Bacteria Communities of Medicago sativa Rhizosphere Soil in Response to Composted Cow Manure

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.012

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 603-611.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.012

Bacteria Communities of Medicago sativa Rhizosphere Soil in Response to Composted Cow Manure

WANG Fang¹, LI Wei^2,3, LIU Xin¹, LI Wen-chen¹, ZHAO Jin-bo^2,3, ZHANG Zhi-hui^2,3, YANG Zhao^2,3

1. College of Life Sciences and Agroforestry, Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Resistance Gene Engineering and Protection of Biodiversity in Cold Areas, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province 161006, China;
2. Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Livestock Veterinary Branch, Qiqiha, Heilongjiang Province 161005, China;
3. Heilongjiang Engineering Technology Research Center of Forage Breeding and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province 161005, China

Received:2021-05-06 Revised:2021-06-21 Published:2022-03-30

紫花苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落对腐熟牛粪响应

王芳¹, 李伟^2,3, 刘鑫¹, 李文辰¹, 赵金波^2,3, 张智慧^2,3, 杨曌^2,3

1. 齐齐哈尔大学生命科学与农林学院, 抗性基因工程与寒地生物多样性保护黑龙江省重点实验室, 黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161006;
2. 黑龙江省农业科学院畜牧兽医分院, 黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161005;
3. 黑龙江省牧草育种与种质资源利用工程技术研究中心, 黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161005

通讯作者: 王芳,E-mail:wangfangnd@hotmail.com
作者简介:王芳(1981-),女,山东即墨人,副教授,主要从事微生物多样性研究,E-mail:wangfangnd@hotmail.com
基金资助:
财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系CARS-34；黑龙江省教育厅基本科研业务费科研项目(135309361)；黑龙江省农业科学院“农业科技创新跨越工程”专项奶牛提质增效技术研究与示范(HNK2019CX15)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to determine the effects of the application amount of composted cow manure on the community diversity and structure of crop rhizosphere soil bacteria,this study sampled potted alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) soils supplemented with 0%,3%,6%,and 9% composted cow manure for 30 d,60 d,and 90 d respectively,sequenced V3-V4 region of soil bacterial 16S rRNA using Illumina-Miseq high-throughput. The results showed that Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla in all tested samples. Addition of composted cow manure decreased the diversity and richness of soil bacteria (P<0.05),significantly increased the abundance of Firmicutes,Bacteroidetes,and Proteobacteria,as well as increased the abundance of Bacillus and Actinomadura (P<0.05). Cluster analysis showed that the abundance of bacterial genus abundance was similar between the whole soil and the whole manure samples. The addition of composted cow manure significantly affected the abundance of some dominant bacteria. The abundance of genera Lysobacter,Bacillus,Saccharomonospora,Planifilum,Cellvibrio,Steroidobacter,Devosia in the mixed samples were significantly higher than those in the non-fertilization group,the whole soil as well as the whole manure (P<0.05). The number of soil bacterial OTU decreased with supplemental proportions,but the number of soil bacterial OTU increased with the growth of alfalfa at 6% cow manure application rate and decreased continuously at 9% manure application rate.

Key words: Medicago sativa, Composted cow manure, Soil bacterial community, High-throughput sequencing

摘要： 为了探讨腐熟牛粪施用量对作物根际土壤细菌丰度、多样性及群落结构的影响，本研究以盆栽紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)为试验材料，分别添加0%，3%，6%，9%的腐熟牛粪，在添加30d，60d，90d后进行取样，利用Illumina-Miseq高通量测序平台对土壤细菌16S rRNA V3-V4区进行测序。结果表明，放线菌门(Actinobacteria)和变形菌门(Proteobacteria)是所有供试样品的优势菌门。添加牛粪降低了土壤细菌多样性和丰富度(P<0.05)，增加了土壤厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)和变形菌门的丰度，增加芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)、马杜拉放线菌属(Actinomadura)的丰度(P<0.05)。聚类分析显示，全土与全粪两个样品含有的一些细菌丰度相似。添加牛粪对一些优势菌丰度产生显著影响，其土壤中溶杆菌属(Lysobacter)、芽孢杆菌属、糖单胞菌属(Saccharomonospora)、直丝菌属(Planifilum)、纤维菌属(Cellvibrio)、Steroidobacter、德沃斯氏菌属(Devosia)的丰度显著高于未添加组、全土和全粪(P<0.05)。不同牛粪添加比例均降低土壤细菌OTU数量，但添加比例至6%牛粪的土壤细菌OTU数目随着苜蓿生长持续增加，添加至9%的土壤细菌OTU数目持续降低。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 腐熟牛粪, 土壤细菌群落, 高通量测序

CLC Number:

S154

WANG Fang, LI Wei, LIU Xin, LI Wen-chen, ZHAO Jin-bo, ZHANG Zhi-hui, YANG Zhao. Bacteria Communities of Medicago sativa Rhizosphere Soil in Response to Composted Cow Manure[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 603-611.

