Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Phosphorus Tolerance and Screening of Representative Evaluation Indexes at Sorghum Seedling

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.019

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 179-187.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.019

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Phosphorus Tolerance and Screening of Representative Evaluation Indexes at Sorghum Seedling

ZHANG Jing-long^1,2, SHEN Yi-xin¹, LIU Xin-bao¹, CHI Ying-jun¹

1. The College of Agro-grassland Science of Nanjing Agrucultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210095, China;
2. Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650500, China

Received:2023-08-01 Revised:2023-09-12 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-30

高粱苗期耐低磷能力的综合评价及代表性评价指标筛选

张景龙^1,2, 沈益新¹, 刘信宝¹, 迟英俊¹

1. 南京农业大学草业学院, 江苏南京 210095;
2. 云南师范大学, 云南昆明 650500

通讯作者: 迟英俊,E-mail:yingjunchi@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:张景龙(1988-),女,汉族,河南开封人,博士研究生,主要从事植物响应低磷胁迫的生理与分子机制研究,E-mail:zhangjinglong@ynnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费（KYYJ2022005、XUEKEN2022020）；云南省基础研究计划项目（202301AU070161）；博士科研启动项目（2021ZB008）资助

Abstract

Abstract: The uneven distribution of phosphorus resources in China leads to the lack of available phosphorus content in large areas of soil, which limits the growth and yield of crops. Sorghum is an important crop for both food and feed, and the breeding of new sorghum varieties with low phosphorus tolerance has a significant impact on the world food security and the development of animal husbandry. In this study, 29 sorghum varieties were evaluated in the two-year pot experiment. Agronomic characters, biomass and phosphorus efficiency correlation indexes of sorghum accessions were measured, and then the low-P tolerance coefficients of them were calculated. The correlation analysis results showed that there was information overlap in the individual indexes used to evaluate sorghum low phosphorus tolerance. Therefore, the low-P tolerance of sorghum accessions was comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis, which transformed 11 indexes at seedling stage into 3 independent comprehensive indexes. Based on the membership function value of the comprehensive indexes, we calculated the comprehensive evaluation value of low phosphorus tolerance, and identified the low phosphorus tolerance variety ‘Tianxuan7’ and low phosphorus sensitivity variety ‘Sanxiatiangaoliag02’. Finally, according to the correlation analysis results between various individual indexes and the comprehensive evaluation value, the total fresh weight of shoot was selected as a representative index to assess the low phosphorus tolerance of sorghum.

Key words: Sorghum, Low phosphorus tolerance, Comprehensive evaluation, Representative indexes

摘要： 我国磷资源分布极不均匀，导致大面积土壤有效磷含量不足，限制了农作物的生长及产量。高粱（Sorghum bicolor）是重要的粮饲兼用作物，选育耐低磷高粱品种对保障粮食安全以及农区畜牧业的稳定发展都具有重要意义。本研究以29份高粱品种为试验材料，通过两年盆栽试验，测定高粱的农艺性状、生物量及磷吸收利用等相关指标，计算各个指标的低磷耐性系数。相关性分析结果表明，测定的各单项指标的耐低磷系数反映的信息存在一定程度的重叠。因此，本研究利用主成分分析法计算综合低磷耐性指数，综合评价高粱的低磷耐性，将苗期的11个指标转化为3个独立的综合指标；根据综合指标隶属函数关系，计算出各个品种的综合低磷耐性评价值，鉴定出低磷耐性品种'甜选7'和低磷敏感性品种'三峡甜高粱02'；根据各单项指标与综合低磷耐性评价值的相关性分析结果，结合实际操作的可行性与简便性，选定地上部总鲜重作为判断高粱低磷耐性的代表性指标。

关键词: 高粱, 低磷耐性, 综合评价, 代表性指标。

CLC Number:

Q945.78

ZHANG Jing-long, SHEN Yi-xin, LIU Xin-bao, CHI Ying-jun. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Phosphorus Tolerance and Screening of Representative Evaluation Indexes at Sorghum Seedling[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 179-187.

张景龙, 沈益新, 刘信宝, 迟英俊. 高粱苗期耐低磷能力的综合评价及代表性评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 179-187.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.019

