Effect of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Italian Ryegrass Silage Ensiled at Different Moisture

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.03.028

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 669-675.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.03.028

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Italian Ryegrass Silage Ensiled at Different Moisture

GUAN Hao¹, GUO Xu-sheng², GAN You-min¹, BAI Hui-juan¹, SONG Shan¹

1. Department of Grassland Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wen Jiang, Sichuan Province 611130, China;
2. International Centre for Tibetan Plateau Ecosystem Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China

Received:2015-06-30 Revised:2016-01-05 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2016-09-18

添加剂对不同含水量多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响

关皓¹, 郭旭生², 干友民¹, 白慧娟¹, 宋珊¹

1. 四川农业大学动物科技学院, 四川温江 611130;
2. 兰州大学青藏高原生态系统管理国际中心, 甘肃兰州 730000

通讯作者: 干友民
作者简介:关皓(1991-),女,四川成都人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲料资源开发与利用,E-mail:guan0427@foxmail.com
基金资助:
公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303061）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to evaluate effects of different additives on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Italian Ryegrass, three additives (formic acid (LA), Lactobacillus plantment (LP), Lactobacillus buchneri (LB))were used to ensile Italian ryegrass with different moisture contents (75% and 65%). Results showed that after 60 days fermentation, the pH value of LA significantly lower than the other treatment groups (P<0.05) in 75% and 65% moisture conditions, and the content of lactic acid was significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05); NH₃-N/TN and acetic acid content of LB was significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05); WSC content of formic acid group were significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05). For the aerobic stability, aerobic stability (186h) of LB group with 75% moisture was significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05). Under 75% and 65% moisture conditions, three additives all effectively improved the silage quality of Italian ryegrass, LP >formic acid >LB, and LB effectively improved the aerobic stability of ryegrass silage.

Key words: Italian ryegrass, Silage, Additives, Fermentation quality, Aerobic stability

摘要：

为研究不同添加剂对不同含水量多花黑麦草（Lolium multiflorum Lam.）样品青贮品质以及有氧稳定性的影响，在含水量分别为75%和65%条件下的多花黑麦草中添加3种不同的添加剂（甲酸、植物乳杆菌、布氏乳杆菌）青贮，在60天时开袋对青贮料进行测定。结果表明，75%和65%水分条件下的植物乳杆菌组pH值显著低于其他处理组（P<0.05），且乳酸含量显著高于其他处理组（P<0.05）；布氏乳杆菌处理组的氨态氮/总氮和乙酸含量显著高于其他处理组（P<0.05）；甲酸组可溶性碳水化合物含量显著高于其他处理组（P<0.05）。就有氧稳定性而言，75%水分条件下布氏乳杆菌处理组的有氧稳定性（186 h）显著高于其他处理组（P<0.05）。在75%和65% 2种水分条件下，3种不同类型的添加剂都能有效改善多花黑麦草青贮品质，改善程度依次为：植物乳杆菌 >甲酸 >布氏乳杆菌；开袋后，75%和65% 2种水分条件下，添加布氏乳杆菌能有效改善多花黑麦草青贮料的有氧稳定性。

关键词: 多花黑麦草, 青贮, 添加剂, 发酵品质, 有氧稳定性

CLC Number:

S816.53

GUAN Hao, GUO Xu-sheng, GAN You-min, BAI Hui-juan, SONG Shan. Effect of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Italian Ryegrass Silage Ensiled at Different Moisture[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(3): 669-675.

关皓, 郭旭生, 干友民, 白慧娟, 宋珊. 添加剂对不同含水量多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 669-675.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.03.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2016/V24/I3/669

