Comparison of Growth Characteristics of Two Varieties of White Clover under Different Light and Water Conditions

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.015

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 1301-1310.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.015

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of Growth Characteristics of Two Varieties of White Clover under Different Light and Water Conditions

WANG Guo-fang¹, ZHANG Wu-ping², ZHANG Qian¹, HAN Ji-wan², DONG Kuan-hu³, JOHN Doonan⁴, LUIS Mur⁴

1. College of Resource&Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. Software College, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
3. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
4. Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EE, UK

Received:2020-03-30 Revised:2020-05-19 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-09-19

不同光照与水分条件下2种白三叶生长特性比较

王国芳¹, 张吴平², 张茜¹, 韩冀皖², 董宽虎³, John Doonan⁴, Luis Mur⁴

1. 山西农业大学资源环境学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 山西农业大学软件学院, 山西太谷 030801;
3. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西太谷 030801;
4. Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EE, UK

通讯作者: 张吴平
作者简介:王国芳(1980-),女,山西左权人,硕士,讲师,主要从事植物-土壤信息技术与3S技术研究,E-mail:guofang19800104@126.com
基金资助:
山西省重点研发计划重点项目（201703D211002-2-1）；STAPLEDON INNOVATION FELLOWSHIP资助

Abstract

Abstract: To explore effects of different light and water conditions on the growth characteristics of two varieties of white clover (Trifolium repens L),in this study two different varieties (TKPR and TNSP) were selected as the experimental objects. Through the greenhouse control experiment,3 light gradients and 3 water gradients were set for 9 combination treatments. The response characteristics of morphology,biomass accumulation,biomass allocation ratio,and plasticity indexes of white clover under different treatments were analyzed. The results showed that the measured characteristics of TKPR were significantly affected by light intensity,and TNSP was significantly affected by water intensity,light and water interaction. The relative growth rate of TNSP was higher than that of TKPR. The biomass accumulation of TNSP was higher than that of TKPR under suitable environment. The interaction between light and water had a greater influence on the flowering and propagation strategy of TKPR. Under the unfavourable environment,TKPR was more adaptable and TNSP was weaker. The study can provide some basic information for cultivating new varieties of white clover and efficient white clover production,cultivation and management.

Key words: White clover, TKPR, TNSP, Light, Water, Invasion adaptability

摘要： 为探究不同光照和水分条件对不同品种白三叶（Trifolium repens L.）生长特性的影响，本研究以TKPR和TNSP 2个白三叶品种为试验对象，通过温室控制设定了3个光照梯度和3个水分梯度共9个组合处理，分析了不同处理下白三叶形态、生物量积累、生物量分配比及其可塑性指标的响应特征。结果表明：品种TKPR各指标受光照强度影响较大，品种TNSP受水分强度、光照与水分交互作用的影响较大；品种TNSP的相对生长速率大于TKPR；在适宜的环境下品种TNSP的生物量积累高于品种TKPR；光照与水分的交互作用对品种TKPR的开花繁殖策略影响较大；在不利的环境下品种TKPR适应可塑性较强，TNSP较弱。本研究结果为培育白三叶的新品种和高效生产栽培管理等方面提供了一定的参考依据。

关键词: 白三叶, TKPR, TNSP, 光照, 水分, 可塑性

CLC Number:

S541

WANG Guo-fang, ZHANG Wu-ping, ZHANG Qian, HAN Ji-wan, DONG Kuan-hu, JOHN Doonan, LUIS Mur. Comparison of Growth Characteristics of Two Varieties of White Clover under Different Light and Water Conditions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1301-1310.

王国芳, 张吴平, 张茜, 韩冀皖, 董宽虎, John Doonan, Luis Mur. 不同光照与水分条件下2种白三叶生长特性比较[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1301-1310.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.015

