Responses of Alpine Meadow Plants and Their Parts to Nitrogen Addition in the Eastern Qilian Mountains

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.08.004

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 1628-1636.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.08.004

Previous Articles Next Articles

Responses of Alpine Meadow Plants and Their Parts to Nitrogen Addition in the Eastern Qilian Mountains

ZHANG Yu-qi¹, MA Yuan², Wen Tong¹, WU Yu-xin¹, XIAO Hai-long¹, ZHANG De-gang¹, CHEN Jian-gang¹

1. College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2021-04-22 Revised:2021-05-28 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-09-06

祁连山东缘高寒草甸植物及各部位对氮素添加的响应

张玉琪¹, 马源², 文铜¹, 吴玉鑫¹, 肖海龙¹, 张德罡¹, 陈建纲¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 青海大学畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016

通讯作者: 张德罡,E-mail:zhangdg@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:张玉琪(1997-),女,山西大同人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地资源与生态研究,E-mail:694052219@qq.com
基金资助:
甘肃省草原技术推广总站“草原生态状况评价技术规范研究”（034-036272）；甘肃省草原技术推广总站“中国两大草原分类系统在甘肃草原普查中的耦合研究”（034-036237）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the nitrogen absorption and allocation patterns of alpine meadow plants under different nitrogen addition treatments, the urea was applied to alpine meadow in the eastern Qilian Mountains (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 g·m^-2) to measuring the biomass of various economic groups and dominant species, as well as nitrogen contents of the whole plants and their organs under these five different nitrogen levels. The results showed that the nitrogen utilization ratio of gramineae and sedges were higher than that of legumes and forbs. The nitrogen contents of Trigonella ruthenica, Kobresia humilis and Elymus nutans was significantly correlated with the five nitrogen levels, but the correlation was weak for that of Leymus secalinus and Artemisia smithii. Along the different nitrogen treatments, the nitrogen content was decreased from plant leaf, panicle/flower and stem in sequence. Nitrogen addition had a significant effect on nitrogen content in leaf, but had no significant effect on stem and panicle/flower.

Key words: Nitrogen addition, Economic group, Dominant species, Plant nitrogen content

摘要： 为探究氮添加处理下高寒草甸草原植物的氮吸收和分配模式，本研究以祁连山东段高寒草甸草原为研究对象，分别施入0，10，20，30，40 g·m^-2的尿素，测定不同施氮水平下不同经济类群和优势种植物的生物量、整个植株及各部位氮含量等。结果表明：相比于豆科和杂类草，禾本科和莎草科植物对于氮素的利用率更为高效；施氮与扁蓿豆（Trigonella ruthenica L.）、矮生嵩草（Kobresia humilis）、垂穗披碱草（Elymus nutans）植物氮含量显著相关，与赖草（Leymus secalinus）和球花蒿（Artemisia smithii）的相关性较弱；施氮后植物叶片氮含量最高，其次是穗/花，茎的氮含量最低，且施氮对于植物叶片的氮含量有显著影响，对茎和穗/花的影响不显著。

关键词: 氮添加, 经济类群, 优势种, 植物氮含量

CLC Number:

S606.2

ZHANG Yu-qi, MA Yuan, Wen Tong, WU Yu-xin, XIAO Hai-long, ZHANG De-gang, CHEN Jian-gang. Responses of Alpine Meadow Plants and Their Parts to Nitrogen Addition in the Eastern Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1628-1636.

张玉琪, 马源, 文铜, 吴玉鑫, 肖海龙, 张德罡, 陈建纲. 祁连山东缘高寒草甸植物及各部位对氮素添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1628-1636.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.08.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2021/V29/I8/1628

