Research Progress of Forage Karyotype and Chromosome Banding Analyses

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.003

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 14-20.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.003

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research Progress of Forage Karyotype and Chromosome Banding Analyses

ZHENG Hui-min¹, MAO Pei-sheng¹, HUANG Ying¹, CHEN Ling-ling^1,2, YAN Hui-fang¹, CHEN Quan-zhu¹

1. Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University Beijing Key Laboratory of Grassland Science, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, Institute of Grassland Research, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024031, China

Received:2014-04-15 Revised:2014-08-23 Online:2015-02-15 Published:2015-01-31

牧草染色体核型和带型分析研究进展

郑慧敏¹, 毛培胜¹, 黄莺¹, 陈玲玲^1,2, 闫慧芳¹, 陈泉竹¹

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院草业科学系草业科学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100193;
2. 赤峰市农牧科学研究院草原研究所, 内蒙古赤峰 024031

通讯作者: 毛培胜
作者简介:郑慧敏(1991-),女,山东菏泽人,硕士研究生,研究方向为牧草种子生理与良种扩繁,E-mail:zhenghuimin5210@163.com
基金资助:
国家"十二五"科技支撑计划课题(2011BAD17B01-02)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

The karyotype and chromosome banding analyses of plants played an important role on the construction of genetic map, identification of genetic relationship, preservation of germplasm resources, exploration of evolution process, plant classification and breeding. This paper analyzed the similarities and differences between karyotype and chromosome banding researches systematically, and summarized the research progress about karyotype and chromosome banding analysis of forage plants from the aspects of sampling, pretreatment, stationary, dissociation, squash and dye. However, it is necessary for the analysis methods of karyotype and banding pattern to be further specified and standardized, and it will be the emphasis of karyotype and chromosome banding analysis on the evaluation of germplasm resources and the physiology research of seed deterioration in forage plants.

Key words: Forage, Karyotype, Chromosome banding, Research progress

摘要：

植物染色体的核型和带型分析对物种基因图谱的构建、亲缘关系的确定、种质资源的保存、进化过程的探索、植物学分类及育种等方面的研究具有重要作用.分析了植物染色体核型和带型研究的异同点,并从取材、预处理、固定、解离、制片及染色等方面系统综述了牧草核型和带型分析的研究进展.核型和带型分析方法需要进一步的规范和标准化,在种质资源评价、种子劣变生理等方面将成为牧草核型与带型分析研究的重点.

关键词: 牧草, 核型, 带型, 研究进展

CLC Number:

Q943

ZHENG Hui-min, MAO Pei-sheng, HUANG Ying, CHEN Ling-ling, YAN Hui-fang, CHEN Quan-zhu. Research Progress of Forage Karyotype and Chromosome Banding Analyses[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(1): 14-20.

郑慧敏, 毛培胜, 黄莺, 陈玲玲, 闫慧芳, 陈泉竹. 牧草染色体核型和带型分析研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(1): 14-20.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2015/V23/I1/14

