Studying on Regrowth Characteristics and their Correlative Relationship of Medicago sativa Individual Plant

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.005

›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 423-428.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.005

Previous Articles Next Articles

Studying on Regrowth Characteristics and their Correlative Relationship of Medicago sativa Individual Plant

WANG Jian-xun^1,2, YANG Qing-chuan¹, CAO Zhi-zhong², GUO Wen-shan¹, KANG Jun-mei¹, ZHANG Dong-hong³

1. Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 10094, China
2. Pratacutural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
3. Grassland station of Wumen, Inner Mongolia 016000, China

Received:2007-03-16 Revised:2007-06-12 Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

紫花苜蓿再生特性及再生性状相关性研究

王建勋^1,2, 杨青川¹, 曹致中², 郭文山¹, 康俊梅¹, 张东红³

1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京, 100094;
2. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 兰州, 730070;
3. 内蒙古乌盟草原站, 内蒙古, 016000

通讯作者: 杨青川,E-mail:qchyang66@yah oo.com.cn
作者简介:王建勋(1980- )男,山西右玉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为牧草种质资源及育种,Email:xunwjian2120@163.com
基金资助:
国家高新技术发展计划“863”项目(2002AA241101)

Abstract

Abstract: In order to provide the basis for alfalfa breeding and planting, the regrowth characteristics and the correlative relationship between the regrowth dry weight and cutting sequences of Medicago sativa L. cv. Zhongmu No.2 individual plant were studied through application of four defoliations in one year. The results show that great variance coefficient of regrowth characteristics occurred in individual plants and from highest to lowest the variance coefficient were: total regrowth dry weight per plant (39.23%)>regrowth shoot numbers (31.64%)≥regrowth intensity (30.94%)>regrowth shoot weight (26.08)>regrowth rate (13.15%)>regrowth height (10.20%) and variance coefficient of those regrowth characteristics showed increasing trend with defoliation sequences except the regrowth intensity. According to the correlation analysis results, significant positive correlations among all the regrowth characteristics were detected in 2nd and 3rd cuttings and regowth rate and regrowth shoot numbers had high correlation coefficient with R²=0.8139, 0.8578, respectively. Each regrowth characteristic was very significantly in the 2nd and 4th cutting and significantly or very significantly in 3rd cutting positively correlated to the regrowth dry weight, respectively.

Key words: Medicago sativa L, Individual plant, Regrowth characteristics, Correlation

摘要： 通过一年刈割4茬,对中苜2号紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.cv.Zhongmu No.2)单株的再生特性及再生性状相关性进行研究,以期为苜蓿育种?栽培利用提供依据。结果表明:单株之间再生性状存在较大变异,再生总重(39.23%)>再生分枝数(31.64%)≥再生强度(30.94%)>再生单茎重(26.08%)>再生速度(13.15%)>再生株高(10.20%);茬次间除再生强度外其余再生性状变异系数均表现为第4茬>第2茬>第3茬;各个再生性状均在第2、3茬间为极显著正相关,以再生速度(R²=0.8139)和再生分枝数(R²=0.8578)相关系数较大;各个再生性状与再生株重在第2、4茬和第3茬分别呈极显著正相关显著或极显著正相关。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 单株, 再生特性, 相关性

CLC Number:

S812
Q943.1

WANG Jian-xun, YANG Qing-chuan, CAO Zhi-zhong, GUO Wen-shan, KANG Jun-mei, ZHANG Dong-hong. Studying on Regrowth Characteristics and their Correlative Relationship of Medicago sativa Individual Plant[J]. , 2007, 15(5): 423-428.

王建勋, 杨青川, 曹致中, 郭文山, 康俊梅, 张东红. 紫花苜蓿再生特性及再生性状相关性研究[J]. , 2007, 15(5): 423-428.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.005

