Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wild Elymus nutans Griseb.

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.07.017

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 2158-2168.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.07.017

Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wild Elymus nutans Griseb.

LUO Xin^1,3, YAN Li-jun¹, LI Da-xu¹, YOU Ming-hong¹, ZHANG Jian-bo¹, JI Xiao-fei¹, LEI Xiong¹, BAI Shi-qie², CHANG Dan¹

1. Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611731, China;
2. Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan Province 621010, China;
3. Changting county Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Changting, Fujian Province 366399, China

Received:2023-12-20 Revised:2024-02-21 Published:2024-08-03

野生垂穗披碱草种质资源抗旱性筛选与评价

罗鑫^1,3, 闫利军¹, 李达旭¹, 游明鸿¹, 张建波¹, 季晓菲¹, 雷雄¹, 白史且², 常丹¹

1. 四川省草原科学研究院, 四川成都 611731;
2. 西南科技大学, 四川绵阳 621010;
3. 长汀县农业农村局, 福建长汀 366399

通讯作者: 白史且，E-mail:baishiqie@126.com；常丹，E-mail:changdancd@163.com
作者简介:罗鑫(1999-)，女，汉族，福建连城人，硕士研究生，E-mail:1578004280@qq.com
基金资助:
国家林业和草原局应急科技揭榜挂帅项目“草种优良品种选育”(20220102);国家牧草产业技术体系阿坝综合试验站(CARS-34);四川省“十四五”饲草育种攻关项目(2021YFYZ0013-2)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the response of seedling stage of Elymus nutans Griseb. to drought stress and screen out drought-tolerant materials,the germplasm materials of 9 wild plants from different habitats (Inner Mongolia,Gansu,Sichuan and other regions) were selected as the research objects. The seedlings of Elymus nutans Griseb. were treated with natural drought for 35 days. By analyzing the changes of morphological and physiological indexes of seedling leaves,the drought resistance of 9 plants was evaluated by membership function method and cluster analysis. The results showed that the phenotypes and physiological characteristics of 9 plants were affected at different degrees under drought stress,including the decrease of chlorophyll content and maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) in leaves,the increase of cell membrane permeability,antioxidant enzyme activity,and the accumulation of osmoregulatory substances. The order of the drought resistance of 9 materials was:NM037>XJ027>HB013>XZ010>GS007>QH011>GS005>SC021>SC020. The results showed that NM037 better adapted to drought stress,and showed stronger drought-resistant ability. It could be used as a reference object for breeding drought-resistant,and provide basis for improving the productivity and ecological restoration of artificial grassland.

Key words: Elymus nutans Griseb., Drought stress, Rewater, Drought resistance

摘要： 为探究垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans Griseb.)苗期对干旱胁迫的响应，筛选出耐旱材料，本试验选取内蒙、甘肃、四川等不同地区不同生境来源的9份野生垂穗披碱草种质材料为研究对象，采用自然干旱法对垂穗披碱草幼苗进行为期35 d的干旱复水处理。通过分析幼苗叶片的形态表型和生理指标的含量变化，采用隶属函数法和聚类分析综合评价了9份垂穗披碱草的抗旱性。研究发现：在干旱胁迫下，9份垂穗披碱草的植株表型和生理特性均受到不同程度的影响，表现为叶片相对含水量、叶绿素含量和最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)下降，细胞膜透性和抗氧化酶活性升高以及渗透调节物质的积累。9份垂穗披碱草的抗旱性强弱顺序依次为NM037>XJ027>HB013>XZ010>GS007>QH011>GS005>SC021>SC020。本研究表明，材料NM037能更好地适应干旱胁迫的处理，表现出更强的抗旱能力,可作为抗旱型垂穗披碱草育种的参考对象，这为人工草地建植、草地生产力的提高和生态修复提供依据。

关键词: 垂穗披碱草, 干旱胁迫, 复水, 抗旱性

CLC Number:

Q945.78

LUO Xin, YAN Li-jun, LI Da-xu, YOU Ming-hong, ZHANG Jian-bo, JI Xiao-fei, LEI Xiong, BAI Shi-qie, CHANG Dan. Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wild Elymus nutans Griseb.[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2158-2168.

罗鑫, 闫利军, 李达旭, 游明鸿, 张建波, 季晓菲, 雷雄, 白史且, 常丹. 野生垂穗披碱草种质资源抗旱性筛选与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2158-2168.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.07.017