References

[1] 乔江, 赵建宁, 王慧, 等. 施氮肥对草原生态系统影响的研究进展[J]. 草原与草业, 2013, 25(2):22-28
[2] 王刘杰. 高寒草甸豆科植物固氮作用及其对群落的影响[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2010:7-10
[3] 杨晓霞, 任飞, 周华坤, 等. 青藏高原高寒草甸植物群落生物量对氮、磷添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2):159-166
[4] 邓建明, 姚步青, 周华坤, 等. 水氮添加条件下高寒草甸主要植物种氮素吸收分配的同位素示踪研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2):116-124
[5] Harpole W S, Potts D L, Suding K N. Ecosystem responses to water and nitrogen amendment in a California grassland[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 13(11):2341-2348
[6] 武维华. 植物生理学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2003年第一版:213-235
[7] 曹文侠, 李文, 李小龙, 等. 施氮对高寒草甸草原植物群落和土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2015, 35(3):658-666
[8] 田永超, 曹卫星, 王绍华, 等. 不同水、氮条件下水稻不同叶位水、氮含量及光合速率的变化特征[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11):1129-1134
[9] 李诗奇, 李政, 王仙宁, 等. 植物对氮磷元素吸收利用的生理生态学过程研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(3):151-157
[10] 安慧. 子午岭林区典型植物生长的氮素调控机理[D]. 西安:西北农林科技大学, 2008:5-6
[11] 于健龙, 石红霄. 高寒草甸不同退化程度土壤微生物数量变化及影响因子[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(11):77-81
[12] 刘学敏, 罗久富, 邓东周, 等. 氮添加对不同退化程度高寒草地生态系统的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 035(12):2773-2783
[13] 马源, 李林芝, 张德罡, 等. 退化高寒草甸优势植物根际与非根际土壤养分及微生物量的分布特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4):797-804
[14] 李博. 中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(6):2-10
[15] 柳小妮, 孙九林, 张德罡, 等. 东祁连山不同退化阶段高寒草甸群落结构与植物多样性特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(4):1-11
[16] 周华坤, 赵新全, 温军, 等.黄河源区高寒草原的植被退化与土壤退化特征[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(5):1-11
[17] 卡着才让, 德科加, 徐成体. 不同施肥时间及施氮水平对高寒草甸生物量和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4):726-732
[18] 德科加. 施肥对三江源区高寒草甸初级生产力和土壤养分的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2014:58-59
[19] 董俊夫, 王淑平, 崔骁勇, 等. 增施氮肥对青藏高寒草原不同类群植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(11):2291-2299
[20] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2001:264-268
[21] 于兵, 吴克宁. 施氮对高寒草原植物生长和土壤无机氮含量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(15):214-218
[22] 熊星烁, 蔡宏宇, 李耀琪, 等. 内蒙古典型草原植物叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11):1138-1153
[23] 彭琴, 董云社, 齐玉春. 氮输入对陆地生态系统碳循环关键过程的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(8):874-883
[24] Beard J B. Turfgrass:science and culture[M]. New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, 1972:227-260
[25] 沈振西, 陈佐忠, 周兴民, 等. 高施氮量对高寒矮嵩草甸主要类群和多样性及质量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2002, 10(1):7-17
[26] 沈豪, 董世魁, 李帅, 等. 氮添加对高寒草甸植物功能群数量特征和光合作用的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5):1276-1284
[27] 李玉霖, 毛伟, 赵学勇, 等. 北方典型荒漠及荒漠化地区植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征研究[J]. 环境科学, 2010, 31(8):1716-1725
[28] Peter H, Lars H, Helga S. Nitrogen-related root variables of trees along an N-deposition gradient in Europe[J]. Tree Physiology, 1998, 18(12):823-828
[29] 王忠强, 吴良欢, 刘婷婷, 等. 供氮水平对爬山虎生物量及养分分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(8):3435-3441
[30] 陈利. 贝加尔针茅草甸草原主要植物与功能群的叶片性状对增氮增雨的响应[D]. 长春:东北师范大学, 2015:40-41
[31] Chapin Ⅲ F S, Shaver G R, Giblin A E, et al. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate[J]. Ecology, 1995, 76(3):694?711
[32] Xu X, Wanek W, Zhou C, et al. Nutrient limitation of alpine plants:Implications from leaf N:P stoichiometry and leaf δ15 N[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2014, 177(3):378-387
[33] Xu X, Ouyang H, Cao G, et al. Dominant plant species shift their nitrogen uptake patterns in response to nutrient enrichment caused by a fungal fairy in an alpine meadow[J]. Plant & Soil, 2011, 341(s1-2):495-504
[34] 马玉寿, 郎百宁, 李青云, 等. 施氮量与施氮时间对小嵩草草甸草地的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2003, 20(3):47-50
[35] Li J, Yang C, Liu X, et al. Inconsistent stoichiometry response of grasses and forbs to nitrogen and water additions in an alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 279(1):178-186
[36] Bowman W D, Gartner J R, Holland K, et al. Nitrogen Critical Loads For Alpine Vegetation And Terrestrial Ecosystem Response:Are We There Yet?[J]. Ecological Applications A Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2006, 16(3):1183-1193
[37] Scott K Gleeson, David Tilman. Allocation and the Transient Dynamics of Succession on Poor Soils[J]. Ecology, 1990, 71(3):1144-1155
[38] Zhang Z, Niu K, Liu X, et al. Linking flowering and reproductive allocation in response to nitrogen addition in an alpine meadow[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 7(3):231-239
[39] Cleland E E, Chiariello N R, Loarie S R, et al. Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006, 103(37):13740-13744
[40] Gan Y B, InekeStulen, Herman van Keulen, et al. Low concentrations of nitrate and ammonium stimulate nodulation and N 2 fixation while inhibiting specific nodulation (nodule DW g-1 root dry weight) and specific N 2 fixation (N 2 fixed g-1 root dry weight) in soybean[J]. Plant and Soil, 2004, 258(1):281-292
[41] 刘红梅, 李洁, 王丽丽, 等. 氮添加对贝加尔针茅草原植物和土壤化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7):25-35
[42] 黄菊莹, 余海龙, 王丽丽, 等. 不同氮磷比处理对甘草生长与生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3):325-336
[43] 司晓林. 氮、硅添加对高寒草甸4种代表性物种生长及叶片氮含量的影响[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2017:12-24
[44] 魏晴. 利用~(15) N同位素示踪技术研究矮嵩草草甸主要植物种氮素吸收利用对水肥添加的响应[D]. 西宁:青海师范大学, 2014:30-34
[45] You C M, Wu F Z, Gan Y M, et al. Grass and forbs respond differently to nitrogen addition:a meta-analysis of global grassland ecosystems.[J]. Scientific reports, 2017, 7(1):889-892
[46] Zhang R, Degen A.Allan, Bai Y F, et al. The forb, Ajaniatenuifolia, uses soil nitrogen efficiently, allowing it to be dominant over sedges and Graminae in extremely degraded grasslands:Implications for grassland restoration and development on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31(10):1265-1276