王芳, 李伟, 刘鑫, 李文辰, 赵金波, 张智慧, 杨曌. 紫花苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落对腐熟牛粪响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 603-611.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.012

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I3/603

References

[1] SUN R B,ZHANG X X,GUO X S,et al. Bacterial diversity in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization can be more stably maintained with the addition of livestock manure than wheat straw[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015(88):9-18
[2] FAUCI M F,DICK R P. Soil microbial dynamics:short and long-term effects of inorganic and organic nitrogen[J]. Soil Science Society of America,1994(58):801-806
[3] KENNEDY A C,SMITH K L. Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils[J]. Plant and Soil,1995(170):75-86
[4] WANG J C,SONG Y,MA T F,et al. Impacts of inorganic and organic fertilization treatments on bacterial and fungal communities in a paddy soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2017(112):42-50
[5] 郭莹,王一明,巫攀,等. 长期施用粪肥对水稻土中微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(3):593-602
[6] 周东兴,宁玉翠,徐明明,等. 蚯蚓粪对温室黑土土壤酶活性及细菌多样性的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2014,45(4):835-840
[7] 赵凤艳,张勇勇,张玥琦,等. 有机物料对设施番茄长期连作土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(6):1732-1740
[8] 邱珊莲,刘丽花,陈济琛,等. 长期不同施肥对黄泥田土壤酶活性和微生物的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2013(4):31-34
[9] SINGH J S,PANDEY V C,SINGH D P. Efficient soil microorganisms:a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2011,140(3):339-353
[10] XIONG W,JOUSSET A,GUO S,et al. Soil protist communities form a dynamic hub in the soil microbiome[J]. The ISME Journal,2018(12):634-638
[11] CHAUDRY V,REHMAN A,MISHRA A,et al. Changes in Bacterial Community Structure of Agricultural Land Due to Long-Term Organic and Chemical Amendments[J]. Microbiology Ecology,2012(64):450-460
[12] SHARMA S K,RAMESH A,SHARMA M P,et al. Microbial community structure and diversity as indicators for evaluating soil quality[M]. In:Lichtfouse,E.(Ed.),Biodiversity,Biofuels,Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture. Springer Netherlands,2011:317-358
[13] 朱瑞芬,刘杰淋,王建丽,等. 两种不同生境羊草根际土壤细菌群落多样性与环境因子的研究[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(3)：652-660
[14] 曾希柏,王亚男,王玉忠,等. 不同施肥模式对设施菜地细菌群落结构及丰度的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2013,46(1):69-79
[15] CALLAHAN B J,MCMURDIE P J,ROSEN M J,et al. Dada2:high-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data[J]. Nature Methods,2016,13(7):581-583
[16] ROGNES T,FLOURI T,NICHOLS B,et al. Vsearch:a versatile open source tool for metagenomics[J]. Peerj,2016,4(10):e2584
[17] FENG M M,ADAMS J M,FAN K K,et al. Long-tern fertilization influences community assembly processes of soil diazotrophs[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2018(126):151-158
[18] 樊晓刚,金轲,李兆君,等.不同施肥和耕作制度下土壤微生物多样性研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(3):744-751
[19] 王佩雯,朱金峰,陈征,等. 高通量测序技术下连作植烟土壤细菌群落与土壤环境因子的耦合分析[J]. 农业生物技术学报,2016,24(11):1754-1763
[20] 赵凤艳,张勇勇,张玥琦,等. 有机物料对设施番茄长期连作土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(6):1732-1740
[21] ZHANG S N,SUN L T,WANG Y,et al. Cow manure application effectively regulates the soil bacterial community in tea plantation[J]. BMC Microbiology,2020,20(1):190
[22] HAMM A C,TENUTA M,KRAUSE D O,et al. Bacterial communities of an agricultural soil amended with solid pig and dairy manures,and urea fertilizer[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2016(103):61-71
[23] WANG K,CHU C,LI X K,et al. Succession of bacterial community function in cow manure composing[J]. Bioresource Technology,2018(267):63-70
[24] ACOSTA-MARTINEZ V,DOWD S,SUN Y,et al. Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008(40):2762-2770
[25] KURAMAE E E,YERGEAU E,WONG L C,et al. Soil characteristics more strongly influence soil bacterial communities than land use type[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2012(79):12-24
[26] JANSSEN P. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2006,72(3):1719-1728
[27] 南丽丽,郭全恩,刘雪强. 荒漠灌区苜蓿后茬轮作不同作物对土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(1):25-32
[28] SMIT E,LEEFLANG P,GOMMANS S,et al. Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2001,67(5):2284-2291
[29] SAIT M,DAVIS K E R,JANSSEN P H. Effect of pH on isolation and distribution of members of subdivision 1 of the phylum Acidobacteria occurring in soil[J]. Applied and Environment Microbiology,2006,72(3):1852-1857
[30] 刘平静,肖杰,孙本华,等. 长期不同施肥措施下土细菌群落结构变化及其主要影响因素[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(2):307-315
[31] TIAN W,ZHANG Z H,HU X F,et al. Short-term changes in total heavy metal concentration and bacterial community composition after replicated and heavy application of pig manure-based compost in an organic vegetable production system[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2015,51(5):593-603
[32] SUN J,ZHANG Q,ZHOU J,et al. Pyrosequencing technology reveals the impact of different manure doses on the bacterial community in apple rhizosphere soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2014,78(6):28-36
[33] 曹彦强,闫小娟,罗红燕,等. 不同酸碱性紫色土的硝化活性及微生物群落组成[J]. 土壤学报,2018,55(1):194-202
[34] GUO Z B,WAN S X,HUA K K,et al. Fertilization regime has a greater effect on soil microbial community structure than crop rotation and growth stage in an agroecosystem[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2020(149):103510
[35] XU L X,YI M,YI H L,et al. Manure and mineral fertilization change enzyme activity and bacterial community in millet rhizosphere soils[J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2018(34):8
[36] 蒙小俊,李海波,曹宏斌,等. 焦化废水活性污泥细菌菌群结构分析[J]. 环境科学,2016,37(10):3923-3930