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I1/179

References

[1] SHARPLEY A N, SMITH S J. Fractionation of inorganic and organic phosphorus in virgin and cultivated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1985, 49(1):127-130
[2] JUNGK A, SEELING B, GERKE J. Mobilization of different phosphate fractions in the rhizosphere[M]//Plant Nutrition-from Genetic Engineering to Field Practice. Springer, Dordrecht, 1993:95-98
[3] BIELESKI R L. Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability[J]. Annual review of Plant Physiology, 1973, 24(1):225-252
[4] SCHACHTMAN D P, REID R J, AYLING S M. Phosphorus uptake by plants:from soil to cell[J]. Plant Physiology, 1998, 116(2):447-453
[5] HINSINGER P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes:a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2001, 237(2):173-195
[6] KOCHIAN L V. Plant nutrition:rooting for more phosphorus[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7412):466-467
[7] 李维, 高辉, 罗英杰, 等. 国内外磷矿资源利用现状, 趋势分析及对策建议[J]. 中国矿业, 2015, 24(6):6-10
[8] GODFRAY H C J, BEDDINGTON J R, CRUTE I R, et al. Food security:the challenge of feeding 9 billion people[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5967):812-818
[9] LYNCH J P. Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition:tools for future crops[J]. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156(3):1041-1049
[10] SANCHEZ P A. Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics[J]. Soil Science, 1977, 124(3):187-187
[11] WITHERS P J A, EDWARDS A C, FOY R H. Phosphorus cycling in UK agriculture and implications for phosphorus loss from soil[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2001, 17(3):139-149
[12] 陈洁, 南丽丽, 汪堃, 等.低磷胁迫对红豆草光合、叶绿素荧光及内源激素的影响[J].草地学报, 2023, 31(1):112-119
[13] LYNCH J P, BROWN K M. Topsoil foraging-an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability[J]. Plant and Soil, 2001, 237(2):225-237
[14] LYNCH J P, BROWN K M. New roots for agriculture:exploiting the root phenome[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2012, 367(1595):1598-1604
[15] MUDGE S R, RAE A L, DIATLOFF E, et al. Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the Pht1 family of phosphate transporters in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Journal, 2002, 31(3):341-353
[16] PASZKOWSKI U, KROKEN S, ROUX C, et al. Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99(20):13324-13329
[17] RAUSCH C, BUCHER M. Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants[J]. Planta, 2002, 216(1):23-37
[18] HUANG C Y, SHIRLEY N, GENC Y, et al. Phosphate utilization efficiency correlates with expression of low-affinity phosphate transporters and noncoding RNA, IPS1, in barley[J]. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156(3):1217-1229
[19] ZHANG H W, HUANG Y, YE X S, et al. Genotypic variation in phosphorus acquisition from sparingly soluble P sources is related to root morphology and root exudates in Brassica napus[J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2011, 54(12):1134-1142
[20] LEISER W L, RATTUNDE H F W, WELTZIEN E, et al. Phosphorus uptake and use efficiency of diverse West and Central African sorghum genotypes under field conditions in Mali[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 377(1-2):383-394
[21] SHENOY V V, KALAGUDI G M. Enhancing plant phosphorus use efficiency for sustainable cropping[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2005, 23(7-8):501-513
[22] FAGERIA N K, BALIGAR V C, LI Y C. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2008, 31(6):1121-1157
[23] HUFNAGEL B, DE SOUSA S M, ASSIS L, et al. Duplicate and conquer:multiple homologs of Phosphorus-starvation tolerance1 enhance phosphorus acquisition and sorghum performance on low-phosphorus soils[J]. Plant Physiology, 2014, 166(2):659-677
[24] WANG Q, WANG J, YANG Y, et al. A genome-wide expression profile analysis reveals active genes and pathways coping with phosphate starvation in soybean[J]. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17(192):1-11
[25] DOUMBIA M D, HOSSNER L R, ONKEN A B. Variable sorghum growth in acid soils of subhumid West Africa[J]. Arid Land Research and Management, 1993, 7(4):335-346
[26] DOUMBIA M D, HOSSNER L R, ONKEN A B.Sorghum growth in acid soils of West Africa:variations in soil chemical properties[J]. Arid Land Research and Management, 1998, 12(2):179-190
[27] ZERBINI E, THOMAS D. Opportunities for improvement of nutritive value in sorghum and pearl millet residues in South Asia through genetic enhancement[J]. Field Crops Research, 2003, 84(1-2):3-15
[28] 罗峰, 李子芳, 高建明, 等. 氮磷钾肥对甜高梁含糖量和子粒产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(22):5459-5462
[29] QUEIROZ O C M, ADESOGAN A T, ARRIOLA K G, et al. Effect of a dual-purpose inoculant on the quality and nutrient losses from corn silage produced in farm-scale silos[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 95(6):3354-3362
[30] 马建华, 王玉国, 孙毅, 等. 低磷胁迫对不同品种高粱苗期形态及生理指标的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(5):1083-1091
[31] 刘鹏, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 不同基因型高粱的磷效率和磷素转运特性研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(3):344-349
[32] ZHANG J, JIANG F, SHEN Y, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals candidate genes related to phosphorus starvation tolerance in sorghum[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(306):1-18
[33] 郑金凤, 米少艳, 婧姣姣, 等. 小麦代换系耐低磷生理性状的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(10):1984-1993
[34] 潘新雅,李军保,陈阳,等. 6个紫花苜蓿品种根系形态结构对低磷胁迫的响应[J].草地学报,2021,29(11):2494-2504
[35] 马帅国,田蓉蓉,胡慧,等. 粳稻种质资源苗期耐盐性综合评价与筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报,2020,21(5):1089-1101
[36] 武兆云, 郭娜, 赵晋铭, 等. 大豆苗期耐低磷主成分及隶属函数分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(1):42-46
[37] 王军, 周美学, 许如根, 等. 大麦耐湿性鉴定指标和评价方法研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(10):2145-2152
[38] 白志英, 李存东, 孙红春, 等. 小麦代换系抗旱性生理指标的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(12):4264-4272
[39] 朱宗河, 郑文寅, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜耐旱相关性状的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(9):1775-1787

Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Phosphorus Tolerance and Screening of Representative Evaluation Indexes at Sorghum Seedling

高粱苗期耐低磷能力的综合评价及代表性评价指标筛选

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHOU Li, FU Wei, QING Tao-ying, MENG Jun-jiang, GUI Yong-qing, REN Jian-hua, HAN Yong-fen, DING Lei-lei. Effects of Fertilizer Application on the Yield,Forage Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense with Dolichos lablab Intercropping System [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1754-1761.
[2]	WANG Yi-bo, CHEN Yi-tong, LIU Xin-di, GUO Yong-zhen, SUN Juan, ZHANG Hui, LI Yuan-yuan, GUO Shan-li. Study on Adaptability of Forage Chenopodium quinoa in Saline-alkali Land of Yellow River Delta [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1810-1817.
[3]	CHEN Chao-chao, LI He-yang, YAN Yu-xin, SONG Qing, HUANG You, REZIYA·Aili, ZHANG Tie-jun. Evaluation on the Resistance of 20 Germplasms of Medicago sativa to Verticillium Wilt [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1425-1434.
[4]	WU Rui-xin, SHI Xia, JIA Wen-juan, YOU Yong-liang, ZHAO Hai-ming, LI Yuan. Research on Double Cropping Pattern of the Forage Triticale and Brown Midrib Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense in North China Plain [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1571-1577.
[5]	LI Jing, NAN Ming, LIU Yan-ming, ZHANG Cheng-jun, REN Sheng-lan, BIAN Fang. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Yield,Quality and Feeding Performance on Different Oat Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098.
[6]	HONG Sen-rong, LIN Shun-lai, LI Ying-ping, LI Yun-yun, LI He-yue, ZHANG Qing-bao. Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence Characteristics and Its Code Usage Bias of Sorghum bicolor [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3636-3650.
[7]	ZHU Kun, LIU Hua-jun, FENG Cheng-long, LI Bo, LIU Xin-yu, MA Hao-ran. Comprehensive Evaluation on the Salt Tolerance of Seed Germination of Different Alfalfa Varieties under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3724-3733.
[8]	ZHANG Xiao-juan, CHEN Cai-jin, ZHANG Jiu-pan, ZENG Yan-xia, Bao Ming-fang, ZHANG Shang-pei, SHANG Ji-hong, SHA Xiao-di, WU Juan, ZHANG Guo-hui, GAO Ting, YANG Tian-hui, WANG Chuan, SHI Shang-li. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic and Yield Traits of 55 Alfalfa Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(11): 3453-3461.
[9]	TANG Fang, HOU Rui-hong, DU Ke, GAO Jia-he, HUANG Wei-ye, SHI Feng-ling. Study on Seed Features and Germination Characteristics of Wild Medicago ruthenica L. from Different Provenances [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 2992-2999.
[10]	HUANG Juan, ZHOU Yu, ZHANG Ya-qin, LI Ze-bi, WANG Qiu-yue, XI Jiang, WU Xiu-lin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Cadmium Tolerance and Enrichment Ability of Sweet Sorghum at Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3040-3049.
[11]	ZHANG Zhao, JIN Qi-fan, SHI Yan-xin, DUAN Xiao-tong, YAN Hui-fang. Comprehensive Evaluation on Low Temperature Tolerance of Different Varieties of Alfalfa Seeds during Germination [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3050-3057.
[12]	WANG Qi-yu, LIU Huan, RENZENG Wang-dui, WANG Jing-long, LUO Jian-min, HUANG Ying, Dong Kai. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Artemisia wellbyi Germplasm at the Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 148-156.
[13]	XIE Wen-hui, ZHAO Wen-wu, WANG Lei-ting, ZHAO Li-li, WANG Pu-chang. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 22 Lotus corniculatus Germplasm Resources Based on Phenotypic Quantitative Traits [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 173-179.
[14]	NI Wang, LIANG Dan-ni, SHI Xing-wei, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, LI Man-you, FENG Qin, LAN Jian. Effects of Irrigation Frequency and Fertilizer Application Rate on Production Performance and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 294-301.
[15]	YU Ru-gang, WANG Xue-jia, WANG Guo-liang, XU Zhi-ming, GAO Qing-qing, DU Xue-ling, ZHANG Yu-long. Analysis of Salinity-Tolerance and Screening Evaluation Indicators to Salinity-Tolerance in Medicago Sativa Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1781-1789.