Effects of Double Polymer Materials on Growth of Lolium perenne Seedling under Different Water Stress

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.03.015

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 793-803.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.03.015

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Double Polymer Materials on Growth of Lolium perenne Seedling under Different Water Stress

LI Shuang¹, HUANG Juan-juan¹, PEI Xiang-jun¹, ZHOU Li-hong¹, CHEN Zheng-feng², HU You-bang¹, ZHAO Chun-zhang¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, College of Ecological Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610059, China;
2. China Southwest Geotechnical Investigation & Design Institute Co., Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610052, China

Received:2023-09-06 Revised:2023-11-27 Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-04-03

双聚材料对干旱条件下多年生黑麦草幼苗生长的影响

李霜¹, 黄娟娟¹, 裴向军¹, 周立宏¹, 陈正峰², 胡友邦¹, 赵春章¹

1. 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室, 成都理工大学生态环境学院, 四川成都 610059;
2. 中国建筑西南勘察设计研究院有限公司, 四川成都 610052

通讯作者: 赵春章,E-mail:zhaochzh04@126.com
作者简介:李霜(1997-)，男，汉族，四川泸州人，硕士研究生，主要从事地下水埋深对植物的影响研究，E-mail：1520893216@qq.com
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(No.XDA26010102);国家自然基金(32271688)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Drought is the key environmental factor limiting plant growth in engineering wounds. Double polymers (SJ) are widely used to solidify engineering slope soil,enhance soil nutrient retention ability,and accelerate the vegetation restoration in engineering disturbance area. However,there are few studies focused on the effects of SJ on plant growth under different drought conditions,which greatly limits the application of SJ. In this study, Lolium perenne was taken as the material,and a pot experiment was conducted to explore the effects of three moisture gradients:controls (70% field capacity),moderate drought (40%),severe drought (20%),and two SJ treatments (add SJ and without SJ) on plant growth. The results revealed that the survival rate of L. perenne was increased by the addition of SJ,particularly under severe drought condition. Drought also reduced plant chlorophyll and water contents,but increased the contents of·O^2-,H₂O₂,and MDA. However,SJ significantly stimulated root growth and fresh biomass accumulation,increased the levels of chlorophyll,proline,and the activities of SOD,POD and CAT across all water treatments. Consequently,the contents of·O^2-,H₂O₂,and MDA decreased in the presence of SJ. In conclusion,SJ improved the tolerance of L. perenne to drought,by increasing plant water content,regulating reactive oxygen metabolism,reducing MDA accumulation,and increasing leaf chlorophyll contents and plant growth. At the same time,the increase of L. perenne growth was also conducive to the nutrient retention of slope soil,which can promote plant growth and the ecological recovery,and reduce the cost of ecological managements in the engineering disturbance damage area.

Key words: SJ, Drought stress, Lolium perenne L., Soil enzyme

摘要： 干旱是限制工程创面植物生长发育的关键环境因子,双聚材料(Double polymers SJ)是用于边坡土体防渗固化的新型材料,对于工程扰损区植被恢复具有重要意义。本研究选择黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)为研究材料,采用盆栽试验,分析不同干旱条件下SJ对黑麦草生长的影响,结果表明:中、重度干旱处理显著降低了黑麦草存活率、植株含水量及叶绿素含量,增加了植株·O^2-、H₂O₂、MDA等毒性物质的积累。添加SJ一方面提高了土壤的保水性(蒸发量减少约50%),另一方面显著增加了黑麦草植株的含水量和叶绿素含量,并降低了活性氧等有毒物质含量,有利于黑麦草生物量的积累及存活率的提高。因此,SJ的保水性及其对植物生长的促进作用,有利于干旱区工程边坡的生态修复。

关键词: 双聚材料, 干旱胁迫, 黑麦草, 土壤酶

CLC Number:

Q945.78

LI Shuang, HUANG Juan-juan, PEI Xiang-jun, ZHOU Li-hong, CHEN Zheng-feng, HU You-bang, ZHAO Chun-zhang. Effects of Double Polymer Materials on Growth of Lolium perenne Seedling under Different Water Stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 793-803.

