Evaluating Submergence Tolerance of Different Warm-season Turfgrass Cultivars

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.017

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 1021-1030.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.017

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluating Submergence Tolerance of Different Warm-season Turfgrass Cultivars

GAO Yan-zhi^1,2, ZONG Jun-qin², MENG Fan², CHEN Jing-bo², ZHAO Rui-shuang¹, LIU Jian-xiu²

1. College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210095, China;
2. Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province &Chinese Academy of Science, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210014, China

Received:2013-12-13 Revised:2014-02-26 Online:2014-10-15 Published:2014-09-30

不同暖季型草坪草种耐淹性能评价

高艳芝^1,2, 宗俊勤², 孟璠², 陈静波², 赵瑞霜¹, 刘建秀²

1. 南京农业大学园艺学院, 江苏南京 210095;
2. 江苏省中国科学院植物研究所(南京中山植物园), 江苏南京 210014

通讯作者: 刘建秀
作者简介:高艳芝（1987-），女，山西吕梁人，硕士研究生，主要从事草坪草抗性生理方面的研究，E-mail：gaoyanzhijiao@163.com；
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项课题研究专题（2012ZX07101-005）；江苏省水利厅项目（2011076）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

To determine the growth of several warm-season turfgrass cultivars which are naturally distributed in riparian zone after seasonal submergence, Three growth conditions of plants including complete submergence for 30 d (all plants growing under water with 7 cm higher than plant height), partial submergence (water flooding soil surface) and a control (no submergence) are designed. Relative clipping dry weight (RCDW), relative recovery dry weight (RRDW), relative shoot dry weight (RSDW) and relative root dry weight (RDW) are investigated in order to evaluate the submergence tolerance of several warm-season turfgrasses. The results of comprehensive evaluation show that P. spinescens and P. distichum are submergence-tolerance species and able to grow quickly under water. The submergence tolerances of turfgrasses are significant difference among different species. The submergence tolerances of turfgrasses with partial submergence for 30 days are ordered as P. spinescens>P. distichum>C. transvaalensis×C. dactylon>E. ophiuroides>P. vaginatum>C. dactylon, whereas the submergence tolerance of these species with complete submergence are ordered as P. spinescens>P. distichum>C. transvaalensis×C. dactylon>C. dactylon>P. vaginatum>E. ophiuroides. The submergence tolerance of the same species differs from different habitats. The growth of turfgrass is harmed significantly in complete submergence more than in partial submergence situation. The final results show that PX02 (P. spinescens), P018 (P. distichum), P019 (P. distichum), C751 ‘Tifdwarf’, C807 ‘Tifway’ and C291 (C. dactylon) have strong resistance to submergence, and are the ideal materials of vegetation reconstruction in natural riparian zone.

Key words: Turfgrass, Resources, Riparian zone, Submergence tolerance, Evaluation

摘要：

为明确我国南方河岸带广泛分布的几种植物在其原始生境季节性淹水胁迫下的生长情况，设置对照（不进行水淹，常规供水管理）、半淹（水位刚好淹没土面）和全淹（水位淹没并高于植株7 cm）3个处理，时间为30 d，利用相对修剪干重、相对恢复干重、相对地上部分干重和相对根系干重等指标，对几种暖季型草坪草的水淹胁迫下生长情况进行综合评价。结果表明：不同草坪草资源的耐淹性差异明显，在半淹处理30 d后，耐淹性由强到弱依次为伪针茅（Pseudoraphis spinescens）>双穗雀稗（Paspalum distichum）>杂交狗牙根（Cynodon dactylon×C. transvaalensis） >假俭草（Eremochloa ophiuroides）>海滨雀稗（Paspalum vaginatum）>狗牙根（Cynodon dactylon）；在全淹处理30 d后，伪针茅和双穗雀稗的耐淹性最好，其植株能够迅速长出水面，而其余草种一直淹没在水中生长受到严重抑制，几乎停滞，综合分析后得到全淹处理下耐淹性由强到弱为伪针茅>双穗雀稗>杂交狗牙根>狗牙根> 海滨雀稗>假俭草。同一种草坪草资源在半淹胁迫下其生长受到的伤害明显小于全淹胁迫，而不同生境的同种草坪草其耐水淹能力亦存在明显差异。表明伪针茅PX02、双穗雀稗P018、双穗雀稗P019、双穗雀稗P020、杂交狗牙根C751、杂交狗牙根C807及狗牙根C291具有较强的耐淹性，是理想的河岸带植被重建植物资源。

关键词: 草坪草, 种质资源, 河岸带, 耐淹性, 评价

CLC Number:

GAO Yan-zhi, ZONG Jun-qin, MENG Fan, CHEN Jing-bo, ZHAO Rui-shuang, LIU Jian-xiu. Evaluating Submergence Tolerance of Different Warm-season Turfgrass Cultivars[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5): 1021-1030.

