Adaptability Evaluation of Different Avena sativa Varieties in Bashang,Hebei Province

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.01.014

›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 68-73.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.01.014

Previous Articles Next Articles

Adaptability Evaluation of Different Avena sativa Varieties in Bashang,Hebei Province

ZHAO Ning¹, ZHAO Xiu-fang², ZHAO Lai-xi³, RONG Yu-ping¹

1. Institute of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210008, China;
3. Grassland Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Huhhot, Inner Mon golia Autonomous Region 010010, China

Received:2007-12-12 Revised:2008-09-09 Online:2009-02-15 Published:2009-02-15

不同燕麦品种在坝上地区的适应性评价

赵宁¹, 赵秀芳², 赵来喜³, 戎郁萍¹

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院草地所, 北京, 100193;
2. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所, 南京, 210008;
3. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 呼和浩特, 010010

通讯作者: 戎郁萍,讯作者 Author for correspondence,E-mail:rongyuping@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:赵宁(1984- ),男,汉族,辽宁沈阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草地生态,E-mail:zn1033@163.com
基金资助:
国家十一五科技支撑(2006BAD16B06);国家科技基础条件平台(2006DKA21007);河北省省校合作项目资助

Abstract

Abstract: In alpine region,Avena sativa L.is a forage crop for animal and also a cereal food for human due to its high contents of protein,fat,and linoleic acid.This study evaluated the agronomic characters,forage yield characters,and seed qualities of 11 oat varieties in Bashang,Hebei Province.The results show that all the tested varieties had a good adaptability to local environment according to their agronomic characters.The principal component analysis was applied to the 10 involved characters and the contribution rate of five principal component factors reached to 92.091%.Bayou 5 was the most suitable variety in the alpine region of Bashang,Hebei Province with the highest principal component score and integrated score among all tested varieties.It had higher forage and seed yields,more tillers number per plant,and 1000-grain weight 28.4 g,and higher contents of crude protein and linoleic acid in seeds.

Key words: Avena sativa L., Adaptability, Seed quality, Evaluation

摘要： 在河北坝上地区,对11个燕麦(Avena sativa L.)品种的农艺性状、产量性状和籽实品质性状进行测定评价。结果表明:供试品种的农艺性状对当地的适应性均较好;对10个性状进行主成分分析,得出累积贡献率达到92.091%的5个主成分因子;对各品种的主成分得分和综合得分值分析表明,坝优5号燕麦综合得分最高,其产草量和种子产量高,单株分蘖数多,千粒重达28.4g,籽实的粗蛋白和亚油酸含量较高,为供试品种中最适合在坝上地区种植的燕麦品种。

关键词: 燕麦, 适应性, 籽实品质, 评价

CLC Number:

ZHAO Ning, ZHAO Xiu-fang, ZHAO Lai-xi, RONG Yu-ping. Adaptability Evaluation of Different Avena sativa Varieties in Bashang,Hebei Province[J]. , 2009, 17(1): 68-73.

赵宁, 赵秀芳, 赵来喜, 戎郁萍. 不同燕麦品种在坝上地区的适应性评价[J]. , 2009, 17(1): 68-73.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.01.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2009/V17/I1/68

References

[1] 赵秀芳,戎郁萍,赵来喜.我国燕麦种质资源的收集和评价[J]. 草业科学,2007,24(3):36-40.36-40.
[2] 黄相国,葛菊梅.燕麦(A vena sativa L.)的营养成分与保健价值探讨[J]. 麦类作物学报,2004,24(4):147-149.
[3] 王萍.燕麦脂质[J]. 粮食与油脂,1999,4:57-59.
[4] 刘军海,袭爱泳,朱向菊.燕麦脂质及其应用[J]. 粮食与油脂,2003,5:19-20.
[5] 魏决,郭玉蓉,金小培,等.燕麦油脂的理化性质研究及脂肪酸组成分析[J]. 食品科技,2006,7:204-206.
[6] 马春晖,韩建国.高寒地区种质一年生牧草及饲料作物的研究[J]. 中国草地,2007,23(2):49-54.
[7] 张耀先,周兴民,王启基.高寒牧区燕麦生产性能的初步分析[J]. 草地学报,1998,6 (2):113-122.
[8] 杨发林,胡自治.高寒牧区燕麦人工草地的营养物质产量及其光能转化率[J]. 草地学报,1991,1(1):106-111.
[9] 李淑娟,周青平,颜红波,等.4种披碱草属野生牧草在高寒地区农艺性状及生产性能的评价[J]. 草原与草坪,2007,2:34-36.
[10] 曹仲华,魏军,杨富裕,等.西藏山南地区西藏山南地区箭筈豌豆与丹麦"444"燕麦混播效应的研究[J]. 西北草业学报,2007,16(5):67-71.
[11] 马春晖,韩建国,毛培胜.一年生饲用燕麦与豌豆混种最佳刈割时期的研究[J]. 西北农业学报,2001,10(4):76-79.
[12] Owens V N,Albrecht K A,Muck R E,et al.Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J]. Crop Science,1999,39:1873-1880.
[13] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社.2003.
[14] 严梅荣.比色法测定粮食脂肪酸值的研究[J]. 粮食储藏,2007(3):43-45.
[15] 林海明,张文霖.主成分分析与因子分析的异同和SPSS软件-兼与刘玉玫、卢纹岱等同志商榷[J]. 统计研究,2005,(3):65-69.
[16] 陈四龙,李玉荣,程增书,等.花生品种(系)生物学性状的主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 花生学报,2007,36(2):28-34.
[17] 田长叶,郝志君,赵世峰,等.冀北坝上裸燕麦生产的优势[J]. 河北农业科技,2004,(9):4.
[18] 罗旭辉,应朝阳,方金梅,等.闽北22个紫花苜蓿品系引种筛选试验初报[J]. 福建畜牧兽医,2004,26(4):10-12.
[19] 朱旺生,凌明亮,左瑞华,等.皖西地区几种冷季型牧草适应性评价及营养成分比较[J]. 中国草地,2005,11(27):19-27.
[20] 蔡丽艳,宋志萍,徐静,等.18份燕麦属牧草种质材料的鉴定与评价[J]. 中国草地学报,2007,7(27)21-27.
[21] 龚海,李成雄,王雁丽.燕麦品种资源品质分析[J]. 山西农业科学,1999,27(2):16-19.
[22] 马艳明,刘志勇,白玉亭,等.新疆燕麦地方品种资源多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学,2006,43(6):510-513