李霜, 黄娟娟, 裴向军, 周立宏, 陈正峰, 胡友邦, 赵春章. 双聚材料对干旱条件下多年生黑麦草幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 793-803.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.03.015

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I3/793

References

[1] 朱亚丽,刘彦清. 高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报,2017,23(21):99-101
[2] 庄文婷. 高速公路生态护坡技术的水土保持效应研究[J]. 水能经济,2018(2):143
[3] JIM C Y. Ecological and landscape rehabilitation of a quarry site in Hong Kong[J]. Restoration Ecology,2001,9(1):85-94
[4] 黎曦. 我国岩质边坡植被修复与水土保持应用进展[J]. 南方农业,2021,15(6):208-209
[5] 李天宇. 冀北地区适用于边坡修复的苔藓植物筛选研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2017:1-2
[6] ANDEREGG W R L,KANE J M,ANDEREGG L D L. Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress[J]. Nature Climate Change,2013,3(1):30-36
[7] 陈亚宁,李玉朋,李稚,等. 全球气候变化对干旱区影响分析[J]. 地球科学进展,2022,37(2):111-119
[8] SUN J K,ZHANG W H,LU Z H,et al. Effects of drought stress on gas exchange characteristics and protective enzyme activities in Elaeagnus angustifolia and Grewia biloba G. Donvar. parviflora seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(3):1330-1340
[9] GHADERI N,SIOSEMARDEH A. Response to drought stress of two strawberry cultivars (cv. Kurdistan and Selva)[J]. Horticulture,Environment,and Biotechnology,2011,52:6-12
[10] HAFFANI S,MEZNI M,SLAMA I,et al. Plant growth,water relations and proline content of three vetch species under water-limited conditions[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2014,69(2):323-333
[11] SILVA E N,FERREIRA-SILVA S L,VIEGAS R A,et al. The role of organic and inorganic solutes in the osmotic adjustment of drought-stressed Jatropha curcas plants[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2010,69(3):279-285
[12] 王德福,段洪浪,黄国敏,等. 高温和干旱胁迫对西红柿幼苗生长、养分含量及元素利用效率的影响[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(9):3199-3209
[13] CUI K,HUANG J,XING Y,et al. Mapping QTLs for seedling characteristics under different water supply conditions in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2008,132(1):53-68
[14] 韩福松,余成群,付刚,等. 低温和干旱胁迫下牧草的抗逆性机制[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(11):2856-2864
[15] 周鑫胜,崔佳,司家屹,等. 百里香对干旱胁迫的形态及生理响应[J]. 草原与草坪,2020(4):88-95
[16] 郑清岭,杨忠仁,张晓艳,等. 干旱胁迫对沙芥和斧形沙芥抗坏血酸含量及其代谢相关酶的影响[J]. 植物生理学报,2018,54(12):1865-1874
[17] 裴斌,张光灿,张淑勇,等. 土壤干旱胁迫对沙棘叶片光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(5):1386-1396
[18] 季杨,张新全,彭燕,等. 干旱胁迫对鸭茅根、叶保护酶活性、渗透物质含量及膜质过氧化作用的影响[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(3):144-151
[19] 张仁和,郑友军,马国胜,等. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光合作用和保护酶的影响[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(5):1303-1311
[20] 黄荣雁,孟维珊,朱琨,等. 细叶小檗生理,光合特性及叶表微形态对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(5):138
[21] GOMES F P,OLIVA M A,MIELKE M S,et al. Osmotic adjustment,proline accumulation and cell membrane stability in leaves of Cocos nucifera submitted to drought stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2010,126(3):379-384
[22] 张志刚,李斌,史开奇,等. 伊犁地区5个引种白蜡对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2022,40(2):9-16
[23] 杨婷,钟全林,李宝银,等. 短期铵态氮与硝态氮配施对刨花楠幼苗生长及叶片性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(1):25-32
[24] 韩希英,宋凤斌. 干旱胁迫对玉米根系生长及根际养分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(3):170-172
[25] 李晓月. 根际土壤不同形态碳,氮的含量及特性研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011:22-25
[26] 刘方春,邢尚军,马海林,等. 干旱生境中接种根际促生细菌对核桃根际土壤生物学特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2014,25(5):1475-1482
[27] 吴丹. 土壤固化剂改善红层土边坡抗冲刷性试验研究[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学,2017:2
[28] 卢雪松. 离子土壤固化剂加固武汉红色粘土的试验效果及其机理研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学,2010:4-5