References

[1] 王志锋,徐安凯,于洪柱,等. 牧草种质资源保护意义及其方法[J]. 吉林畜牧兽医,2004(8):18-20
[2] 陈立坤,杜丽霞,王岩春,等. 我国牧草种子生产现状分析及产业化发展建议[J]. 草业与畜牧,2012(10):46-49
[3] 王文强. 牧草遗传资源核心种质及其构建[J]. 热带农业科学,2010,30(1):10-14
[4] 吴甘霖. 核型分析在细胞分类学中的应用[J]. 生物学杂志,2006,23(1):39-42
[5] 窦笑菊. 核型分析方法研究及进展[J]. 安徽农学通报,2012,18(2):32-34
[6] 李波,董杨,李红,等. 冰草种子的发芽率及核型分析[J]. 种子,2011,30(7):23-25
[7] Masoud S A, Gill B S, Johnson L B. C-banding of alfalfa chromosomes: Standard karyotype and analysis of a somaclonal va-riant [J]. The Journal of Heredity,1991,82(2):335-338
[8] Bauchan G R, Campbell T A, Hossain M A. Chromosomal polymorphism as detected by C-banding patterns in Chilean alfalfa germplasm [J]. Crop Science,2002,42(4):1291-1297
[9] Mirzaghaderi G, Hassani H S, Karimzadeh G. C-banded karyotype of Thinopyrum bessarabicum and identification of its chromosomes in wheat background [J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,2010,57(3):319-324
[10] 刘利青,盛中飞,张素勤,等. 提莫菲维小麦核型分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2010(5):106-107
[11] 虢国成,向洋. 大麦和玉米染色体去壁低渗法制片及其核型分析[J]. 大麦与谷类科学,2008(2):8-11
[12] 吴士筠,吕璐,覃瑞,等. 水稻广陆矮4号与杂交水稻杂优1号染色体核型分析[J]. 中南民族大学学报:自然科学版,2006,25(1):32-35
[13] 杨起简,周禾,孙彦. 二倍体新麦草染色体核型分析[J]. 北京农学院学报,2001,16(2):1-4
[14] 黎渊珠. 加拿大披碱草×老芒麦杂种F1加倍一代株系Ⅱ花粉母细胞减数分裂行为的观察[J]. 科技信息,2013(8):279-280
[15] 王玉祥,陈述明,张博. 苜蓿根尖制片技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2013,29(9):163-166
[16] Falistocco E, Falcinelli M, Veronesi F. Karyotype and C-banding pattern of mitotic chromosomes in alfalfa, Medicago sativa L [J]. Plant Breeding,1995,114(5):451-453
[17] Bauchan G R, Hossain M A. Karyotypic analysis of C-banded chromosomes of diploid alfalfa: Medicago sativa ssp. caerulea and ssp. falcata and their hybrid[J]. Journal of Heredity,1997,88(6):533-537
[18] 杨根凤,赵传孝. 紫花苜蓿毛苕子染色体组型的研究[J]. 中国草原,1986(2):58-60,47
[19] 杨德奎,刘丽. 金色狗尾草的染色体观察[J]. 山东科学,1997,10(1):58-59
[20] 石凤敏,赵彦,云锦凤,等. 蒙古冰草有丝分裂及染色体核型分析[J]. 内蒙古农业科技,2008(6):59-60,77
[21] 邢建军,李志勇,蔡丽艳,等. 利用细胞染色体技术对苜蓿属和胡卢巴属亲缘关系的鉴定[J]. 内蒙古草业,2011,23(4):28-32
[22] 中华人民共和国国家标准. 牧草种子检验规程GB/T2930.4-2001[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2001:3-5
[23] 王六英,林小虎,易津. 不同类型苏丹草染色体数目及核型分析研究[J]. 内蒙古草业,1999(5):17-19
[24] 王琴,邰丽华,哈斯巴根,等. 披碱草属七种植物核型及其亲缘关系的研究[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报:自然科学汉文版,2013,42(2):192-200
[25] 贾纳提,维纳汗,李保军,等. 四种豆科牧草的染色体核型分析[J]. 草业科学,1996,13(4):11-13
[26] 王果平,陶锦,康喜亮,等. 阿尔冈金和WL-323两苜蓿品种染色体核型分析[J]. 江西饲料,2005(2):4-5
[27] 张凤仙,毕玉芬,王晓云. 云南野生苜蓿与引进苜蓿的核型分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报,2008,23(4):431-435
[28] 陈是宇,方程,孙彦,等. 燕麦属牧草根尖组织染色体观察方法的优化研究[J]. 草原与草坪,2008(2):23-26
[29] 祁如虎. 三种胡卢巴属植物的核型比较[J]. 中国草地,1997(4):52-54
[30] 冯霞,孙振元,刘建锋,等. 多年生黑麦草核型分析与组织培养再生植株染色体变异研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2005,18(3):321-324
[31] 张晓红. 南苜蓿和紫花苜蓿染色体的核型分析[J]. 安徽农学通报,2009,15(7):51-52
[32] 蔡联炳,冯海生. 披碱草属3个种的核型分析[J]. 西北植物学报,1997,17(2):238-241
[33] 王长山,徐香玲,张月学,等. 不同熟期苦荬菜的染色体数目及核型分析[J]. 草业科学,2006,23(4):32-35
[34] 张晓燕,毛培春,孟林,等. 毛稃偃麦草染色体核型分析[J]. 草原与草坪,2011,31(5):34-36,41