References

[1] 孙吉雄. 草坪学[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2008,7:89-90
[2] 张子仪. 中国饲料学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2003:334
[3] 陈三有,杨中艺,辛国荣. 黑麦草、水稻草田轮作系统研究与应用[J]. 草原与草坪,2000,(1):32-34
[4] 杨杰,顾洪如,翟频,等. 凋萎程度与复合添加剂处理对多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2008,24(2):187-189
[5] 沈益新,杨志刚,刘信宝. 凋萎和添加有机酸对多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2004,20(2):95-99
[6] 杨连双. 牧草青贮的优点及其调制[J]. 哲里木畜牧学院学报,2000,10(2):31-32
[7] 杨志刚. 多花黑麦草春季青贮技术的研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2002
[8] 杨杰. 复合青贮剂处理对多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2006
[9] 张增欣,邵涛. 丙酸对多花黑麦草青贮发酵动态变化的影响[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(2):102-107
[10] 张静,玉柱,邵涛. 丙酸、乳酸菌添加对多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(2):162-165
[11] 杨春华,杨兴霖,左艳春,等. 不同含水量多花黑麦草青贮效果研究[J]. 草业与畜牧,2006,3:5-7
[12] Liu Q H, Zhang G J, Shi S L, et al. The effects of wilting and storage temperatures on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of stylo silage[J]. Animal Science Journal,2011,82:549-553
[13] Zhu Y, Nishion N, Kishida Y, et al. Ensiling characteristics and ruminal degration of Italian ryegrass and Lucerne silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes[J]. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[14] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1999:58-63
[15] Krishnamoorthu U, Muscato T V, Sniffen C J, et al. Nitrogen fractions in selected feed stuffs[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1982,65:217-225
[16] Vansoest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74:3583-3597
[17] 傅彤. 微生物接种剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵进程及其品质的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院硕士学位论文,2005
[18] 刘建新,杨振海,叶均安. 青贮饲料的合理调制与饲料评定标准[J]. 饲料工业,1999,20(4):3-5
[19] Zhang J G, Kumai S. Effluent and aerobic stability of cellulase and LAB-treated silage of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum)[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2000,8:1035-1188
[20] Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia[J]. Ana/ytica/Chemistry,1967,39(8):971-974
[21] Whitlock L A, Wistuba T J, Seifers M K, et al. Effect of level of surface-spoiled silage on the nutritive value of corn silage diets[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(Suppl 1):110
[22] 张德玉,李忠秋,刘眷龙. 影响青贮饲料品质因素的研究进展[J]. 家畜生态学报,2007,28(1):109-112
[23] McDouald P, Henderson A R, Herou S J E. The Biochemistrv of Silage[M]. Marlow,U K:Chalconhe Publications,1991:184-236
[24] 张宁. 青贮饲料品质的鉴定法[J]. 国外畜牧学饲料,1990(1):34-35
[25] Weinberg Z G, Ashbell G, Hen Y, et al.The effect of applying lactic acid bacteria on the aerobic stability of silages[J]. Apply Bacteriol,1993,75:512-518
[26] 张吉鹍,卢德勋. 试述反刍动物日粮中的纤维问题[J]. 中国乳业,2003(7):21-24
[27] Muck R E. A lactic acid bacteria strain to improve aerobic stability of silages[J]. U.S.Dairy Forage Research Center 1996 Research Summaries,1996,3(14):42-43
[28] Wohlt J E. Use of silage inoculant to improve feeding stability and intake of a corn dilae-gain diet[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1989,72:545-551
[29] Borreani G, Cavallarin L, Antoniazzi, et al. Effeet of the stage of growth,wilting and inoeulation in field Pea(Pisum sativam L.)silages.Herbageeoln Position and silage fermentation[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2003,86:1377-1382
[30] DavidsonT R, Stevenson K R. Influence of Formic acid and formalin on quality of direct-cut Alfalfa silage[J]. Canadian Journal of Plantence,1973,66:482-486
[31] Davit G, Chamberlain J Q. The effeets of the rate of addition of formic acid,sulphuric acid on the ensilage of Perennial ryegrass in laboratory silos[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agrieulture,1987,38:217-228
[32] Jones B A, Satter L D, Muck R E. Influence of bacterial inoculant and subst rate addition to lucerne ensiled at different dry matter contents[J].Grass and Forage Science,1992,47:19-27
[33] Ohyama Y, Mcmonld P. The effect of some additives on aerobic deterioration of silage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1975,26:941-948
[34] Hill J, Leaver J D. Changes in chemical composition and nutritive value of urea treated whole crop wheat during exposure to air[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,102(3):181-195
[35] Filya I, Sucu E. The effect of bacterial inoculants and a chemical preservative on the fermantation and aerobic stability of whole crop cereal silages[J]. Asian-Australisian Journal of Animal Science,2007,20(3):378-384

Effect of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Italian Ryegrass Silage Ensiled at Different Moisture

添加剂对不同含水量多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[3]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[4]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[5]	FU Zhi-hui, GE Gen-tu, JIA Yu-shan, WANG Zhi-jun, LYU Shi-jie, HOU Mei-ling, NAN Ding-han, YI Ru-le, A Xi-da, JIN Guo. Effects of Cutting Times and Varieties on the Yield and Nutrient Value of Italian Ryegrass Planted in Northern Regions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1571-1577.
[6]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[7]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[8]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[9]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[10]	WANG Xin-yu, SHEN Chen, HUO Wen-jie, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Shuan-lin, WANG Cong, CHEN Lei, XU Qing-fang, WANG Yong-xin, GUO Gang. Analysis of Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Structure of Whole Corn Silage of Different Varieties in Yanbei Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[11]	ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[12]	YOU Si-Han, DU Shuai, ZHOU Zhong-Yi, Gegentu, WAN Tao, JIA Yu-Shan. Mixed Silage of Sorghum Hybrid Sudan Grass and Perennial Ryegrass with Different Proportions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[13]	WANG Bin, DONG Xiu, LI Man-you, YANG Yu-qi, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Planting of Dolichos Lablab with Different Sowing Rates and Silage Corn on Grassland Productivity and Forage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[14]	LU Yong-xiang, YAN Xian-ming, ZHOU Zhao-xiang, ZHU Hui-xian, GOU Wen-long, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, CHEN Shi-yong, LI Ping, BAI Shi-qie. Effects of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community of High-moisture Whole-plant Corn Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[15]	CHEN De-kui, GUO Xiang, ZHENG Ming-yang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing. The Effects of Amomum Villosum Lour. Essential Oil on the Fermentation Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.