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I5/1301

References

[1] 余婷,孟焕文,温艳斌,等. 白三叶根系分泌物对5种草坪草的化感作用[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(4):729-736
[2] 李明,王树香,高宝嘉. 对不同光照条件下白三叶草生长发育的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学,2011,50(14):122-125
[3] 陈阳,陈雅君,周阳,等. 三叶草不同品种茎结构特征与抗旱性的关系[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(4):686-691
[4] 曾伟航,程碧真,彭燕,等. 甘露糖浸种对干旱胁迫下白三叶种子萌发及抗旱性的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(7):112-122
[5] 杨丽,王瑜,袁庆华,等. 60Co-γ辐照诱变处理下白三叶草种子萌发期抗旱性研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2015,20(2):156-166
[6] 成向荣,邢文黎,苑海静,等. 披针叶茴香对变化光环境的表型可塑性[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(6):1935-1944
[7] 李晓玲,温浩然,王雪松,等. 三峡库区不同生境下中华蚊母树叶片表型可塑性及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(10):3581-3591
[8] 胡启鹏,郭志华,李春燕,等. 植物表型可塑性对非生物环境因子的响应研究进展[J]. 林业科学,2008,44(5):135-142
[9] 翟偲涵,王平,盛连喜. 竞争条件下植物功能性状的表型可塑性研究进展[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版),2017,18(4):538-546
[10] 尚春琼,朱珣之. 外来植物三叶鬼针草的入侵机制及其防治与利用[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(01):54-67
[11] 王宁,袁美丽,王磊,等. 入侵植物节节麦表型可塑性及竞争能力对模拟氮沉降的响应[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1428-1434
[12] 宁瑶,雷金睿,宋希强,等. 石灰岩特有植物海南凤仙花潜在适宜生境分布模拟[J]. 植物生态学报,2018,42(09):66-74
[13] 王宁,陈浩,董莹莹,等. 土壤水分对入侵植物节节麦表型可塑性和化感作用的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(02):139-145
[14] Yang X,Li J,Zhao T,et al. Variation and heritability of morphological and physiological traits among Leymus chinensis genotypes under different environmental conditions[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2019,11(1):66-74
[15] Gregory P,Tennant D,Belford R. Root and shoot growth,and water and light use efficiency of barley and wheat crops grown on a shallow duplex soil in a mediterranean-type environment[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1992,43(3):555-573
[16] 黄慧敏,董蓉,钱凤,等. 紫耳箭竹克隆形态可塑性对典型冠层结构及光环境的响应[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(19):52-62
[17] Sulpice R,Nikoloski Z,Tschoep H,et al. Impact of the Carbon and Nitrogen Supply on Relationships and Connectivity between Metabolism and Biomass in a Broad Panel of Arabidopsis Accessions[J]. Plant Physiology,2013,162(1):347-363
[18] Mojzes A,Kalapos T,Klára Virágh. Plasticity of leaf and shoot morphology and leaf photochemistry for Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. growing in contrasting microenvironments in a semiarid loess forest-steppe vegetation mosaic[J]. Flora,2015,198(4):304-320
[19] 闫敏,张英俊,韩建国,等. 水分对白三叶种子产量及产量构成要素的影响[J]. 草地学报,2005,13(3):209-214
[20] 蔺万煌,HOFMANN Rainer W,STILWELL Stephen A. 干旱胁迫下5种白三叶草的生长和生理反应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(4):580-584
[21] 韩建秋,张志国. 水分胁迫对白三叶物质分配和根系生长的影响[J]. 草业科学,2007,24(11):32-37
[22] 王宁,袁美丽,陈浩,等. 不同光照条件和土壤含水量对节节麦表型可塑性及化感作用的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2019,28(01):36-44
[23] 胡艳,肖娟,廖咏梅,等. 光照强度对白簕生长和生理特征的影响[J]. 西华师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(1):56-61
[24] Zheng Y P,Li R Q,Guo L L,et al. Temperature Responses of Photosynthesis and Respiration of Maize (Zea mays) Plants to Experimental Warming[J]. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology,2018,65(4):524-531
[25] 夏江宝,张光灿,刘刚,等. 不同土壤水分条件下紫藤叶片生理参数的光响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(01):32-36
[26] 李俊,杨玉皎,王文丽,等.UV-B辐射增强对马铃薯叶片结构及光合参数的影响[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(16):5368-5381
[27] 冯燕,王彦荣,胡小文. 水分胁迫对两种荒漠灌木幼苗生长与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报,2011(04):296-301
[28] 黄乔乔,沈奕德,李晓霞,等. 不同光照和水分条件对土著灾变种金钟藤形态性状和化感作用的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2015,34(2):438-444
[29] 周忆堂,马红群,梁丽娇,等. 不同光照条件下长春花的光合作用和叶绿素荧光动力学特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2008,41(11):3589-3595
[30] Elena S,Gladys L,Claudia A,et al. Photosynthesis,Resource Acquisition and Growth Responses of Two Biomass Crops Subjected to Water Stress[J]. Journal of Plant Sciences,2018,6(3):68-86
[31] Karkanis A,Bilalis D,Efthimiadou A. Architectural plasticity,photosynthesis and growth responses of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) plants to water stress in a semi-arid environment[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science,2011,5(4):369-374
[32] Guo W,Li B,Zhang X,et al. Architectural plasticity and growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana intermedia seedlings to simulated water stress[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2007,69(3):385-399
[33] 田雪,李海燕,杨允菲. 松嫩平原不同生育期虎尾草无性系构件生长与生物量分配[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(3):805-810
[34] 赵丹丹,马红媛,李阳,等. 水分和养分添加对羊草功能性状和地上生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2019,43(6):501-511
[35] 王丽华,高景,王金牛,等. 高山草地长花马先蒿的性状和生物量分配对坡向的适应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2017,23(4):56-65
[36] 孟金柳,曾波,叶小齐,等. 不同光照水平下叶损失对樟(Cinnamomum camphora)生物量分配的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,29(3):439-444
[37] 孙莹,石锦安,邵小鹏,等. 不同生境条件下光照强度对蓝花楹光合色素含量及开花的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2015,118(06):172-178
[38] 白艳荣,蒋亚莲. 不同光照条件对舞春花生长发育的影响[J]. 西部林业科学,2019,48(01):143-146
[39] 王艳莉,齐欣宇,杨昊天,等. 不同生境下砂蓝刺头(Echinops gmelini)形态结构及生物量分配特征[J]. 中国沙漠,2018,38(04):78-86
[40] 潘玉梅,唐赛春,韦春强,等. 不同光照和水分条件下鬼针草属入侵种与本地种生长、光合特征及表型可塑性的比较[J]. 生物多样性,2017,25(12):7-16