高艳芝, 宗俊勤, 孟璠, 陈静波, 赵瑞霜, 刘建秀. 不同暖季型草坪草种耐淹性能评价[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1021-1030.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.017

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2014/V22/I5/1021

References

[1] Bagstad K J, Stromberg J C, Lite S J. Response of herbaceous riparian plants to rain and flooding on the San Pedro River, Arizona, USA [J]. Wetlands,2005,25(1):210-223
[2] Kinley T A, Newhouse N J. Relationship of riparian reserve zone width to bird density and diversity in southeastern British Columbia [J]. Northwest Science,1997,71(2):75-86
[3] 邓红兵,王青春,王庆礼. 河岸植被缓冲带与河岸带管理[J]. 应用生态学报,2001,12(6):951-954
[4] 胡化广,张振铭,沈晓华. 5种草坪草对水涝胁迫的反应及耐涝评价[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(2):253-256
[5] 姜爱军,周学东,周桂香,等. 长江下游异常雨涝及其对农业影响的评估[J]. 地理学报,2000,55(S):46-51
[6] Kotschy K, Rogers K. Reed clonal characteristics and response to disturbance in a semi-arid river [J]. Aquatic Botany, 2008,88(1):47-56
[7] 刘可心,李科云,杨知建. 耐淹性草种的研究进展[J]. 草业科学,2008,25(7):11-18
[8] Jones H E, Etherington J R. Comparative studies of plant growth and distribution in relation to waterlogging: I.The survival of Erica cinerea and E. tetralix and its apparent relationship to iron and manganese uptake in waterlogged soil [J]. Journal of Ecology,1970,58(2):487-496
[9] Cooper A. The effects of salinity and waterlogging on the growth and cation uptake of salt-marsh plants [J]. New Phytologist,1982,90(2)：263-275
[10] Fry J D. Submersion tolerance of warm-season turfgrasses [J]. HortScience,1991,26(7):927
[11] Baruch Z. Responses to drought and flooding in tropical forage grasses [J]. Plant and Soil,1994,164(1):87-96
[12] Liao J, Jiang M, Li L. Effects of simulated submergence on survival and recovery growth of three species in water fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges reservoir [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(4):216-220
[13] 谭淑端,朱明勇,张克荣,等. 水淹对双穗雀稗抗氧化酶活性及碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(1):217-224
[14] 谭淑端,张守君,张克荣,等. 长期深淹对三峡库区三种草本植物的恢复生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 武汉植物学研究,2009,27(4):391-396
[15] 谭淑端,朱明勇,党海山,等. 三峡库区狗牙根对深淹胁迫的生理响应[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(7):3685-3691
[16] Mommer L, Lenssen J P M, Huber H, et al. Ecophysiological determinants of plant performance under flooding: a comparative study of seven plant families [J]. Journal of Ecology,2006,94(6):1117-1129
[17] 时明芝,周保松. 植物涝害和耐涝机理研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2006,34(2):209-210
[18] 李娅,曾波,叶小齐,等. 水淹对三峡库区岸生植物秋华柳 (Salix variegata Franch.) 存活和恢复生长的影响[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(5):1923-1930
[19] Schlichting C D. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants [J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1986,17:667-693
[20] Poorter H, Niklas K J, Reich P B, et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control [J]. New Phytologist,2012,193(1):30-50
[21] 金茜,王瑞,周向睿,等. 水淹胁迫对紫穗槐生长及营养元素积累的影响[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(6):904-909
[22] Striker G G. Time is on our side: The importance of considering a recovery period when assessing flooding tolerance in plants [J]. Ecological Research,2012,27(5):983-987
[23] Voesenek L, Rijnders J, Peeters A J M, et al. Plant hormones regulate fast shoot elongation under water: From genes to communities [J]. Ecology,2004,85(1):16-27
[24] Chen X, Huber H, de Kroon H, et al. Intraspecific variation in the magnitude and pattern of flooding-induced shoot elongation in Rumex palustris [J] .Annals of botany,2009,104(6):1057-1067
[25] Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek L. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology,2008,59:313-339
[26] Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek L. Life in the balance: A signaling network controlling survival of flooding [J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2010,13(5):489-494
[27] Malik A I, Colmer T D, Lambers H, et al. Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat [J]. New Phytologist,2002,153(2):225-236
[28] Real D, Warden J, Sandral G A, et al. Waterlogging tolerance and recovery of 10 Lotus species [J]. Animal Production Science,2008,48(4):480-487
[29] Armstrong W, Brndle R, Jackson M B. Mechanisms of flood tolerance in plants [J]. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 1994,43(4):307-358
[30] 董登峰,骆炳山. 小麦苗期和孕穗期涝渍的某些生理特性比较研究[J]. 广西农业大学学报,1998,17(4):351-355
[31] Vashisht D, Hesselink A, Pierik R, et al. Natural variation of submergence tolerance among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions [J]. New Phytologist,2011,190(2):299-310
[32] Voesenek L, Colmer T D, Pierik R, et al. How plants cope with complete submergence [J]. New Phytologist,2006,170(2):213-226
[33] 刘友良. 植物水分逆境生理[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1992
[34] Jackson M B, Ram P C. Physiological and molecular basis of susceptibility and tolerance of rice plants to complete submergence [J]. Annals of Botany,2003,91(2):227-241
[35] 李玉昌,李阳生,李绍清. 淹涝胁迫对水稻生长发育危害与耐淹性机理研究的进展[J]. 中国水稻科学,1998,12(S1):70-76
[36] Okamoto G, Ueki K, Imai T, et al. A comparative study of drought and excess-water tolerance in Vitis coignetiae and several table grapes grown in Japan [J]. Scientific Reports of the Faculty of Agriculture,2004,93(1):39-43
[37] 汤聪,郭微,蔡桂芬,等. 高温高湿环境佛甲草栽培基质的研制[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(3):334-340
[38] Imaz J A, Giménez D O, Grimoldi A A, et al. The effects of submergence on anatomical, morphological and biomass allocation responses of tropical grasses Chloris gayana and Panicum coloratum at seedling stage [J]. Crop and Pasture Science,2013,63(12):1145-1155
[39] Mollard F P O, Striker G G, Ploschuk E L, et al. Subtle topographical differences along a floodplain promote different plant strategies among Paspalum dilatatum subspecies and populations [J]. Austral Ecology,2010,35(2):189-196