[29] 张丽萍,孙强. 固化剂对提高黄土边坡坡面抗冲刷性的试验研究[J]. 科技创新与应用,2017(11):26-27
[30] LEVY G J,WARRINGTON D N. Polyacrylamide addition to soils:impacts on soil structure and stability[J]. Functional Polymers in Food Science:from Technology to Biology,2015:9-31
[31] LIU J,SHI B,JIANG H,et al. Research on the stabilization treatment of clay slope topsoil by organic polymer soil stabilizer[J]. Engineering Geology,2011,117(1-2):114-120
[32] 裴向军,杨晴雯,许强,等. 改性钠羧甲基纤维素胶结固化土质边坡机制与抗冲蚀特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(11):2316-2327
[33] 苏黎,董笛,柴琦,等. 乙烯利浸种对不同土壤水分条件下多年生黑麦草幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业科学,2015,32(8):1260-1267
[34] ZHAN H,ZHOU Z,DU J,et al. Starch-derived photoresponsive high-efficientcy hygroscopic hydrogel for all-weather atmospheric water harvesting[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2023,416:137897
[35] CATTIVELL L,RIZZA F,BADECK F W,et al. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants:an integrated view from breeding to genomics[J]. Field Crops Research,2008,105(1-2):1-14
[36] ZHANG C,SHI S,LIU Z,et al. Drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties is associated with enhanced antioxidative protection and declined lipid peroxidation[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2019,232:226-240
[37] 杨雨薇,吴迪. 若尔盖县土地沙漠化研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报,2019,25(18):98-101,104
[38] 朱利君,裴向军,张晓超,等. 双聚材料改良黄土持水性及生态效应研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(4):158-166
[39] 张治安,陈展宇. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 长春:吉林大学出版社,2008:220
[40] 高俊山,蔡永萍. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2019:93-114
[41] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:18-638
[42] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1986:274-339
[43] 朱自洋,段文焱,陈芳媛,等. 干旱土壤中生物炭对黑麦草生长的促进机制[J]. 水土保持学报,2022,36(1):352-359
[44] REN A,GAO Y,LIU S. Response of some protective enzymes in Brassica chinensis seedlings to Pb²⁺,Cd²⁺ and Cr⁶⁺ stresses[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology,2002,13(4):510-512
[45] 刘承,李佐同,杨克军,等. 水分胁迫及复水对不同耐旱性玉米生理特性的影响[J]. 植物生理学报,2015,51(5):702-708
[46] 时忠杰,杜阿朋,胡哲森,等. 水分胁迫对板栗幼苗叶片活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 林业科学研究,2007(5):683-687
[47] 阎尚博,钱永强,张艳,等. 土壤含水量对4种委陵菜属植物生长及生理影响[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(1):98-105
[48] YAMADA M,MORISHITA H,URANO K,et al. Effects of free proline accumulation in petunias under drought stress[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2005,56(417):1975-1981
[49] 杨耀国,牛冰洁,王永新,等. 干旱胁迫下CO₂浓度倍增对达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(3):661-669
[50] CAO B H,ZHANG M R,ZHAI M P,et al. Growth and osmotic adjustment of Robinia pseudoacacia clones under drought stress[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College,2005,22(2):161-165
[51] HAMEED M K,UMAR W,RAZZAQ A,et al. Differential Metabolic Responses of Lettuce Grown in Soil,Substrate and Hydroponic Cultivation Systems under NH⁺₄/NO^-₃ Application[J]. Metabolites,2022,12(5):444
[52] 张淑英,褚贵新,梁永超. 不同铵硝配比对低温胁迫棉花幼苗生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(3):721-729
[53] 尉欣荣,张智伟,周雨,等. 褪黑素对低温和干旱胁迫下多年生黑麦草幼苗生长和抗氧化系统的调节作用[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1337-1345
[54] 邓辉茗,龙聪颖,蔡仕珍,等. 不同水分胁迫对绵毛水苏幼苗形态和生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2018,38(6):1099-1108
[55] 李博书,秦昕宇,刘丽君,等. 干旱胁迫对大豆幼苗过氧化物酶和过氧化氢酶活性的影响[J]. 新农业,2020(19):8-9
[56] 焦志勇. 土壤脲酶的研究进展及发展前景[J]. 江西农业,2016(17):84
[57] 赵阳,栾军伟,王一,等. 模拟干旱和磷添加对热带低地雨林氮矿化过程的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2022,46(1):102-113(责任编辑彭露茜)第32卷第3期 Vol.32 No. 3草地学报 ACTAAGRESTIASINICA 2024年 3月