[35] 张雪婷,师尚礼,张小甫. 陇东野生紫花苜蓿的核型分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2011,12(1):150-153,157
[36] 杨青川,耿华珠. 紫花苜蓿染色体组型分析[J]. 四川草原,1992(2):60-61
[37] 智力,蔡联炳. 赖草属5个种的核型与进化[J]. 西北植物学报,2000,20(5):876-881
[38] 刘伟,张宗文,吴斌,等. 加拿大引进的二倍体燕麦种质的核型鉴定[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2013,14(1):141-145
[39] Kurata N, Omura T. Karyotype analysis in rice, Ⅰ: A new method for identifying all chromosome pairs [J]. Japanese Journal of Genetics,1978,53(2):251-254
[40] 王海波,施晓东,郭俊云. 南方紫花苜蓿及其原生质体再生植株染色体核型的对比分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2009,30(1):63-64
[41] 李瑜,蔺海明,程卫东,等. 红芪染色体数目及核型分析[J]. 科技导报,2010,28(1):40-43
[42] 丁鸿,邱东萍,陈少雄. 植物染色体标本的制备和染色体核型分析研究进展[J]. 南方农业学报,2012,43(12):1958-1962
[43] 詹秋文,高丽,张天真,等. 苏丹草与高粱染色体核型比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2006,15(2):100-106
[44] 周自玮,薛世明,奎嘉祥,等. 毛果扁蓿豆的核型分析[J]. 中国草地,2000(5):76-77,79
[45] 伊风艳,石凤翎,赵景峰, 等. 斜茎黄芪与膜荚黄芪杂交种的核型分析[J]. 种子,2011,30(7):43-44, 48
[46] 肖苏,张新全,马啸,等. 川渝地区野生鹅观草种质的核型分析[J]. 中国草地学报,2008,30(6):54-61
[47] 张晓燕,毛培春,孟林,等. 中间偃麦草和长穗偃麦草染色体核型分析[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(7):1315-1319
[48] 葛荣朝,赵宝存,沈银柱,等. 多枝赖草的C-分带与核型分析[J]. 中国草地,2004,26(3):72-74
[49] 黄莺,毛培胜,孟林,等. 中间偃麦草染色体核型及C-带带型的分析比较[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(3):378-382
[50] Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg A A. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes [J]. Hereditas,1964,52(2):201-220
[51] 李懋学,陈瑞阳. 关于植物核型分析的标准化问题[J]. 武汉植物学研究,1985,3(4):297-302
[52] Mohanty I C, Mahapatra D, Mohandy S, et al. Karyotype analyses and studies on the nuclear DNA content in 30 genotypes of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) [J]. Cell Biology International,2004(28):625-633
[53] Dimitrova D, Greilhuber J. Karyotype and DNA-content evolution in ten species of Crepis (Asteraceae) distributed in Bulgaria [J]. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,2000,132(3):281-297
[54] Stebbins G L. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants [M]. London: Edward Arnold,1971:85-104
[55] 郭玉堂,魏凌基,阎平,等. 芨芨草染色体的核型分析[J]. 石河子大学学报:自然科学版,2003,7(3):223-225
[56] 宁红梅,米福贵,李鸿雁,等. 野生黄花型扁蓿豆染色体核型分析(简报)[J]. 草地学报,2008,16(3):316-318
[57] 何小周,郭东林. 自动核型分析技术及其在植物中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学,2009,37(31):15129-15130
[58] 刘玉红. 我国11种披碱草的核型研究[J]. 植物科学学报,1985,3(4):325-330
[59] 李永干,彭启乾,马鹤林,等. 五种国产披碱草属牧草的核型分析[J]. 中国草地学报,1985(3):56-60
[60] 张素贞,闫贵兴,朱光华,等. 四种鹅观草核型分析及与披碱草属核型比较[J]. 中国草地学报,1991(4):45-48
[61] 李景环,云锦凤,都日斯哈拉,等. 加拿大披碱草与老芒麦种间杂种F₁的染色体遗传分析[J]. 农业科学与技术,2010,38(1):103-106,121
[62] Gill B S, Friebe B, Endo T R. Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum) [J]. Genome,1991,34(5):830-839
[63] 张为民. 四种紫花苜蓿的核型分析[J]. 山西农业大学学报,2006,26(1):73-76
[64] 白岚,张爱勤,方晴,等. 新疆两个苜蓿品种的核型分析[J]. 中国草地学报,2009,31(6):76-79
[65] 赵垦田,张敩方,罗丽芬. 长白落叶松种子活力与染色体核型[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1992,20(5):7-11
[66] 乔燕祥,高平平,王果萍, 等. 玉米种子老化过程中EST同工酶变化与染色体畸变的研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2003,4(2):114-118

