAR N，ILYAS N，ARSHAD M，et al. The impact of calcium， potassium， and boron application on the growth and yield characteristics of durum wheat under drought conditions[J]. Agronomy，2022，12（8）：1917
[30] GE T D，SUN N B，BAI L P，et al. Effects of drought stress on phosphorus and potassium uptake dynamics in summer maize （Zea mays） throughout the growth cycle[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum，2012，34（6）：2179-2186
[31] LOU D J，CHEN Z，YU D Q，et al. SAPK2 contributes to rice yield by modulating nitrogen metabolic processes under reproductive stage drought stress[J]. Rice，2020，13（1）：35
[32] REGASSA T H，WORTMANN C S. Sweet sorghum as a bioenergy crop： literature review[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy，2014，64：348-355
[33] FÜNFGELD M M F F，WANG W，ISHIHARA H，et al. Sucrose synthases are not involved in starch synthesis in Arabidopsis leaves[J]. Nature Plants，2022，8（5）：574-582
[34] CHEN A Q，GIBNEY P A. Dietary trehalose as a bioactive nutrient[J]. Nutrients，2023， 15（6）：1393
[35] LIU Y，LI T，ZHANG C X，et al. Raffinose positively regulates maize drought tolerance by reducing leaf transpiration[J]. The Plant Journal，2023，114（1）：55-67
[36] SZABADOS L，SAVOURÉ A. Proline： a multifunctional amino acid[J]. Trends in Plant Science，2010，15（2）：89-97
[37] HUANG T F，JANDER G. Abscisic acid-regulated protein degradation causes osmotic stress-induced accumulation of branched-chain amino acids in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Planta，2017，246（4）：737-747

PEG处理下两个甜高粱品种渗透调节物质积累特征比较研究

A Comparative Study on the Accumulation Characteristics of Osmolytes in Two Sweet Sorghum Cultivars under PEG Treatments

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨玉娇, 贺朝鑫, 周洁, 李林菊, 张新全, 彭燕. 象草ERF基因家族鉴定及其对低温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(9): 3223-3233.
[2]	唐雅楠, 韩露, 段梦琪, 杜广啟, 许立新, 韩烈保. 乙烯利对草坪草干旱胁迫下脯氨酸等生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(9): 3284-3291.
[3]	郭鹏辉, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 高金兰, 余亿, 努尔艾拉·萨依木, 高旺, 伊斯拉依·达吾提. 不同株行配置对饲用甜高粱抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(9): 3505-3516.
[4]	金旭, 黄荣, 左妍妍, 刘雪梅, 雷杰, 兰添雅, 张振粉. 干旱胁迫下Cp2-EPS种子包衣对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长及光合生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(7): 2741-2752.
[5]	何彩, 刘源, 晋敏, 吴媛, 王素桢, 胡芳. 沙木蓼MYB-related基因家族的鉴定及其响应干旱胁迫的表达模式研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2012-2021.
[6]	刘进娣, 陈仕勇, 李进, 梁国玲, 周青平. 燕麦SWEET基因家族的鉴定及其响应干旱和盐碱胁迫的表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1568-1583.
[7]	王清屿, 李陈建, 黄梦琪, 路璐, 蒋优, 王玉祥, 童爱香, 张英, 靳瑰丽. 101份无芒雀麦苗期耐旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1610-1621.
[8]	董志晓, 傅康, 刘英杰, 王昭婷, 谭小平, 范文涛, 赵俊茗, 马啸, 张健. 甜高粱与田菁间作比例对饲草生产力及种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1889-1899.
[9]	张浩浩, 张永强, 蒋昂辰, 陈爱萍. 干旱胁迫下伊犁绢蒿幼苗根系的构型、生理与解剖结构响应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1288-1301.
[10]	马翔宇, 刘家佳, 段博文, 张琮滟, 胡晓炜, 周青平. 水磷限制对燕麦生长发育的影响及综合评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1335-1346.
[11]	戈孟婷, 乔丹丹, 王新月, 张若琳, 毕明月, 何学青. 纳米氧化铈引发对干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发及生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1534-1545.
[12]	詹圆, 崔琪, 虞应乾, 方嘉琪, 汪辉. 花后干旱胁迫对燕麦穗部器官光合生理及糖代谢的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 415-423.
[13]	谢鸿宇, 任秋羽, 何清云, 刘纯, 王琳, 李倩. 20份黄花苜蓿种质资源苗期抗旱性综合评价研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 581-591.
[14]	倪淑敏, 张建鹏, 覃屹, 郑思曈, 张薛琳, 王竞红, 杨青杰. 宽叶薹草NAC基因家族的鉴定与干旱响应基因CsNAC16的克隆与分析[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(10): 3589-3603.
[15]	何雨飞, 呼延美静, 唐川江, 张清, 刘博, 吕奥, 刘伟. 燕麦幼苗响应干旱胁迫的生理与转录组学分析[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(10): 3604-3615.