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2007/V15/I5/423

References

[1] 耿华珠.中国苜蓿[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.35-37
[2] Leach G L.The regrowth of the lucerne plant after cuttting:the effects of cutting at different stages of maturity and at different intensities[J].Aust.J.agric.Res.,1968,19:517-530
[3] Leach G L.Shoot regrowth on lucerne plants cut at different heights[J].Aust.J.agric.Res.,1970,21:583-591
[4] 戎郁萍,韩建国,王培,等.放牧强度对牧草再生性能的影响[J].草地学报,2001,9(2):93-98
[5] 顾明德,程海卫,赵书珍,等.不同苜蓿品种再生草特性分析[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(1):18-20
[6] 周丽霞,王朝凌,杜天庆,等.不同秋眠类型苜蓿生产性能的比较研究[J].国外畜牧学-草原与草坪,1999,(2):16-18
[7] Kalengamaliro N E,Cunningham S M,Volenec J J.Growth,sugar accumulation,and dark respiration of suspension cell cultures derived from contrasting alfalfa cultivars[J].Plant Cell,Tissue and Organ Culture,2003,72:163-171
[8] Bélanger G,Richards J E.Dynamics of biomass and N accumulation of alfalfa under three N fertilization rates[J].J.Plant Soil,2000,219:177-185
[9] 罗天琼,刘正书,莫本田,等.12种紫花苜蓿干草产量与土壤养份变化的关系分析[J].中国草地,1998,(2).29-32,71
[10] Qurry A,Kim T H,boucaud J.Nitrogen reserve mobilization during regrowth of Medicago sativa L:relationships between their availability and regrowth yield[J].Plant Physiol.,1994,105:831-837
[11] Volenec J J,Ourry A,Joern B C.A role for nitrogen reserves in forage regrowth and stress tolerance[J].Plant Physiology,1996,97:185-193
[12] Avice J C,Ourry A,Lemaire G.Root protein and vegetative storage protein are key organic nutrients for alfalfa shoot regrowth[J].Crop Science,1997,37:1187-1193
[13] Dhont C,Castonguay Y,Nadeau P.Alfalfa root nitrogen reserves and regrowth potential in response to fall harvests[J].Crop Science,2003,43:181-194
[14] 许志信,曲永全,白飞.草甸草原8种牧草再生性的研究[J].内蒙古草业,2001,(1):1-5
[15] 马其东,高振生,洪绂曾.不同苜蓿地方品种根系发育能力的评价与筛选[J].草业学报,1999,8(1):42-49
[16] 孙建华,王彦荣,余玲.中国主要苜蓿品种产量性状及其多样性的研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(5):803-808
[17] 胡保忠,刘娣,胡国富.中国紫花苜蓿地方品种随机扩增多态DNA 的研究[J].植物生态学报,2000,24 (6) 697-701
[18] 李拥军.苜蓿地方品种遗传多样性的研究-RAPD标记[J].草地学报,1998,6(2):104-114
[19] 侯建香.气象条件与垂穗披碱草再生关系的研究[J].青海草业,2000,9 (3):6-8
[20] 赵萌利,许志信.短花针茅荒漠草原主要牧草再生特性及其影响因素的研究[J].草地学报,1994,2 (2):34-41
[21] 白永飞,许志信.内蒙古典型草原牧草再生性的研究[J].中国草地,1994,(5):7-11
[22] 孙建华,王彦荣,余玲.紫花苜蓿生长特性及产量性状相关性研究[J].草业学报,2004,13(4):80-86
[23] Liang G H L,Riedl W A.Agronomic traits influencing forage and seed yield in alfalfa[J].Crop Sci,1964,2:394-396
[24] 韩路,贾志宽.影响苜蓿产量相关性状的通径分析[J].西北农业学报,2003,(1):56-59
[25] Bran L J,Worcester B K.Soil water extraction by Alfalfa[J].Agron.J.,1975,67:586-589

Studying on Regrowth Characteristics and their Correlative Relationship of Medicago sativa Individual Plant

紫花苜蓿再生特性及再生性状相关性研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Shi-ting, LU Guang-xin, DENG Ye, FAN Yue-jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, DANG Ning, WANG Ying-cheng, ZHANG Hai-juan, YAN Hui-lin. Effects of Simulated Warming on the Composition and Diversity of Soil Prokaryotic Communities in Alpine Grasslands [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 27-34.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[4]	ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, ZHOU Bing-rong, SONG Ming-hua, XU Wen-hua, DENG Yan-fang, WANG Fang, SHE Yan-di, ZHANG Qian, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Esponse of the Functional Diversity of Dominant Plants to Warming and Simulated Grazing in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[5]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[6]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[7]	NIE Cong, YANG Xiao-peng, LIU Zhe-chuan, ZHAO Yu-han, CHEN Wan-ting, HE Run-hao, LIU Wei, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Different Preceding Combination and Planting Density on Production Performance and Quality of Forage Corn [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 709-716.
[8]	WU Jia-long, WEI Zhen-wu, Omer Idris Olom. Improvement Effect of Agronomic Traits in the BC₂ Population of Multifoliate Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 488-494.
[9]	WAN Ting, DUAN Jun-yi, LI Meng, CHEN Zhi-yong. Correlation Between MlNAC2 Gene Differential Expression and Salt-resistance Physiological Response in Miscanthus lutarioriparius Polyploid [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2685-2693.
[10]	LU Ping-le, WEI Yu-ming, YANG Fa-rong, JIANG Xiao-fan, LI Qian, ZHAO Sheng-guo, CAI Yuan, JIAO Ting. Feeding Value Ealuation of Mixed Silage of Whole Plant Green Quinoa and Green Corn by Using an In Vitro Gas Production Technique [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2391-2398.
[11]	ZHANG Jun, LIU Ju-hong, CAO Na, ZHANG Cai-qin. Time-lag Response of Aboveground Biomass Dynamic of Leymus chinensis in the Growing Season on Precipitation in Inner Mongolian Typical Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1719-1725.
[12]	WANG Yun-tao, YANG Zhi-min, LIU Jian-cheng, LI Feng, YU Lin-qing, YUAN Ting, LIANG Xiao, ZHOU Wen-xiu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of 21 Oat Varieties in Northwest of Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318.
[13]	ZHOU Qi-long, Duoji-dunzhu, Yixi-yangzong. Evaluation of Grey Relational Grade Analysis to 16 Oats Varieties Introduced in Lhasa Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 389-396.
[14]	LI Pei-pei, LI Yi, SU Shi-ping, CHONG Pei-fang, LI Zhen. Screening and Analysis of Drought Resistance Indexes for 18 Families of Reaumuria soongorica [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 412-419.
[15]	DU Hong-qi, XU Zhao-xue, FANG Wei-ping, FENG Chang-song, LOU Zhi-guo, YUAN Hua-yi. Expression Regulation of Monocopper Oxidase-like Protein SKU5 Gene and its Role in Alfalfa Fall Dormancy [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1494-1502.