Research Progress of Forage Karyotype and Chromosome Banding Analyses

牧草染色体核型和带型分析研究进展

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[4]	ZHANG Feng, ZHAO Tian-qi, QIAO Ji-rong, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Xin-yue, WU Jian-xin. Effects of Stubble Height on productivity and Sustainable Utilization in the Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1491-1498.
[5]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[6]	ZHANG Li-tian, LIU De-mei, LIU Bo, YANG Shi-hai, WANG Yan-long, WANG Xiao-li, MA Yu-shou. Karyotype Analysis of Pennisetum centrasiaticum in Shigatse,Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1589-1593.
[7]	SUN Hao-nan, TIAN Lin, WEN Chun-xiu, LIU Dong-yun, WANG Xin, LI Ming-yang. Karyotype Analysis of 28 Chinese Germplasms in Perilla [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1242-1248.
[8]	GUO Chao-fan, CHEN Ze-wei, ZHANG Zhi-gao. Research on Remote Sensing Estimation of Forage Above-ground Biomass Based on Optimal Model Selection [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 946-955.
[9]	NIE Cong, YANG Xiao-peng, LIU Zhe-chuan, ZHAO Yu-han, CHEN Wan-ting, HE Run-hao, LIU Wei, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Different Preceding Combination and Planting Density on Production Performance and Quality of Forage Corn [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 709-716.
[10]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Adaptability Evaluation of Secale cereale ‘Gannong No.2’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 504-514.
[11]	WANG Bin, YANG Yan-jun, DONG Xiu, LI Man-you, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LAN Jian. Effects of Reseeding Grass on Production Performance and Forage Quality of Degraded Alfalfa Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 618-624.
[12]	SU Bei-bei, ZHANG Ying, DAO Ri-na. Study on the Distribution Characteristics of Bacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil of Four Leguminous Cultivated Forages [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 250-258.
[13]	SU Bei-bei, ZHANG Ying, DAO Ri-na. Correlation Analysis between Fungal Community Characteristics and Soil Physicochemcal Factors in the Rhizosphere of Four Legumes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2670-2677.
[14]	WANG Yu-qin, SONG Mei-ling, WANG Hong-sheng, YIN Ya-li, MA Yu-shou. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Vegetation and Forage Nutritional Quality of Degraded Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2742-2751.
[15]	ZHANG Hai-juan, LU Guang-xin, FAN Yue-jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, ZHOU Xue-li, DOU Sheng-yun, YAN Hui-lin, MA Kun, ZHAO Yang-an. Effect of Different Dying Methods on the Mycorrhizal Infection Rate of Two Gramineous Forages [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2838-2844.