Responses of Alpine Meadow Plants and Their Parts to Nitrogen Addition in the Eastern Qilian Mountains

祁连山东缘高寒草甸植物及各部位对氮素添加的响应

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Bo, CHENG Jie, WANG Shu-hong, LIU Jing, YANG Xue, YAN Xin-hui, LI Wei. Effects of Nitrogen Addition and Grazing on Allometric Growth of Dominant Plant Species in Grassland in the Yunwu Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1983-1991.
[2]	SUN Yi-mei, TIAN Qing, GUO Ai-xia, ZHANG Sen-xi, LV Peng, ZUO Xiao-an. Effects of Grazing and Nitrogen Addition on Functional Traits of Dominant Species Cleistogenes squarrosa and Community in Semi-arid Sandy Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.
[3]	LI Hong-lin, HU Jing-ge, XIAO Feng, LIANG De-fei, ZHOU Hua-kun. Responses of Soil Water Content of Degraded Alpine Wetland to Growing-Season Fencing and Nitrogen Addition [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2523-2529.
[4]	LIU Yong-wan, BAI Wei, YING Peng-song, FENG Yue, ZHANG Jing-ran. Effects of Exogenous Nitrogen Addition on Soil Nutrients and Plant Community Biomass in Alpine Swamp Meadow in the Headwaters Region of the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 483-491.
[5]	YAO Xi-xi, GONG Xu-yin, ZHANG Li-ping, JIAO Ting, TAO Hai-xia, GUO Bin, ZHANG Ai-qing, WU Jian-ping. Effects of Grazing and Long-term Fencing on Nutritive Values of Dominant Species in Alpine Meadow of Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1354-1362.
[6]	YAO Xi-xi, GONG Xu-yin, ZHANG Li-ping, WANG Jian-fu, LANG Xia, WANG Cai-lian, SONG Shu-zhen, WU Jian-ping. Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Nutritive Values of Dominant Species in Alpine Meadow of Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(5): 1159-1167.
[7]	SUN Jian-ping, XUE Zhu-hui, YANG Guo-yi, ZHAO Xiang, DONG Kuan-hu. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on the Yield and Quality of Oat in Northern Shanxi [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(4): 964-970.
[8]	ZHANG Jin-ling, YU Li, ZHAO Jian-ning, LI Gang, YANG Dian-lin. Responses of Soil Inorganic Nitrogen Content to Nitrogen Addition in the Stipa baicalensis Grassland of Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(5): 958-965.
[9]	ZHANG Qian, LI Xiu-zhen, ZHANG Yun-qing, SUN Xiang-li, XU Yan, YAN Zhong-zheng. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Growth and Physiological Characters of Scirpus mariqueter in the Yangtze River Estuary [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(1): 115-121.
[10]	YOU Xu, YANG Hao. A Review of Ecological Research on Cleistogenes Squarrosa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(4): 726-730.
[11]	GUO Hong-yu, DE Ke-jia, LU Guang-xin, WANG Wei. The Impacts of Simulative Warming and Adding Nitrogen on the Grassland Productivity of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(2): 322-327.
[12]	ZHENG Wei, Jiangaerguli, TANG Gao-rong, ZHU Jin-zhong. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Competitive Ability and Productive Performance of Legume-Grass Mixture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(2): 422-425.
[13]	ZHANG Yu, HONG Mei. Response of Soil Respiration to Experimental Warming and Nitrogen Addition in Inner Mongolia Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1227-1231.
[14]	ZOU Ya-li, NIU De-cao, YANG Yi, WEN Hai-yan, FU Hua. The Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Soil Nitrogen Mineralization in the Semi-arid Typical Grassland of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(3): 461-468.