Evaluating Submergence Tolerance of Different Warm-season Turfgrass Cultivars

不同暖季型草坪草种耐淹性能评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Wei, LIU Yu-ling, WANG De-ping, ZHAO Min, YANG He-long, SONG Qian, XIAO Hong, WANG Kai-li, CAO Jing, RONG Yu-ping. Effects of Reseeding Leymus Chinensis (Trin.)Tzvel. and Medicago Falcata L. on Plant Community Characteristics of Degraded Meadow Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[2]	LIU Yang-yang, REN Han-yu, ZHOU Rong-lei, BASANG Can-mujue, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Zhao-ying, WEN Zhong-ming. Estimation and Dynamic Analysis of the Service Value of Grassland Ecosystem in China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1522-1532.
[3]	CHEN Zhi-xiang, LUO Xiao-yan, LI Shuan-lin, WU Ru-yue, WANG Wen-qiang, DING Xi-peng. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of the Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajanL.) Germplasm Resources Based on SSR Markers [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 904-911.
[4]	LI Man-you, MA Zhong-ren, WANG Bing, YANG Yu-qi, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LI Xiao-yun, LAN Jian. Study on the Mixed Planting Mode of Two Alfalfa Varieties in Different Row Ratios in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[5]	XU Zheng, XU Qian, LIU Ming-xi, XIANG Zuo-xiang. Effect of ‘Henace’ Herbicide on the Spring Transition of Zoysia japonica ‘Lantai No.3’ Overseeding Turfgrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 603-609.
[6]	YIN Yu-lin, MA Wen-xin, LI Ya-juan, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Study on the Cold Resistance of New Strains of Timothy Grass from the Central Part of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 625-630.
[7]	LI Si-da, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, QIN Yan, LI Wen. Study on the Relationship Between Productive Performance and Interspecies of Mixed Grassland with Poa pratensis var.anceps Gaund. ‘Qinghai’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2827-2837.
[8]	XIE Nan, LIU Zhen-yu, FENG Wei, ZHI Jian-fei, LI Meng, DU Zi-xuan, LIU Zhong-kuan. The Production Performance and Forage Quality of Forage Millet in Saline Alkali Dryland Around Bohai Sea [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 60-71.
[9]	NAN Ming, JING Fang, BIAN Fang, REN Sheng-lan, LIU Yan-ming. Comparison of Production Performance and Feed Value of Six Oat Varieties at Tao River Irrigation Middle-Area in Gansu province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.
[10]	LI Yu-ying, LIU Na, JING Ze-yao, WEN Wei, CAO Lei, XIA Fang-shan, ZHU hui-sen. Effect of Extract from Artemisia annua on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Four Species of Turfgrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1285-1293.
[11]	LI Jia-huan, LIU Xi-qiang, LV Jin-ying, REN Cheng, WANG Kai-li, HUANG Ding, DENG Bo, WANG Kun. Drought Resistance Evaluation of 12 Alfalfa Varieties Based on Physiological Response of Four Plant Organs [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1319-1328.
[12]	JIA Xiang, DUOJI Ge-sang, ZHAO Ai-min, ZHANG Wen-cai, QUNI Jia-cuo, LABA Zhuo-ma, PUBU Ci-reng, MIAO Yan-jun. Comprehensive Evaluation of Cold resistance of 4 Species of Gramineae at Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1372-1378.
[13]	WU Rui-xin, Li Yuan, YOU Yong-liang, LIU Gui-bo, ZHAO Hai-ming. Study on Drought Resistance Identification and Evaluation Methods of Alfalfa during Whole Growth Period [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1444-1453.
[14]	CUI Hui-ting, SUN Xi-nuo, MA Cheng-ze, HU Qian-nan, SUN Yan. Advances in Applications of Metabolomics Technology in Stress Resistance of Forage and Turfgrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 873-880.
[15]	DENG Su-fang, HUANG Shui-zhen, ZHENG Xiang-li, YING Zhao-yang. Quality Evaluation of Azolla Lam. as Organic Manure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 932-939.