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I7/2158

References

[1] FATHI A,TARI D B. Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants[J]. International Journal of Life Sciences,2016,10(1):1-6
[2] ZANDALINAS S I, MITTLER R, BALFAGON D, et al. Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2018, 162(1): 1-12
[3] 曲涛,南志标.作物和牧草对干旱胁迫的响应及机理研究进展[J].草业学报,2008(2):126-135
[4] ABID M, ALI S, LEI K Q, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):4615
[5] 张建波,白史且,张新全,等.川西北高原12个垂穗披碱草居群的核型研究[J].西北植物学报,2008(5):946-955
[6] 袁春光.青藏高原野生优质牧草--垂穗披碱草[J].草业与畜牧,2006(10):62
[7] 卢宝荣.披碱草属与大麦属系统关系的研究[J].植物分类学报,1997,35(3):193-207
[8] 张静,王沛,王平,等.15份垂穗披碱草种质资源苗期抗旱性比较[J].草原与草坪,2020,40(2):1-8
[9] 顾锡羚,万志强.紫花苜蓿和垂穗披碱草功能性状对水分的响应研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,50(1):53-58
[10] 王传旗,刘文辉,张永超,等.野生垂穗披碱草成苗期间的耐旱性研究[J].草业学报,2021,30(9):76-85
[11] 王怡丹.聚乙二醇6000模拟水分胁迫下蒙古冰草、扁穗冰草和滨麦抗旱性研究[D].延吉:延边大学,2008：13-14
[12] 王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2015：20-23
[13] 盛业龙,王莎莎,许美玲,等.应用隶属函数法综合评价不同烤烟品种苗期抗旱性[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(10):1751-1758
[14] 侯瑞虹,杜柯,黄伟业,等.10份不同种源野生花苜蓿材料种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J].草地学报,2024,32(2):489-494
[15] 岳丽,山其米克,王卉,等.新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J].草地学报,2024,32(2):553-561
[16] 高悦,朱永铸,杨志民,等.干旱胁迫和复水对冰草相关抗性生理指标的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):336-341
[17] XU J Q,JIN J J,ZHAO H,et al.Drought stress tolerance analysis of Populus ussuriensis clones with different ploidies[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2019,30(4):1267-1275
[18] 闫天芳,苗彦军,王向涛,等.干旱胁迫对西藏4份野生披碱草属牧草幼苗生理指标的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(6):1333-1339
[19] 刘勇,张永超,魏小星,等.18种披碱草属种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2016,46(6):16-23
[20] 郑敏娜,李向林,万里强,等.四种暖季型禾草对水分胁迫的生理响应[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(9):114-119
[21] 常丹,张建波,鄢家俊,等.斑茅抗旱种质资源筛选与评价[J].草学,2019(6):26-38
[22] 刘世鹏,刘济明,陈宗礼,等.模拟干旱胁迫对枣树幼苗的抗氧化系统和渗透调节的影响[J].西北植物学报,2006(9):1781-1787
[23] 李洁.植物干旱胁迫适应机制研究进展[J].广东农业科学,2014,41(19):154-159
[24] 刘新,符开欣,郭志慧,等.6份川西北短芒披碱草种质苗期的抗旱性综合评价[J].草业科学,2017,34(1):101-111
[25] 周晶,王传旗,包赛很那,等.西藏野生垂穗披碱草对温度和水分的生理响应[J].种子,2019,38(8):65-69
[26] 吴敏,张文辉,周建云,等.干旱胁迫对栓皮栎幼苗细根的生长与生理生化指标的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(15):4223-4233
[27] 王娟,李德全.逆境条件下植物体内渗透调节物质的积累与活性氧代谢[J].植物学通报,2001(4):459-465
[28] MANIVANNAN P, JALEEL C A, SOMASUNDARAM R, et al. Osmoregulation and antioxidant metabolism in drought-stressed Helianthus annuus under triadimefon drenching[J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2008, 331(6):418-425
[29] 郭郁频,米福贵,闫利军,等.不同早熟禾品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J].草业学报,2014,23(4):220-228
[30] 车轩,梁宗锁,吴珍.2种豆科牧草对干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J].草业科学,2010,27(11):89-94
[31] 吉增宝,王进鑫,李继文,等.不同季节干旱及复水对刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量的影响[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(7):1358-1363
[32] 井春喜,张怀刚,师生波,等.土壤水分胁迫对不同耐旱性春小麦品种叶片色素含量的影响[J].西北植物学报,2003(5):811-814
[33] 张小娇,祁娟,曹文侠,等.干旱胁迫对垂穗披碱草苗期抗旱生理特性的影响[J].草原与草坪,2014,34(5):55-59
[34] 刘金龙,王莹,许爱云,等.干旱胁迫下5种禾本科牧草幼苗期的生理特性[J].草业科学,2018,35(5):1106-1115
[35] 韩福松,余成群,付刚,等.低温和干旱胁迫下牧草的抗逆性机制[J].草地学报,2022,30(11):2856-2864
[36] 戴海根,董文科,柴澍杰,等.模拟干旱胁迫下鹰嘴紫云英幼苗生长及生理特性[J].中国草地学报,2021,43(10):63-75
[37] 王晓龙,米福贵,郭跃武,等.干旱胁迫对不同禾本科牧草叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].草原与草业,2014,26(3):45-51
[38] 于思敏,罗永忠,康芳明,等.干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿生长和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].草地学报,2023,31(6):1762-1771
[39] 刘文瑜,何斌,杨发荣,等.不同品种藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫和复水的生理响应[J].草业科学,2019,36(10):2656-2666
[40] 龚容,徐霞,田晓宇,等.三种锦鸡儿属植物水力结构特征及其干旱适应策略[J].生态学报,2018,38(14):4984-4993
[41] 贾海娟,李毅,杨彩红,等.6个种源红砂幼苗主要水分参数与抗旱性研究[J].干旱区资源与境,2016,30(8):182-187
[42] 王平,王沛,孙万斌,等.8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价[J].草地学报,2020,28(2):397-404
[43] 陈爱萍,隋晓青,王玉祥,等.干旱胁迫及复水对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].草地学报,2020,28(5):1216-1225

Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wild Elymus nutans Griseb.