Bacteria Communities of Medicago sativa Rhizosphere Soil in Response to Composted Cow Manure

紫花苜蓿根际土壤细菌群落对腐熟牛粪响应

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Zhi-xuan, AO Ping-xing, BI Yu-fen, ZHAO Yan. Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence and Characteristics Analysis of Medicago sativa ‘Deqin’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 320-328.
[2]	ZHAO Yang-an, LU Guang-xin, DENG Ye, WANG Ying-cheng, MA Kun, YAN Hui-lin, ZHANG Hai-juan, ZHOU Xue-li, DOU Sheng-yun. Effect of Rhizobium Seed Dressing on Growth of Two Alfalfa and Rhizosphere Microbial Diversity [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 370-378.
[3]	WANG Ming-tao, FANG Jiang-ping, BAOSAI Hen-na, MIAO Yan-jun, WANG Xiang-tao, ZHAO Yu-hong, XIE Wen-dong, CANGMU De-ji. Effects of Continuous Utilization and Abandonment of Oat Grassland on Soil Characteristics of Alpine Grassland in Northern Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[4]	ZHENG Min-na, LIANG Xiu-zhi, HAN Zhi-shun, KANG Jia-hui, CHEN Yan-ni. Effects of Different Improvement Measures on the Diversity of Soil Bacteria Communities in Salt-alkali Soil [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1200-1209.
[5]	PAN Xin-yi, SHI Kun, GONG Pan, WEI Bao, WU Xin-ming, WANG Zan. Transcriptomic Analysis of Anthocyanin Synthesis in Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.
[6]	CHEN Cai-jin, ZHANG Shang-pei, SHI Shang-li, ZENG Yan-xia, WU Juan, SHANG Ji-hong, GAO Ting, ZHANG Rong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fertility and Stability of Alfalfa Varieties Based on GGE-biplot [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 912-918.
[7]	WU Jia-long, WEI Zhen-wu, Omer Idris Olom. Improvement Effect of Agronomic Traits in the BC₂ Population of Multifoliate Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 488-494.
[8]	SU Bei-bei, ZHANG Ying, DAO Ri-na. Study on the Distribution Characteristics of Bacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil of Four Leguminous Cultivated Forages [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 250-258.
[9]	ZHANG Jie-xue, WANG Zhan-qing, QUAN Xiao-long, LIANG Jun, SHI Hui-lan, CHEN Meng-ci, QIAO You-ming. Responses of Soil Microbial Communities of Sown Perennial Grassland in Alpine Region to Different Sowing Ways and Growth Years [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 270-280.
[10]	SU Bei-bei, ZHANG Ying, DAO Ri-na. Correlation Analysis between Fungal Community Characteristics and Soil Physicochemcal Factors in the Rhizosphere of Four Legumes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2670-2677.
[11]	LIU Chong-yi, JIN Xu-mei, WANG Ying-ying, LI Teng-fei, CHEN Xin-yi, CAO Xin-yue, LONG Ming-xiu, HE Shu-bin. Response of Soil Characteristics and Bacterial Communities to Cover Crops in Organic Kiwifruit Orchard in Guanzhong Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2711-2720.
[12]	YAO Ze-ying, LI Jun, SONG Lian-zhao, LIU Chun-yang, YAO Ze-jun, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Effect of Cross Sowing of Elymus nutans and Medicago sativa in Different Periods [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1454-1459.
[13]	ZHAO Jiao-yang, LI Xiao-yan, ZHU Hui-sen, ZHANG Shi-min, ZHANG Yan. Seed Germination and Plant Regeneration System Optimization of Medicago sativa ‘Pianguan’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 947-955.
[14]	WEI Zhao-jun, NIU Bing-jie, WANG Yong-xin, ZHAO Xiang, ZHU Hui-sen, GUO Xiu-ping, QIAO Dong. Effect of Methyl Jasmonate on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Medicago sativa ‘Pianguan’ under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 998-1005.
[15]	JIA Hui-li, WANG Xue-min, GAO Tao, SHI Yong-hong, WANG Yun-qi, WU Xin-ming, LIU Jian-ning, FANG Zhi-hong, DONG Kuan-hu. Characterization of the Salt Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsis Thaliana Overexpression of MsLEA4-4 from Medicago Sativa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 597-605.