Comparison of Growth Characteristics of Two Varieties of White Clover under Different Light and Water Conditions

不同光照与水分条件下2种白三叶生长特性比较

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LAN Xiang-yu, YE Chong-chong, WANG Yi, ZENG Tao, SUN Jian. Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics and Its Driving Forces of Water Conservation Function on the Tibetan Plateau from 1995 to 2014 [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[2]	SUN Shu-jiao, ZHOU Bing-rong, ZHOU Hua-kun, WANG Xiu-ying, QUAN Chen, LI Fu, CHEN Qi. Characteristics of Evapotranspiration and Water Consumption of Typical Alpine Desert in the Tibetan Plateau During the Growing Season [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 137-145.
[3]	CHEN Guo-qian, ZHU Cun-xiong, LI Su-yun, ZHOU Bing-rong, LI Fu, CAO Xiao-yun, ZHOU Hua-kun. Remote Sensing Model Constructions and Spatial-temporal Changes of Soil Moisture in the Three-River Headwaters Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 199-207.
[4]	WANG Jian-xun, LIU Yan, REN Liang. Study on the Current Situation, Existing Problems and Countermeasures of Green Development in Zhangjiakou City [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2017-2022.
[5]	TONG Li-rong, NI Shun-gang, REN Xing-yuan, LIU Jia-xin, WEN Jing, WANG Juan, SONG Yu. Effects of Melatonin on Seedling Growth and Leaf Water Physiology of Lespedeza davurica under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[6]	LI Shan-kui, MENG Huan-wen, LI Yu-chen, ZHANG Hai-qing, BAI Xue, ZHANG Yu-kuan, ZHOU Hong-you, WANG QIan-jun, ZHANG Xiao-yu. Analysis of Allelopathic Potential of Sabina chinensis to Several Farmland Weeds and Crops [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1769-1778.
[7]	ZHOU Yang-yang, JING Yuan-yuan, XU Chang-lin, YU Xiao-jun. Effects of Film-mulching Planting on Soil Water,Temperature,Nutrients and Alfalfa Overwintering in Alpine Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1843-1852.
[8]	ZHANG Wei-yu, WANG Chun-yong, DU Hong-mei. Effects of Hydrogen-rich Water on Salt-Tolerance of Kentucky Bluegrass and Antioxidant Enzymes Activity [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1436-1445.
[9]	PEI Wen, CHEN Qing, ZHANG Luo-zi, JIA Li-ying. Effects of Grazing,Water and Nitrogen on Soil Aggregates in Inner Mongolia Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[10]	LIN Chun-ying, LI Xi-lai, SUN Hai-song, SUN Hua-fang, MA Cheng-biao, HAN Hui-bang, ZHANG Yu-Peng, LI Cheng-yi. Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Component on Different Degrees of Degradation of Alpine Wetland in the Source of Yellow River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1540-1548.
[11]	WANG Jia-lan, LI Chun-jie. Effect of Different Water Gradients on Agronomic Characters of Puccinellia distans [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1584-1588.
[12]	QIAN Qian, ZHANG Xiu-juan, WANG Jun-bang, YE Hui, LI Ying-nian, ZHANG Zhi-jun. The Spatio-temporal Pattern of Grazing Pressure in the Three-River Headwaters in Qinghai Province from 2005 to 2017 [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1311-1317.
[13]	RAO Pin-zeng, WANG Yi-cheng, WANG Fang. Analysis on the NDVI Change and Influence Factors of Vegetation Cover in the Three-River Headwaters Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 572-582.
[14]	CHEN Bin, XUE Qing, LI Zi-wei, YANG Yu-jia, YANG Xiao-mei, BO Shan, LI Qiang, HE Miao. Effects of Light Intensities on Physiological Characteristics and Ultrastructure of Four Commelinaceae Plants [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 281-292.
[15]	SUN Ming-xue, ZHANG Yu-xia, CONG Bai-ming, XIA Quan-chao, TIAN Yong-lei, ZHANG Qing-xin, ZHANG Dong-mei. Effect of Water and Potassium Coupling on the Antioxidant Characteristics and Overwintering Rate of Alfalfa Root Crown [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2845-2852.