野生垂穗披碱草种质资源抗旱性筛选与评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Tian-guo, YI Lan, GU Xin-ying, WANG Si-qi, ZHANG Shuang. Analysis of the Physiological Mechanism of Drought Alleviation of Alfalfa Seedlings by Exogenous Spermidin [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2099-2105.
[2]	YU Yuan-ping, JIANG Yu-jia, SUN Xiang-yi, WU Chun-yan, ZHOU Min, LIU Ming-xi. Identification of the WRKY Family Genes and thier Expression Analysis in Response to Drought Stress in Centipedegrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1378-1391.
[3]	LI Ming-yi, WANG Ran, JIA Hao-ji, GENG Qi-ming, GUO Shi-wei, WANG Fu-hao, LIU Li-ming, DONG Wen-hao, XU Wen-nian. Effects of Brassinosteroid on Plant-soil Stoichiometric Characteristics and Homeostasis under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1068-1077.
[4]	ZHAO Yao-yao, LIU Mei-jun, ZHANG Zheng, WANG Jie, WANG Yu-xiang, AN Chang-qi, WANG Tiao-xia. Effects of Low Temperature and Drought Stress on Photosystem II of Alfalfa Leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1120-1130.
[5]	ZHAI Yong-qing, MA Yan-hong, FAN Bo-bo, FANG Yong-yu, ZHANG Xue-feng, YU Zhuo, LI Kun, WU Jing, YAN Xiu-xiu, ZHAO Yan. Bioinformatics Identification and Expression Analysis of Dehydratin Genes in Agropyron mongolicum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 684-692.
[6]	LI Shuang, HUANG Juan-juan, PEI Xiang-jun, ZHOU Li-hong, CHEN Zheng-feng, HU You-bang, ZHAO Chun-zhang. Effects of Double Polymer Materials on Growth of Lolium perenne Seedling under Different Water Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 793-803.
[7]	HOU Rui-hong, DU Ke, HUANG Wei-ye, GAO Jia-he, LIU Ya-ling, SHI Feng-ling, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, TANG Fang. Evaluation on Drought Resistance of 10 Wild Medicago ruthenica L. Materials from Different Provenances at Germination Period [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 489-494.
[8]	YUE Li, SHAN Qi-mike, WANG Hui, Zaituniguli·Kuerban, MAO Hong-yan, LIU Min. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Sorghum Germplasm Resources during Germination in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 553-561.
[9]	SONG Xue, FU Chu-han, LI Jia-hong, SUN Xue-tong, WEI Yin-zhu, XIAO Hui-chuan, LI Wei-yao, QIN Li-gang. Research Progress on Molecular Mechanism of Endophytes Improving the Drought Resistance and Salt Tolerance of Plant [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 13-24.
[10]	HAN Zhe, ZHANG Yong-qiang, ZHANG Hao-hao, LUO Wen-hao, CHEN Ai-ping. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Leaf Anatomical Structure of Seriphidium transiliense seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 105-112.
[11]	WU Ling-ling, XIE Yong-li, YANG Jie, YANG Xue, LI Jun-xi, WANG Tian, GAO Ying, CHANG Fei-fei. Biological Activity of Bacillus WL520 and Its Growth-promoting Effect on Alfalfa under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 322-330.
[12]	JIANG Yu-Jia, YU Yuan-Ping, SUN Xiang-Yi, ZHOU Min, WU Chun-Yan, LI Yu-Hua, LIU Ming-Xi. Identification of R2R3-MYB Gene Family and Analysis of its Expression Pattern in Centipedegrass under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2628-2641.
[13]	FENG Shu-lin, ZHOU Ting, WANG Jun-li. Responses Characteristics of Leaf Water Potential in Different Growth Stages of Lespedeza bicolor Seedlings to Drought Stress and Rewatering [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2077-2085.
[14]	YU Si-min, LUO Yong-zhong, KANG Fang-ming, QIU Ying-de, LI Zhuan-tao. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Medicago sativa L. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1762-1771.
[15]	CEN Hui-fang, QIAN Wen-wu, ZHU Hui-sen, XIA Fang-shan, DU Li-xia, XU Tao. Effects of Drought Stress on Leaf Microstructure and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Poa pratensis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1368-1377.