Adaptability Evaluation of Different Avena sativa Varieties in Bashang,Hebei Province

不同燕麦品种在坝上地区的适应性评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Wei, LIU Yu-ling, WANG De-ping, ZHAO Min, YANG He-long, SONG Qian, XIAO Hong, WANG Kai-li, CAO Jing, RONG Yu-ping. Effects of Reseeding Leymus Chinensis (Trin.)Tzvel. and Medicago Falcata L. on Plant Community Characteristics of Degraded Meadow Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[2]	LI Man-you, MA Zhong-ren, WANG Bing, YANG Yu-qi, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LI Xiao-yun, LAN Jian. Study on the Mixed Planting Mode of Two Alfalfa Varieties in Different Row Ratios in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[3]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Adaptability Evaluation of Secale cereale ‘Gannong No.2’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 504-514.
[4]	YIN Yu-lin, MA Wen-xin, LI Ya-juan, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Study on the Cold Resistance of New Strains of Timothy Grass from the Central Part of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 625-630.
[5]	ZHANG Qi, WEI Zhen-wu, YAN Tian-fang, GENG Xiao-li. Identification and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Agronomic Traits in Oat Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 309-316.
[6]	LI Si-da, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, QIN Yan, LI Wen. Study on the Relationship Between Productive Performance and Interspecies of Mixed Grassland with Poa pratensis var.anceps Gaund. ‘Qinghai’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2827-2837.
[7]	HU Jia-yan, LIU Chang, LI Zhi-jian, ZHOU Bang-wei, BAI Jing. Comparative Study on Yield and Agronomic Traits of Different Types of Oat in Western Jilin Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2247-2257.
[8]	XIE Nan, LIU Zhen-yu, FENG Wei, ZHI Jian-fei, LI Meng, DU Zi-xuan, LIU Zhong-kuan. The Production Performance and Forage Quality of Forage Millet in Saline Alkali Dryland Around Bohai Sea [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 60-71.
[9]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Evaluations on the Adaptability of Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1626-1634.
[10]	NAN Ming, JING Fang, BIAN Fang, REN Sheng-lan, LIU Yan-ming. Comparison of Production Performance and Feed Value of Six Oat Varieties at Tao River Irrigation Middle-Area in Gansu province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.
[11]	WANG Guo-fang, ZHANG Wu-ping, ZHANG Qian, HAN Ji-wan, DONG Kuan-hu, JOHN Doonan, LUIS Mur. Comparison of Growth Characteristics of Two Varieties of White Clover under Different Light and Water Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1301-1310.
[12]	LI Jia-huan, LIU Xi-qiang, LV Jin-ying, REN Cheng, WANG Kai-li, HUANG Ding, DENG Bo, WANG Kun. Drought Resistance Evaluation of 12 Alfalfa Varieties Based on Physiological Response of Four Plant Organs [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1319-1328.
[13]	JIA Xiang, DUOJI Ge-sang, ZHAO Ai-min, ZHANG Wen-cai, QUNI Jia-cuo, LABA Zhuo-ma, PUBU Ci-reng, MIAO Yan-jun. Comprehensive Evaluation of Cold resistance of 4 Species of Gramineae at Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1372-1378.
[14]	WU Rui-xin, Li Yuan, YOU Yong-liang, LIU Gui-bo, ZHAO Hai-ming. Study on Drought Resistance Identification and Evaluation Methods of Alfalfa during Whole Growth Period [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1444-1453.
[15]	DENG Su-fang, HUANG Shui-zhen, ZHENG Xiang-li, YING Zhao-yang. Quality Evaluation of Azolla Lam. as Organic Manure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 932-939.