Effects of Double Polymer Materials on Growth of Lolium perenne Seedling under Different Water Stress

双聚材料对干旱条件下多年生黑麦草幼苗生长的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHAI Yong-qing, MA Yan-hong, FAN Bo-bo, FANG Yong-yu, ZHANG Xue-feng, YU Zhuo, LI Kun, WU Jing, YAN Xiu-xiu, ZHAO Yan. Bioinformatics Identification and Expression Analysis of Dehydratin Genes in Agropyron mongolicum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 684-692.
[2]	CAO Ming, WANG Wen-ying, XU Jin, ZHOU Hua-kun, LIU Yan-fang, QUE La-mu, YANG Yu-qing. The Study about Thermal Effect of Qinghai Lycoperdales Fungus Fairy Ring [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 812-817.
[3]	YUE Li, SHAN Qi-mike, WANG Hui, Zaituniguli·Kuerban, MAO Hong-yan, LIU Min. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Sorghum Germplasm Resources during Germination in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 553-561.
[4]	SONG Xue, FU Chu-han, LI Jia-hong, SUN Xue-tong, WEI Yin-zhu, XIAO Hui-chuan, LI Wei-yao, QIN Li-gang. Research Progress on Molecular Mechanism of Endophytes Improving the Drought Resistance and Salt Tolerance of Plant [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 13-24.
[5]	HAN Zhe, ZHANG Yong-qiang, ZHANG Hao-hao, LUO Wen-hao, CHEN Ai-ping. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Leaf Anatomical Structure of Seriphidium transiliense seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 105-112.
[6]	WU Ling-ling, XIE Yong-li, YANG Jie, YANG Xue, LI Jun-xi, WANG Tian, GAO Ying, CHANG Fei-fei. Biological Activity of Bacillus WL520 and Its Growth-promoting Effect on Alfalfa under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 322-330.
[7]	JIANG Yu-Jia, YU Yuan-Ping, SUN Xiang-Yi, ZHOU Min, WU Chun-Yan, LI Yu-Hua, LIU Ming-Xi. Identification of R2R3-MYB Gene Family and Analysis of its Expression Pattern in Centipedegrass under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2628-2641.
[8]	FENG Shu-lin, ZHOU Ting, WANG Jun-li. Responses Characteristics of Leaf Water Potential in Different Growth Stages of Lespedeza bicolor Seedlings to Drought Stress and Rewatering [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2077-2085.
[9]	YU Si-min, LUO Yong-zhong, KANG Fang-ming, QIU Ying-de, LI Zhuan-tao. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Medicago sativa L. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1762-1771.
[10]	PAN Sen, BU Jia-wei, GAN An-qi, SHANG Zhen-yan, GUO Ding, YANG Xiao-xia, DONG Quan-min, NIU De-cao. Effect of Grazing Intensities on Extracellular Enzyme Stoichiometry of Soil Microorganisms in Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1780-1787.
[11]	CEN Hui-fang, QIAN Wen-wu, ZHU Hui-sen, XIA Fang-shan, DU Li-xia, XU Tao. Effects of Drought Stress on Leaf Microstructure and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Poa pratensis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1368-1377.
[12]	HUANG Rong-yan, MENG Wei-shan, ZHU Kun, LIU Dian-hui, ZHAO Zhu-ting, LU Cheng-wei, SUN Zheng-xuan, TANG Kuan-yu, ZHOU Jia-qi, CHENG Yu. Responses of Physiological,Photosynthetic Characteristics and Leaf Surface Micromorphology of Berberis poiretii to Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1386-1392.
[13]	REN Ming-hui, ZHANG Yu-peng, XU Tao, ZHU Hui-sen, CEN Hui-fang. Identification and Expression Analyses of R2R3-MYB Subfamily in Alfalfa under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 972-983.
[14]	WU Xue-rui, ZHAO Qing-xia, CAI Yin-mei, ZHANG Cheng-fu, LI Guan-liang. Effects of Drought-Rewatering on Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Opening and Closing in Broussonetia papyrifera [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 769-776.
[15]	SHI Wei-ning, SU Shi-ping, LI Yi, ZHANG Gong, XI Jie. Effects of Exogenous Proline Spraying on Stomatal Morphology of Reaumuria soongorica under Arid Environment [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(3): 777-784.